RATIONALE: FHFs (fibroblast growth factor homologous factors) are key regulators of sodium channel (NaV) inactivation. Mutations in these critical proteins have been implicated in human diseases including Brugada syndrome, idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias, and epileptic encephalopathy. The underlying ionic mechanisms by which reduced Nav availability in Fhf2 knockout (Fhf2KO) mice predisposes to abnormal excitability at the tissue level are not well defined. OBJECTIVE: Using animal models and theoretical multicellular linear strands, we examined how FHF2 orchestrates the interdependency of sodium, calcium, and gap junctional conductances to safeguard cardiac conduction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fhf2KO mice were challenged by reducing calcium conductance (gCaV) using verapamil or by reducing gap junctional conductance (Gj) using carbenoxolone or by backcrossing into a cardiomyocyte-specific Cx43 (connexin 43) heterozygous background. All conditions produced conduction block in Fhf2KO mice, with Fhf2 wild-type (Fhf2WT) mice showing normal impulse propagation. To explore the ionic mechanisms of block in Fhf2KO hearts, multicellular linear strand models incorporating FHF2-deficient Nav inactivation properties were constructed and faithfully recapitulated conduction abnormalities seen in mutant hearts. The mechanisms of conduction block in mutant strands with reduced gCaV or diminished Gj are very different. Enhanced Nav inactivation due to FHF2 deficiency shifts dependence onto calcium current (ICa) to sustain electrotonic driving force, axial current flow, and action potential (AP) generation from cell-to-cell. In the setting of diminished Gj, slower charging time from upstream cells conspires with accelerated Nav inactivation in mutant strands to prevent sufficient downstream cell charging for AP propagation. CONCLUSIONS: FHF2-dependent effects on Nav inactivation ensure adequate sodium current (INa) reserve to safeguard against numerous threats to reliable cardiac impulse propagation.
RATIONALE: FHFs (fibroblast growth factor homologous factors) are key regulators of sodium channel (NaV) inactivation. Mutations in these critical proteins have been implicated in human diseases including Brugada syndrome, idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias, and epileptic encephalopathy. The underlying ionic mechanisms by which reduced Nav availability in Fhf2 knockout (Fhf2KO) mice predisposes to abnormal excitability at the tissue level are not well defined. OBJECTIVE: Using animal models and theoretical multicellular linear strands, we examined how FHF2 orchestrates the interdependency of sodium, calcium, and gap junctional conductances to safeguard cardiac conduction. METHODS AND RESULTS:Fhf2KOmice were challenged by reducing calcium conductance (gCaV) using verapamil or by reducing gap junctional conductance (Gj) using carbenoxolone or by backcrossing into a cardiomyocyte-specific Cx43 (connexin 43) heterozygous background. All conditions produced conduction block in Fhf2KOmice, with Fhf2 wild-type (Fhf2WT) mice showing normal impulse propagation. To explore the ionic mechanisms of block in Fhf2KO hearts, multicellular linear strand models incorporating FHF2-deficient Nav inactivation properties were constructed and faithfully recapitulated conduction abnormalities seen in mutant hearts. The mechanisms of conduction block in mutant strands with reduced gCaV or diminished Gj are very different. Enhanced Nav inactivation due to FHF2 deficiency shifts dependence onto calcium current (ICa) to sustain electrotonic driving force, axial current flow, and action potential (AP) generation from cell-to-cell. In the setting of diminished Gj, slower charging time from upstream cells conspires with accelerated Nav inactivation in mutant strands to prevent sufficient downstream cell charging for AP propagation. CONCLUSIONS:FHF2-dependent effects on Nav inactivation ensure adequate sodium current (INa) reserve to safeguard against numerous threats to reliable cardiac impulse propagation.
Authors: Aleksandra Siekierska; Mala Isrie; Yue Liu; Chloë Scheldeman; Niels Vanthillo; Lieven Lagae; Peter A M de Witte; Hilde Van Esch; Mitchell Goldfarb; Gunnar M Buyse Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Jessica A Hennessey; Cherisse A Marcou; Chuan Wang; Eric Q Wei; Chaojian Wang; David J Tester; Margherita Torchio; Federica Dagradi; Lia Crotti; Peter J Schwartz; Michael J Ackerman; Geoffrey S Pitt Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2013-10-04 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Akshay Shekhar; Orlando Aristizabal; Glenn I Fishman; Colin K L Phoon; Jeffrey A Ketterling Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Nourdine Chakouri; Sharen Rivas; Daniel Roybal; Lin Yang; Johanna Diaz; Allen Hsu; Ryan Mahling; Bi-Xing Chen; Josiah O Owoyemi; Deborah DiSilvestre; Dario Sirabella; Barbara Corneo; Gordon F Tomaselli; Ivy E Dick; Steven O Marx; Manu Ben-Johny Journal: Nat Cardiovasc Res Date: 2022-05-16
Authors: Naoko Yamaguchi; Junhua Xiao; Deven Narke; Devin Shaheen; Xianming Lin; Erik Offerman; Alireza Khodadadi-Jamayran; Akshay Shekhar; Alex Choy; Sojin Y Wass; David R Van Wagoner; Mina K Chung; David S Park Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 29.690