Alis Guberinic1, Veerle Souverein1, Ruben Volkers1, Anne-Marie van Cappellen van Walsum1,2, Kris Cp Vissers3, Jeroen Mollink1,2,4, Dylan Jha Henssen1,2. 1. Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Anatomy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 2. Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 4. Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Recently, an additional trigeminothalamic tract - the dorsal trigeminothalamic tract - has been described in human brainstems by our group next to the known ventral trigeminothalamic tract. As various elements of the trigeminal system are known to be organised in a somatotopic fashion, the question arose whether the fibres within the trigeminal root show specific distributions patterns in their contribution to the ventral trigeminothalamic tract and dorsal trigeminothalamic tract specifically. METHODS: This study investigated the arrangement of the fibres in the trigeminal root by combining various imaging methods in the pons of 11 post-mortem specimens. The pons were investigated by polarised light imaging (PLI) (n = 4; to quantify fibre orientation; 100 µm interslice distance), histochemical staining methods (n = 3; to visualise the internal myeloarchitecture; 60 µm) and ultra-high field, post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n = 4; for tractography; 500 µm interslice distance). RESULTS: This study shows that the fibres, from the point where the trigeminal root enters the brainstem, are distinctly arranged by their contribution to the ventral trigeminothalamic tract and dorsal trigeminothalamic tract. This finding is supported by both post-mortem, ultra-high dMRI and different light microscopy techniques. CONCLUSION: The data from this study suggest that the fibres in the superior half of the root contribute mainly to the ventral trigeminothalamic tract, whereas the fibres in the inferior half mainly contribute to the dorsal trigeminothalamic tract. Such a somatotopic organisation could possibly create new insights into the anatomical origin of trigeminal neuralgia and the clinical relevance of this somatotopic organisation should therefore be further explored.
INTRODUCTION: Recently, an additional trigeminothalamic tract - the dorsal trigeminothalamic tract - has been described in human brainstems by our group next to the known ventral trigeminothalamic tract. As various elements of the trigeminal system are known to be organised in a somatotopic fashion, the question arose whether the fibres within the trigeminal root show specific distributions patterns in their contribution to the ventral trigeminothalamic tract and dorsal trigeminothalamic tract specifically. METHODS: This study investigated the arrangement of the fibres in the trigeminal root by combining various imaging methods in the pons of 11 post-mortem specimens. The pons were investigated by polarised light imaging (PLI) (n = 4; to quantify fibre orientation; 100 µm interslice distance), histochemical staining methods (n = 3; to visualise the internal myeloarchitecture; 60 µm) and ultra-high field, post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (n = 4; for tractography; 500 µm interslice distance). RESULTS: This study shows that the fibres, from the point where the trigeminal root enters the brainstem, are distinctly arranged by their contribution to the ventral trigeminothalamic tract and dorsal trigeminothalamic tract. This finding is supported by both post-mortem, ultra-high dMRI and different light microscopy techniques. CONCLUSION: The data from this study suggest that the fibres in the superior half of the root contribute mainly to the ventral trigeminothalamic tract, whereas the fibres in the inferior half mainly contribute to the dorsal trigeminothalamic tract. Such a somatotopic organisation could possibly create new insights into the anatomical origin of trigeminal neuralgia and the clinical relevance of this somatotopic organisation should therefore be further explored.
