Literature DB >> 3296238

Lumbar laminectomy for herniated disc: a prospective controlled comparison with internal fixation fusion.

A H White, P von Rogov, J Zucherman, D Heiden.   

Abstract

This is a controlled prospective study on a matched set of patients with herniated lumbar discs. Both groups received the same bilateral lumbar laminectomy and disc excision by the same surgeon. One group had the addition of an intertransverse fusion with internal fixation. Both groups were studied by an independent examiner at an average of 3 years postoperatively for success rate as determined by activity level, medication, subjective and objective evaluation. Both groups had similar age, sex, and occupational characteristics. No patient had prior surgical treatment or chemonucleolysis. Patients with associated lumbar spine problems such as stenosis, instability, or spondylolisthesis were excluded. Each patient had a positive clinical picture for a herniated lumbar disc, as well as a positive myelogram, venogram or computerized tomographic scan. Most had positive electromyograms. All patients received at least 3 months of conservative care. The 38 patients with fusion had a significantly longer mean time to return to work after surgery versus the 31 patients without fusion. Although the general success rate of both groups was 87%, the best results were in the nonfusion group. A total of 29% of nonfusions had excellent results whereas only 11% of the fusion group had excellent results. The conclusion is that fusions are not necessary and give less excellent results in simple laminectomy cases for herniated lumbar disc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3296238     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198704000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  10 in total

Review 1.  Role of lumbar interspinous distraction on the neural elements.

Authors:  Alex Alfieri; Roberto Gazzeri; Julian Prell; Christian Scheller; Jens Rachinger; Christian Strauss; Andreas Schwarz
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Clinical studies in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Beate Hanson; Branko Kopjar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Clinical approaches to low back pain. Part 2. Management, sequelae, and disability and compensation.

Authors:  R W Teasell; K White
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  The Graf stabilisation system: early results in 50 patients.

Authors:  M P Grevitt; A D Gardner; J Spilsbury; I M Shackleford; R Baskerville; L M Pursell; A Hassaan; R C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  [Course of conservatively treatment herniation of the lumbar disc. Radicular deficits and computed tomography findings.].

Authors:  R Fischer; M Schumacher; U Thoden
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.107

6.  Surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Matteo Palmisani; Eugen Dema; Stefano Cervellati
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Decompression with fusion is not in superiority to decompression alone in lumbar stenosis based on randomized controlled trials: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Jinyu Wang; Yan Liang; Zhenqi Zhu; Kaifeng Wang; Yalong Qian; Haiying Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  The memory metal minimal access cage: a new concept in lumbar interbody fusion-a prospective, noncomparative study to evaluate the safety and performance.

Authors:  D Kok; R D Donk; F H Wapstra; A G Veldhuizen
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2012-04-08

Review 9.  Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Roberto Gazzeri; Marcelo Galarza; Alex Alfieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Decompression alone versus fusion and Coflex in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yunpeng Fan; Liulong Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.