Literature DB >> 32961317

Diagnostic Strategies toward Clinical Implementation of Liquid Biopsy RAS/BRAF Circulating Tumor DNA Analyses in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Iris van 't Erve1, Marjolein J E Greuter2, Karen Bolhuis3, Daan C L Vessies4, Alessandro Leal5, Geraldine R Vink6, Daan van den Broek4, Victor E Velculescu5, Cornelis J A Punt7, Gerrit A Meijer1, Veerle M H Coupé2, Remond J A Fijneman8.   

Abstract

Detection of KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in tumor tissue is currently used to predict resistance to treatment with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Liquid biopsies are minimally invasive, and cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutation analyses may better represent tumor heterogeneity. This study examined the incorporation of liquid biopsy RAS/BRAF ctDNA analyses into diagnostic strategies to determine mCRC patient eligibility for anti-EGFR therapy. Tumor tissue and liquid biopsies were collected from 100 mCRC patients with liver-only metastases in a multicenter prospective clinical trial. Three diagnostic strategies incorporating droplet digital PCR ctDNA analyses were compared with routine tumor tissue RAS/BRAF mutation profiling using decision tree analyses. Tissue DNA mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF were present in 54%, 0%, and 3% of mCRC patients, respectively. A 93% concordance was observed between tissue DNA and liquid biopsy ctDNA mutations. The proportion of patients with RAS/BRAF alterations increased from 57% to 60% for diagnostic strategies that combined tissue and liquid biopsy mutation analyses. Consecutive RAS/BRAF ctDNA analysis followed by tissue DNA analysis in case of a liquid biopsy-negative result appeared to be the most optimal diagnostic strategy to comprehensively determine eligibility for anti-EGFR therapy in a cost-saving manner. These results highlight the potential clinical utility of liquid biopsies for detecting primary resistance to anti-EGFR-targeted therapies.
Copyright © 2020 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32961317     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  4 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic liquid biopsy components as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Afsheen Raza; Abdul Q Khan; Varghese Philipose Inchakalody; Sarra Mestiri; Zeenath Safira K M Yoosuf; Takwa Bedhiafi; Dina Moustafa Abo El-Ella; Nassiba Taib; Shereena Hydrose; Shayista Akbar; Queenie Fernandes; Lobna Al-Zaidan; Roopesh Krishnankutty; Maysaloun Merhi; Shahab Uddin; Said Dermime
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2022-03-15

2.  KRAS A146 Mutations Are Associated With Distinct Clinical Behavior in Patients With Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Iris van 't Erve; Nina J Wesdorp; Jamie E Medina; Leonardo Ferreira; Alessandro Leal; Joost Huiskens; Karen Bolhuis; Jan-Hein T M van Waesberghe; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; Daan van den Broek; Victor E Velculescu; Geert Kazemier; Cornelis J A Punt; Gerrit A Meijer; Remond J A Fijneman
Journal:  JCO Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-11-17

Review 3.  Liquid Biopsies in Colorectal Liver Metastases: Towards the Era of Precision Oncologic Surgery.

Authors:  Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Ioannis Ntanasis-Stathopoulos; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 4.  Use of Circulating Tumour DNA (ctDNA) for Measurement of Therapy Predictive Biomarkers in Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Michael J Duffy; John Crown
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-01-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.