Yosuke Osuka1, Hunkyung Kim2, Yutaka Watanabe3, Yu Taniguchi4, Narumi Kojima2, Satoshi Seino5, Hisashi Kawai6, Ryota Sakurai5, Hiroki Inagaki2, Shuichi Awata2, Shoji Shinkai7. 1. Research Team for Promoting Independence and Mental Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan. osuka@tmig.or.jp. 2. Research Team for Promoting Independence and Mental Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan. 3. Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan. 4. Japan Environment and Children's Study Programme Office, National Institute for Environmental Studies, Ibaraki, Japan. 5. Research Team for Social Participation and Community Health, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan. 6. Research Team for Human Care, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology, Tokyo, Japan. 7. Graduate School of Nutrition and Health Science, Kagawa Nutrition University, Sakato, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether motor-cognitive dual tasks predict cognitive decline better than either motor or cognitive tasks alone. AIMS: To examine the utility of the novel motor-cognitive dual-task test [Stepping Trail Making Test (S-TMT)], as a predictor of cognitive decline, and compare its predictive performance with single motor or cognitive tests. METHODS: This 2-year population-based prospective study included 626 adults aged ≥ 70 years from Takashimadaira, Itabashi, Tokyo. The S-TMT measured the time taken to step on 16 numbers in order. Gait speed and TMT-A were assessed with standardized methods as single motor and cognitive tasks, respectively. A decline in the Mini-Mental State Examination score by ≥ 3 points over 2 years was defined as a significant cognitive decline. RESULTS: Over 2 years, 97 (15.5%) experienced cognitive decline. After adjusting for confounders, binary logistic regression models showed no significant associations between gait speed, TMT-A time tertiles, and risk of cognitive decline, but participants in the longest tertile of S-TMT time were more likely to develop cognitive decline than those of the shortest tertile (odds ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval 1.17-3.90). Only the addition of the S-TMT time to the covariates model significantly improved the reclassification indices for predicting cognitive decline (net reclassification improvement: 0.31, P < 0.01; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.01, P = 0.02). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Only the S-TMT was significantly associated with cognitive decline and improved reclassification indices, indicating that it is more useful for predicting cognitive decline than individual gait speed or visual tracking tests alone.
BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether motor-cognitive dual tasks predict cognitive decline better than either motor or cognitive tasks alone. AIMS: To examine the utility of the novel motor-cognitive dual-task test [Stepping Trail Making Test (S-TMT)], as a predictor of cognitive decline, and compare its predictive performance with single motor or cognitive tests. METHODS: This 2-year population-based prospective study included 626 adults aged ≥ 70 years from Takashimadaira, Itabashi, Tokyo. The S-TMT measured the time taken to step on 16 numbers in order. Gait speed and TMT-A were assessed with standardized methods as single motor and cognitive tasks, respectively. A decline in the Mini-Mental State Examination score by ≥ 3 points over 2 years was defined as a significant cognitive decline. RESULTS: Over 2 years, 97 (15.5%) experienced cognitive decline. After adjusting for confounders, binary logistic regression models showed no significant associations between gait speed, TMT-A time tertiles, and risk of cognitive decline, but participants in the longest tertile of S-TMT time were more likely to develop cognitive decline than those of the shortest tertile (odds ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval 1.17-3.90). Only the addition of the S-TMT time to the covariates model significantly improved the reclassification indices for predicting cognitive decline (net reclassification improvement: 0.31, P < 0.01; integrated discrimination improvement: 0.01, P = 0.02). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Only the S-TMT was significantly associated with cognitive decline and improved reclassification indices, indicating that it is more useful for predicting cognitive decline than individual gait speed or visual tracking tests alone.
Entities:
Keywords:
C-statistics; Integrated discrimination improvement; Net reclassification improvement; Predictive performance
Authors: Olivier Beauchet; Cédric Annweiler; Michele L Callisaya; Anne-Marie De Cock; Jorunn L Helbostad; Reto W Kressig; Velandai Srikanth; Jean-Paul Steinmetz; Helena M Blumen; Joe Verghese; Gilles Allali Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Theodore K Malmstrom; Fredric D Wolinsky; Elena M Andresen; J Philip Miller; Douglas K Miller Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Ana Alfaro-Acha; Soham Al Snih; Mukaila A Raji; Yong-Fang Kuo; Kyriakos S Markides; Kenneth J Ottenbacher Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: S Gillain; M Dramé; F Lekeu; V Wojtasik; C Ricour; J-L Croisier; E Salmon; J Petermans Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Scott Marquis; M Milar Moore; Diane B Howieson; Gary Sexton; Haydeh Payami; Jeffrey A Kaye; Richard Camicioli Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2002-04
Authors: Michelle M Mielke; Rosebud O Roberts; Rodolfo Savica; Ruth Cha; Dina I Drubach; Teresa Christianson; Vernon S Pankratz; Yonas E Geda; Mary M Machulda; Robert J Ivnik; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Walter A Rocca; Ronald C Petersen Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2012-12-18 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Nandini Deshpande; E Jeffrey Metter; Stefania Bandinelli; Jack Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Nuria Marín-Jiménez; Carolina Cruz-León; Alejandro Perez-Bey; Julio Conde-Caveda; Alberto Grao-Cruces; Virginia A Aparicio; José Castro-Piñero; Magdalena Cuenca-García Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-01-10 Impact factor: 4.241