The trigeminal nerve (TN) is composed of three main sensory divisions (ophthalmic,
maxillary and mandibular) and one motor component. Deficits of the trigeminal system
are the cause of numerous acute and chronic neuropathic orofacial pain conditions,
including trigeminal neuralgia and trigeminal neuropathic pain conditions (1). Previous research
reported on a correlation between the location of vascular compression of the
trigeminal nerve and the origin of facial pain (e.g. superomedial compression gave
pain in the V1 region) (2). These findings are also supported by the work of Sindou et al. (3), which showed a
relationship between the location of conflict of the retro-Gasserian trigeminal root
and the distribution of pain. Such functional segregation of the fibres in the
trigeminal root has been proposed before (4), although it is regarded as rather
controversial (5,6). In general, a gross
somatotopic representation of the three major peripheral trigeminal divisions is
reasonably well maintained within the trigeminal root, although entwinement of
fibres occur as fibres progress from distal to proximal to the brainstem (7). The somatotopy is,
however, not exclusive to the trigeminal root and is also maintained in the
trigeminal ganglion from its embryological development (8). In the trigeminal ganglion, the afferent
fibres of the ophthalmic division are located anteromedially, the mandibular
posterolaterally and the maxillary in between (8). The same fundamental spatial
organisation is also seen in foetuses of soft-shelled turtles and mouse foetuses
(9). Others, on the
other hand, specify that somatotopic localisation does not appear to be maintained
(10). Nevertheless,
improved knowledge on this matter can progress understanding of clinical symptoms,
which will aid in diagnostic imaging and more effective treatment (11). Although many studies
have contributed to our knowledge about the somatotopy of the peripheral trigeminal
nerve, little is known about this segregation within the brainstem.We therefore investigated the trigeminal root entry zone and pons, to map the
arrangement of the trigeminal nerve within the brainstem of four post-mortem samples
using polarised light imaging microscopy (PLI). PLI microscopy is capable of
quantifying the orientation of fibres and is based on the birefringence of the
myelin sheath in histological brain sections (12,13). Findings of the PLI microscopy were
thereafter reconstructed by using various advanced neuroimaging techniques,
including tractography at 11.7 Tesla (diffusion-weighted) post-mortem magnetic
resonance imaging ((d)MRI). This gave a three-dimensional presentation of the
trigeminal nerve, further specifying its anatomical and somatotopic basis.
Methods and materials
Ethics statement
The brainstems studied herein were part of the anatomical collection of the
Department of Anatomy of the Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the
Netherlands. All body donors signed a written informed consent during their
lifetime, permitting the use of their body and parts for scientific research and
educational purposes. All protocols concerning the acquisition of data and
tissue processing were approved by the CMO (Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek)
region Arnhem-Nijmegen, the Netherlands, and are legislated under Dutch national
law (BWBR0005009).
Specimens
Eleven brains that showed no signs of neurological diseases were included in this
study. The brains were extracted from the skull and immersion-fixed using 7.7%
formaldehyde at a short post-mortem interval (<48 h). The brains of specimens
with a post-mortem interval under 24 h were included for MR scanning, as the
post-mortem reduction of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional
anisotropy (FA) is limited in such specimens (14,15). See Table 1 for information on the
specimens used in this study.
Table 1.
Overview of the characteristics of the specimens used in this study.
Specimen
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Imaging modality
Post-mortem MRI
Post-mortem MRI
Post-mortem MRI
Post-mortem MRI
PLI
PLI
PLI
PLI
HW-staining
KB- staining
NS- staining
Age (years)
76
77
62
72
76
63
79
71
87
83
62
Gender
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
Female
Male
Female
Female
Male
Male
Cause of death
Euthanasia
Pneumonia
Colon cancer
Colon cancer
Liver carcinoma
Euthanasia
Congestive heart failure
Cardiac arrest
Pneumonia
Prostate carcinoma
Lung carcinoma
Time between death and fixation
23 hours
17 hours
12 hours
11 hours
23 hours
18 hours
21 hours
15 hours
×
×
×
HW: Heidenhain-Woelke-staining; KB: Klüver-Barrera staining; MRI:
magnetic resonance imaging; NS: Nauta silver staining; × = Not
documented; PLI: polarized light imaging.
Overview of the characteristics of the specimens used in this study.HW: Heidenhain-Woelke-staining; KB: Klüver-Barrera staining; MRI:
magnetic resonance imaging; NS: Nauta silver staining; × = Not
documented; PLI: polarized light imaging.
Preparation of tissues and magnetic resonance image acquisition
Prior to MR scanning, the four included specimens were soaked in a
phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS 0.1M, pH 7.4) for 7 days in order to
reverse the decrease of the T2 relaxation rate of tissue induced by formaldehyde
fixation (16). Next,
the pontes were placed for 24 hours in Fomblin® (Solvay Solexis
Inc,
https://www.solvay.com/en/brands/fomblin-pfpe-lubricants), a
susceptibility-matched, hydrogen-free liquid. Finally, each pons was placed in a
100 ml syringe filled with Fomblin® for MR scanning.All experiments were performed using an 11.7 T Bruker BioSpec Avance III
preclinical MR system (Bruker BioSpin, Ettlingen, Germany) running Paravision
6.0.1, equipped with an actively shielded gradient set of 600 mT/m (slew rate
4570 T/m/sec). A circular polarised resonator was used for signal transmission
and an actively decoupled birdcage coil was used for receiving (Bruker BioSpin,
Ettlingen, Germany). All scanning was performed at 20 degrees Celsius. Further
detailed information concerning the applied MR protocol is provided in Table 2 and has been
described extensively before by our group (17).
