Literature DB >> 32968952

The experiences and needs of couples affected by prostate cancer aged 65 and under: a qualitative study.

Nicole Collaço1,2, Richard Wagland3, Obrey Alexis4, Anna Gavin5, Adam Glaser6, Eila K Watson4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate Cancer (PCa) is often considered to be an illness affecting older men, however the prevalence in younger men (<=65 years) is rising. Diagnosis and treatment for PCa can have a significant impact on the lives of both the man with PCa and his partner. This study explored the experiences and needs of younger men and their partners affected by PCa. The findings will be used to inform service provision and develop interventions appropriate to need.
METHODS: Participants were recruited from respondents to a national PROMS study (Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis (LAPCD), who indicated on completed questionnaires their willingness to be interviewed. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with twenty-eight couples, separately (56 participants). Data were analysed using the Framework Method.
RESULTS: Following the diagnosis of PCa, couples' experienced changes in their intimate relationships, parental/familial roles, work and finances, and social connections and activities. Couples adopted a range of strategies and behaviours to help their adjustment to PCa, such as communicating with each other, distancing, distraction, and adopting a positive mindset towards PCa. This, in turn, influenced how their identity as a couple evolved.
CONCLUSIONS: Following a diagnosis of PCa, the identity of couples are continually evolving. It is important that these couples are provided with the appropriate information, support and resources to help them transition along the cancer pathway. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Key areas of support identified for younger couples include: 1) couple focused support programme to foster relationship strategies/behaviours that facilitate couple adjustment; 2) age-specific support, e.g. 'buddying systems' connecting younger couples affected by PCa and providing them with tailored information (written/online/app).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Couples; Dyad; LAPCD; Partner; Prostate cancer; Qualitative

Year:  2020        PMID: 32968952      PMCID: PMC7966139          DOI: 10.1007/s11764-020-00936-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Surviv        ISSN: 1932-2259            Impact factor:   4.442


  24 in total

1.  Approaches to and outcomes of dyadic interview analysis.

Authors:  Zvi Eisikovits; Chaya Koren
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-07-27

Review 2.  A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span.

Authors:  Cynthia A Berg; Renn Upchurch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.

Authors:  Allison Tong; Peter Sainsbury; Jonathan Craig
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 2.038

4.  The experience and perceptions of men with prostate cancer and their partners of the CONNECT psychosocial intervention: a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  Eilis McCaughan; Suzanne McKenna; Oonagh McSorley; Kader Parahoo
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  Patient navigation from the paired perspectives of cancer patients and navigators: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Amanat M Yosha; Jennifer K Carroll; Samantha Hendren; Charcy M Salamone; Mechelle Sanders; Kevin Fiscella; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-01-20

Review 6.  A literature review on the mutual impact of the spousal caregiver-cancer patients dyads: 'communication', 'reciprocal influence', and 'caregiver-patient congruence'.

Authors:  Qiuping Li; Alice Yuen Loke
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.398

7.  Lung cancer patients' perceptions of access to financial benefits: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Alison Chapple; Sue Ziebland; Ann McPherson; Nick Summerton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Life after prostate cancer diagnosis: protocol for a UK-wide patient-reported outcomes study.

Authors:  Amy Downing; Penny Wright; Richard Wagland; Eila Watson; Therese Kearney; Rebecca Mottram; Majorie Allen; Victoria Cairnduff; Oonagh McSorley; Hugh Butcher; Luke Hounsome; Conan Donnelly; Peter Selby; Paul Kind; William Cross; James W H Catto; Dyfed Huws; David H Brewster; Emma McNair; Lauren Matheson; Carol Rivas; Johana Nayoan; Mike Horton; Jessica Corner; Julia Verne; Anna Gavin; Adam W Glaser
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Factors influencing job loss and early retirement in working men with prostate cancer-findings from the population-based Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis (LAPCD) study.

Authors:  Damien Bennett; Therese Kearney; David W Donnelly; Amy Downing; Penny Wright; Sarah Wilding; Richard Wagland; Eila Watson; Adam Glaser; Anna Gavin
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.442

10.  Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.

Authors:  Nicola K Gale; Gemma Heath; Elaine Cameron; Sabina Rashid; Sabi Redwood
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  3 in total

1.  Using the Framework Method for the Analysis of Qualitative Dyadic Data in Health Research.

Authors:  Nicole Collaço; Richard Wagland; Obrey Alexis; Anna Gavin; Adam Glaser; Eila K Watson
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2021-05-13

2.  Men's experiences of sex and intimacy after prostate cancer treatment in China: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Tong Wang; Hui-Lin Cheng; Ping Kit Kitty Wong; Wen Dong
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.359

3.  Sexual dysfunction associated with prostate cancer treatment in Japanese men: a qualitative research.

Authors:  Saeko Hayashi; Fumiko Oishi; Kazuki Sato; Hiromi Fukuda; Shoko Ando
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 3.359

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.