Literature DB >> 32960428

Health-related stakeholders' perceptions of clinical pharmacy services in Qatar.

Tesnime Jebara1, Scott Cunningham2, Katie MacLure2, Ahmed Awaisu3, Abdulrouf Pallivalapila4, Moza Al Hail4, Derek Stewart3.   

Abstract

Background In Qatar, the National Vision 2030 and the National Health Strategy 2018-2022 articulate the need to improve healthcare delivery by better utilisation of the skilled workforce. In this regard, pharmacy practice is rapidly advancing and several extended pharmacy services are now available in institutionalised settings. Objective This study aimed to determine health-related stakeholders' perceptions of current clinical pharmacy services in Qatar, and the potential development and implementation of further patient-centred roles. Setting All major organisations and institutions relating to the practice, education, regulation, and governance of pharmacy in Qatar. Method Qualitative, face-to-face semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals in key strategic positions of policy development and influence (i.e. health-related academic leaders, healthcare policy developers, directors of medicine/pharmacy/nursing, and patient safety leaders). Participants were recruited via a combination of purposeful and snowball sampling, until the point of data saturation was reached. The interview guide was grounded in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains of innovation characteristics, outer and inner setting, characteristics of individuals, and implementation process. The interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and independently analysed by two researchers using the Framework approach. Main outcome measure Perceptions of stakeholders regarding current and potential for future clinical pharmacy services in Qatar. Results Thirty-seven interviews were conducted with stakeholders of policy influence in healthcare. The interviewees reported a variety of clinical pharmacy services available in Qatar, which they perceived as positively impacting patient care outcomes, pharmacists' professional autonomy, and the healthcare system in general (innovation characteristics). However, they perceived that these services were mainly performed in hospitals and less in community pharmacy setting (inner setting) and were undervalued by patients and the public (outer setting). Expansion of pharmacists' clinical activities was supported, with recognition of facilitators such as the skillset and training of pharmacists, potential time release due to automation and well-considered implementation processes (characteristics of individuals, inner setting, process). Conclusion Health-related stakeholders in Qatar have positive perceptions of current clinical pharmacy services and support the expansion of pharmacist's roles. However, service development needs to consider the issues of patient and public awareness and initially target institutionalised healthcare settings.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical pharmacy; Middle east; Pharmacy practice; Qualitative study; Service evaluation; Theory

Year:  2020        PMID: 32960428      PMCID: PMC7878249          DOI: 10.1007/s11096-020-01114-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  18 in total

1.  Integrating pharmacists into primary care teams: barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Derek Jorgenson; Tessa Laubscher; Barry Lyons; Rebecca Palmer
Journal:  Int J Pharm Pract       Date:  2013-11-27

2.  Development of consensus guidance to facilitate service redesign around pharmacist prescribing in UK hospital practice.

Authors:  Antonella Tonna; Dorothy McCaig; Lesley Diack; Bernice West; Derek Stewart
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2014-08-10

Review 3.  Nonmedical prescribing: where are we now?

Authors:  Louise C Cope; Aseel S Abuzour; Mary P Tully
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2016-04-29

4.  Evaluating pharmacist input into the pharmaceutical care of patients in dispensing medical practices in remote and rural areas of Scotland.

Authors:  Derek Stewart; Breda Anthony; Clare Morrison; Yvonne MacRae; Lucy Dixon; Emer Friel; Evelyn Yoong; Scott Cunningham; Katie MacLure
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.267

5.  What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies.

Authors:  Jill J Francis; Marie Johnston; Clare Robertson; Liz Glidewell; Vikki Entwistle; Martin P Eccles; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2010-12

6.  Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.

Authors:  Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Physicians' perceptions, expectations, and experience with pharmacists at Hamad Medical Corporation in Qatar.

Authors:  Manal Zaidan; Rajvir Singh; Mayyada Wazaify; Linda Tahaineh
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2011-04-08

8.  Patient and public perspectives of community pharmacies in the United Kingdom: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ali M K Hindi; Ellen I Schafheutle; Sally Jacobs
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Facilitators and strategies to implement clinical pharmacy services in a metropolis in Northeast Brazil: a qualitative approach.

Authors:  Sheila Feitosa Ramos; Genival Araujo Dos Santos Júnior; André Mascarenhas Pereira; Aline Santana Dosea; Kérilin Stancine Santos Rocha; Déborah Mônica Machado Pimentel; Divaldo Pereira de Lyra-Jr
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Factors influencing national implementation of innovations within community pharmacy: a systematic review applying the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Authors:  Natalie M Weir; Rosemary Newham; Emma Dunlop; Marion Bennie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.