Table 2.
Characteristics of the applied 11.7T MRI protocol.
Anatomical imaging with True Fast Imaging with
SteadyState Free Precession (TRUFI)
TE
7.0 ms
TR
3.3 ms
α
20 degrees
Voxel size
0.25 mm isotropic
Diffusion weighted spin echo planar imaging
TE
30.7 ms
TR
13.8 ms
α
30 degrees
Δ
12.5 ms
δ
4.0 ms
Number of directions
256 gradientdirections
Number of averages
2.0
Number of q = 10 mm−1 (b = 0 equivalent)
6.0
Voxel size
0.50 mm isotropic
b-value (equivalent)
≈ 4000 s/mm2
TE: echo time, representing the time from the centre of
the radiofrequency pulse to the centre of the echo; TR:
repetition time, representing the length of the time between the
consecutive points on a repeating series of pulses and echoes; α:
flip angle, amount of rotation the magnetisation experiences during
the application of the radiofrequency pulse; Δ: time between two
consecutive pulses; δ: duration of the pulse; b-value: measures the
degree of the applied diffusion weighting.
Characteristics of the applied 11.7T MRI protocol.TE: echo time, representing the time from the centre of
the radiofrequency pulse to the centre of the echo; TR:
repetition time, representing the length of the time between the
consecutive points on a repeating series of pulses and echoes; α:
flip angle, amount of rotation the magnetisation experiences during
the application of the radiofrequency pulse; Δ: time between two
consecutive pulses; δ: duration of the pulse; b-value: measures the
degree of the applied diffusion weighting.
Probabilistic tractography
Processing of MR data was performed with the software package FSL (18). To correct for
eddy current artifacts and displacement between the different diffusion images,
an eddy current correction was applied (19). The bedpostX algorithm was used to
model multiple fibre orientations (n = 3) at each voxel (20). To delineate the different tracts
sprouting from the trigeminal root in our specimens, probabilistic tractography
was performed using the Probtrackx2 algorithm (20,21). A manually defined seed
mask (i.e. the starting point of tractography) was placed in the trigeminal root
in the mean diffusivity (MD) maps by two neuroanatomists separately (DH and
AMvCvW). The placed inferior and superior seeding masks were correlated with the
PLI and histological sections based on fixed anatomical landmarks. Seed masks
were placed on both sides of each trigeminal root. Streamlines were drawn from
each seed-voxel (n = 50000 streamlines/voxel). A waypoint mask was placed
manually at the level of the Pr5 in order to prevent the inclusion of other
large dominating white tracts that course through the pons (22). Final
probabilistic tractography results were converted into region of interest (ROI)
masks. ROI-masks were converted into colour-coded maps using the vector map,
which shows the principal diffusion tensor direction (V1 map).
Histological tissue processing and polarised light imaging
Histological sectioning of four of the remaining pontes for PLI microscopy was
performed in order to optimally visualise all trigeminal fibres sprouting from
the trigeminal root coursing in the ventral and dorsal trigeminothalamic tract
(VTTH and DTTH, respectively). First, the pontes were bisected midsagitally in
order to fit within the maximum field of view of the PLI microscope. Prior to
histological sectioning, all pontes were immersed in a 30% sucrose-solution in
0.1M PBS at 4°C for 7 days as cryoprotection to prevent crystallisation during
the freezing process prior to sectioning. The specimens were serially sectioned
with an HM 450 Sliding Microtome (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA,
USA) at a thickness of 100 microns. All sections were mounted on glass and
cover-slipped using the mounting medium polyvinylpyrrolidone, creating an
interslice distance of 100 µm.A Zeiss Axio Imager A2 microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy LLC, USA) was upgraded
with a stationary polariser, a quarter wave plate and a rotating polarise and
thereafter used as polarisation microscope. This setup has been described
extensively before (17,23)
and has been shown to yield a spatial resolution of 4 μm/pixel. PLI
post-processing was carried out by in-house written software in MATLAB
(MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA, 1994–2017).
