Literature DB >> 32967790

Homologous recombination deficiency real-time clinical assays, ready or not?

Katherine Fuh1, Mary Mullen2, Barbara Blachut2, Elizabeth Stover3, Panagiotis Konstantinopoulos3, Joyce Liu3, Ursula Matulonis3, Dineo Khabele2, Nima Mosammaparast4, Alessandro Vindigni5.   

Abstract

Cancers with deficiencies in homologous recombination-mediated DNA repair (HRR) demonstrate improved clinical outcomes and increased survival. Approximately 50% of high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) exhibit homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). HRD can be caused by germline or somatic mutations of genes involved in the HR pathway. Given platinum-based chemotherapy and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) are used in HGSOC, double-strand breaks (DSBs) are common. Unrepaired DSBs are toxic to cells as genomic instability ensues and cells eventually die. Thus, tumor cells with DSBs utilize the high-fidelity HRR as one of the central pathways for repair. In tumors that have HRD, an alternate pathway such as non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) is used and leads to error-prone repair. To date, methods for clinical detection of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) are limited to genomic changes of HRR genes and genomic mutation patterns resulting from HRD genes involved in HR-mediated DNA repair. However, these tests detect genomic scars that might not always correlate well with PARP inhibitor or platinum sensitivity in the current state. Therefore, a functional HRD assay should be able to more accurately predict tumor response in real-time. RAD51 foci formation has been used as a functional assay to define HRD and closely correlates with chemotherapy and PARPi sensitivity. The inability to form RAD51 foci is a common feature of HRD. DNA damage can also cause transient slowing or stalling of replication forks defined as replication stress. Replication fork stalling can lead to fork degradation and decreased cell viability if forks do not resume DNA synthesis. Fork degradation has been found to lead to chemosensitivity in BRCA-deficient tumors. To determine this fork degradation phenotype, replication fork/DNA fiber assays are utilized. This review will highlight functional assays for HRD in the context of translating these to real-time clinical assays.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Functional assay; Homologous recombination deficiency; PARP inhibitor; RAD51; Replication forks; chemotherapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32967790     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.08.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  11 in total

Review 1.  PARP Inhibitors in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Brown; Kim A Reiss
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.360

2.  Basal expression of RAD51 foci predicts olaparib response in patient-derived ovarian cancer xenografts.

Authors:  F Guffanti; M F Alvisi; A Anastasia; F Ricci; M Chiappa; A Llop-Guevara; V Serra; R Fruscio; A Degasperi; S Nik-Zainal; M R Bani; M Lupia; R Giavazzi; E Rulli; G Damia
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Entinostat, a selective HDAC1/2 inhibitor, potentiates the effects of olaparib in homologous recombination proficient ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Vijayalaxmi G Gupta; Jeff Hirst; Shariska Petersen; Katherine F Roby; Meghan Kusch; Helen Zhou; Makena L Clive; Andrea Jewell; Harsh B Pathak; Andrew K Godwin; Andrew J Wilson; Marta A Crispens; Emily Cybulla; Alessandro Vindigni; Katherine C Fuh; Dineo Khabele
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 4.  The role of distinct BRD4 isoforms and their contribution to high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma pathogenesis.

Authors:  Ana Luiza Drumond-Bock; Magdalena Bieniasz
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 5.  Toward More Comprehensive Homologous Recombination Deficiency Assays in Ovarian Cancer, Part 1: Technical Considerations.

Authors:  Stanislas Quesada; Michel Fabbro; Jérôme Solassol
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Tumor BRCA Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: Past and Future-Five-Years' Single-Institution Experience of 762 Consecutive Patients.

Authors:  Caterina Fumagalli; Ilaria Betella; Alessandra Rappa; Maria di Giminiani; Michela Gaiano; Luigi Antonio De Vitis; Benedetta Zambetti; Davide Vacirca; Francesco Multinu; Konstantinos Venetis; Nicoletta Colombo; Massimo Barberis; Elena Guerini Rocco
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  Next Generation Sequencing and Molecular Biomarkers in Ovarian Cancer-An Opportunity for Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Laura M Harbin; Holly H Gallion; Derek B Allison; Jill M Kolesar
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-29

8.  Enhanced Efficacy of Aurora Kinase Inhibitors in G2/M Checkpoint Deficient TP53 Mutant Uterine Carcinomas Is Linked to the Summation of LKB1-AKT-p53 Interactions.

Authors:  Katherine N Lynch; Joyce F Liu; Nikolas Kesten; Kin-Hoe Chow; Aniket Shetty; Ruiyang He; Mosammat Faria Afreen; Liping Yuan; Ursula A Matulonis; Whitfield B Growdon; Michael G Muto; Neil S Horowitz; Colleen M Feltmate; Michael J Worley; Ross S Berkowitz; Christopher P Crum; Bo R Rueda; Sarah J Hill
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 9.  Biomarkers for Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Cancer.

Authors:  Svenja Wagener-Ryczek; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse; Janna Siemanowski
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2021-06-28

10.  Artificial intelligence-based image analysis can predict outcome in high-grade serous carcinoma via histology alone.

Authors:  Anna Ray Laury; Sami Blom; Tuomas Ropponen; Anni Virtanen; Olli Mikael Carpén
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.