Literature DB >> 32961123

Hydroxychloroquine early in pregnancy and risk of birth defects.

Krista F Huybrechts1, Brian T Bateman2, Yanmin Zhu3, Loreen Straub3, Helen Mogun3, Seoyoung C Kim4, Rishi J Desai3, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine is generally considered safe in pregnancy for the treatment of rheumatic conditions, but studies have been too small to evaluate teratogenicity. Quantifying the risk of congenital malformations associated with early pregnancy exposure to hydroxychloroquine is important in both the context of its ongoing use for rheumatological disorders and its potential future use for coronavirus disease 2019 prophylaxis, for which a number of clinical trials are ongoing despite initial trials for coronavirus disease 2019 treatment having been negative.
OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to evaluate the risk of major congenital malformations associated with exposure to hydroxychloroquine during the first trimester of pregnancy, the period of organogenesis. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a population-based cohort study nested in the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX, 2000-2014) and IBM MarketScan Research Database (MarketScan, 2003-2015). The source cohort included 2045 hydroxychloroquine-exposed pregnancies and 3,198,589 pregnancies not exposed to hydroxychloroquine continuously enrolled in their respective insurance program for 3 months before the last menstrual period through at least 1 month after delivery; infants were enrolled for at least 3 months after birth. We compared the risk of congenital malformations in women using hydroxychloroquine during the first trimester of pregnancy with that of those not using hydroxychloroquine, restricting the cohort to women with rheumatic disorders and using propensity score matching to control for indication, demographics, medical comorbidities, and concomitant medications (1867 hydroxychloroquine-exposed pregnancies and 19,080 pregnancies not exposed to hydroxychloroquine). The outcomes considered included major congenital malformations diagnosed during the first 90 days after delivery and specific malformation types for which there were at least 5 exposed events: oral cleft, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genital, urinary, musculoskeletal, and limb defects.
RESULTS: Overall, 54.8 per 1000 infants exposed to hydroxychloroquine were born with a major congenital malformation versus 35.3 per 1000 unexposed infants, corresponding to an unadjusted relative risk of 1.51 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-1.81). Patient characteristics were balanced in the restricted, propensity score-matched cohort. The adjusted relative risk was 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.54); it was 1.33 (95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.65) for a daily dose of ≥400 mg and 0.95 (95% confidence interval, 0.60-1.50) for a daily dose of <400 mg. Among the different malformation groups considered, more substantial increases in the risk of oral clefts, respiratory anomalies, and urinary defects were observed, although estimates were imprecise. No pattern of malformation was identified.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest a small increase in the risk of malformations associated with first-trimester hydroxychloroquine use. For most patients with autoimmune rheumatic disorders, the benefits of treatment during pregnancy will likely outweigh this risk. If hydroxychloroquine were shown to be effective for coronavirus disease 2019 prophylaxis in ongoing trials, the risk of malformations would need to be balanced against such benefits.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coronavirus disease 2019; hydroxychloroquine; malformations; pregnancy; rheumatic disorders; systemic lupus erythematosus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32961123      PMCID: PMC7501839          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


Introduction

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an antimalarial drug widely used in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other rheumatic disorders. It is generally considered to be safe for the treatment of autoimmune rheumatic conditions during pregnancy, and the continuation of HCQ during pregnancy is commonly recommended to improve disease management and pregnancy outcomes.1, 2, 3 However, studies have been too small to evaluate teratogenicity. Over the last several months, there has been heightened interest in HCQ because of it being a candidate drug for the treatment and/or prophylaxis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Why was this study conducted?

Although hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is generally considered safe for the treatment of rheumatic conditions during pregnancy, most studies have been too small to evaluate teratogenicity.

Key findings

In this cohort study including 2045 HCQ-exposed pregnancies and 3,198,589 pregnancies not exposed to HCQ (1867 and 19,080, respectively, after restriction and matching), a 26% increase in the risk of major congenital malformations among HCQ-exposed patients was observed. The risk increase was seen with daily doses of ≥400 mg. No specific pattern of malformations was identified.

What does this add to what is known?

This is the third and by far the largest study to suggest a small increased risk. This signal warrants follow-up, given that HCQ is widely used for autoimmune rheumatic disorders in women of childbearing age. Should ongoing clinical trials indicate that there is a role for HCQ in coronavirus disease 2019 prophylaxis, the benefits of HCQ for this new indication would need to be weighed against the potential risk in pregnancy. Between March 30, 2020, and June 15, 2020, HCQ was granted emergency use authorization by the Food and Drug Administration, allowing it to be used for COVID-19 outside the clinical trial setting, resulting in widespread use during that time window. At some hospitals, pregnant women with moderate COVID-19 have been treated with HCQ. Although several recent studies have failed to show a clear benefit of HCQ as a postexposure prophylaxis4, 5, 6 and the World Health Organization has discontinued the HCQ arm of the Solidarity Trial evaluating its efficacy for the treatment of patients who are hospitalized, numerous randomized controlled studies are still ongoing in particular to evaluate its effects for preexposure prophylaxis, including a trial in pregnant women. Most studies regarding the safety of HCQ when used for malaria and for rheumatic disorders, such as SLE, suggest no increase in the risk of common adverse obstetrical outcomes, such as spontaneous abortion, prematurity, and intrauterine growth restriction.10, 11, 12, 13 However, data regarding the risk of major congenital malformations associated with early pregnancy exposure are very limited, with the largest published cohort study including fewer than 200 exposed pregnancies (Supplemental Table 1). Quantification of the risk of congenital malformations associated with early pregnancy exposure to HCQ is therefore important in both the context of its ongoing use for rheumatological disorders and its potential future use for COVID-19, although its usefulness in this clinical context remains highly uncertain based on the results of initial trials. Given the limited data currently available, we evaluated the risk of major congenital malformations associated with HCQ using 2 large healthcare utilization databases.
Supplemental Table 1

Summary of studies with information on HCQ and the risk of congenital malformations