Histological tissue processing and histochemical staining
Three brainstems were embedded in paraffin prior to sectioning for histochemical
myelin staining. The first stain involved Klüver-Barrera staining, which is a
commonly used stain to observe myelin under light microscopy (24). The second stain
involved Nauta silver stain, which can be used to visualise neurofilaments. This
stain can be used to observe neurodegenerative changes of white matter, but can
also be used to study myelinated and non-myelinated fibres (25,26). The third stain
comprised modified Heidenhain-Woelke stain (data previously published by Mollink
et al. (27)), which
contributes to optimal visualisation and differentiation between degrees of
myelination within white matter fibre bundles (28,29). Sectioning was performed with an
LKB 2260 Macrotome (LKB Instruments, Bromma, Sweden). The knife was positioned
at a 15 degree angle with respect to the sectioning plane. The tissue was
serially sectioned at 4 µm thickness and every 15th slice was kept for staining,
resulting in an interplane resolution of 60 µm. Each successful section was
mounted and dried overnight in a stove at 37°C. Macrophotographs of the stained
sections (referred to hereafter as the histological slices) were taken with a
Canon EOS 550D camera using a Canon 100 mm autofocus lens to digitise the
data.Anatomical findings were reported in agreement with the standardised
Paxinos-Watson abbreviation system, which has been adopted by the majority of
the available anatomical atlases, including the atlases of Paxinos and Huang
(30) and Mai
et al. (31).
Results
Polarised light images
On the PL images, the trigeminal root can be observed to enter the ventrolateral
aspect of each of the collected pontes. Within the pons, the trigeminal tract
(TT) can be observed to penetrate the fibres of the middle cerebellar peduncle
(MCP) as it courses towards the fourth ventricle. The superior part of the TT
fibres can be seen to bend off in the direction of the medial lemniscus (ML).
These superior fibres course towards the raphe of the brainstem while partially
entwining with the fibers of the ML and are partially bounded ventrally by the
ML. These fibres represent the VTTH. The fibres that make up the DTTH sprout
from the TT as well and can be seen to course in between the MCP fibres in the
direction of the dorsal aspect of the pons. These fibres bend downwards, as they
are covered by MCP fibres cranially and continue their course towards the floor
of the fourth ventricle. This dorsal division, recognised as the DTTH, runs
towards the tegmentum and the fourth ventricle. At the dorsal aspect, after
exiting the MCP, the DTTH shows the sprouting of a dispersing tract that runs in
the direction of the cerebellum, bounded laterally by the superior cerebellar
peduncle. Figure 1
provides a general overview of the anatomy of the pons at the level of
trigeminal root entry zone as appreciated on MR and PL images. In Figure 2, consecutive PL
images (from A to E) are shown from rostral to caudal. On this figure, it can be
appreciated that the trigeminal fibres that course in the upper half of the
trigeminal root and TT make up the VTTH. Furthermore, the fibres that contribute
to the DTTH are found in the lower half of the trigeminal root and TT in this
figure. Figures 2 and
3 depict PL images
of consecutive slices of two of the included specimens and the contributions of
the trigeminal root to the VTTH and DTTH, respectively.
Figure 1.
Overview of the anatomy of the pons at the level of the trigeminal entry
zone. Exemplary images of MRI and PLI modalities. Anatomical orientation
depicted by the anatomical anemone in the above-left corner. The fibre
orientation is defined by the colour sphere on the right-hand side of
the image. (a) A transverse T2* MR image of the human pons at the level
of the entrance of the trigeminal entry zone. (b) Schematic drawing of
the same MR image with annotations. (c) PL images of two sides of a
bisected brainstem at the level of the trigeminal entry zone.
Consecutive polarised light imaging slices showing the fibre distribution
patterns of the trigeminal root. Anatomical orientation depicted by the
anatomical anemone in the above-left corner. The fibre orientation is
defined by the colour sphere in the above-right corner. Figures 2(a)–(e)
show consecutive PLI images of the trigeminal nerve. Figures 2(a)–(e)
show consecutive PLI images of the trigeminal nerve. (a) is the most
rostral part of the trigeminal nerve, (e) represents the most caudal
part of the trigeminal nerve. In (a), (b) and (c) one can appreciate the
branch coursing to the left, towards the pontine fibres. This branch
represents the VTTH. The other branch, which has its trajectory towards
the dorsal side of the pons, represents the DTTH.
