Literature DB >> 32960359

Analysis of genomic pathogenesis according to the revised Bethesda guidelines and additional criteria.

Jin Cheon Kim1,2, Jong Hwan Kim3,4, Ye Jin Ha5,3, Chan Wook Kim5,3, Ka Hee Tak5,3, Yong Sik Yoon5,3, Yi Hong Kwon3, Seon Ae Roh3, Dong-Hyung Cho6, Seon-Kyu Kim3,4, Seon-Young Kim7, Yong Sung Kim3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: As few genotype-phenotype correlations are available for nonsyndromic hereditary colorectal cancer (CRC), we implemented genomic analysis on the basis of the revised Bethesda guideline (RBG) and extended (12 items) to verify possible subtypes.
METHODS: Patients with sporadic CRC (n = 249) were enrolled, stratified according to the revised Bethesda guidelines (RBG+ and RBG- groups) plus additional criteria. Exome/transcriptome analyses (n = 98) and cell-based functional assays were conducted.
RESULTS: We detected 469 somatic and 830 germline gene mutations differing significantly between the positive and negative groups, associated with 12 RBG items/additional criteria. Twenty-one genes had significantly higher mutation rates in left, relative to right, colon cancer, while USP40, HCFC1, and HSPG2 mutation rates were higher in rectal than colon cancer. FAT4 mutation rates were lower in early-onset CRC, in contrast to increased rates in microsatellite instability (MSI)-positive tumors, potentially defining an early-onset microsatellite-stable subtype. The mutation rates of COL6A5 and MGAM2 were significantly and SETD5 was assumably, associated CRC pedigree with concurrent gastric cancer (GC). The predicted deleterious/damaging germline variants, SH2D4A rs35647122, was associated with synchronous/metachronous CRC with related tumors, while NUP160 rs381660 and KRTAP27-1 rs2244485 were potentially associated with a GC pedigree and less strictly defined hereditary CRC, respectively. SH2D4A and NUP160 acted as oncogenic facilitators.
CONCLUSION: Our limited genomic analysis for RBG and additional items suggested that specific somatic alterations in the respective items may enlighten relevant pathogenesis along with the knowledge of germline mutations. Further validation is needed to indicate appropriate surveillance in suspected individuals.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hereditary colorectal cancer; NGS; Nonsyndromic; Revised Bethesda guideline; SNP

Year:  2020        PMID: 32960359     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03391-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  29 in total

Review 1.  Multifaceted role of keratins in epithelial cell differentiation and transformation.

Authors:  Crismita Dmello; Saumya S Srivastava; Richa Tiwari; Pratik R Chaudhari; Sharada Sawant; Milind M Vaidya
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Predictors for High Microsatellite Instability in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Fulfilling the Revised Bethesda Guidelines.

Authors:  Keiichi Arakawa; Keisuke Hata; Kazushige Kawai; Toshiaki Tanaka; Takeshi Nishikawa; Kazuhito Sasaki; Yasutaka Shuno; Manabu Kaneko; Masaya Hiyoshi; Shigenobu Emoto; Koji Murono; Hiroaki Nozawa
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.480

3.  Is gastric cancer part of the tumour spectrum of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer? A molecular genetic study.

Authors:  A Gylling; W M Abdel-Rahman; M Juhola; K Nuorva; E Hautala; H J Järvinen; J-P Mecklin; M Aarnio; P Peltomäki
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Classification and characterization of microsatellite instability across 18 cancer types.

Authors:  Ronald J Hause; Colin C Pritchard; Jay Shendure; Stephen J Salipante
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 5.  Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management of colon cancer.

Authors:  Mitchell S Cappell
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.806

6.  Pathology features in Bethesda guidelines predict colorectal cancer microsatellite instability: a population-based study.

Authors:  Mark A Jenkins; Shinichi Hayashi; Anne-Marie O'Shea; Lawrence J Burgart; Tom C Smyrk; David Shimizu; Paul M Waring; Andrew R Ruszkiewicz; Aaron F Pollett; Mark Redston; Melissa A Barker; John A Baron; Graham R Casey; James G Dowty; Graham G Giles; Paul Limburg; Polly Newcomb; Joanne P Young; Michael D Walsh; Stephen N Thibodeau; Noralane M Lindor; Loïc Lemarchand; Steven Gallinger; Robert W Haile; John D Potter; John L Hopper; Jeremy R Jass
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 7.  MUC16 as a novel target for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Abhijit Aithal; Sanchita Rauth; Prakash Kshirsagar; Ashu Shah; Imayavaramban Lakshmanan; Wade M Junker; Maneesh Jain; Moorthy P Ponnusamy; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Expert Opin Ther Targets       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 6.902

8.  Identification of Novel Candidate Genes for Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Susceptibility.

Authors:  Richarda M de Voer; Marc-Manuel Hahn; Robbert D A Weren; Arjen R Mensenkamp; Christian Gilissen; Wendy A van Zelst-Stams; Liesbeth Spruijt; C Marleen Kets; Junxiao Zhang; Hanka Venselaar; Lilian Vreede; Nil Schubert; Marloes Tychon; Ronny Derks; Hans K Schackert; Ad Geurts van Kessel; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Marjolijn J L Ligtenberg; Roland P Kuiper
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 9.  Next-generation sequencing: recent applications to the analysis of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Del Vecchio; Valentina Mastroiaco; Antinisca Di Marco; Chiara Compagnoni; Daria Capece; Francesca Zazzeroni; Carlo Capalbo; Edoardo Alesse; Alessandra Tessitore
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Genomic landscape of colorectal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Jin Cheon Kim; Walter F Bodmer
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.553

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.