Literature DB >> 32960665

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Versus Doppler Ultrasound for Detection of Early Vascular Complications of Pancreas Grafts.

Jordan Swensson1, Danielle Hill1, Temel Tirkes1, Jonathan Fridell2, Aashish Patel1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare conventional duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for identifying vascular abnormalities in pancreas allografts in the immediate posttransplant setting. Identification of pancreas allografts at risk of failure may impact patient care because early intervention for vascular insufficiency can lead to graft salvage. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Two radiologists who were blinded to patient outcomes performed a retrospective analysis of the postoperative Doppler ultrasound and CEUS images of 34 pancreas grafts from transplants performed between 2017 and 2019. A total of 28 patients who did not require surgical reexploration were considered the control group. Six patients had surgically proven arterial or venous abnormalities on surgical reexploration. Each radiologist scored grafts as having normal or abnormal vascularity on the basis of image sets obtained using Doppler ultrasound only and CEUS only. Comparisons of both the diagnostic performance of each modality and interobserver agreement were performed. RESULTS. Both readers showed that CEUS had increased sensitivity for detecting vascular abnormalities (83.3% for both readers) compared with Doppler ultrasound (66.7% and 50.0%). For both readers, the specificity of CEUS was similar to that of Doppler imaging (81.6% and 78.9% for reader 1 and reader 2 versus 76.3% and 84.2% for reader 1 and reader 2). For both readers, the negative predictive value of CEUS was higher than that of Doppler ultrasound (96.9% and 96.8% for reader 1 and reader 2 versus 93.5% and 91.4% for reader 1 and reader 2). Interobserver agreement was higher for CEUS than for Doppler ultrasound (κ = 0.54 vs κ = 0.28). CONCLUSION. CEUS may provide radiologists and surgeons with a means of timely and effective evaluation of pancreas graft perfusion after surgery, and it may help identify grafts that could benefit from surgical salvage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Doppler ultrasound; contrast-enhanced ultrasound; pancreas transplant; postoperative

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32960665      PMCID: PMC7987210          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.20.22858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  19 in total

1.  Use of the end-to-end anastomotic circular stapler for creation of the duodenoenterostomy for enteric drainage of the pancreas allograft [corrected].

Authors:  Jonathan A Fridell; Martin L Milgrom; Sharon Henson; Mark D Pescovitz
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 2.  Imaging of whole-organ pancreas transplants.

Authors:  Fauzia Q Vandermeer; Maria A Manning; Aletta A Frazier; Jade J Wong-You-Cheong
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  Pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  Steve A White; James A Shaw; David E R Sutherland
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Preparation of the pancreas allograft for transplantation.

Authors:  Jonathan A Fridell; John A Powelson; Carrie E Sanders; Gaetano Ciancio; George W Burke; Robert J Stratta
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.863

5.  Microbubble contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the vascular evaluation after pancreas transplantation: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Audun E Berstad; Knut Brabrand; Rune Horneland; Trygve Syversveen; Håkon Haugaa; Trond G Jenssen; Aksel Foss
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 1.990

6.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  Stephan Kersting; Stefan Ludwig; Florian Ehehalt; Andreas Volk; Alfred Bunk
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Pancreas transplant imaging: how I do it.

Authors:  Parag P Tolat; W Dennis Foley; Christopher Johnson; Mark D Hohenwalter; Francisco A Quiroz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Early reexploration for suspected thrombosis after pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  Jonathan A Fridell; Richard S Mangus; Aaron B Mull; Tim E Taber; Carrie E Sanders; Robert C Slisher; Michelle L Goble; John A Powelson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Identification of early complications following pancreas and renal transplantation using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)--first results.

Authors:  Janine Rennert; Stefan Farkas; Martina Georgieva; Martin Loss; Christian Dornia; Wolfgang Jung; Christian Stroszczynski; Ernst-Michael Jung
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Contribution of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to nonoperative management of segmental ischemia of the head of a pancreas graft.

Authors:  U Boggi; L Morelli; G Amorese; I Bargellini; P Marchetti; F Mosca
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.