Exemplary images of the trigeminal tracts, the ventral and dorsal
trigeminothalamic tracts. Anatomical orientation depicted by the
anatomical anemone in the above-left corner. The fibre orientation is
defined by the colour sphere on the right-hand side of the image. (a),
(b), (c) and (d) represent the four included specimens. For each
specimen, three consecutive PLI images of the trigeminal nerve are
shown. The four figures on the left side all represent the most rostral
part of the trigeminal nerve, while the figures on the right side
represent the most caudal part of the trigeminal nerve. The figures in
between represent the middle part. The VTTH branch can be seen on the
rostral part of the figures, while the DTTH can be seen on the caudal
part of the figures.
Overview of the anatomy of the pons at the level of the trigeminal entry
zone. Exemplary images of MRI and PLI modalities. Anatomical orientation
depicted by the anatomical anemone in the above-left corner. The fibre
orientation is defined by the colour sphere on the right-hand side of
the image. (a) A transverse T2* MR image of the human pons at the level
of the entrance of the trigeminal entry zone. (b) Schematic drawing of
the same MR image with annotations. (c) PL images of two sides of a
bisected brainstem at the level of the trigeminal entry zone.dtth: dorsal trigeminothalamic tract;
ml: medial lemniscus; pt:
pyramidal tract; tn: trigeminal nerve;
tt: trigeminal tract; vtth:
ventral trigeminothalamic tract.Consecutive polarised light imaging slices showing the fibre distribution
patterns of the trigeminal root. Anatomical orientation depicted by the
anatomical anemone in the above-left corner. The fibre orientation is
defined by the colour sphere in the above-right corner. Figures 2(a)–(e)
show consecutive PLI images of the trigeminal nerve. Figures 2(a)–(e)
show consecutive PLI images of the trigeminal nerve. (a) is the most
rostral part of the trigeminal nerve, (e) represents the most caudal
part of the trigeminal nerve. In (a), (b) and (c) one can appreciate the
branch coursing to the left, towards the pontine fibres. This branch
represents the VTTH. The other branch, which has its trajectory towards
the dorsal side of the pons, represents the DTTH.dtth: dorsal trigeminothalamic tract;
tt: trigeminal tract; vtth:
ventral trigeminothalamic tract.Exemplary images of the trigeminal tracts, the ventral and dorsal
trigeminothalamic tracts. Anatomical orientation depicted by the
anatomical anemone in the above-left corner. The fibre orientation is
defined by the colour sphere on the right-hand side of the image. (a),
(b), (c) and (d) represent the four included specimens. For each
specimen, three consecutive PLI images of the trigeminal nerve are
shown. The four figures on the left side all represent the most rostral
part of the trigeminal nerve, while the figures on the right side
represent the most caudal part of the trigeminal nerve. The figures in
between represent the middle part. The VTTH branch can be seen on the
rostral part of the figures, while the DTTH can be seen on the caudal
part of the figures.dtth: dorsal trigeminothalamic tract;
tt: trigeminal tract; vtth:
ventral trigeminothalamic tract.
Histochemical staining patterns
The consecutive Heidenhain-Woelke stained sections, the Klüver-Barrera stained
sections and the Nauta stained sections (Figure 4) show a similar distribution
pattern of the trigeminal root fibres. The upper half of the trigeminal root
contributes primarily to the VTTH, whereas the lower half of the fibres course
to join the DTTH.
Tractography results confirm the results of the PLI microscopy results. When a
seeding mask was placed in the superior half of the trigeminal root, tracts can
be seen to course towards the location of the Pr5 within the MCP. From that
point, superiorly orientated voxels that lie adjacent to the ML can be
appreciated as tracts crossing over to the other side of the brainstem (VTTH)
(Figure 5). Tracts
seeded from the inferior seeding mask were shown to transverse the MCP. Within
the MCP, these tracts bend in a medial direction towards the centre of the
brainstem. After emerging from the MCP, the fibres change from a dorsoventral
orientation to a craniocaudal orientation. This craniocaudal tract runs in the
posterior aspect of the pons near the superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP). These
fibres predominantly course on the ipsilateral side of the brainstem (DTTH)
(Figure 6).