AuthorNumber of patients exposed to HCQNumber of controls not exposed to HCQOutcomeRisk estimatesComments
Levy et al, 1991124 exposed pregnant women (27 pregnancies)Chloroquine=16HCQ=8No controlCongenital malformationsNo congenital malformations were detected in 14 live birthsExtremely limited sample to evaluate malformations. No control group
Buchanan et al, 1996236 pregnancies53 unexposed pregnancies with systemic lupus erythematosusCongenital malformationsNo congenital malformations were detected in the HCQ-exposed group (1 Down syndrome); 1 case in control group (1 extra finger)Extremely limited sample to estimate the RR of malformations
Parke et al, 199639 pregnanciesNo controlCongenital malformationsNo congenital malformations were detected in 9 live birthsExtremely limited sample to evaluate malformations. No control group
Levy et al, 2001410 pregnancies10 in the placebo groupCongenital malformationsNo congenital malformations were detected in 19 live birthsExtremely limited sample to evaluate malformations despite being a randomized controlled study
Costedoat-Chalumeau et al, 20035133 pregnancies70 unexposed with similar disordersCongenital malformations3 malformations were observed in the HCQ group (1 hypospadias, 1 craniostenosis, and 1 cardiac malformation, and 1 pulmonary hypoplasia in a preterm birth) vs 4 in the group not exposed to HCQ (1 hypospadias, 1 aplasia cutis of the scalp, 1 ulnar, and 1 severe cardiac malformation)Modest sample to estimate the risk of malformations. Controlled study. Daily dose of 400–200 mg
Motta et al, 2005640 pregnanciesNo controlCongenital malformationsNo congenital malformations were detected in 39 live birthsExtremely limited sample to evaluate malformations. No control group
Clowse et al, 2006756 pregnancies with continuous use of HCQ during pregnancy163 unexposed, with lupusCongenital malformationsMiscarriage risk was 13% in the HCQ-exposed group and 4% in the group not exposed to HCQ and stillbirth 8% and 6%, respectively. Among the 47 live-born infants exposed to HCQ, 1 had cleft lip and palate. In the 145 not exposed to HCQ, 3 fetuses had fatal congenital anomalies and 1 had an abdominal herniaLimited sample to estimate the RR of malformations. Controlled study
Viktil et al, 2012858 pregnancies exposed between 3 months before delivery to delivery (34, first trimester of pregnancy)Population referenceCongenital malformations and major congenital malformationsExposed to HCQ, 4 of 58 (6.9%)Overall cohort, 5000 of 154,976 (3.2%)Limited sample to evaluate the risk of malformations. Reference group does not consider indication or other confounders
Diav-Citrin et al, 20139114 pregnancies455 unexposedCongenital malformations7 of 97 in exposed (7.2%) vs 15 of 440 (3.4%) in unexposed (malformations in the exposed: 1 spina bifida, 2 developmental dysplasia of the hip, 1 ventricular septal defect, 1 congenital hypothyroidism, 1 inguinal hernia, 1 congenital toxoplasmosis)Modest sample to evaluate the RR of malformations; no control for indication. Daily dose of 200 to 400 mg
Cooper et al, 201410194 pregnancies exposed during the first trimester171 women with similar indications treated before but not during, pregnancyCongenital malformations; counts provided for specific malformationsRR, 3.11 (0.99–9.77). Malformations were more common in HCQ-exposed group (6.7%) than in the reference (2.3%) or other immunosuppressive medication (3%) group. Most common were genitourinary and cardiac but no clear patternControlled study that adjusted for confounding (sociodemographic variables, chronic health diagnoses, medications used to treat chronic diseases, chronic immune-mediated diseases, geographic factors, and calendar year of pregnancy). Limited power to estimate the risk of specific congenital malformations
Gayed et al, 201411149 pregnancies during pregnancy or breastfeeding139 unexposed with systemic lupus erythematosusCongenital malformationsExposed, 3 of 143 (2.1%)Unexposed 3 of 134 (2.2%)Modest sample to estimate the RR of malformations; no control for confounding other than indication. Exposure outside relevant period possible. Only abstract, no peer review
Koh et al, 20151233 pregnancies exposed during pregnancyNo control group designed for risk estimates of congenital malformationGoal not to assess congenital malformations, noted as remarks. Goal not to study treatmentsNo congenital malformations were detected in 33 HCQ-exposed pregnanciesExtremely limited sample to observe any malformation cases. No control group for malformations

HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; RR, relation risk.

Huybrechts et al. Hydroxychloroquine and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.

Materials and Methods

Data sources and study cohorts

We conducted a cohort study of pregnancies nested in the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX, 2000–2014), composed of all patients enrolled in Medicaid, and the IBM MarketScan Research Database (MarketScan, 2003–2015), composed of a nationally representative sample of patients with employer-provided health insurance. Both data sources included demographic and insurance enrollment information, medical visits and hospitalizations, diagnoses and procedures received as an in- or outpatient, and prescriptions filled on an outpatient basis. The development of the linked mother-infant pregnancy cohorts has been described previously. , Briefly, we identified all completed pregnancies in women 12 to 55 years of age and linked these pregnancies to live-born infants by state, family identification number, and delivery and birth dates. Using a validated algorithm, we estimated the date of the last menstrual period on the basis of the delivery date and diagnostic codes indicative of preterm delivery. Mothers were required to be continuously insured from 3 months before the start of pregnancy to 1 month after delivery. Infants were required to be insured from birth to 3 months thereafter, unless they died sooner. These restrictions did not affect the age or race distribution in MAX but resulted in a decrease in the proportion of who become Medicaid eligible because of the occurrence of pregnancy and a corresponding increase in the proportion of who become eligible based on other criteria. Pregnancies with exposure to a known teratogenic medication (ie, warfarin, antineoplastic agents, lithium, isotretinoin, misoprostol, thalidomide) during the first trimester of pregnancy and pregnancies with chromosomal abnormalities were excluded.

Exposure

Women were considered exposed if they filled a prescription for HCQ during the first trimester of pregnancy (defined as the date of the last menstrual period to day 90 of pregnancy), the etiologically relevant exposure window for congenital malformations. To reduce the probability of exposure during early pregnancy from use of HCQ dispensed at an earlier time point, the reference group consisted of women without a prescription for HCQ for 3 months before the start of pregnancy to the end of the first trimester of pregnancy given HCQ’s long half-life.

Outcomes

The outcome of interest was major congenital malformations overall. In the secondary analyses, we also evaluated the specific malformation types for which we observed at least 5 exposed events across the 2 cohorts: oral cleft, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genital, urinary, musculoskeletal, and limb defects. The presence of malformations was defined using validated algorithms based on inpatient or outpatient diagnoses and procedures, which have been shown to identify the outcomes with high specificity (ie, more than 1 date with the respective diagnostic codes recorded or 1 diagnostic code and a code for a procedure or surgery or infant death). Isolated congenital heart block was not included in the definition for cardiac malformations because its risk is increased in babies born to women with SLE. Supplemental Table 2 provides the details.
Supplemental Table 2

Definition of congenital malformations

Malformation groupMalformation subgroupICD-9 diagnosis code
Cardiovascular anomaliesaConotruncal defects745.0x, 745.1x, 745.2x
Single ventricle745.3x
Ventricular septal defect745.4x
Secundum atrial septal defect or patent foramen ovale745.5x and no preterm
Atrioventricular septal defect745.6x
Right-sided defects746.00, 746.01, 746.09, 746.1x, 746.2x, 746.83, 747.3x and no preterm, 746.02 and no preterm
Left-sided defects747.1x, 747.2x, 746.3x, 746.5x, 746.7x, 746.81, 746.82, 746.84
Patent ductus arteriosus747.0x and no preterm
Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn416.0x or 747.83 and no preterm
Anomalous pulmonary venous return747.4x
Other cardiac malformation745.7x,745.8x, 746.8 (exclude if only 746.86), 746.85–746.87, 746.89
Cardiac malformation not otherwise specified745, 745.9, 746, 746.9x (exclude if only 746.99), 747
Central nervous systemOverall740.xx–742.xx
Microcephaly742.1x
Hydrocephaly742.3x
Reduction deformities of the brain742.2x
Neural tube defects741.xx, 756.17, 740.0x, 740.2x, 742.0x
Clubfoot754.50, 754.51, 754.59, 754.60, 754.62, 754.69, 754.70, 754.71, 754.79
Gastroschisis756.73 if coded after October 2009
756.79 and ICD-9 procedure 54.71 if coded before October 2009
Oral cleftaCleft palate749.0x
Cleft lip749.1x
Cleft palate with cleft lip749.2x
Eye anomalies743.xx (exclude if only 743.6x and 743.8x)
Ear anomalies744.xx (exclude if only 744.1x, 744.21, 744.29, and 744.4x–744.9x)
Other vascular (noncardiac) anomalies747.6x–747.9x (exclude if only 747.83)
Respiratory anomaliesa748.xx (exclude if only 748.1x)
Gastrointestinal anomaliesa750.xx–751.xx (exclude if only 750.0x, 750.1x, 750.50, 751.0x)
Genital anomaliesa752.xx (exclude if only 752.42, 752.52) (in addition, exclude 752.5x if preterm)
Urinary anomalies753.xx (exclude if only 753.7x)
Musculoskeletal anomaliesa754.xx and 756.xx (exclude if only 754.3x, 754.81, 754.82, 756.2x)
Limb defectsa755.xx (exclude if only 755.65)
Other anomalies757.xx; 759.xx (exclude if only 757.2–757.6, 759.81–759.83)

In- and outpatient claims in the infant record between DoB and DoB + 90 days and/or in the maternal record between delivery and delivery + 30 days are considered.

