Literature DB >> 32968257

The hysteresis of the Antarctic Ice Sheet.

Julius Garbe1,2, Torsten Albrecht1, Anders Levermann1,2,3, Jonathan F Donges1,4, Ricarda Winkelmann5,6.   

Abstract

More than half of Earth's freshwater resources are held by the Antarctic Ice Sheet, which thus represents by far the largest potential source for global sea-level rise under future warming conditions1. Its long-term stability determines the fate of our coastal cities and cultural heritage. Feedbacks between ice, atmosphere, ocean, and the solid Earth give rise to potential nonlinearities in its response to temperature changes. So far, we are lacking a comprehensive stability analysis of the Antarctic Ice Sheet for different amounts of global warming. Here we show that the Antarctic Ice Sheet exhibits a multitude of temperature thresholds beyond which ice loss is irreversible. Consistent with palaeodata2 we find, using the Parallel Ice Sheet Model3-5, that at global warming levels around 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, West Antarctica is committed to long-term partial collapse owing to the marine ice-sheet instability. Between 6 and 9 degrees of warming above pre-industrial levels, the loss of more than 70 per cent of the present-day ice volume is triggered, mainly caused by the surface elevation feedback. At more than 10 degrees of warming above pre-industrial levels, Antarctica is committed to become virtually ice-free. The ice sheet's temperature sensitivity is 1.3 metres of sea-level equivalent per degree of warming up to 2 degrees above pre-industrial levels, almost doubling to 2.4 metres per degree of warming between 2 and 6 degrees and increasing to about 10 metres per degree of warming between 6 and 9 degrees. Each of these thresholds gives rise to hysteresis behaviour: that is, the currently observed ice-sheet configuration is not regained even if temperatures are reversed to present-day levels. In particular, the West Antarctic Ice Sheet does not regrow to its modern extent until temperatures are at least one degree Celsius lower than pre-industrial levels. Our results show that if the Paris Agreement is not met, Antarctica's long-term sea-level contribution will dramatically increase and exceed that of all other sources.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32968257     DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2727-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  20 in total

1.  The multi-millennial Antarctic commitment to future sea-level rise.

Authors:  N R Golledge; D E Kowalewski; T R Naish; R H Levy; C J Fogwill; E G W Gasson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  SEA-LEVEL RISE. Sea-level rise due to polar ice-sheet mass loss during past warm periods.

Authors:  A Dutton; A E Carlson; A J Long; G A Milne; P U Clark; R DeConto; B P Horton; S Rahmstorf; M E Raymo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Increased future ice discharge from Antarctica owing to higher snowfall.

Authors:  R Winkelmann; A Levermann; M A Martin; K Frieler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise.

Authors:  Robert M DeConto; David Pollard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Dynamic Antarctic ice sheet during the early to mid-Miocene.

Authors:  Edward Gasson; Robert M DeConto; David Pollard; Richard H Levy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Modelling West Antarctic ice sheet growth and collapse through the past five million years.

Authors:  David Pollard; Robert M DeConto
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Combustion of available fossil fuel resources sufficient to eliminate the Antarctic Ice Sheet.

Authors:  Ricarda Winkelmann; Anders Levermann; Andy Ridgwell; Ken Caldeira
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Sea-level feedback lowers projections of future Antarctic Ice-Sheet mass loss.

Authors:  Natalya Gomez; David Pollard; David Holland
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Four decades of Antarctic Ice Sheet mass balance from 1979-2017.

Authors:  Eric Rignot; Jérémie Mouginot; Bernd Scheuchl; Michiel van den Broeke; Melchior J van Wessem; Mathieu Morlighem
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Early Last Interglacial ocean warming drove substantial ice mass loss from Antarctica.

Authors:  Chris S M Turney; Christopher J Fogwill; Nicholas R Golledge; Nicholas P McKay; Erik van Sebille; Richard T Jones; David Etheridge; Mauro Rubino; David P Thornton; Siwan M Davies; Christopher Bronk Ramsey; Zoë A Thomas; Michael I Bird; Niels C Munksgaard; Mika Kohno; John Woodward; Kate Winter; Laura S Weyrich; Camilla M Rootes; Helen Millman; Paul G Albert; Andres Rivera; Tas van Ommen; Mark Curran; Andrew Moy; Stefan Rahmstorf; Kenji Kawamura; Claus-Dieter Hillenbrand; Michael E Weber; Christina J Manning; Jennifer Young; Alan Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  6 in total

1.  A new sea-level record for the Neogene/Quaternary boundary reveals transition to a more stable East Antarctic Ice Sheet.

Authors:  Kim A Jakob; Paul A Wilson; Jörg Pross; Thomas H G Ezard; Jens Fiebig; Janne Repschläger; Oliver Friedrich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Decadal-scale onset and termination of Antarctic ice-mass loss during the last deglaciation.

Authors:  Michael E Weber; Nicholas R Golledge; Chris J Fogwill; Chris S M Turney; Zoë A Thomas
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios.

Authors:  Luke Kemp; Chi Xu; Joanna Depledge; Kristie L Ebi; Goodwin Gibbins; Timothy A Kohler; Johan Rockström; Marten Scheffer; Hans Joachim Schellnhuber; Will Steffen; Timothy M Lenton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  A weakened AMOC may prolong greenhouse gas-induced Mediterranean drying even with significant and rapid climate change mitigation.

Authors:  Thomas L Delworth; William F Cooke; Vaishali Naik; David Paynter; Liping Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 12.779

5.  Economic impacts of melting of the Antarctic Ice Sheet.

Authors:  Simon Dietz; Felix Koninx
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Potential for perceived failure of stratospheric aerosol injection deployment.

Authors:  Patrick W Keys; Elizabeth A Barnes; Noah S Diffenbaugh; James W Hurrell; Curtis M Bell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 12.779

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.