The arylboronic acid catalyzed dehydrative C-alkylation of 1,3-diketones and 1,3-ketoesters using secondary benzylic alcohols as the electrophile is reported, forming new C-C bonds (19 examples, up to 98% yield) with the release of water as the only byproduct. The process is also applicable to the allylation of benzylic alcohols using allyltrimethylsilane as the nucleophile (12 examples, up to 96% yield).
The arylboronic acid catalyzed dehydrative C-alkylation of 1,3-diketones and 1,3-ketoesters using secondary benzylic alcohols as the electrophile is reported, forming new C-C bonds (19 examples, up to 98% yield) with the release of water as the only byproduct. The process is also applicable to the allylation of benzylic alcohols using allyltrimethylsilane as the nucleophile (12 examples, up to 96% yield).
The formation of carbon–carbon
bonds is central to the synthesis of organic molecules, with the alkylation
of carbon-based pro-nucleophiles an important strategy within this
area. Traditionally, alkylation reactions are performed using either
alkyl halides or stoichiometrically activated alcohol derivatives
as the electrophile. However, with the drive to develop more efficient
and sustainable organic reactions,[1] there
has been increasing interest in catalytic methods for the direct use
of alcohols as electrophiles in alkylation processes, releasing water
as the only byproduct.[2] Catalytic dehydrative
substitutions can occur by a number of general mechanistic pathways
including nucleophilic substitution, “borrowing hydrogen”
via a redox reaction of primary or secondary alcohols,[3] or addition to metal π-allyl complexes formed from
allylic alcohols.[4]Recently, arylboronic
acids have gained increasing attention as
catalysts that can activate hydroxyl groups toward both electrophilic
and nucleophilic reactivity.[5] Boronic acids
are attractive as catalysts due to their wide availability, tractability,
and generally low toxicity.[6] Of particular
relevance is the use of arylboronic acid catalysis for the activation
of alcohols toward C–C bond formations through either complete
or partial ionization of the C(sp3)–OH bond. In
this regard, dehydrative Friedel–Crafts alkylation processes
have been most widely explored to date (Scheme a).[7] Seminal work
by McCubbin[7a,7b] and Hall[7c] showed that electron-deficient arylboronic acids catalyze the Friedel–Crafts
alkylation of electron-rich arenes and heteroarenes using either allylic
or benzylic alcohols as the electrophile. The reaction scope has recently
been extended to the use of electron-deficient arenes using 2,3,4,5-tetrafluorophenylboronic
acid as the catalyst alongside perfluoropinacol as a cocatalyst.[7g] Arylboronic acid catalysis can also be combined
with enamine catalysis for the enantioselective α-alkylation
of aldehydes using tertiary allylic alcohols.[8] Other C–C bond formations promoted by the catalytic arylboronic
acid activation of alcohols include dehydrative Nazarov cyclizations
of divinyl alcohols,[9] and [4 + 3] cycloadditions
promoted by the ionization of indolyl alcohols.[10]
Scheme 1
Boronic Acid Catalyzed Dehydrative Substitutions
We recently reported the use of catalytic pentafluorophenylboronic
acid 1 alongside cocatalytic oxalic acid 2 for the activation of benzylic alcohols toward inter- and intramolecular
dehydrative etherification reactions (Scheme b).[11] Mechanistic
investigations suggest that pentafluorophenylboronic acid 1 and oxalic acid 2 condense in situ to form
a Brønsted acid catalyst that promotes SN1-type reactivity.
We therefore questioned whether this system could be applied to the C-alkylation of 1,3-diketone derivatives and allylation
reactions, which have not previously been explored using arylboronic
acid catalysis. Various Brønsted acid catalysts have previously
been reported for dehydrative C–C bond formations.[2,12] However, the use of a tractable arylboronic acid would avoid the
direct handling of strong acids and further expand the scope of reactions
promoted by these readily available catalytic systems.First,
the use of enolizable 1,3-diketones as potential pro-nucleophiles
was investigated with the reaction of benzhydrol with dibenzoylmethane.
