Vita W Jongen1, Maarten F Schim van der Loeff1,2, Anders Boyd1,3, Mariska Petrignani1, Maria Prins1,2, Marcel van der Wal4, Astrid Nielen5, Hester de Melker6, Theo G W M Paulussen7, Catharina J Alberts1,8. 1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Internal Medicine, Amsterdam Infection & Immunity Institute (AIII), Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Stichting HIV Monitoring, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, Public Health Service of Amsterdam (GGD), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Youth Health Service, Public Health Service of Amsterdam (GGD), Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands. 7. TNO (Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research), Expertise Centre Child Health, Leiden, The Netherlands. 8. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: It is unclear what role daughters play in the decision-making process regarding HPV vaccination. Therefore, we explored the impact of HPV vaccination intention among parents and their 12-13 year-old daughters on HPV vaccination uptake. METHODS: In February 2014 parents/guardians and their 12-13 year-old daughters were invited to complete a questionnaire about socio-psychological determinants of the decision-making process regarding HPV vaccination. Vaccination status of the daughter was retrieved from the national vaccination database after the last possible vaccination date in 2014. The association between HPV vaccination uptake and intention, and determinants of intention, was jointly assessed using a generalized structural equation model, stratified by origin of parents (Dutch versus non-Dutch). RESULTS: In total, 273 Dutch parent-daughter dyads and 165 non-Dutch dyads were analyzed for this study. HPV vaccination uptake was 90% (246/273) and 84% (139/165) in the Dutch and non-Dutch group, respectively. In the Dutch group, high parental intention (β = 2.3, 95%CI 1.2-3.3) and high daughters' intention (β = 1.5, 95%CI 0.41-2.6) were significantly associated with HPV vaccination uptake. In the non-Dutch group, high daughters' intention (β = 1.2, 95%CI 0.16-2.2) was significantly associated with HPV vaccination, but high parental intention was not (β = 0.52, 95%CI -0.47-1.5). Attitude was the most prominent socio-psychological determinant associated with vaccination intention among all groups. CONCLUSION: In the non-Dutch group, only daughters' intention was significantly associated with HPV vaccination uptake, whereas in the Dutch group both the parents' and the daughters' intention were significantly associated with uptake. The role of the child in the decision-making process might need to be taken into account when developing new interventions focused on increasing HPV vaccination uptake, especially among individuals of non-Dutch origin.
INTRODUCTION: It is unclear what role daughters play in the decision-making process regarding HPV vaccination. Therefore, we explored the impact of HPV vaccination intention among parents and their 12-13 year-old daughters on HPV vaccination uptake. METHODS: In February 2014 parents/guardians and their 12-13 year-old daughters were invited to complete a questionnaire about socio-psychological determinants of the decision-making process regarding HPV vaccination. Vaccination status of the daughter was retrieved from the national vaccination database after the last possible vaccination date in 2014. The association between HPV vaccination uptake and intention, and determinants of intention, was jointly assessed using a generalized structural equation model, stratified by origin of parents (Dutch versus non-Dutch). RESULTS: In total, 273 Dutch parent-daughter dyads and 165 non-Dutch dyads were analyzed for this study. HPV vaccination uptake was 90% (246/273) and 84% (139/165) in the Dutch and non-Dutch group, respectively. In the Dutch group, high parental intention (β = 2.3, 95%CI 1.2-3.3) and high daughters' intention (β = 1.5, 95%CI 0.41-2.6) were significantly associated with HPV vaccination uptake. In the non-Dutch group, high daughters' intention (β = 1.2, 95%CI 0.16-2.2) was significantly associated with HPV vaccination, but high parental intention was not (β = 0.52, 95%CI -0.47-1.5). Attitude was the most prominent socio-psychological determinant associated with vaccination intention among all groups. CONCLUSION: In the non-Dutch group, only daughters' intention was significantly associated with HPV vaccination uptake, whereas in the Dutch group both the parents' and the daughters' intention were significantly associated with uptake. The role of the child in the decision-making process might need to be taken into account when developing new interventions focused on increasing HPV vaccination uptake, especially among individuals of non-Dutch origin.
Entities:
Keywords:
HPV; Human papillomavirus; The Netherlands; parent-daughter dyads; vaccination; vaccination acceptability; vaccination intention; vaccination uptake
Authors: Mirjam Pot; Hilde M van Keulen; Robert A C Ruiter; Iris Eekhout; Liesbeth Mollema; Theo W G M Paulussen Journal: Prev Med Date: 2017-04-04 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Jane Chang; Lisa S Ipp; Ariel M de Roche; Marina Catallozzi; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Susan L Rosenthal Journal: J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 1.814
Authors: R Hofman; P van Empelen; J H Richardus; I M C M de Kok; H J de Koning; M van Ballegooijen; I J Korfage Journal: Health Educ Res Date: 2013-09-16
Authors: Daisy Y Morales-Campos; Christine M Markham; Melissa Fleschler Peskin; Maria E Fernandez Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Carmen H Logie; Ashley Lacombe-Duncan; Philip Baiden; Peter A Newman; Suchon Tepjan; Clara Rubincam; Nick Doukas; Farid Asey Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-04-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Maricel G Santos; Anu L Gorukanti; Lina M Jurkunas; Margaret A Handley Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 3.390