Jefferson Maul1, Daniele Ongari2, Seyed Mohamad Moosavi2, Berend Smit2, Alessandro Erba1. 1. Dipartimento di Chimica, Università di Torino, via Giuria 5, 10125 Torino, Italy. 2. Laboratory of Molecular Simulation (LSMO), Institut des Sciences et Ingénierie Chimiques, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Rue de l'Industrie 17, Sion, Valais CH-1951, Switzerland.
Abstract
A computationally affordable approach, based on quasi-harmonic lattice dynamics, is presented for the quantum-mechanical calculation of thermoelastic moduli of flexible, stimuli-responsive, organic crystals. The methodology relies on the simultaneous description of structural changes induced by thermal expansion and strain. The complete thermoelastic response of the mechanically flexible metal-organic copper(II) acetylacetonate crystal is determined and discussed in the temperature range 0-300 K. The elastic moduli do not just shrink with temperature but they do so anisotropically. The present results clearly indicate the need for an explicit account of thermal effects in the simulation of mechanical properties of elastically flexible organic materials. Indeed, predictions from standard static calculations on this flexible metal-organic crystal are off by up to 100%.
A computationally affordable approach, based on quasi-harmonic lattice dynamics, is presented for the quantum-mechanical calculation of thermoelastic moduli of flexible, stimuli-responsive, organic crystals. The methodology relies on the simultaneous description of structural changes induced by thermal expansion and strain. The complete thermoelastic response of the mechanically flexible metal-organic copper(II) acetylacetonate crystal is determined and discussed in the temperature range 0-300 K. The elastic moduli do not just shrink with temperature but they do so anisotropically. The present results clearly indicate the need for an explicit account of thermal effects in the simulation of mechanical properties of elastically flexible organic materials. Indeed, predictions from standard static calculations on this flexible metal-organic crystal are off by up to 100%.
Thermoelasticity represents the dependence of elastic mechanical properties of materials on
temperature. In particular, the thermoelastic response of crystalline materials is described
by the thermal dependence of all the isothermal or adiabatic elastic constants defining the
fourth-rank elastic tensor, which provides the formal description of the anisotropic
mechanical properties of the material in the elastic regime.[1] The accurate
description of thermoelasticity is relevant to many areas of research including (i)
geophysics, where the elastic properties of minerals at temperatures of the Earth mantle
determine the velocity of propagation of seismic waves;[2−5] (ii) refractory materials,
whose mechanical stiffness must not be deteriorated at high temperature;[6−9] (iii) pharmacology, where
most potential drugs are synthesized in the form of molecular crystals, whose mechanical
stability at room temperature is crucial for an effective tableting
process;[10−15] (iv) catalysis, where the mechanical instability of porous frameworks
poses serious limitations to their effective use, as for metal–organic
frameworks.[16−19]There is great interest in the possibility of describing the thermoelasticity of soft,
flexible organic materials by computational approaches, which would ensure access to the
complete characterization of their elastic anisotropic response at operando
conditions. This stems from experimental evidence that the anisotropy of the elastic response
of such systems can be largely affected by temperature,[20] which makes a
purely static description (either scaled or unscaled by volume expansion) inadequate. Indeed,
while for certain organic crystals the thermomechanical response nicely correlates with the
sole thermal expansion,[20,21] this cannot be expected in general. It has recently been shown on single
crystals of elastically flexible copper(II) acetylacetonate that the molecular motions
responsible for thermal expansion and bending are different.[22,23] Therefore, a reliable description of the
thermoelastic response of such materials requires the simultaneous description of structural
changes induced by thermal expansion and strain. A successful prediction relies on the
balanced description of the interplay of these effects. For these reasons, we focus on a
quantum-mechanical approach, which ensures an accurate account of all the relevant chemical
interactions.While calculations based on the density functional theory (DFT) have proved reliable in the
prediction of many static properties of materials in the last decades, the effective inclusion
of thermal effects still represents a challenge to state-of-the-art DFT methodologies,
particularly so when one needs to go beyond the usual harmonic approximation in the
description of the lattice dynamics.[24−26] For instance,
this is the case when (i) cubic interatomic force constants are needed to compute phonon
lifetimes and the thermal lattice conductivity and (ii) the free energy dependence on volume
