Hong-Dong Li1, Changhuo Yang1, Zhimin Zhang2, Mengyun Yang1, Fang-Xiang Wu3, Gilbert S Omenn4,5, Jianxin Wang1. 1. Hunan Provincial Key Lab on Bioinformatics, School of Computer Science and Engineering. 2. College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China. 3. Division of Biomedical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK S7N5A9, Canada. 4. Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. 5. Department of Computational Medicine & Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2218, USA.
Abstract
MOTIVATION: High resolution annotation of gene functions is a central goal in functional genomics. A single gene may produce multiple isoforms with different functions through alternative splicing. Conventional approaches, however, consider a gene as a single entity without differentiating these functionally different isoforms. Towards understanding gene functions at higher resolution, recent efforts have focused on predicting the functions of isoforms. However, the performance of existing methods is far from satisfactory mainly because of the lack of isoform-level functional annotation. RESULTS: We present IsoResolve, a novel approach for isoform function prediction, which leverages the information from gene function prediction models with domain adaptation (DA). IsoResolve treats gene-level and isoform-level features as source and target domains, respectively. It uses DA to project the two domains into a latent variable space in such a way that the latent variables from the two domains have similar distribution, which enables the gene domain information to be leveraged for isoform function prediction. We systematically evaluated the performance of IsoResolve in predicting functions. Compared with five state-of-the-art methods, IsoResolve achieved significantly better performance. IsoResolve was further validated by case studies of genes with isoform-level functional annotation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: IsoResolve is freely available at https://github.com/genemine/IsoResolve. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
MOTIVATION: High resolution annotation of gene functions is a central goal in functional genomics. A single gene may produce multiple isoforms with different functions through alternative splicing. Conventional approaches, however, consider a gene as a single entity without differentiating these functionally different isoforms. Towards understanding gene functions at higher resolution, recent efforts have focused on predicting the functions of isoforms. However, the performance of existing methods is far from satisfactory mainly because of the lack of isoform-level functional annotation. RESULTS: We present IsoResolve, a novel approach for isoform function prediction, which leverages the information from gene function prediction models with domain adaptation (DA). IsoResolve treats gene-level and isoform-level features as source and target domains, respectively. It uses DA to project the two domains into a latent variable space in such a way that the latent variables from the two domains have similar distribution, which enables the gene domain information to be leveraged for isoform function prediction. We systematically evaluated the performance of IsoResolve in predicting functions. Compared with five state-of-the-art methods, IsoResolve achieved significantly better performance. IsoResolve was further validated by case studies of genes with isoform-level functional annotation. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: IsoResolve is freely available at https://github.com/genemine/IsoResolve. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: Roland Schmitz; Ryan M Young; Michele Ceribelli; Sameer Jhavar; Wenming Xiao; Meili Zhang; George Wright; Arthur L Shaffer; Daniel J Hodson; Eric Buras; Xuelu Liu; John Powell; Yandan Yang; Weihong Xu; Hong Zhao; Holger Kohlhammer; Andreas Rosenwald; Philip Kluin; Hans Konrad Müller-Hermelink; German Ott; Randy D Gascoyne; Joseph M Connors; Lisa M Rimsza; Elias Campo; Elaine S Jaffe; Jan Delabie; Erlend B Smeland; Martin D Ogwang; Steven J Reynolds; Richard I Fisher; Rita M Braziel; Raymond R Tubbs; James R Cook; Dennis D Weisenburger; Wing C Chan; Stefania Pittaluga; Wyndham Wilson; Thomas A Waldmann; Martin Rowe; Sam M Mbulaiteye; Alan B Rickinson; Louis M Staudt Journal: Nature Date: 2012-08-12 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Yan Song; Olga B Botvinnik; Michael T Lovci; Boyko Kakaradov; Patrick Liu; Jia L Xu; Gene W Yeo Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Daniel Dominguez; Yi-Hsuan Tsai; Robert Weatheritt; Yang Wang; Benjamin J Blencowe; Zefeng Wang Journal: Elife Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 8.140