Subgroups of cardiovascular malformations:

Greater than or equal to 2 dates with a code for a malformation within the group

Exception: codes 747.3x, 746.02, 745.5x, and 747.0x require ≥2 dates with a code for a malformation of which at least 1 code is documented at ≥6 weeks after DoB.

Greater than or equal to 1 date with a code for a malformation within the subgroup and cardiac procedure.

Exception: code 746.02

Greater than or equal to 1 date with a code for a malformation within the subgroup and infant died.

If codes identified in the maternal record between LMP and LMP + 105 days and there are no codes in the infant record between DoB and DoB + 90 days (ie, only maternal codes between delivery and delivery + 30 days), the defect is considered a preexisting maternal defect.

Cardiovascular malformations overall:

Any of the subgroups of cardiovascular anomalies is present.

Greater than or equal to 2 dates with a code for any of the cardiac malformations (regardless of the subgroupb).

Greater than or equal to 1 date with a code for any of the cardiac malformationsb and cardiac procedure.

Greater than or equal to 1 date with a code for any of the cardiac malformationsb and infant died.

If codes identified in the maternal record between LMP and LMP + 105 days and there are no codes in the infant record between DoB and DoB + 90 days (ie, only maternal codes between delivery and delivery + 30 days), the defect is considered a preexisting maternal defect.

Specific noncardiovascular malformations:

Greater than or equal to 2 dates with a code for the malformation group or subgroup

Exception: for gastroschisis: if code 756.79 was used (before October 2009), requires ≥1 date with a code and ICD-9 procedure 54.71.

Greater than or equal to 1 date with a code for the malformation group or subgroup and malformation-specific procedure.

Greater than or equal to 1 date with a code for the malformation group of subgroup and infant died.

If codes identified in the maternal record between LMP and LMP + 105 days and there are no codes in the infant record between DoB and DoB + 90 days (ie, only maternal codes between delivery and delivery + 30 days), the defect is considered a preexisting maternal defect.

Any congenital malformation:

Any of the malformation groups or subgroups mentioned above is present.

DoB, date of birth; ICD-9, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; LMP, last menstrual period.

Huybrechts et al. Hydroxychloroquine and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.

Specific malformation types that are considered individually

The following codes are not considered: 745.4x, 745.5x, 747.0x, 746.4x, 746.6x, 746.99, 747.3x if preterm, 746.02 if preterm, 747.5x, 416.0x if preterm, 747.83 if preterm, 746.08, 746.105.

Covariates

Potential confounders and proxies for confounders considered included sociodemographic information (eg, state of residence, age, race and ethnicity [MAX only]), autoimmune rheumatic disorders (eg, rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis), other maternal conditions (eg, diabetes, hypertension, psychiatric conditions, renal disease, neurologic conditions, chronic respiratory conditions, anemia, infections), concomitant medication use (eg, systemic steroids, nonbiologic and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs [DMARDs], psychiatric medications, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], suspected teratogens), and general markers of the burden of illness (eg, maternal comorbidity index, healthcare utilization measures) (Table ; Supplemental Tables 3 and 4).
Table

Selected patient characteristics for HCQ-exposed pregnancies and pregnancies not exposed to HCQ

VariableOriginal source cohort
Restricted matched cohorta
MarketScan (2003–2015)
MAX (2000–2014)
MarketScan (2003–2015)
MAX (2000–2014)
HCQ exposedUnexposedHCQ exposedUnexposedHCQ exposedUnexposedHCQ exposedUnexposed
Number of pregnancies13591,317,5206861,881,069126111,1796067901
Age, mean (SD)33.0 (4.4)31.9 (4.6)27.8 (6.0)24.5 (5.9)33.1 (4.6)33.1 (4.4)27.9 (6.0)28.3 (5.9)
Autoimmune rheumatic disordersb
 Systemic lupus erythematosus759 (55.9)2188 (0.2)487 (71.0)2707 (0.1)675 (53.5)6065 (54.3)409 (67.5)5184 (65.6)
 Rheumatoid arthritis408 (30.0)3028 (0.2)190 (27.7)3056 (0.2)392 (31.1)3515 (31.4)182 (30.0)2125 (26.9)
 Ankylosing spondylitis14 (1.0)4654 (0.4)<11 (0.7)2588 (0.1)14 (1.1)168 (1.5)<11 (0.8)246 (3.1)
 Psoriatic arthritis15 (1.1)404 (0.0)<11 (0.2)206 (0.0)15 (1.2)127 (1.1)<11 (0.2)42 (0.5)
 Sicca syndrome134 (9.9)647 (0.0)60 (8.8)183 (0.0)122 (9.7)1113 (10.0)42 (6.9)625 (7.9)
 Dermatomyositis17 (1.3)60 (0.0)<11 (1.2)68 (0.0)13 (1.0)112 (1.0)<11 (1.3)90 (1.1)
 Other diffuse connective tissue disease221 (16.3)1000 (0.1)91 (13.3)423 (0.0)197 (15.6)1774 (15.9)73 (12.1)1075 (13.6)
 Other autoimmune disease68 (5.0)1295 (0.1)<11 (1.5)402 (0.0)67 (5.3)567 (5.1)<11 (1.7)148 (1.9)
 Sarcoidosis6 (0.4)275 (0.0)<11 (1.3)455 (0.0)6 (0.5)50 (0.5)<11 (1.5)121 (1.5)
Other maternal conditionsc
 Anemia93 (6.8)25,507 (1.9)79 (11.5)63,162 (3.4)84 (6.7)730 (6.5)71 (11.7)936 (11.9)
 Diabetes34 (2.5)23,650 (1.8)33 (4.8)41,403 (2.2)34 (2.7)293 (2.6)30 (5.0)391 (4.9)
 Hypertension93 (6.8)30,937 (2.4)74 (10.8)47,746 (2.5)85 (6.7)797 (7.1)65 (10.7)829 (10.5)
 Neuropathic pain68 (5.0)27,054 (2.1)27 (3.9)27,145 (1.4)66 (5.2)577 (5.2)24 (4.0)351 (4.5)
 Nonneuropathic pain450 (33.1)135,075 (10.3)316 (46.1)253,994 (13.5)421 (33.4)3773 (33.8)279 (46.0)3689 (46.7)
 Serious infections43 (3.2)17,924 (1.4)59 (8.6)72,412 (3.9)38 (3.0)318 (2.8)52 (8.6)638 (8.1)
 Renal disease58 (4.3)3379 (0.3)50 (7.3)6578 (0.4)45 (3.6)396 (3.5)35 (5.8)433 (5.5)
Concomitant medicationsc
 Systemic steroids565 (41.6)70,421 (5.3)383 (55.8)69,446 (3.7)485 (38.5)4262 (38.1)309 (51.0)4179 (52.9)
 Biologic DMARDs64 (4.7)1303 (0.1)16 (2.3)459 (0.0)64 (5.1)575 (5.2)16 (2.6)227 (2.9)
 Nonbiologic DMARDs150 (11.0)7535 (0.6)129 (18.8)4269 (0.2)117 (9.3)1021 (9.1)93 (15.4)872 (11.0)
 Opioids296 (21.8)153,634 (11.7)311 (45.3)427,889 (22.8)272 (21.6)2402 (21.5)281 (46.4)3854 (48.8)
 NSAIDs255 (18.8)65,980 (5.0)290 (42.3)317,721 (16.9)235 (18.6)2073 (18.5)254 (41.9)3361 (42.5)
Markers of burden of illnessd
 Maternal comorbidity index, mean (SD)3.0 (2.4)1.2 (1.5)3.4 (2.5)0.9 (1.4)2.9 (2.3)3.0 (2.4)3.3 (2.5)3.2 (2.6)
 Number of distinct diagnoses, mean (SD)4.7 (3.9)2.1 (2.6)6.1 (4.7)2.8 (3.3)4.7 (3.9)4.8 (4.0)6.0 (4.7)6.2 (4.8)
 Number of non-HCQ prescription drugs, mean (SD)3.4 (3.1)1.5 (2.2)4.9 (3.9)1.8 (2.5)3.3 (3.1)3.6 (3.5)4.7 (3.8)4.9 (4.0)
 Number of outpatient visits, mean (SD)4.1 (4.4)2.1 (3.2)4.9 (5.9)2.1 (3.7)4.1 (4.4)4.4 (4.4)4.8 (4.9)5.0 (6.5)

Data are presented as number (percentage), unless otherwise indicated. Cell size of <11 for the MAX cohort are suppressed in accord with the CMS cell size suppression policy.