Reaction optimization showed that a combination of pentafluorophenylboronic
acid 1 (5 mol %) and oxalic acid 2 (10 mol
%) in MeNO2,[13] a catalytic system
first reported by Moran for a dehydrative Friedel–Crafts alkylation
reaction,[7f] gave the desired C-alkylation product 3 in 76% yield after 3 h at room
temperature. In the absence of any catalyst or with pentafluorophenylboronic
acid 1 alone, no reaction was observed, while using only
oxalic acid 2 (10 mol %) gave 5% conversion into 3 over 3 h.[13] The reaction scope
was first investigated through variation of the 1,3-diketone component
(Scheme ). Symmetrical
diketones bearing both electron-donating and electron-withdrawing
substituents were tolerated under the standard reaction conditions,
forming products 4 and 5 in good yields.
Heterocycle containing acyl benzothiazoles and acyl benzoxazoles were
also competent pro-nucleophiles, forming products 6 and 7 after extended 48 h reaction times at 90 °C, although
the analogous acyl benzimidazole was unreactive under these conditions.
The use of a cyclic 1,3-diketone was also possible, forming product 8 bearing a new quaternary carbon center in an excellent 93%
yield. In contrast, the reaction of benzhydrol with 1,3-cyclohexanedione
gave selective O-alkylation into the corresponding
β-keto enolether.[13,14] Attempts to extend
the scope to alternative enolizable ketones such as 2-phenylacetophenone
or benzoylacetonitrile were unsuccessful, with only starting materials
returned at room temperature. Using dibenzoylmethane (2 equiv) as
standard, the use of various secondary benzylic alcohols as the electrophilic
component was trialed. 1-Arylethanol derivatives bearing either neutral
or electron-donating substituents were well tolerated, forming products 9–11 in excellent yields. The synthetic
potential was demonstrated by performing the reaction on gram scale
(4 mmol of alcohol) to give 1.25 g of 9 in 93% yield.
Halogen substitution on the aryl ring was also possible with 4-fluoro-
and 4-bromophenyl ethanol reacting to give 12 and 13 in 90% and 71% yield, respectively. Altering the substitution
pattern affected the reactivity, with 1-(2-bromo- and 1-(3-bromophenyl)ethanol
giving products 14 and 15 in slightly reduced
yields. The presence of an alkyne on the reacting carbinol center
was well tolerated, giving 16 in 98% yield. Limitations
included the use of a sterically demanding secondary and tertiary
alcohols, which are unreactive, while primary benzylic alcohols preferentially
form the symmetric ether product.[13]
Scheme 2
Dehydrative Alkylation of 1,3-Diektone Derivatives
Using 1,3-diketone (5 equiv).
Using benzhydrol (2 equiv)
and 1,3-diketone (1 equiv).
Reaction performed on a 4 mmol scale.
Dehydrative Alkylation of 1,3-Diektone Derivatives
Using 1,3-diketone (5 equiv).Using benzhydrol (2 equiv)
and 1,3-diketone (1 equiv).Reaction performed on a 4 mmol scale.The
use of 1,3-ketoesters as pro-nucleophiles was possible under
the standard conditions (Scheme ). For example, reacting ethyl benzoylacetate 17 with benzhydrol (2 equiv) gave product 18 in
an excellent 97% yield after heating at 90 °C overnight. In this
case, an excess of the alcohol was used to aid purification, with
the symmetrical ether of benzhydrol formed as a side product. The
use of 1-arylethanol derivatives bearing either electron-donating
or halogen substituents as the electrophile gave C-alkylation products 19–22 in generally
good yield as a mixture of diastereoisomers. Resubjecting an isolated
sample of diastereomerically enriched product 21 (63:37
dr) to the reaction conditions led to equilibration of the diastereoisomers
into the observed 53:47 dr, suggesting formation of a thermodynamic
mixture. The product epimerization presumably occurs via catalyst-promoted
enolization and protonation of the 1,3-ketoester stereocenter. The C-alkylation of 1,3-ketoesters could also be performed on
gram scale (3.2 mmol of alcohol), giving 0.97 g of product 20 in 97% yield.
Scheme 3
Use of 1,3-Ketoesters as Pro-nucleophiles
Using alcohol (2
equiv) and
ethyl benzoylacetate 17 (1 equiv).
Reaction performed on a 3.2 mmol
scale.
KOH, MeOH, 70
°C.
