Jooyoung Cho1, Jung Yoon Pyo2, Ailyn Fadriquela1,3, Young Uh1, Jong-Han Lee4. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea. 2. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Environmental Medical Biology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, South Korea. 4. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea. cello425@yonsei.ac.kr.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/ OBJECTIVES: Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) is one of the most important serologic markers for diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to compare the analytical and clinical performances of the second- and third-generation anti-CCP assays. METHODS: Four automated anti-CCP assays were evaluated: Chorus anti-CCP (Diesse Diagnostica), Elecsys anti-CCP (Roche Diagnostics), Atellica® IM anti-CCP IgG (Siemens Healthineers), and Quanta Flash® CCP3 (Inova Diagnostics Inc.). Analytical performance included the precision, linearity, correlation, and concordance rate. For evaluating the clinical performance, 240 patient samples (120 positive and 120 negative samples, determined by the Chorus anti-CCP assay) were used, including those with a diagnosis of RA (n = 132) and non-RA (n = 108). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. RESULTS: All four assays that were evaluated showed good precision and linearity, and their correlation and concordance rates were in acceptable ranges. The area under the curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.888 to 0.914, showing a good diagnostic performance. The sensitivity and specificity of all assays were similar (88.0-97.2%). CONCLUSIONS: All four anti-CCP assays showed good analytical and diagnostic performances for diagnosing RA. After adjusting the cutoff values, these assays are expected to show enhanced sensitivity and specificity. Key Points • Previous studies have described the diagnostic performance of a few immunologic markers in RA diagnosis, but nothing has been proven to be sufficiently good in clinical practice. • All four automated anti-CCP assays showed good analytical and diagnostic performances for diagnosing RA in clinical practice. • After adjusting the cutoff values, these assays are expected to show enhanced sensitivity and specificity. • The present study provides reassuring evidence that any of the studied commercially available anti-CCP tests for detecting rheumatoid arthritis provide similar diagnostic information to institutions that adopt these specific testing systems.
INTRODUCTION/ OBJECTIVES: Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (anti-CCP) is one of the most important serologic markers for diagnosing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to compare the analytical and clinical performances of the second- and third-generation anti-CCP assays. METHODS: Four automated anti-CCP assays were evaluated: Chorus anti-CCP (Diesse Diagnostica), Elecsys anti-CCP (Roche Diagnostics), Atellica® IM anti-CCP IgG (Siemens Healthineers), and Quanta Flash® CCP3 (Inova Diagnostics Inc.). Analytical performance included the precision, linearity, correlation, and concordance rate. For evaluating the clinical performance, 240 patient samples (120 positive and 120 negative samples, determined by the Chorus anti-CCP assay) were used, including those with a diagnosis of RA (n = 132) and non-RA (n = 108). Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. RESULTS: All four assays that were evaluated showed good precision and linearity, and their correlation and concordance rates were in acceptable ranges. The area under the curve (AUC) values ranged from 0.888 to 0.914, showing a good diagnostic performance. The sensitivity and specificity of all assays were similar (88.0-97.2%). CONCLUSIONS: All four anti-CCP assays showed good analytical and diagnostic performances for diagnosing RA. After adjusting the cutoff values, these assays are expected to show enhanced sensitivity and specificity. Key Points • Previous studies have described the diagnostic performance of a few immunologic markers in RA diagnosis, but nothing has been proven to be sufficiently good in clinical practice. • All four automated anti-CCP assays showed good analytical and diagnostic performances for diagnosing RA in clinical practice. • After adjusting the cutoff values, these assays are expected to show enhanced sensitivity and specificity. • The present study provides reassuring evidence that any of the studied commercially available anti-CCP tests for detecting rheumatoid arthritis provide similar diagnostic information to institutions that adopt these specific testing systems.
Authors: Linda Mathsson Alm; Donna L Fountain; Kevin K Cadwell; Ana Maria Madrigal; Gaia Gallo; Maryam Poorafshar Journal: Clin Exp Rheumatol Date: 2017-11-28 Impact factor: 4.473