CMS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; MAX, Medicaid Analytic eXtract; NSAID, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug; SD, standard deviation.

Huybrechts et al. Hydroxychloroquine and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.

Given the variable ratio matching, the counts for the unexposed group are weighted counts to demonstrate the balance in baseline covariates

Autoimmune rheumatic disorders were measured from 3 months before the start to the end of pregnancy

Maternal conditions and concomitant medication use were measured from 3 months before the start of pregnancy to the end of the first trimester of pregnancy

General markers of the burden of illness were measured during the 3 months before but not during pregnancy, as these measures may be affected by early detection of pregnancy complications.

Supplemental Table 3

Patient characteristics for HCQ-exposed pregnancies and pregnancies not exposed to HCQ: MarketScan cohort (2003–2005)

VariableOriginal source cohort
Restricted matched cohorta
HCQ exposedUnexposedStandardized differenceHCQ exposedUnexposedStandardized difference
Total13591,317,520126111,179
Age, mean (SD)33.0(4.4)31.9(4.6)0.234(33.1)4.4(33.1)4.6−0.016
Region, n (%)
 Northeast203(14.9)207,517(15.8)−0.023199(15.8)1754(15.7)0.003
 Midwest298(21.9)338,554(25.7)−0.089278(22.1)2548(22.8)−0.018
 South608(44.7)520,269(39.5)0.106553(43.9)4796(42.9)0.019
 West232(17.1)235,923(17.9)−0.022215(17.1)1949(17.4)−0.010
 Unknown18(1.3)15,257(1.2)0.01516(1.3)132(1.2)0.008
Autoimmune rheumatic disordersb, n (%)
 Systemic lupus erythematosus759(55.9)2188(0.2)1.581675(53.5)6065(54.3)−0.015
 Rheumatoid arthritis408(30.0)3028(0.2)0.914392(31.1)3515(31.4)−0.008
 Ankylosing spondylitis14(1.0)4654(0.4)0.08214(1.1)168(1.5)−0.035
 Psoriatic arthritis15(1.1)404(0.0)0.14315(1.2)127(1.1)0.005
 Sicca syndrome134(9.9)647(0.0)0.464122(9.7)1113(10.0)−0.009
Dermatomyositis17(1.3)60(0.0)0.15813(1.0)112(1.0)0.003
 Other diffuse connective tissue disease221(16.3)1000(0.1)0.619197(15.6)1774(15.9)−0.007
 Other autoimmune disease68(5.0)1295(0.1)0.31567(5.3)567(5.1)0.011
 Sarcoidosis6(0.4)275(0.0)0.0876(0.5)50(0.5)0.004
Other maternal conditionsc, n (%)
 Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder13(1.0)6198(0.5)0.05812(1.0)109(1.0)−0.002
 Adjustment disorder4(0.3)3291(0.3)0.0094(0.3)27(0.3)0.014
 Alcohol abuse or dependence2(0.2)1125(0.1)0.0181(0.1)15(0.1)−0.016
 Anxiety63(4.6)40,106(3.0)0.08358(4.6)510(4.6)0.002
 Bipolar disorder5(0.4)4030(0.3)0.0114(0.3)41(0.4)−0.008
 Delirium1(0.1)638(0.1)0.0101(0.1)10(0.1)−0.003
 Depression76(5.6)51,324(3.9)0.08072(5.7)645(5.8)−0.003
 Drug abuse or dependence6(0.4)1850(0.1)0.0566(0.5)46(0.4)0.010
 Other psychiatric disorders4(0.3)4017(0.3)−0.0024(0.3)40(0.4)−0.008
 Personality disorder1(0.1)469(0.0)0.0161(0.1)6(0.1)0.011
 Psychosis0(0.0)436(0.0)−0.0260(0.0)0(0.0)
 Schizophrenia2(0.2)126(0.0)0.0491(0.1)5(0.0)0.015
 Sleep disorder35(2.6)11,100(0.8)0.13429(2.3)290(2.6)−0.019
 Tobacco use10(0.7)9354(0.7)0.00310(0.8)86(0.8)0.003
 Anemia93(6.8)25,507(1.9)0.24184(6.7)730(6.5)0.005
 Asthma51(3.8)26,538(2.0)0.10447(3.7)427(3.8)−0.005
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease13(1.0)8896(0.7)0.03111(0.9)116(1.0)−0.017
 Chronic fatigue syndrome137(10.1)53,082(4.0)0.238129(10.2)1187(10.6)−0.013
 Diabetes34(2.5)23,650(1.8)0.04934(2.7)293(2.6)0.005
 Obesity or overweight38(2.8)22,882(1.7)0.07134(2.7)319(2.9)−0.009
 Epilepsy or convulsions14(1.0)4025(0.3)0.08914(1.1)124(1.1)0.000
 Fibromyalgia100(7.4)18,641(1.4)0.29393(7.4)813(7.3)0.004
 Hypertension93(6.8)30,937(2.4)0.21685(6.7)797(7.1)−0.015
 Inflammatory myopathy1(0.1)102(0.0)0.0331(0.1)7(0.1)0.005
 Inflammatory bowel disease20(1.5)14,652(1.1)0.03220(1.6)170(1.5)0.005
 Irritable bowel syndrome16(1.2)5366(0.4)0.08714(1.1)129(1.2)−0.004
 Migraine or headache96(7.1)54,436(4.1)0.12891(7.2)793(7.1)0.005
 Nausea and vomiting45(3.3)37,352(2.8)0.02840(3.2)372(3.3)−0.009
 Neuropathic pain68(5.0)27,054(2.1)0.16066(5.2)577(5.2)0.003
 Nonneuropathic pain450(33.1)135,075(10.3)0.577421(33.4)3773(33.8)−0.008
 Other pain13(1.0)4290(0.3)0.07912(1.0)108(1.0)−0.001
 Infections43(3.2)17,924(1.4)0.12138(3.0)318(2.8)0.010
 Renal disease58(4.3)3379(0.3)0.27245(3.6)396(3.5)0.001
Concomitant medicationsc, n (%)
 Systemic steroids565(41.6)70,421(5.3)0.945485(38.5)4262(38.1)0.007
 Biologic DMARDs64(4.7)1303(0.1)0.30464(5.1)575(5.2)−0.003
 Nonbiologic DMARDs150(11.0)7535(0.6)0.459117(9.3)1021(9.1)0.005
 Anticonvulsants63(4.6)14,365(1.1)0.21458(4.6)501(4.5)0.006
 Antidepressants220(16.2)99,633(7.6)0.269187(14.8)1724(15.4)−0.017
 Antipsychotics11(0.8)2986(0.2)0.0818(0.6)67(0.6)0.004
 Anxiolytics3(0.2)2917(0.2)0.0003(0.2)30(0.3)−0.006
 Barbiturates40(2.9)14,607(1.1)0.13034(2.7)317(2.8)−0.008
 Benzodiazepines116(8.5)49,574(3.8)0.200107(8.5)940(8.4)0.003
 Other hypnotics85(6.3)23,721(1.8)0.22870(5.6)631(5.6)−0.004
 Stimulants21(1.6)10,212(0.8)0.07218(1.4)182(1.6)−0.017
 Opioids296(21.8)153,634(11.7)0.274272(21.6)2402(21.5)0.002
 Naloxone2(0.2)575(0.0)0.0342(0.2)19(0.2)−0.002
 Naltrexone0(0.0)97(0.0)−0.0120(0.0)0(0.0)
 Buprenorphine2(0.2)623(0.1)0.0322(0.2)19(0.2)−0.002
 Methadone6(0.4)2902(0.2)0.0396(0.5)46(0.4)0.010
 Acetaminophen45(3.3)16,027(1.2)0.14138(3.0)352(3.2)−0.008
 NSAIDs255(18.8)65,980(5.0)0.435235(18.6)2073(18.5)0.002
 Antidiabetics58(4.3)32,993(2.5)0.09855(4.4)436(3.9)0.023
 Antihypertensives147(10.8)40,106(3.0)0.310127(10.1)1074(9.6)0.016
 Chloroquine1(0.1)243(0.0)0.0261(0.1)6(0.1)0.010
 Insulin54(4.0)13,102(1.0)0.19251(4.0)407(3.6)0.021
 Triptans38(2.8)17,138(1.3)0.10637(2.9)302(2.7)0.014
 Suspected teratogensd219(16.1)100,774(7.7)0.264199(15.8)1785(16.0)−0.005
Markers of burden of illnesse
 Maternal comorbidity index, mean (SD)3.0(2.4)1.2(1.5)0.9022.9(2.3)3.0(2.4)−0.018
 Number of distinct diagnoses, mean (SD)4.7(3.9)2.1(2.6)0.7764.7(3.9)4.8(4.0)−0.042
 Number of non-HCQ prescription drugs, mean (SD)3.4(3.1)1.5(2.2)0.7073.3(3.1)3.6(3.5)−0.073
 Number of outpatient visits, mean (SD)4.1(4.4)2.1(3.2)0.5364.1(4.4)4.4(4.4)−0.055
 Number emergency department visits, mean (SD)0.1(0.4)0.1(0.3)0.1070.1(0.4)0.1(0.4)−0.002
 Hospitalization, n (%)19(1.4)9100(0.7)0.07017(1.4)164(1.5)−0.010
 Number of hospitalizations, mean (SD)0.0(0.1)0.0(0.1)0.0690.0(0.1)0.0(0.1)−0.014
Number of d hospitalized, mean (SD)0.1(0.5)0.0(0.4)0.0580.0(0.4)0.1(0.7)−0.040

DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; NSAID, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug; SD, standard deviation.

Huybrechts et al. Hydroxychloroquine and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.

Given the variable ratio matching, the counts for the unexposed group are weighted counts to demonstrate the balance in baseline covariates

Autoimmune rheumatic disorders were measured from 3 months before the start to the end of pregnancy

Maternal conditions and concomitant medication use were measured from 3 months before the start of pregnancy to the end of the first trimester

Women exposed to known teratogens have been excluded (ie, warfarin, antineoplastic agents, lithium, isotretinoin, misoprostol, thalidomide). Suspected teratogens considered include danazol, methimazole, propylthiouracil, aminoglycosides, trimethoprim, triamterene, sulfasalazine, spasmofen, cholestyramine, potassium iodide, tetracycline, and fluconazole

General markers of the burden of illness were measured during the 3 months before but not during pregnancy, as these measures may be affected by early detection of pregnancy complications

Supplemental Table 4

Patient characteristics for HCQ-exposed and pregnancies not exposed to HCQ: MAX cohort (2000–2014)

VariableOriginal source cohort
Restricted matched cohorta
HCQ exposedUnexposedStandardized differenceHCQ exposedUnexposedStandardized difference
Total6861,881,0696067901
Age, mean (SD)27.8(6.0)24.5(5.9)0.56827.9(6.0)28.3(5.9)−0.068
Race, n (%)
 White219(31.9)763,706(40.6)−0.181209(34.5)2861(36.2)−0.036
 Black or African American236(34.4)609,802(32.4)0.042204(33.7)2599(32.9)0.016
 Hispanic or Latino109(15.9)271,736(14.5)0.04097(16.0)1183(15.0)0.029
 Other or unknown122(17.8)235,825(12.5)0.14796(15.8)1258(15.9)−0.002
Region, n (%)
 Northeast171(24.9)330,760(17.6)0.180146(24.1)1953(24.7)−0.014
 Midwest200(29.2)592,663(31.5)−0.051180(29.7)2395(30.3)−0.013
 South164(23.9)535,503(28.5)−0.104147(24.3)1926(24.4)−0.003
 West151(22.0)422,143(22.4)−0.010133(22.0)1628(20.6)0.033
Autoimmune rheumatic disordersb, n (%)
 Systemic lupus erythematosus487(71.0)2707(0.1)2.200409(67.5)5184(65.6)0.040
 Rheumatoid arthritis190(27.7)3056(0.2)0.867182(30.0)2125(26.9)0.070
 Ankylosing spondylitis<11(0.7)2588(0.1)0.090<11(0.8)246(3.1)−0.165
 Psoriatic arthritis<11(0.2)206(0.0)0.049<11(0.2)42(0.5)−0.063
 Sicca syndrome60(8.8)183(0.0)0.43742(6.9)625(7.9)−0.038
 Dermatomyositis<11(1.2)68(0.0)0.153<11(1.3)90(1.1)0.016
 Other diffuse connective tissue disease91(13.3)423(0.0)0.55273(12.1)1075(13.6)−0.047
 Other autoimmune disease<11(1.5)402(0.0)0.168<11(1.7)148(1.9)−0.017
 Sarcoidosis<11(1.3)455(0.0)0.158<11(1.5)121(1.5)−0.004
Other maternal conditionsc, n (%)
 Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder<11(0.9)19,977(1.1)−0.019<11(0.7)60(0.8)−0.012
 Adjustment disorder<11(0.7)10,427(0.6)0.022<11(0.7)53(0.7)−0.001
 Alcohol abuse or dependence<11(0.7)13,958(0.7)−0.002<11(0.7)73(0.9)−0.029
 Anxiety40(5.8)76,887(4.1)0.08038(6.3)500(6.3)−0.002
 Bipolar disorder11(1.6)25,851(1.4)0.01911(1.8)172(2.2)−0.026
 Delirium<11(0.7)1701(0.1)0.100<11(0.7)33(0.4)0.034
 Depression75(10.9)120,954(6.4)0.16066(10.9)873(11.1)−0.005
 Drug abuse or dependence24(3.5)37,945(2.0)0.09121(3.5)291(3.7)−0.012
 Other psychiatric disorders14(2.0)22,868(1.2)0.065<11(1.7)104(1.3)0.027
 Personality disorder<11(0.2)4345(0.2)−0.020<11(0.2)17(0.2)−0.011
 Psychosis<11(0.4)4149(0.2)0.038<11(0.3)38(0.5)−0.024
 Schizophrenia<11(0.3)3133(0.2)0.026<11(0.3)32(0.4)−0.012
 Sleep disorder18(2.6)14,869(0.8)0.14218(3.0)211(2.7)0.018
 Tobacco use29(4.2)77,232(4.1)0.00627(4.5)377(4.8)−0.015
 Anemia79(11.5)63,162(3.4)0.31571(11.7)936(11.9)−0.004
 Asthma38(5.5)79,108(4.2)0.06234(5.6)494(6.3)−0.027
 Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease15(2.2)35,194(1.9)0.02213(2.2)194(2.5)−0.021
 Chronic fatigue syndrome63(9.2)60,757(3.2)0.24957(9.4)764(9.7)−0.009
 Diabetes33(4.8)41,403(2.2)0.14230(5.0)391(4.9)0.000
 Obesity or overweight33(4.8)48,447(2.6)0.11931(5.1)408(5.2)−0.002
 Epilepsy or convulsions19(2.8)13,534(0.7)0.15715(2.5)179(2.3)0.014
 Fibromyalgia73(10.6)19,343(1.0)0.41962(10.2)906(11.5)−0.040
 Hypertension74(10.8)47,746(2.5)0.33565(10.7)829(10.5)0.007
 Inflammatory myopathy<11(0.6)91(0.0)0.107<11(0.5)36(0.5)0.006
 Inflammatory bowel disease20(2.9)39,963(2.1)0.05019(3.1)293(3.7)−0.032
 Irritable bowel syndrome<11(0.9)4722(0.3)0.083<11(0.8)76(1.0)−0.015
 Migraine or headache98(14.3)141,233(7.5)0.21986(14.2)1160(14.7)−0.014
 Nausea and vomiting55(8.0)133,447(7.1)0.03550(8.3)694(8.8)−0.019
 Neuropathic pain27(3.9)27,145(1.4)0.15424(4.0)351(4.5)−0.024
 Nonneuropathic pain316(46.1)253,994(13.5)0.762279(46.0)3689(46.7)−0.013
 Other pain25(3.6)18,050(1.0)0.18021(3.5)341(4.3)−0.044
 Infections59(8.6)72,412(3.9)0.19852(8.6)638(8.1)0.018
 Renal disease50(7.3)6578(0.4)0.36835(5.8)433(5.5)0.013
Concomitant medicationsc, n (%)
 Systemic steroids383(55.8)69,446(3.7)1.387309(51.0)4179(52.9)−0.038
 Biologic DMARDs, n (%)16(2.3)459(0.0)0.21516(2.6)227(2.9)−0.014
 Nonbiologic DMARDs129(18.8)4269(0.2)0.66793(15.4)872(11.0)0.128
 Anticonvulsants67(9.8)42,724(2.3)0.31961(10.1)848(10.7)−0.022
 Antidepressants161(23.5)174,161(9.3)0.391140(23.1)1960(24.8)−0.040
 Antipsychotics<11(1.3)27,612(1.5)−0.013<11(1.3)129(1.6)−0.026
 Anxiolytics<11(1.5)8696(0.5)0.102<11(1.3)143(1.8)−0.040
 Barbiturates30(4.4)22,716(1.2)0.19325(4.1)393(5.0)−0.040
 Benzodiazepines49(7.1)64,984(3.5)0.16546(7.6)617(7.8)−0.008
 Other hypnotics65(9.5)68,885(3.7)0.23655(9.1)820(10.4)−0.044
 Stimulants<11(1.3)15,280(0.8)0.049<11(1.3)117(1.5)−0.014
 Opioids311(45.3)427,889(22.8)0.491281(46.4)3854(48.8)−0.048
 Naloxone<11(0.4)4270(0.2)0.037<11(0.5)34(0.4)0.010