and strain is needed to determine thermal expansion and thermoelasticity. While the former
class of physical properties above requires the explicit evaluation of anharmonic terms of the
nuclear potential,[27−33] the latter has often been
tackled within the so-called quasi-harmonic approximation (QHA), as long as inorganic solids
were considered.[34−39]Owing to the progress made in the inclusion of dispersive interactions into the DFT and in
the exploitation of parallel computing, the QHA could finally be effectively applied to
organic molecular crystals and mixed organic–inorganic materials such as
metal–organic frameworks to determine their thermal expansion.[40−48] Let us stress that while the evaluation of the thermal expansion of the
system requires the calculation of the dependence of the free-energy on volume, the evaluation
of the thermoelasticity involves the extra dependence of the free-energy on strain, which
makes the corresponding lattice dynamical calculations much more demanding and challenging,
particularly so for soft, flexible materials with low-frequency phonon modes.In this Letter, we introduce an affordable quasi-harmonic computational protocol for the
description of the thermoelasticity of organic crystals within the framework of
dispersion-corrected DFT calculations. We apply our scheme to the investigation of the
thermoelasticity of the stimuli-responsive, metal–organic copper(II) acetylacetonate
crystal: a system that has recently attracted a lot of attention because of its unusual high
flexibility[22] and its different structural mechanisms induced by
temperature and strain.[23] Present quantum-mechanical calculations allow to
report the first complete characterization of the 3D anisotropic elastic response of this
system, as well as its thermal evolution. Inclusion of thermal effects up to room temperature
results in dramatic changes of the statically computed values. Comparison with the
experimentally measured values of the Young modulus along two crystallographic directions
confirms the reliability of the description to an unexpected degree.The full thermoelastic characterization of a crystal requires the determination of the
fourth-rank thermoelastic tensor at each desired temperature T; that is, the
full set of isothermal elastic constants (second free-energy density derivatives with respect
to pairs of strain
types):where
V(T) is the volume of the equilibrium structure at
temperature T, F is the Helmholtz free energy,
η is one of the six independent components of the
strain tensor η, and v, u = 1, ..., 6 are
Voigt indices.[49] The calculation of thermoelastic coefficients from eq represents a formidable computational task for systems
with more than a few atoms per cell and/or belonging to low-symmetry space groups.[37] This is because it involves the calculation of the free energy dependence on
all lattice parameters to get the anisotropic thermal expansion and the second derivatives
with respect to strain.[50−53] As such, the use of eq is
unpractical for soft (metal-)organic crystals. However, based on experience gained in previous
investigations of the anisotropic thermal expansion of soft molecular
crystals,[40,43,44] we know that, at variance with strongly bound inorganic crystals, the
dependence on the lattice parameters of the free energy,
F(η; T), can be safely substituted by
that of the static energy, E(η;
T0), for weakly bound organic crystals. Therefore, here, we
introduce a different strategy where thermoelastic constants are obtained
fromwhere
T0 is the absolute zero. While eq still relies on the quasi-harmonic determination of
V(T), now the second energy derivatives with respect to
strain are evaluated from the static internal energy E and not from the free
energy F, and this remarkably simplifies the corresponding calculations. See
the Supporting Information for a more detailed description of the algorithm. We
stress that, crucially, the scheme represented by eq ,
while neglecting vanishingly small terms in weakly bound crystals, still couples thermal
expansion with strain.Calculations are performed with the CRYSTAL program for quantum-mechanical simulations of the
condensed matter.[54,55] The
hybrid PBE0 exchange-correlation functional is used[56] as corrected for
missing dispersive interactions with Grimme’s D3 scheme:[57,58] PBE0-D3. A basis set of triple-ζ
quality plus polarization is used.[59] Reciprocal space is sampled on a
Monkhorst–Pack mesh with a shrinking factor of 2.The copper(II) acetylacetonate molecules are almost planar and crystallize in a monoclinic
lattice (space group P21/n) that is shown in
Figure . In particular, Figure
b shows the structure of the crystal in the ac
crystallographic plane (XZ Cartesian plane). Green dashed arrows identify the
two crystallographic directions along which the Young modulus has been measured experimentally
by Worthy et al.[22] The two directions are [101] and [101̅] and
correspond to the two directions in the plane connecting the Cu centers of the molecules along
the two molecular chains.
