Ricardo José Fittipaldi-Fernandez1, Idiberto José Zotarelli-Filho2,3, Cristina Fajardo Diestel4, Márcia Regina Simas Torres Klein4, Marcelo Falcão de Santana5,6, João Henrique Felicio de Lima7, Fernando Santos Silva Bastos5,6, Newton Teixeira Dos Santos8. 1. EndogastroRio Clinic, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. 2. Faculty of Medicine, FACERES, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil. dr.idibertozotarelli@faceres.com.br. 3. Zotarelli-Filho Scientific Work, Scientific Consulting LTDA, Sao Jose do Rio Preto, SP, Brazil. dr.idibertozotarelli@faceres.com.br. 4. Department of Applied Nutrition, Nutrition Institute, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. 5. IFEC-Instituto Falcão de Endoscopia e Cirurgia (Falcão Institute of Endoscopy and Surgery), Salvador, BA, Brazil. 6. EBMSP-Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública (Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health), Salvador, BA, Brazil. 7. Endobatel-Digestive Endoscopy, Universidade Federal do Paraná-UFPR (Federal University of Paraná), Curitiba, PR, Brazil. 8. NT Santos Serviços médicos (NT Santos-Medical Services), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic methods, especially the intragastric balloon (IGB), have been shown to be effective for the treatment of excess weight. This study aimed to assess the tolerance, complications, and efficacy of excess weight treatment with a non-adjustable IGB during 6 months. METHODS: A total of 5874 patients treated with a liquid-filled IGB (600-700 mL) and followed up by a multidisciplinary team were evaluated. Participants presented an initial body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 and were stratified according to sex and degree of overweight (overweight and obesity grades I, II, and III). RESULTS: The incidence of complications was 7.32% (n = 430): 6.10% (n = 357) early IGB removal, 0.20% (n = 12) gas production inside the balloon, 0.54% (n = 32) leakage, 0.32% (n = 19) pregnancy, 0.07% (n = 4) gastric perforation, 0.05% (n = 3) upper digestive bleeding, 0.01% (n = 1) Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome due to excessive vomiting, and 0.02% each (n = 1) pancreatitis and esophagus perforation. The 5444 remaining patients (4081 women, 38 ± 38 years) presented a weight loss of 19.13 ± 8.86 kg and a BMI decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) (36.94 ± 5.67 vs. 30.08 ± 5.06 kg/m2). The % total weight loss (%TWL) was 18.42 ± 7.25%, and the % excess weight loss (%EWL) was 65.66 ± 36.24%. The treatment success rate (%TWL ≥ 10%) was 85%. The %EWL was higher in the pre-obese group (122.19%), followed by obesity grades I (76.67%), II (56.01%), and III (45.45%), with p < 0.0001 for each group. %EWL was higher in women (69.71%) than in men (53.39), with p < 0.0001 for each group. There was also a statistical difference between the TWL and EWL groups, with p < 0.001 for all analyses. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic IGB treatment for excess weight is an excellent therapeutic option for patients with different degrees of overweight.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic methods, especially the intragastric balloon (IGB), have been shown to be effective for the treatment of excess weight. This study aimed to assess the tolerance, complications, and efficacy of excess weight treatment with a non-adjustable IGB during 6 months. METHODS: A total of 5874 patients treated with a liquid-filled IGB (600-700 mL) and followed up by a multidisciplinary team were evaluated. Participants presented an initial body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 and were stratified according to sex and degree of overweight (overweight and obesity grades I, II, and III). RESULTS: The incidence of complications was 7.32% (n = 430): 6.10% (n = 357) early IGB removal, 0.20% (n = 12) gas production inside the balloon, 0.54% (n = 32) leakage, 0.32% (n = 19) pregnancy, 0.07% (n = 4) gastric perforation, 0.05% (n = 3) upper digestive bleeding, 0.01% (n = 1) Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome due to excessive vomiting, and 0.02% each (n = 1) pancreatitis and esophagus perforation. The 5444 remaining patients (4081 women, 38 ± 38 years) presented a weight loss of 19.13 ± 8.86 kg and a BMI decreased significantly (p < 0.0001) (36.94 ± 5.67 vs. 30.08 ± 5.06 kg/m2). The % total weight loss (%TWL) was 18.42 ± 7.25%, and the % excess weight loss (%EWL) was 65.66 ± 36.24%. The treatment success rate (%TWL ≥ 10%) was 85%. The %EWL was higher in the pre-obese group (122.19%), followed by obesity grades I (76.67%), II (56.01%), and III (45.45%), with p < 0.0001 for each group. %EWL was higher in women (69.71%) than in men (53.39), with p < 0.0001 for each group. There was also a statistical difference between the TWL and EWL groups, with p < 0.001 for all analyses. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic IGB treatment for excess weight is an excellent therapeutic option for patients with different degrees of overweight.
Authors: Jan Král; Evžen Machytka; Veronika Horká; Jana Selucká; Filip Doleček; Julius Špičák; Viktorie Kovářová; Martin Haluzík; Marek Bužga Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-11-26 Impact factor: 5.717