 Naltrexone<11(0.2)237(0.0)0.047<11(0.0)<11(0.0)−0.010
 Buprenorphine<11(0.4)4646(0.3)0.033<11(0.5)33(0.4)0.012
 Methadone<11(0.3)6084(0.3)−0.006<11(0.3)53(0.7)−0.049
 Acetaminophen74(10.8)78,658(4.2)0.25363(10.4)909(11.5)−0.035
 NSAIDs290(42.3)317,721(16.9)0.579254(41.9)3361(42.5)−0.013
 Antidiabetics12(1.8)17,424(0.9)0.072<11(1.3)153(1.9)−0.049
 Antihypertensives140(20.4)56,587(3.0)0.562113(18.7)1548(19.6)−0.024
 Chloroquine<11(0.2)20(0.0)0.053<11(0.2)13(0.2)0.000
 Insulin17(2.5)16,250(0.9)0.12614(2.3)181(2.3)0.001
 Triptans20(2.9)21,062(1.1)0.12818(3.0)231(2.9)0.003
 Suspected teratogensd152(22.2)218,185(11.6)0.285134(22.1)1918(24.3)−0.051
Markers of burden of illnesse
 Maternal comorbidity index, mean (SD)3.4(2.5)0.9(1.4)1.2033.3(2.5)3.2(2.6)0.016
 Number of distinct diagnoses, mean (SD)6.1(4.7)2.8(3.3)0.8156.0(4.7)6.2(4.8)−0.037
 Number of non-HCQ prescription drugs, mean (SD)4.9(3.9)1.8(2.5)0.9594.7(3.8)4.9(4.0)−0.053
 Number of outpatient visits, mean (SD)4.9(5.9)2.1(3.7)0.5804.8(4.9)5.0(6.5)−0.050
 Number of emergency department visits, mean (SD)0.5(1.1)0.3(0.9)0.1950.5(1.0)0.6(1.3)−0.040
 Hospitalization, n (%)51(7.4)67,486(3.6)0.16942(6.9)525(6.7)0.011
 Number of hospitalizations, mean (SD)0.1(0.3)0.0(0.2)0.1680.1(0.3)0.1(0.3)0.007
 Number of d hospitalized, mean (SD)0.4(2.5)0.1(1.2)0.1280.4(2.4)0.3(1.7)0.025

Cell size of <11 for the MAX cohort are suppressed in accord with the CMS cell size suppression policy.

CMS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; MAX, Medicaid Analytic eXtract; NSAID, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug; SD, standard deviation.

Huybrechts et al. Hydroxychloroquine and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.

Given the variable ratio matching, the counts for the unexposed group are weighted counts to demonstrate the balance in baseline covariates

Autoimmune rheumatic disorders were measured from 3 months before the start to the end of pregnancy

Maternal conditions and concomitant medication use were measured from 3 months before the start of pregnancy to the end of the first trimester

Women exposed to known teratogens have been excluded (ie, warfarin, antineoplastic agents, lithium, isotretinoin, misoprostol, thalidomide). Suspected teratogens considered include danazol, methimazole, propylthiouracil, aminoglycosides, trimethoprim, triamterene, sulfasalazine, spasmofen, cholestyramine, potassium iodide, tetracycline, and fluconazole

General markers of the burden of illness were measured during the 3 months before but not during pregnancy, as these measures may be affected by early detection of pregnancy complications.

Selected patient characteristics for HCQ-exposed pregnancies and pregnancies not exposed to HCQ Data are presented as number (percentage), unless otherwise indicated. Cell size of <11 for the MAX cohort are suppressed in accord with the CMS cell size suppression policy. CMS, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; MAX, Medicaid Analytic eXtract; NSAID, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug; SD, standard deviation. Huybrechts et al. Hydroxychloroquine and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021. Given the variable ratio matching, the counts for the unexposed group are weighted counts to demonstrate the balance in baseline covariates Autoimmune rheumatic disorders were measured from 3 months before the start to the end of pregnancy Maternal conditions and concomitant medication use were measured from 3 months before the start of pregnancy to the end of the first trimester of pregnancy General markers of the burden of illness were measured during the 3 months before but not during pregnancy, as these measures may be affected by early detection of pregnancy complications.

Analyses

Baseline characteristics were compared between women exposed to HCQ and the reference group of unexposed women. Relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using generalized linear models. As a first level of adjustment, the reference group was restricted to women with a recorded diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic disorders commonly treated with HCQ (“restricted cohort”). In fully adjusted analyses, exposed and unexposed women in the restricted cohort were matched on the basis of their propensity score (PS), using a 1:200 variable ratio matching and a 0.01 caliper (“restricted matched cohort”). The PS, which reflects the probability of being treated with HCQ, was estimated using a logistic regression model, including all (>80) prespecified covariates. When evaluating the balance in baseline characteristics in the restricted matched cohort, the counts for the unexposed group were weighted to account for the variable ratio matching. We conducted analyses stratified by dose, using the highest daily dose dispensed during the first trimester of pregnancy (<400 mg and ≥400 mg daily) and duration of exposure (≤60 days and >60 days). In a sensitivity analysis, both the exposed and the reference groups were restricted to women with a recorded diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic disorders. Estimates from both cohorts were combined using a meta-analytic approach with random effects. For all analyses presented, results were described as similar or different from the reference group based on the magnitude of the point estimates, taking into account the precision of each estimate as reflected in the width of its 95% CI. We focused on estimating the magnitude of effects in preference to dichotomizing the results as statistically significant or not. The research was approved by the institutional review board of Brigham and Women’s Hospital, which waived the need for informed consent.