NaOH, EtOH,
80 °C
Use of 1,3-Ketoesters as Pro-nucleophiles
Using alcohol (2
equiv) and
ethyl benzoylacetate 17 (1 equiv).Reaction performed on a 3.2 mmol
scale.KOH, MeOH, 70
°C.NaOH, EtOH,
80 °CFurthermore, the isolated diastereomeric
mixtures of products 19–21 could
be derivatized into the corresponding
β-aryl ketones 23–25 through
decarboxylation under basic conditions.Next, we sought to extend
the C-alkylation protocol
to a catalytic Hosomi–Sakurai process using allyl silanes as
the nucleophile.[15] Initial investigations
reacting benzhydrol as the electrophile with allyltrimethylsilane 26 (2 equiv) using pentafluorophenylboronic acid 1 (5 mol %) and oxalic acid 2 (10 mol %) exclusively
gave the symmetrical ether at room temperature in nitromethane. However,
increasing the temperature to 90 °C gave allylation product 27 in excellent 96% yield (Scheme ), with no formation of the unwanted symmetrical
ether. Various secondary alcohols were trialed under the standard
catalytic conditions. Electron-rich and halogen substituted 1-arylethanol
derivatives were suitable electrophiles, forming allylation products 28–33 in moderate to good yields. In all
cases, complete conversion into the allylation product was observed,
but the nonpolar nature of the products resulted in loss of material
during purification by chromatography accounting for some of the moderate
yields. Unsubstituted 1-phenylethanol derivatives were not reactive,
returning either starting materials or the corresponding symmetrical
ether byproduct under all conditions tested.[13] In contrast to the reactivity observed with 1,3-diketone nucleophiles,
a secondary alcohol bearing a bulky tert-butyl substituent
worked well, forming product 34 in 86% yield. Alkynyl
and extended alkenyl substituents were also well tolerated, with products 35 and 36 formed in 80% and 90% yield, respectively.
The catalytic allylation of an electron-rich tertiary alcohol was
also possible, forming product 37 with a new quaternary
carbon center in 68% yield. The electron-donating methoxy substituent
on the aryl ring was essential for reactivity, with the analogous
unsubstituted phenyl substrate returned unreacted under the same conditions.
Cinnamyl trimethylsilane could also be used as a nucleophile, giving 38 in 77% yield as a 64:36 mixture of diastereoisomers at
room temperature.
Scheme 4
Allylation of Benzylic Alcohols
Using cinnamyl trimethylsilane
(2 equiv).
Allylation of Benzylic Alcohols
Using cinnamyl trimethylsilane
(2 equiv).We have previously shown that pentafluorophenylboronic
acid 1 and oxalic acid 2 condense in situ
to form hydrated boronate ester 39, which acts as a strong
Brønsted acid to promote SN1 type reactivity through
formation of an intermediate benzylic carbocation from the secondary
alcohol.[11] This is consistent with the
literature on related arylboronic acid catalyzed reactions and accounts
for the higher reactivity observed for electron-rich secondary benzylicalcohols in the substrate scope. A possible catalytic cycle for the
dehydrative C-alkylation process is outlined in Scheme . In solution, pentafluorophenylboronic
acid 1 and oxalic acid 2 are in dynamic
equilibrium with hydrated boronate 39,[16] which is likely to act as a Brønsted acid to protonate
the secondary benzylicalcohol. This is consistent with recent work
by Moran and co-workers, who found that various arylboronic acid promoted
alcohol activation processes are likely to proceed via either a Brønsted
acid or H-bond activation mode, as opposed to Lewis acid or covalent
catalysis.[17] Dissociation of ion pair 40 forms benzylic carbocation 41, which can undergo
nucleophilic addition from the enol tautomer of either the 1,3-diketone
derivatives or 1,3-ketoesters to form the C-alkylation
products and release water as the only byproduct. An analogous mechanism
is plausible using allyltrimethylsilane 26 as the nucleophile
reacting with carbocation 41, with trimethylsilanol released
as the byproduct in this case.[18]
Scheme 5
Possible
Catalytic Cycle
In conclusion, arylboronic
acid catalysis can be used for the dehydrative C-alkylation
of various carbon nucleophiles using secondary
benzylic alcohols as the electrophile. A range of 1,3-diketones and
1,3-ketoesters can be used as pro-nucleophiles toward secondary benzylicalcohols activated by a combination of pentafluorphenylboronic acid 1 (5 mol %) and oxalic acid 2 (10 mol %) to form C-alkylation products in good yields, with water formed
as the only byproduct. The catalytic system is also compatible with
allyltrimethylsilane 26 as the nucleophile, promoting
the direct allylation of various benzylic alcohols. Further studies
into the applicability of arylboronic acid catalysis toward dehydrative
substitution reactions are ongoing in our laboratory.[19]