| Literature DB >> 32962194 |
Weiteng Shen1, Qiuguang Hu1,2, Xuan Yu1, Bernadette Tadala Imwa1.
Abstract
China has formulated many policies and regulations for the management of the coastal water environment. However, the coastal water environment has not been significantly improved. The perspective of local government competition can provide an explanation for this phenomenon. This study uses panel data comprising 48 coastal cities in China from 2004 to 2017 as bases explore the impact of coastal local government competition on coastal water pollution by using a two-way fixed-effects panel regression model. Results show that coastal local government competition increased coastal water pollution. However, a sub-sample estimation based on fiscal pressure shows that coastal local government competition only increased the coastal water pollution of the high fiscal pressure group, and its impact on the coastal water pollution in the low financial pressure group failed to pass the significance test. In addition, sub-sample estimation based on different periods shows that the impact of coastal local government competition on coastal water pollution was not significant before 2008, but showed a significant positive impact after 2008.Entities:
Keywords: coastal water pollution; financial pressure; fixed-effects panel regression models; local government competition
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32962194 PMCID: PMC7559585 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186862
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Average concentration of inorganic nitrogen in 11 coastal provinces.
Summary statistics.
| Variables | Variable Definition | Obs | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNORGANICN | Inorganic nitrogen concentration (mg/L) | 655 | 0.283 | 0.301 | 0.003 | 2.271 |
| LNPERFDI | Logarithm of per capita actual utilization of FDI (yuan/person) | 655 | 6.559 | 1.432 | 1.229 | 9.774 |
| LNPERGDP | Logarithm of GDP per capita (Thousands of yuan) | 655 | 10.396 | 0.639 | 8.500 | 12.784 |
| LNPERGDP2 | the quadratic term of the logarithm of GDP per capita | 655 | 108.486 | 13.260 | 72.250 | 163.418 |
| LNDENSITY | Logarithm of population density (person/km2) | 655 | 7.637 | 0.712 | 5.557 | 9.908 |
| LNPATGRANTED | Logarithm of total number of patent grants (piece) | 655 | 7.215 | 1.820 | 1.609 | 11.449 |
| URBANIZATION | Urbanization (%) | 655 | 48.155 | 20.782 | 10.142 | 100.000 |
| SECONDGDP | Proportion of secondary industry to GDP (%) | 655 | 48.881 | 9.470 | 18.140 | 82.280 |
| LNMGDP | Logarithm of gross ocean product (100 million yuan) | 655 | 7.959 | 1.240 | 2.226 | 9.809 |
Estimation results of the entire sample.
| Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNORGANICN | LNORGANICN | LNORGANICN | LNORGANICN | |
| LNPERFDI | 0.061 *** | 0.020 ** | 0.050 *** | 0.023 ** |
| (0.009) | (0.010) | (0.009) | (0.010) | |
| LNPERGDP | −0.774 *** | −1.121 *** | ||
| (0.276) | (0.343) | |||
| LNPERGDP2 | 0.039 *** | 0.052 *** | ||
| (0.013) | (0.016) | |||
| LNDENSITY | 0.061 *** | 0.080 *** | ||
| (0.015) | (0.015) | |||
| LNPATGRANTED | 0.060 *** | 0.004 | ||
| (0.008) | (0.008) | |||
| URBANIZATION | −0.001 | 0.003 *** | ||
| (0.001) | (0.001) | |||
| SECONDGDP | 0.000 | 0.003 ** | ||
| (0.001) | (0.002) | |||
| LNMGDP | −0.026 ** | 0.008 | ||
| (0.012) | (0.033) | |||
| Constant | −0.119 ** | 3.267 ** | −0.304 *** | 4.872 *** |
| (0.049) | (1.397) | (0.062) | (1.762) | |
| Province effect | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| Year effect | No | No | Yes | Yes |
| N | 655 | 653 | 655 | 653 |
| Adj R2 | 0.084 | 0.204 | 0.432 | 0.483 |
Note: Figures in () are robust standard error; ***, and ** indicate significance at the 1%, and 5% levels, respectively.
Estimation results of replacing proxy variables.
| Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COD | LNORGANICN | LNORGANICN | LNORGANICN | |
| LNPERFDI | 0.108 *** | |||
| (0.038) | ||||
| PROFDI | 0.013 ** | |||
| (0.006) | ||||
| DUSAGE | 0.031 ** | |||
| (0.015) | ||||
| DUMAGE | 0.029 * | |||
| (0.015) | ||||
| LNPERGDP | −2.155 ** | −1.061 *** | −1.066 *** | −1.097 *** |
| (0.849) | (0.310) | (0.328) | (0.317) | |
| LNPERGDP2 | 0.092 ** | 0.052 *** | 0.051 *** | 0.053 *** |
| (0.038) | (0.015) | (0.016) | (0.015) | |
| LNDENSITY | 0.203 *** | 0.083 *** | 0.082 *** | 0.078 *** |
| (0.048) | (0.015) | (0.016) | (0.016) | |
| LNPATGRANTED | −0.065 *** | 0.014 | 0.009 | 0.010 |
| (0.024) | (0.009) | (0.008) | (0.008) | |
| URBANIZATION | 0.007 *** | 0.004 *** | 0.004 *** | 0.004 *** |
| (0.002) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| SECONDGDP | 0.019 *** | 0.002 | 0.003 ** | 0.003 * |
| (0.005) | (0.002) | (0.001) | (0.002) | |
| LNMGDP | −0.019 | 0.020 | 0.010 | 0.012 |
| (0.061) | (0.033) | (0.033) | (0.033) | |
| Constant | 9.548 ** | 4.275 *** | 4.509 *** | 4.689 *** |
| (4.368) | (1.577) | (1.679) | (1.629) | |
| Province effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N | 557 | 653 | 653 | 653 |
| Adj R2 | 0.247 | 0.481 | 0.481 | 0.480 |
Note: Figures in () are robust standard error; ***, **, and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.