Results

The combined cohort included 2045 pregnancies exposed to HCQ during the first trimester of pregnancy (686 in MAX and 1359 in MarketScan) and 3,198,589 pregnancies not exposed to HCQ (1,881,069 in MAX and 1,317,520 in MarketScan). The mean daily dose of HCQ was 371 mg (standard deviation, 379 mg), and 61% of women used a daily dose of 400 mg. Among the exposed women, 25.9% were exposed for ≤30 days, 33.6% for 31 to 60 days, and 40.5% for >60 days during the first trimester of pregnancy. Women exposed to HCQ tended to be older, had more comorbid conditions, took more concomitant medications (especially pain medications, steroids, NSAIDs, and DMARDs), and had greater healthcare utilization. After cohort restriction and adjustment through PS matching, all covariates—including treatment indications—were well balanced (Table; Supplemental Tables 3 and 4). The pooled risk of any congenital malformation was 54.8 per 1000 HCQ-exposed infants (n=112 events) and 35.3 per 1000 infants not exposed to HCQ in the general population (n=112,908 events), corresponding to a pooled unadjusted RR of 1.51 (95% CI, 1.27–1.81). Restricting the reference group to women with rheumatic disorders resulted in an absolute risk of 44.1 per 1000 unexposed infants (506 of 11,468 events) and an RR of 1.26 (95% CI, 1.04–1.53). Adjusting for all potential confounding variables through PS matching did not result in further attenuation of the association (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04–1.54). Estimates were consistent between the 2 cohorts. The risk of malformations among the HCQ-exposed women was the same regardless of whether women had concomitant exposure to steroids. The adjusted RR was 1.33 (95% CI, 1.08–1.65) for a daily dose of ≥400 mg and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.60–1.50) for <400 mg. The risk was not affected by the duration of exposure (Figure 1 ), and results were similar when restricting both the exposed and the reference group to women with a recorded diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic disorders (Supplemental Table 5).
Figure 1

Relative risks of any congenital malformation: main and dose-stratified analyses

The asterisk symbol indicates that for the variable ratio matching PS analysis after restriction to deliveries with rheumatic disorders, the number of outcome events and the total number of deliveries in both the HCQ-exposed group and group not exposed to HCQ are not meaningful for absolute risk estimation; therefore, those counts are left blank in the Figure. The section symbol indicates that data are restricted to rheumatic disorders and PS-matched estimate.

CI, confidence interval; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; MAX, Medicaid Analytic eXtract; PS, propensity score.

Huybrechts et al. Hydroxychloroquine and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.

Supplemental Table 5

Sensitivity analyses: adjusted RRs restricting the cohort to women with a recorded diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic disorders

OutcomeFully adjusted pooled RR (95% CI)
Restricting the reference group to women with recorded diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic disorders (original estimate)Restricting both the HCQ and reference groups to women with recorded diagnosis of autoimmune rheumatic disorders (sensitivity analysis)
Malformations overall1.26 (1.04–1.54)1.27 (1.03–1.57)
Cardiac malformations1.20 (0.62–2.32)1.36 (0.68–2.72)
Oral clefts3.70 (1.55–8.82)3.37 (1.32–8.56)
Respiratory malformations1.85 (0.94–3.64)1.63 (0.63–4.26)
Gastrointestinal malformations0.89 (0.44–1.82)0.86 (0.35–2.14)
Genital malformations1.16 (0.28–4.76)1.01 (0.26–3.90)
Urinary malformations2.21 (1.26–3.86)2.26 (1.27–4.02)
Musculoskeletal malformations1.17 (0.74–1.86)1.09 (0.65–1.83)
Limb defects1.17 (0.61–2.26)1.18 (0.60–2.35)

CI, confidence interval; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; RR, relative risk.

Huybrechts et al. Hydroxychloroquine and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.

Relative risks of any congenital malformation: main and dose-stratified analyses The asterisk symbol indicates that for the variable ratio matching PS analysis after restriction to deliveries with rheumatic disorders, the number of outcome events and the total number of deliveries in both the HCQ-exposed group and group not exposed to HCQ are not meaningful for absolute risk estimation; therefore, those counts are left blank in the Figure. The section symbol indicates that data are restricted to rheumatic disorders and PS-matched estimate. CI, confidence interval; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; MAX, Medicaid Analytic eXtract; PS, propensity score. Huybrechts et al. Hydroxychloroquine and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021. In the context of few events, risk estimates for the specific malformation types considered were relatively imprecise (Figure 2 ). The point estimates indicated an approximately 2- to 4-fold increase in the risks for oral clefts (RR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.55–8.82), respiratory defects (RR, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.94–3.64), and urinary defects (RR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.26–3.86), which were consistent between the 2 cohorts. None of the HCQ-exposed cases of oral clefts had concomitant exposure to steroids. The upper limit of the 95% CI for the pooled estimates suggested no more than a 2-fold increase in the risk of other specific malformation types with the exception of genital defects (upper limit 95% CI, 4.76). Among the 112 HCQ-exposed infants with malformations, 12 (10.7%) had more than 1 type of malformation recorded, with no specific pattern suggestive of a syndrome.
Figure 2

Pooled adjusted relative risks in the PS-matched, restricted cohorts

The asterisk symbol indicates that for the variable ratio matching PS analysis after restriction to deliveries with rheumatic disorders, the number of outcome events and the total number of deliveries in both the HCQ-exposed group and the group not exposed to HCQ are not meaningful for absolute risk estimation; therefore, counts after restriction to deliveries with rheumatic disorders but before the PS matching are reported in the Figure.

HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; PS, propensity score.

Huybrechts et al. Hydroxychloroquine and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.

Pooled adjusted relative risks in the PS-matched, restricted cohorts The asterisk symbol indicates that for the variable ratio matching PS analysis after restriction to deliveries with rheumatic disorders, the number of outcome events and the total number of deliveries in both the HCQ-exposed group and the group not exposed to HCQ are not meaningful for absolute risk estimation; therefore, counts after restriction to deliveries with rheumatic disorders but before the PS matching are reported in the Figure. HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; PS, propensity score. Huybrechts et al. Hydroxychloroquine and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021.

Discussion

Principal findings

Using data from health plans that provide coverage for large populations of both commercially and publicly insured individuals in the United States, we identified a cohort of pregnant women with chronic autoimmune rheumatic diseases and assessed the relative prevalence of major congenital malformations in their newborns following exposure to HCQ during early pregnancy. Women who filled prescriptions for HCQ during the first trimester of pregnancy had a higher risk of malformations in their newborn than the general population. On the restriction to women with the indication (mainly SLE and rheumatoid arthritis), the RR attenuated but was still elevated. In utero–exposed newborns had an adjusted risk of major congenital malformations 26% higher than unexposed newborns overall and 33% higher for daily doses of ≥400 mg (although no increased risk was observed for lower doses based on the point estimate, reflecting the estimate most consistent with the data). A more substantial increase in the risk of oral clefts, respiratory anomalies, and urinary defects was observed, although CIs for specific malformations were wide. No pattern of malformation was identified.

