Literature DB >> 32961125

The COVID-19 and Saliva Paradox.

Ana Carolina Serafim Vilela1, Nádia Lago Costa1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32961125      PMCID: PMC7501522          DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.07.225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0278-2391            Impact factor:   1.895


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor:—We read with great interest the article by Chigurupati et al in the Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. In their article, the authors presented solutions to keep our patients and health care personnel safe in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) era. We compliment Chigurupati et al for the excellent review and would also like to express our considerations. We would like to comment on 2 aspects that could be taken into account for future studies, considering that saliva plays 2 antagonistic yet equally important roles. The saliva contains live severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that may be transmitted via saliva specimens. , The risk of contagion via saliva led to the development of dental care guidelines by responsible entities to teach professionals preventive infection control measures. The guidelines recommend that dentists prioritize emergency cases, postpone elective procedures, and reduce aerosols as much as possible (www.ada.org). To conform with these measures, fewer patients are being examined and treated in the dental clinic. This has adverse impacts on oral health, like delays in the detection and diagnosis of oral cancer. The fear of COVID-19 has changed the priorities and thought process of patients, leading them to assess the need to leave their homes for dental treatment. However, this fear should not be a reason to avoid health care and worsen the prognosis of other health conditions. , Paradoxically, saliva is an asset for quick and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19. Rapid serologic tests using blood or plasma and traditional tests using respiratory tract specimens need trained professionals and a basic infrastructure to collect and process the material. They increase the exposure of health care staff, cause discomfort to patients, and cannot be self-collected by patients.1, 2, 3 Saliva specimens can be an alternative for COVID-19 diagnostic testing. It offers the advantage of being less invasive and easier to collect, with lower expense. It can also be self-collected safely and can be analyzed in a shorter time to confirm the diagnosis. Diagnosis using saliva is possible because the local immune system of the salivary glands produces immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G. In addition, saliva samples contain the virus in transmissible form. Concordance rate of saliva specimens with nasopharyngeal aspirate is greater than 90%, with high sensitivity and specificity in the detection of respiratory viruses. In viral culture, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in the self-collected saliva of 91.7% (11 of 12) patients suspected of COVID-19. Moreover, using saliva for diagnostic purposes opens up a range of possibilities besides virus detection, such as the use of proteomics, metabolomics, detection of antibodies, chemokines, and cytokines, which allow rapid diagnostics. An accurate study involving the collection of saliva from different patients at different times can be useful in studying the transmissible form of SARS-CoV-2 and help in vaccine and therapeutic antiviral development. , Therefore, it is of paramount importance to support studies investigating the impact of salivary specimen tests on transmission and early diagnosis. This knowledge will help adopt preventive protocols and measures to test, isolate, and treat a large number of patients quickly and safely. Thus, an attempt to combat the spread of SARS-CoV-2 can be made.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Saliva as a diagnostic fluid.

Authors:  Daniel Malamud
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2011-01

Review 2.  Considerations for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons in COVID-19 Era: Can We Sustain the Solutions to Keep Our Patients and Healthcare Personnel Safe?

Authors:  Radhika Chigurupati; Neeraj Panchal; Andrew M Henry; Hussam Batal; Amit Sethi; Richard D'innocenzo; Pushkar Mehra; Deepak G Krishnan; Steven M Roser
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Consistent Detection of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in Saliva.

Authors:  Kelvin Kai-Wang To; Owen Tak-Yin Tsang; Cyril Chik-Yan Yip; Kwok-Hung Chan; Tak-Chiu Wu; Jacky Man-Chun Chan; Wai-Shing Leung; Thomas Shiu-Hong Chik; Chris Yau-Chung Choi; Darshana H Kandamby; David Christopher Lung; Anthony Raymond Tam; Rosana Wing-Shan Poon; Agnes Yim-Fong Fung; Ivan Fan-Ngai Hung; Vincent Chi-Chung Cheng; Jasper Fuk-Woo Chan; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Human Saliva: Non-Invasive Fluid for Detecting Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV).

Authors:  Zohaib Khurshid; Faris Yahya Ibrahim Asiri; Hamed Al Wadaani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  The outbreak of Novel Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) caused a worrying delay in the diagnosis of oral cancer in north-west Italy: The Turin Metropolitan Area experience.

Authors:  Paolo G Arduino; Davide Conrotto; Roberto Broccoletti
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.068

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.