Figure 5.
Tractography results when the seeding mask is placed in the superior part
of the trigeminal root. Anatomical orientation depicted by the
anatomical anemone in the above-left corner. A transection of the
trigeminal root showing the definition of the superior part of the
trigeminal root. Tractography results of dMRI overlain on 11.7 T mean
diffusivity maps. The RGB (red-green-blue) colour cross indicates the
principal eigenvector orientations, red = left-right,
green = anterior-posterior, blue = cranial-caudal. Tractography results
from the superior half TT can be observed to contribute to the VTTH.
*Transverse sections (white line shows the level of transection).
**Coronal sections (white line shows the level of transection).
Tractography results when the seeding mask is placed in the inferior part
of the trigeminal root. Anatomical orientation depicted by the
anatomical anemone in the above-left corner. A transection of the
trigeminal root showing the definition of the inferior part of the
trigeminal root. Tractography results of dMRI overlain on 11.7 T mean
diffusivity maps. The RGB (red-green-blue) colour cross indicates the
principal eigenvector orientations, red = left-right,
green = anterior-posterior, blue = cranial-caudal. Tractography results
from the inferior half TT can be observed to contribute to the DTTH.
*Transverse sections (white line shows the level of transection).
**Coronal sections (white line shows the level of transection).
Tractography results when the seeding mask is placed in the superior part
of the trigeminal root. Anatomical orientation depicted by the
anatomical anemone in the above-left corner. A transection of the
trigeminal root showing the definition of the superior part of the
trigeminal root. Tractography results of dMRI overlain on 11.7 T mean
diffusivity maps. The RGB (red-green-blue) colour cross indicates the
principal eigenvector orientations, red = left-right,
green = anterior-posterior, blue = cranial-caudal. Tractography results
from the superior half TT can be observed to contribute to the VTTH.*Transverse sections (white line shows the level of transection).**Coronal sections (white line shows the level of transection).tt: trigeminal tract; vtth: ventral
trigeminothalamic tract.Tractography results when the seeding mask is placed in the inferior part
of the trigeminal root. Anatomical orientation depicted by the
anatomical anemone in the above-left corner. A transection of the
trigeminal root showing the definition of the inferior part of the
trigeminal root. Tractography results of dMRI overlain on 11.7 T mean
diffusivity maps. The RGB (red-green-blue) colour cross indicates the
principal eigenvector orientations, red = left-right,
green = anterior-posterior, blue = cranial-caudal. Tractography results
from the inferior half TT can be observed to contribute to the DTTH.*Transverse sections (white line shows the level of transection).**Coronal sections (white line shows the level of transection).dtth: dorsal trigeminothalamic tract;
tt: trigeminal tract.
Discussion
This study shows that the fibres, from the point where the trigeminal root enters the
brainstem, are distinctly arranged by their contribution to the VTTH and DTTH. This
finding is supported by both post-mortem, ultra-high dMRI and different light
microscopy techniques.Even though these results show that the superior part of the trigeminal nerve
contributes to the VTTH and the inferior part to the DTTH, the controversy regarding
whether the somatotopic arrangement of the trigeminal nerve is maintained within the
brainstem is not fully answered by these results. The data of the present study do
not provide insight into the somatotopic arrangement of the main divisions of the
trigeminal nerve (V1, V2 and V3) within the pons. However, Lipari et al. (8) proposed that the spinal
nucleus (SN) receives fibres of all three divisions and that the somatotopic
arrangement is preserved within the nucleus with the face represented in upside-down
fashion. It can therefore be hypothesised that the somatotopic arrangement is
preserved in case either the VTTH or the DTTH are responsible for afferent fibres to
the spinal nucleus. However, further research will be needed to conclude this.