Results of other robustness tests.
| Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNORGANICN | LNORGANICN | LNORGANICN | LNORGANICN | |
| LNPERFDI | 0.023 ** | 0.019 ** | 0.027 ** | 0.037 ** |
| (0.010) | (0.009) | (0.011) | (0.015) | |
| LNPERGDP | −1.136 *** | −1.072 *** | −1.164 *** | −0.945 * |
| (0.349) | (0.329) | (0.339) | (0.498) | |
| LNPERGDP2 | 0.053 *** | 0.051 *** | 0.054 *** | 0.043 * |
| (0.017) | (0.016) | (0.016) | (0.024) | |
| LNDENSITY | 0.078 *** | 0.075 *** | 0.083 *** | 0.092 *** |
| (0.015) | (0.014) | (0.016) | (0.018) | |
| LNPATGRANTED | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.001 | −0.003 |
| (0.008) | (0.008) | (0.008) | (0.010) | |
| URBANIZATION | 0.003 *** | 0.003 *** | 0.003 *** | 0.003 *** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| SECONDGDP | 0.003 ** | 0.003 * | 0.003 ** | 0.004 ** |
| (0.002) | (0.001) | (0.002) | (0.002) | |
| LNMGDP | −0.026 | 0.010 | 0.005 | −0.009 |
| (0.051) | (0.032) | (0.033) | (0.076) | |
| BASINPOLL | 0.004 *** | |||
| (0.001) | ||||
| Constant | 5.157 *** | 4.630 *** | 5.012 *** | 4.681 * |
| (1.785) | (1.690) | (1.735) | (2.537) | |
| Province effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year effect | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N | 625 | 653 | 653 | 517 |
| Adj R2 | 0.443 | 0.500 | 0.487 | 0.498 |
| DWH | 0.382 | |||
| Hansen J | 0.336 | |||
| F statistics | 179.550 |
Note: Figures in () are robust standard error; ***, **, and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively. DWH is the Durbin-Wu-Hausman test. F statistics are excluded-instruments F statistics.
Estimated results for the low and high fiscal pressure groups.
| Variables | (1) | (2) |
|---|---|---|
| Low | High | |
| LNPERFDI | 0.020 | 0.039 ** |
| (0.014) | (0.018) | |
| LNPERGDP | −1.256 ** | −1.164 |
| (0.508) | (0.923) | |
| LNPERGDP2 | 0.060 ** | 0.050 |
| (0.025) | (0.044) | |
| LNDENSITY | 0.082 *** | 0.085 *** |
| (0.019) | (0.030) | |
| LNPATGRANTED | 0.005 | −0.016 |
| (0.011) | (0.015) | |
| URBANIZATION | 0.003 *** | 0.004 *** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | |
| SECONDGDP | 0.003 * | 0.006 * |
| (0.002) | (0.003) | |
| LNMGDP | 0.017 | −0.160 |
| (0.033) | (0.145) | |
| Constant | 5.432 ** | 6.468 |
| (2.596) | (4.831) | |
| Province effect | Yes | Yes |
| Year effect | Yes | Yes |
| N | 367 | 286 |
| Adj R2 | 0.457 | 0.537 |
Note: Figures in () are robust standard error; ***, **, and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.
Estimated results of the periods before 2007, 2007–2012, and 2013–2017.
| Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004–2007 | 2008–2012 | 2013–2017 | |
| LNPERFDI | 0.003 | 0.042 * | 0.033 * |
| (0.022) | (0.022) | (0.018) | |
| LNPERGDP | −1.156 | −0.990 | −1.823 ** |
| (0.726) | (0.705) | (0.837) | |
| LNPERGDP2 | 0.058 | 0.045 | 0.082 ** |
| (0.036) | (0.034) | (0.038) | |
| LNDENSITY | 0.046 ** | 0.108 *** | 0.114 *** |
| (0.022) | (0.026) | (0.038) | |
| LNPATGRANTED | 0.004 | −0.003 | −0.015 |
| (0.015) | (0.013) | (0.021) | |
| URBANIZATION | 0.002 ** | 0.003 *** | 0.005 *** |
| (0.001) | (0.001) | (0.002) | |
| SECONDGDP | 0.002 | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| (0.003) | (0.003) | (0.004) | |
| LNMGDP | 0.017 | 0.206 | −0.203 |
| (0.039) | (0.179) | (0.168) | |
| Constant | 5.052 | 2.532 | 10.734 ** |
| (3.578) | (3.654) | (4.834) | |
| Province effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Year effect | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| N | 183 | 235 | 235 |
| Adj R2 | 0.418 | 0.469 | 0.528 |
Note: Figures in () are robust standard error; ***, **, and * indicate significance at the 1%, 5%, and 10% levels, respectively.