Literature DB >> 32969649

Improved Accuracy for Modeling PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complex Formation and Targeted Protein Degradation via New In Silico Methodologies.

Michael L Drummond1, Andrew Henry2, Huifang Li1, Christopher I Williams1.   

Abstract

Extending upon our previous publication [Drummond, M.; J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2019, 59, 1634-1644], two additional computational methods are presented to model PROTAC-mediated ternary complex structures, which are then used to predict the efficacy of any accompanying protein degradation. Method 4B, an extension to one of our previous approaches, incorporates a clustering procedure uniquely suited for considering ternary complexes. Method 4B yields the highest proportion to date of crystal-like poses in modeled ternary complex ensembles, nearing 100% in two cases and always giving a hit rate of at least 10%. Techniques to further improve this performance for particularly troublesome cases are suggested and validated. This demonstrated ability to reliably reproduce known crystallographic ternary complex structures is further established through modeling of a newly released crystal structure. Moreover, for the far more common scenario where the structure of the ternary complex intermediate is unknown, the methods detailed in this work nonetheless consistently yield results that reliably follow experimental protein degradation trends, as established through seven retrospective case studies. These various case studies cover challenging yet common modeling situations, such as when the precise orientation of the PROTAC binding moiety in one (or both) of the protein pockets has not been experimentally established. Successful results are presented for one PROTAC targeting many proteins, for different PROTACs targeting the same protein, and even for degradation effected by an E3 ligase that has not been structurally characterized in a ternary complex. Overall, the computational modeling approaches detailed in this work should greatly facilitate PROTAC screening and design efforts, so that the many advantages of a PROTAC-based degradation approach can be effectively utilized both rapidly and at reduced cost.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32969649     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  8 in total

1.  Identification of ligand linkage vectors for the development of p300/CBP degraders.

Authors:  Duncan K Brownsey; Ben C Rowley; Evgueni Gorobets; Koichiro Mihara; Ranjan Maity; James W Papatzimas; Benjamin S Gelfand; Morley D Hollenberg; Nizar J Bahlis; Darren J Derksen
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2022-04-14

2.  Rationalizing PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complex Formation Using Rosetta.

Authors:  Nan Bai; Sven A Miller; Grigorii V Andrianov; Max Yates; Palani Kirubakaran; John Karanicolas
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 3.  Phosphorylated tau targeted small-molecule PROTACs for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease and tauopathies.

Authors:  Pradeepkiran Jangampalli Adi; P Hemachandra Reddy
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 6.633

Review 4.  Major Advances in Targeted Protein Degradation: PROTACs, LYTACs, and MADTACs.

Authors:  Shanique Alabi; Craig Crews
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  PROTACs bearing piperazine-containing linkers: what effect on their protonation state?

Authors:  Jenny Desantis; Andrea Mammoli; Michela Eleuteri; Alice Coletti; Federico Croci; Antonio Macchiarulo; Laura Goracci
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Predicting the structural basis of targeted protein degradation by integrating molecular dynamics simulations with structural mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tom Dixon; Derek MacPherson; Barmak Mostofian; Taras Dauzhenka; Samuel Lotz; Dwight McGee; Sharon Shechter; Utsab R Shrestha; Rafal Wiewiora; Zachary A McDargh; Fen Pei; Rajat Pal; João V Ribeiro; Tanner Wilkerson; Vipin Sachdeva; Ning Gao; Shourya Jain; Samuel Sparks; Yunxing Li; Alexander Vinitsky; Xin Zhang; Asghar M Razavi; István Kolossváry; Jason Imbriglio; Artem Evdokimov; Louise Bergeron; Wenchang Zhou; Jagat Adhikari; Benjamin Ruprecht; Alex Dickson; Huafeng Xu; Woody Sherman; Jesus A Izaguirre
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  PRosettaC: Rosetta Based Modeling of PROTAC Mediated Ternary Complexes.

Authors:  Daniel Zaidman; Jaime Prilusky; Nir London
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 8.  Unifying Catalysis Framework to Dissect Proteasomal Degradation Paradigms.

Authors:  Frances P Rodriguez-Rivera; Samuel M Levi
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 14.553

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.