Wei-Che Lin1, Na-Ning Kan1, Hsiu-Ling Chen1, Sheng-Dean Luo2, Yu-Cheng Tung1, Wei-Chih Chen2, Chen-Kai Chou3, Shun-Yu Chi4, Meng-Hsiang Chen1, Yan-Ye Su2, Kai-Lun Cheng5,6, Jung Hwan Baek7. 1. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 3. Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 4. Departments of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. 5. Department of Medical Imaging, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan. 6. School of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. 7. Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) among groups presenting with different nodule volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 186 patients with BTNs who underwent ultrasound guided RFA treatment. The BTNs were categorized into small (≤10 ml); medium (10-30 ml); and large (>30 ml) according to the initial volume of BTNs before ablation. The RFA procedures were performed using the moving shot technique. The volume reduction ratio (VRR) of each nodule, cosmetic score, symptomatic score, and complications were analyzed at 1, 3, and 6 months after RFA treatment and the three groups compared. RESULTS: At 1-month follow-up, the large nodules group showed significantly greater VRR compared to the other two groups (small, 31.88% ± 37.91; medium, 38.9% ± 19.18; large, 48.7% ± 20.43, p = .03). At 6-month follow-up, there was no significant difference of VRR among the three groups (small, 74.6% ± 20.92; medium, 68.1% ± 17.07; large, 75.0% ± 11.88). The most common presented complication was temporary vocal palsy (6 patients; small, n = 1; medium, n = 1; large, n = 3). Additionally, one skin burn, one hematoma, and one nodular rupture of BTNs occurred after the procedures. The complication rate of the large nodules group was highest among the three groups and showed a considerable difference (8 patients; small, n = 1, 2.1%; medium, n = 2, 4.5%; large, n = 5, 11.4%, p = .061). CONCLUSIONS: RFA was confirmed as effective in patients with large thyroid nodule (>30ml), with therapeutic efficacy similar to patients with smaller thyroid nodules.
PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) among groups presenting with different nodule volumes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated 186 patients with BTNs who underwent ultrasound guided RFA treatment. The BTNs were categorized into small (≤10 ml); medium (10-30 ml); and large (>30 ml) according to the initial volume of BTNs before ablation. The RFA procedures were performed using the moving shot technique. The volume reduction ratio (VRR) of each nodule, cosmetic score, symptomatic score, and complications were analyzed at 1, 3, and 6 months after RFA treatment and the three groups compared. RESULTS: At 1-month follow-up, the large nodules group showed significantly greater VRR compared to the other two groups (small, 31.88% ± 37.91; medium, 38.9% ± 19.18; large, 48.7% ± 20.43, p = .03). At 6-month follow-up, there was no significant difference of VRR among the three groups (small, 74.6% ± 20.92; medium, 68.1% ± 17.07; large, 75.0% ± 11.88). The most common presented complication was temporary vocal palsy (6 patients; small, n = 1; medium, n = 1; large, n = 3). Additionally, one skin burn, one hematoma, and one nodular rupture of BTNs occurred after the procedures. The complication rate of the large nodules group was highest among the three groups and showed a considerable difference (8 patients; small, n = 1, 2.1%; medium, n = 2, 4.5%; large, n = 5, 11.4%, p = .061). CONCLUSIONS: RFA was confirmed as effective in patients with large thyroid nodule (>30ml), with therapeutic efficacy similar to patients with smaller thyroid nodules.