Figure 1
(a) Atomic structure of copper(II) acetylacetonate crystals (belonging to the
P21/n space group); (b) atomic structure of
the crystal in the ac crystallographic plane (XZ Cartesian
plane). The two directions, [101] and [101̅], along which the elastic Young modulus
of the system has been experimentally determined are identified by green arrows.
(a) Atomic structure of copper(II) acetylacetonate crystals (belonging to the
P21/n space group); (b) atomic structure of
the crystal in the ac crystallographic plane (XZ Cartesian
plane). The two directions, [101] and [101̅], along which the elastic Young modulus
of the system has been experimentally determined are identified by green arrows.The first step of our methodology consists of a standard QHA calculation to determine the
thermal expansion of the system. Harmonic vibration frequencies have been computed at four
volumes, from a −2.5% compression to a +5% expansion relative to the static optimized
equilibrium volume. Harmonic frequencies as a function of volume are then fitted to a
quadratic polynomial function, and the fitting coefficients are used to set up the canonical
vibrational partition function and compute the Helmholtz free energy
F(V; T) on a dense grid of volumes at
each desired temperature. The V(T) relation is obtained by
minimizing the free energy with respect to volume at several
temperatures.[60−63] The computed volumetric thermal expansion
V(T) is reported in Figure (black line) where it is compared with available experimental data
(red squares) from ref (22). The agreement between the
two sets is remarkable, which proves that the QHA provides a reliable description of the
thermal expansion in this case. The metal–organic molecular crystal of copper(II)
acetylacetonate is found to expand by 1.7% just by inclusion of zero-point motion effects at
the absolute zero, which is followed by a further thermal expansion of about 4% when
temperature is raised from 0 to 310 K. The thermal expansion along individual lattice
parameters is reported in the Supporting Information.
Figure 2
Volumetric thermal expansion of copper(II) acetylacetonate crystals in the 0–310 K
temperature range. Available experimental data (red squares) are from ref (22). The black line is the expansion obtained from our
QHA calculations.
Volumetric thermal expansion of copper(II) acetylacetonate crystals in the 0–310 K
temperature range. Available experimental data (red squares) are from ref (22). The black line is the expansion obtained from our
QHA calculations.Starting from the thermal expansion determined by the QHA, isothermal elastic constants have
been computed through eq at four different
temperatures: 0, 100, 200, and 300 K. At the absolute zero, two sets of elastic constants have
been evaluated, one corresponding to the equilibrium volume obtained from the standard static
geometry optimization and one corresponding to the equilibrium volume at 0 K upon inclusion of
zero-point motion effects. The explicit dependence on temperature of the full set of 13
independent elastic constants can be found in the Supporting Information, where it is shown that very regular trends are obtained
for all elastic coefficients, including small ones, Once the full set of elastic constants is
obtained, a variety of mechanical features of the material can be derived such as the bulk
modulus, the shear modulus, the Young modulus, Poisson’s ratio, the velocity of
propagation of directional elastic waves, etc. In particular, the directional
Young modulus can be determined, which measures the stiffness of the material along any
direction in space.[49,64]
The thermal evolution of the Young modulus of copper(II) acetylacetonate crystals is shown in
Figure where it is reported in 2D maps in three
Cartesian planes (XY, YZ, and XZ). The
following can be observed: (i) as expected, the mechanical stiffness decreases with
temperature (i.e., the Young modulus decreases); (ii) the Young modulus does not shrink
isotropically with temperature and rather the anisotropy of the mechanical response
significantly evolves as temperature changes. For instance, let us have a closer look at the
spatial dependence of the Young modulus in the YZ plane. While the Young
modulus almost does not change along the Y axis (with values close to 6 GPa
at 0 and 300 K), its value passes from 27 to 11 GPa in the same temperature range in the
diagonal YZ direction. A more quantitative analysis on the thermal evolution
of the computed Young modulus is provided in the table in the bottom right corner of Figure , where the two crystallographic directions in
the ab plane, [101] and [101̅], are considered, which were graphically
marked by the green arrows in Figure b. These are
the only two directions along which the Young modulus of copper(II) acetylacetonate crystals
has been experimentally measured.[22] Also in this case, along one direction,
[101̅], the Young modulus shows little thermal evolution, while along the second one,
[101], it changes from 25.3 GPa at 0 K in the static limit to 11.3 GPa at 300 K. In the
Supporting Information, we report the thermoelastic response of the system as
obtained from a nonhybrid functional of the DFT, PBE-D3: while the absolute values of the
computed mechanical properties are systematically slightly lower than those from PBE0-D3 (for
reasons also discussed in the Supporting Information), thermal trends are found to be very consistent with
those discussed above, which confirms the reliability of the approach. The comparison with the
experimental values shows that it is absolutely mandatory to take into account thermal effects
to accurately reproduce the room temperature mechanical features of this class of soft
metal–organic molecular crystals and, at the same time, that the simplified
quasi-harmonic scheme introduced here provides a reliable and yet feasible way to do so.