Furthermore, the data show that the bifurcation of the VTTH and DTTH approximates
the location of the principal sensory nucleus (PSN). The provided data therefore
show the trajectory of the trigeminal tract from the trigeminal root entry zone to
the PSN. The course of the two fibre tracts (VTTH and DTTH) originating from the
PSN, however, is rather obscure. The classic interpretation is that the trigeminal
tract synapses in the PSN and from there projections towards the thalamic nuclei,
the trigeminal spinal nucleus and the mesencephalic nucleus arise. However, the
classical subdivision that the nociceptive trigeminal input is conveyed by the VTTH
and that tactile input is relayed via the DTTH seems to be more complex (32–34). Various authors reported that the
fibres that sprout from the dorsal aspect of the PSN (i.e. the DTTH) course towards
the ipsilateral posterior ventral nucleus of the thalamus (32–34). This could therefore indicate that the
VTTH is responsible for the contralateral and the DTTH for the ipsilateral sensory
input to the thalamus. Nevertheless, it remains difficult to assign a functionality
to the VTTH and DTTH based on the anatomical results provided here. Another
interesting insight is whether these results can improve future therapeutic
interventions for trigeminal neuralgia, which will become more target specific.
Sindou et al. (2,3), showed that patients
suffering from pain in the ophthalmic division are more likely to have a conflict on
the superomedial part of the trigeminal root entry zone, which would indicate a
somatotopic arrangement of the trigeminal root entry zone. Selective destruction of
fibres in the trigeminal root has been proposed by others as a method to relieve
pain with only minimal sensory loss (32–35). Although our results do confirm a
superior and inferior arrangement, further research is needed to confirm that
patients who are undergoing selective destruction of the trigeminal root have fewer
consequences than those undergoing non-selective destruction.
Strengths and limitations
This paper used a multimodality approach to investigate the internal architecture
of the trigeminal root and found in all these imaging methods a distribution
pattern of the trigeminal fibres that form the origins of the trigeminothalamic
connections. Another strength is that, by combining 11.7 T structural and
diffusion MRI with PLI microscopy, the imaging resolution from this study
bridged from 0.1 mm to 5.0 mm (36). Furthermore, the present study
concerns the use of PLI validation (37) and direct implementation of the
findings by use of tractography, although this technique is also known to
produce false-positive, plausible-looking bundles of white matter anatomy (38). The absence of
other imaging methods, including tracer studies, can be regarded as a relative
limitation of the present study. Nonetheless, Seehaus et al. showed that tracing
studies can be performed in a post-mortem setting on adult human neural tissue
over short trajectories (with a maximal length of 13 mm), which could possibly
be long enough to observe the distribution of fibres of the trigeminal root in
the human brainstem (39). Finally, the precise clinical relevance of this data cannot be
determined by the current study protocol and the applied methodologies; for
example, due to the fact that the current data provide no insights into the
somatotopic arrangement of the trigeminal main divisions in the trigeminal nerve
within the pons. Further anatomical research and improved clinical phenotyping
of patients suffering from trigeminal neuralgia, combined with new
interpretation of radiological data, must be carried out to conclude whether a
somatotopic arrangement of the trigeminal nerve is preserved within the pons.
Although the sample size was relatively limited, the included specimens showed
consistent anatomic features, which decreased the chances of having observed
anatomical variants.
Conclusion
The present study showed that the origins of the VTTH and DTTH can be traced back to
specific fibre bundles within the trigeminal root, indicating a distinct
organisation of the trigeminal root. The superior half of the trigeminal root was
found to contribute mostly to the VTTH, whereas the inferior half of the trigeminal
root contains the fibres that constitute the DTTH. Future clinical implications must
be further elucidated.
Article highlights
The superior half of the trigeminal root was found to contribute mostly
to the ventral trigeminothalamic tract (VTTH);The inferior half of the trigeminal root contains the fibres that
constitute the dorsal trigeminothalamic tract (DTTH).
Data
All data can be acquired upon reasonable request by contacting the corresponding
author.
Authors: T E J Behrens; M W Woolrich; M Jenkinson; H Johansen-Berg; R G Nunes; S Clare; P M Matthews; J M Brady; S M Smith Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Nathalie Holl; Vincent Noblet; Sébastian Rodrigo; Jean L Dietemann; Mustapha Ben Mekhbi; Pierre Kehrli; Renée Wolfram-Gabel; Marc Braun; Stéphane Kremer Journal: Surg Radiol Anat Date: 2011-05-01 Impact factor: 1.246