Context

Previous studies evaluating the safety of HCQ in pregnancy included between 36 and 194 women and overall suggested no increased risk of pregnancy loss, prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation, preeclampsia, fetal distress, or induction of delivery compared with the reference groups. , , 21, 22, 23, 24 As flares are associated with these and other complications and HCQ is effective at controlling them, drug use in pregnancy may improve pregnancy outcomes for women with rheumatic disorders and reduce the risk of congenital heart block in the neonate. Moreover, HCQ use reduces the dose of prednisone needed during pregnancy. However, most of these studies were too small to assess the risk of major malformations, and many based their conclusion on the statistical significance of underpowered comparisons. Given that HCQ crosses the placenta and inhibits cell division and DNA synthesis and that initial reports suggested an increased risk of chromosomal damage attributable to chloroquine, concerns regarding effects on rapidly dividing embryonic cells remain. Specific malformations reported among exposed newborns included cleft lip and palate (1 of 79) and pulmonary hypoplasia in a preterm infant (1 of 133). Moreover, 2 of the largest studies found a meaningful, although not statistically significant, increased risk of malformations overall. In 1 study, malformations were more common in the 194 HCQ-exposed patients (6.7%) than in the reference (2.3%) group (adjusted RR, 3.11; 95% CI, 0.99–9.77), with no clear pattern. In another study, the 114 HCQ-exposed patients had a prevalence of malformations of 7 of 97 (7.2%) and the reference group of 15 of 440 (3.4%) with a P value of .094, again with no clear pattern.

Research implications

For pregnant women with malaria or rheumatic disorders, the benefits of HCQ may still outweigh the potential risk, especially given that discontinuation of HCQ after conception would not necessarily prevent birth defects because the half-life is more than a month and would increase the risk of flares and their complications. Therefore, our findings of a potential small increase in the risk of malformations—although important for prescribers to be aware of—should not necessarily alter the treatment recommendation for a given woman with malaria or rheumatic disorders. For COVID-19, it will depend on whether the currently ongoing clinical trials demonstrate meaningful benefits of HCQ in reducing COVID-19 or its severity. Although initial trials using HCQ to treat COVID-19 have failed to demonstrate efficacy, trials regarding its use for preexposure prophylaxis have not yet been reported.

Strengths and limitations

In addition to several strengths (including a large and nationally representative population and a robust control for confounding through restriction and matching), our study is also subject to certain limitations, most of which would bias the results toward the null. First, we included only women with a live-born delivery because abortions and stillbirths are incompletely recorded in healthcare utilization data. This approach may have resulted in the exclusion of pregnancies with the outcome, as fetuses with malformations are more likely to experience fetal death or termination. Therefore, the incidence of major malformations reported in this study could underestimate the risk in pregnant women. If a higher proportion of women on HCQ had lethal malformations, more prenatal screening, or a higher propensity to terminate an affected pregnancy, this study would also underestimate the RR. However, differential terminations have been shown to be an unlikely source of selection bias. Second, the identification of major congenital malformations was based on the diagnosis and/or procedure codes recorded in claims. Misclassification would tend to bias RRs toward the null unless a higher proportion of malformation diagnoses were identified in women exposed to HCQ. Although others and we have shown a high positive predictive value for malformations, , , the potential for some misclassification remains. Third, information on HCQ exposure is obtained from the claims of filled prescriptions. As some women may fill prescriptions for medications but not use them, our study may misclassify unexposed pregnancies into the HCQ group, thus underestimating any potential effect; however, a large fraction of our cohort filled prescriptions for HCQ throughout the first trimester of pregnancy. Fourth, it is possible that some women in the reference group were taking immunomodulatory agents in lieu of HCQ. If these agents were teratogenic, we would be underestimating the effect of HCQ. However, their use is negligible during pregnancy, and on restriction and PS matching, our exposed and reference groups were balanced in the use of these medications. Fifth, disease flares in women with rheumatic disorders, such as SLE, have been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes, and HCQ use during pregnancy improves disease activity and reduces the antiphospholipid syndrome. , Therefore, the reference group of women with the disease and without HCQ could have a higher risk, thus potentially underestimating the RR of flare-related adverse pregnancy outcomes, including fetal loss, fetal growth retardation, and prematurity. Alternatively, it is possible that there is a misclassification of the unexposed group with respect to the presence of underlying rheumatic disease or that women being treated with HCQ have more severe underlying disease than women without HCQ. Although neither rheumatic disorders nor flares have been associated with congenital malformations, it is conceivable that women with more severe disease receive higher doses of steroids and this may not be fully captured in our data. However, recent studies , have refuted initial reports of strong associations between steroids and oral clefts. More directly, in this study, the absolute risk of malformations was the same among HCQ-exposed pregnancies with and without concomitant exposure to systemic steroids, and none of the cases of oral clefts in the HCQ-exposed pregnancies were exposed to steroids. Together, this suggests that steroid exposure is not a major threat to the validity of our analyses. Sixth, the MAX cohort included data through 2014—the most recent data available at the time of study conduct—and MarketScan included data through 2015, to avoid the use of International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision–based algorithms for cohort creation and outcome identification that have not yet been validated. However, the biological association between HCQ exposure and malformations should not change over time. Finally, despite being the largest exposed cohort to date, the numbers were small for specific malformation groups, and CIs were wide; specific individual defects could not be examined. However, there is enough information to suggest that the magnitude of a potential risk of malformations would not be in the order of that associated with major teratogens.

Conclusions

In this study, there was no evidence of a large increase in the prevalence of major congenital malformations in the newborn from first-trimester maternal exposure to HCQ. However, it is the third study to suggest a moderate increased risk. For most patients with autoimmune rheumatic disorders, the benefits of treatment during pregnancy will likely outweigh this risk. If proven effective for COVID-19 prophylaxis in ongoing randomized trials, the benefits of HCQ would need to be weighed against the potential risk in pregnancy.
  9 in total

Review 1.  Undifferentiated Connective Tissue Disease in Pregnancy: A Topic Yet to be Explored.

Authors:  Caterina Serena; Sara Clemenza; Serena Simeone; Sara Zullino; Serena Ottanelli; Marianna Pina Rambaldi; Silvia Vannuccini; Felice Petraglia; Federico Mecacci
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Hydroxychloroquine in the pregnancies of women with lupus: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Authors:  Megan E B Clowse; Amanda M Eudy; Stephen Balevic; Gillian Sanders-Schmidler; Andrzej Kosinski; Rebecca Fischer-Betz; Dafna D Gladman; Yair Molad; Cecilia Nalli; Abir Mokbel; Angela Tincani; Murray Urowitz; Caroline Bay; Megan van Noord; Michelle Petri
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2022-03

Review 3.  COVID-19 AND UPPER LIMB ANOMALIES IN NEWBORNS: A REASON FOR CONCERN?

Authors:  Carlos Henrique Fernandes; Rodrigo Guerra Sabongi; João Baptista Gomes Dos Santos
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 4.  Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Management in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Kathryn H Dao; Bonnie L Bermas
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-02-15

5.  COVID-19 pharmacotherapy utilization patterns during pregnancy: International Registry of Coronavirus Exposure in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Whitney J Westhoff; Louisa H Smith; Diego F Wyszynski; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 2.732

6.  Protection by hydroxychloroquine prevents placental injury in obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  Jing Liu; Liting Zhang; Yijia Tian; Shuting Wan; Min Hu; Shasha Song; Meihua Zhang; Qian Zhou; Yu Xia; Xietong Wang
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 5.295

7.  Medication use during pregnancy and birth defects in Hunan province, China, during 2016-2019: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Wei Zou; Shuting Xie; Changbiao Liang; Donghua Xie; Junqun Fang; Bo Ouyang; Li Sun; Hua Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  The Potential Benefit of Hydroxychloroquine in Chronic Placental Inflammation of Unknown Etiology Associated with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandra Bouariu; Nicolae Gică; Anca Marina Ciobanu; Ana Maria Scutelnicu; Mihaela Roxana Popescu; Anca Maria Panaitescu
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17

9.  Maternal exposure to hydroxychloroquine and birth defects.

Authors:  Meredith M Howley; Martha M Werler; Sarah C Fisher; Alissa R Van Zutphen; Suzan L Carmichael; Cheryl S Broussard; Dominique Heinke; Elizabeth C Ailes; Shannon M Pruitt; Jennita Reefhuis; Allen A Mitchell; Marilyn L Browne
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 2.661

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.