Literature DB >> 32969993

Safety Evaluation of Biportal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Assessment of Cervical Epidural Pressure During Surgery.

Min-Seok Kang1, Hyun-Jin Park2, Jin-Ho Hwang3, Ju-Eun Kim3, Dae-Jung Choi3, Hoon-Jae Chung1.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the change in cervical epidural pressure (CEP) during biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (BELD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In percutaneous uniportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy, irrigation fluid (IF) introduced into the spinal canal during surgery can compress the thecal sac, and act as a potential risk for neurological complications by disturbing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) circulation and increasing intracranial pressure.
METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients, who underwent BELD, which was performed under automated pump system, an infusion pressure of 30 mmHg were enrolled. The change in CEP on C7-T1 level was measured. CEP was measured in each of the five phases of the procedure (1st phase-making surgical portals; 2nd phase-creating a workspace; 3rd phase-performing neural decompression and discectomy; 4th phase-factitious increase of pressure by clogging the outflow; 5th phase-dismission from fluid irrigation system). Neurological complications and independent risk factors were evaluated.
RESULTS: In the final 27 patients, changes in CEP during surgery were similar. The baseline CEP was 14.8 ± 2.8 mmHg, and the mean CEP in the 3rd phase 18.8 ± 5.1 mmHg was not significantly higher. In the 4th phase, however, the CEPs rose with linear correlation as the pressure increased. In the 5th phase, the elevated CEP returned to baseline in 2.5 ± 5.6 minutes. No patient had neurological complications. No statistically significant risk factors were observed.
CONCLUSION: In BELD, which is performed to allow continuous lavage with infusion pressure set to 30 mmHg, CEP does not increase beyond the physiological range. Therefore, BELD may be considered as a potentially safe technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32969993     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

1.  Biportal Endoscopic Technique for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Review of Current Research.

Authors:  Min-Seok Kang; Dong Hwa Heo; Hyoung-Bok Kim; Heung-Tae Chung
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

2.  A Narrative Review of Uniportal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Uniportal Facet-Preserving Trans-Kambin Endoscopic Fusion and Uniportal Facet-Sacrificing Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Hyeun Sung Kim; Pang Hung Wu; Koichi Sairyo; Il-Tae Jang
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2021-12

3.  How i do it: biportal endoscopic thoracic decompression for ossification of the ligamentum flavum.

Authors:  Min-Seok Kang; Hoon-Jae Chung; Ki-Han You; Hyun-Jin Park
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Comparing the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive biportal endoscopic spine surgery versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-BH Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled equivalence trial study protocol.

Authors:  Sang-Min Park; Kwang-Sup Song; Ho-Joong Kim; Si-Young Park; Taewook Kang; Min-Seok Kang; Dong Hwa Heo; Choon Keun Park; Dong-Geun Lee; Jin Sub Hwang; Jae-Won Jang; Jun Young Kim; Jin-Sung Kim; Hong-Jae Lee; Ki-Han You; Hyun-Jin Park
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Microendoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yufei Niu; Zhen Shen; Haoyang Li
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 2.809

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.