Literature DB >> 32966209

Stoichiometric interactions explain spindle dynamics and scaling across 100 million years of nematode evolution.

Che-Hang Yu1, Gunar Fabig2, Reza Farhadifar1,3, Hai-Yin Wu1, David B Stein3, Matthew Rockman4, Thomas Müller-Reichert2, Michael J Shelley3,5, Daniel J Needleman1,3.   

Abstract

The spindle shows remarkable diversity, and changes in an integrated fashion, as cells vary over evolution. Here, we provide a mechanistic explanation for variations in the first mitotic spindle in nematodes. We used a combination of quantitative genetics and biophysics to rule out broad classes of models of the regulation of spindle length and dynamics, and to establish the importance of a balance of cortical pulling forces acting in different directions. These experiments led us to construct a model of cortical pulling forces in which the stoichiometric interactions of microtubules and force generators (each force generator can bind only one microtubule), is key to explaining the dynamics of spindle positioning and elongation, and spindle final length and scaling with cell size. This model accounts for variations in all the spindle traits we studied here, both within species and across nematode species spanning over 100 million years of evolution.
© 2020, Farhadifar et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C. elegans; QTL mapping; cell biology; cell division; cortical forces; mathematical modeling; mitotic spindle; physics of living systems; scaling

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32966209      PMCID: PMC7511230          DOI: 10.7554/eLife.55877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elife        ISSN: 2050-084X            Impact factor:   8.140


  70 in total

1.  Spindle oscillations during asymmetric cell division require a threshold number of active cortical force generators.

Authors:  Jacques Pecreaux; Jens-Christian Röper; Karsten Kruse; Frank Jülicher; Anthony A Hyman; Stephan W Grill; Jonathon Howard
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Cell-size-dependent control of organelle sizes during development.

Authors:  Yuki Hara; Akatsuki Kimura
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2011

3.  Limiting amounts of centrosome material set centrosome size in C. elegans embryos.

Authors:  Markus Decker; Steffen Jaensch; Andrei Pozniakovsky; Andrea Zinke; Kevin F O'Connell; Wolfgang Zachariae; Eugene Myers; Anthony A Hyman
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Identification and characterization of factors required for microtubule growth and nucleation in the early C. elegans embryo.

Authors:  Martin Srayko; Aynur Kaya; Joanne Stamford; Anthony A Hyman
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 5.  Physical Limits on the Precision of Mitotic Spindle Positioning by Microtubule Pushing forces: Mechanics of mitotic spindle positioning.

Authors:  Jonathon Howard; Carlos Garzon-Coral
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Finding the cell center by a balance of dynein and myosin pulling and microtubule pushing: a computational study.

Authors:  Jie Zhu; Anton Burakov; Vladimir Rodionov; Alex Mogilner
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  The forces that position a mitotic spindle asymmetrically are tethered until after the time of spindle assembly.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Labbé; Erin K McCarthy; Bob Goldstein
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-10-18       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  R S Kamath; M Martinez-Campos; P Zipperlen; A G Fraser; J Ahringer
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2000-12-20       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Recombinational landscape and population genomics of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Matthew V Rockman; Leonid Kruglyak
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Shape-motion relationships of centering microtubule asters.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tanimoto; Akatsuki Kimura; Nicolas Minc
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  7 in total

1.  Three-dimensional structure of kinetochore-fibers in human mitotic spindles.

Authors:  Robert Kiewisz; Gunar Fabig; William Conway; Daniel Baum; Daniel Needleman; Thomas Müller-Reichert
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 2.  Regulation of organelle size and organization during development.

Authors:  Pan Chen; Daniel L Levy
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 7.499

Review 3.  Microtubule and Actin Cytoskeletal Dynamics in Male Meiotic Cells of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Anna Frappaolo; Roberto Piergentili; Maria Grazia Giansanti
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Natural genetic variation as a tool for discovery in Caenorhabditis nematodes.

Authors:  Erik C Andersen; Matthew V Rockman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Evolutionary divergence of anaphase spindle mechanics in nematode embryos constrained by antagonistic pulling and viscous forces.

Authors:  Dhruv Khatri; Thibault Brugière; Chaitanya A Athale; Marie Delattre
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  CellDynaMo-stochastic reaction-diffusion-dynamics model: Application to search-and-capture process of mitotic spindle assembly.

Authors:  Evgenii Kliuchnikov; Artem Zhmurov; Kenneth A Marx; Alex Mogilner; Valeri Barsegov
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 7.  From QTL to gene: C. elegans facilitates discoveries of the genetic mechanisms underlying natural variation.

Authors:  Kathryn S Evans; Marijke H van Wijk; Patrick T McGrath; Erik C Andersen; Mark G Sterken
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 11.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.