Figure 3
2D plots of the Young modulus (in GPa) of copper(II) acetylacetonate crystals in three
planes (XY, YZ, and XZ) and at four
temperatures (0, 100, 200, and 300 K). The directional Young modulus at 0 K is computed
both without and with inclusion of the zero-point energy (ZPE). The XZ
plane is the one displayed in Figure b. The
table in the bottom-right corner of the figure reports the thermal evolution of the
computed Young modulus along the two crystallographic directions, [101] and [101̅],
probed in the experiments in ref (22).
2D plots of the Young modulus (in GPa) of copper(II) acetylacetonate crystals in three
planes (XY, YZ, and XZ) and at four
temperatures (0, 100, 200, and 300 K). The directional Young modulus at 0 K is computed
both without and with inclusion of the zero-point energy (ZPE). The XZ
plane is the one displayed in Figure b. The
table in the bottom-right corner of the figure reports the thermal evolution of the
computed Young modulus along the two crystallographic directions, [101] and [101̅],
probed in the experiments in ref (22).The evolution with temperature of the mechanical stiffness of copper(II) acetylacetonate
crystals is shown even more explicitly in Figure ,
where a 3D representation of the spatial dependence of the Young modulus is reported. The
figure clearly shows how, still down to the absolute zero of temperature, the large expansion
of about 1.7% due to the lattice-dynamical zero-point motions produces a sizable modification
to the elastic mechanical response of the system. Both the magnitude of the stiffness and the
anisotropy of its spatial distribution are significantly affected by the expansion. As
temperature increases from 0 to 300 K a further volume expansion by about 4% is observed,
which is again reflected in the thermoelastic features of the crystals.
Figure 4
3D plots of the spatial distribution of the Young modulus of copper(II) acetylacetonate
crystals as a function of temperature. Data are in GPa.
3D plots of the spatial distribution of the Young modulus of copper(II) acetylacetonate
crystals as a function of temperature. Data are in GPa.In conclusion, we have presented a computationally affordable scheme to compute the
anisotropic thermoelastic response of soft, flexible (metal-)organic crystals based on the
quantum-mechanical description of their quasi-harmonic lattice dynamics. This scheme relies on
the strain dependence of the static internal energy and, crucially, couples thermal expansion
with strain. We have applied the scheme to stimuli-responsive, elastically flexible copper(II)
acetylacetonate monoclinic crystals and reported the first characterization of its anisotropic
mechanical behavior in the temperature range 0–300 K.
Authors: Aidan J Brock; Jacob J Whittaker; Joshua A Powell; Michael C Pfrunder; Arnaud Grosjean; Simon Parsons; John C McMurtrie; Jack K Clegg Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-07-30 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Anna Worthy; Arnaud Grosjean; Michael C Pfrunder; Yanan Xu; Cheng Yan; Grant Edwards; Jack K Clegg; John C McMurtrie Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2017-08-28 Impact factor: 24.427