Yuelong Wang1,2, Jiaojiao Deng3, Lin Wang4,5, Tingyue Zhou2, Jinlong Yang1, Zerong Tian1, Jinhao Yang1, Hongxu Chen1, Xin Tang1, Shasha Zhao2, Liangxue Zhou1, Aiping Tong6, Jianguo Xu7. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 2. State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 4. Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 5. Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. 6. State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China jianguo_1229@126.com aipingtong@scu.edu.cn. 7. Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China jianguo_1229@126.com aipingtong@scu.edu.cn.
Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are intracranial nonglial tumors of the sellar and parasellar regions that are most commonly seen in children.1 They account for 1.2%–4% of all brain tumors and 6%–9% of all pediatric brain tumors.2 CPs are derived from the epithelium of Rathke’s pouch. According to WHO classification, CPs can be divided into two types: adamantinomatous-type CP (ACP) and papillary-type CP (PCP).3 4 ACP and PCP are characterized by distinct genetic alterations, such that recurrent activating mutations in CTNNB1 gene coding for β-catenin were identified in the majority of ACP, whereas, nearly all PCP had recurrent BRAF V600E mutations.5 6Although the CP is defined by WHO as a benign tumor, both types of CPs are difficult to treat due to their anatomical proximity to important functional structures, such as optic nerve, pituitary stalk, hypothalamus and internal carotid artery.2 Surgical resection is the primary treatment for CP.7 However, achieving gross-total resection (GTR) of either type of CP without any complications remains a challenge,8 which underlines the necessity of new therapeutic options.The B7 family ligands/receptors can selectively bind to T cell ligand to either stimulate or inhibit T cell responses.9 10 Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the pathway of B7 family members, such as CTLA-4/B7-1/B7-2 and PD-1/PD-L1, have been shown to provide clinical benefit and transformed the treatment of several advanced cancers, including melanoma and non-small-cell lung cancer.11–13 These findings have inspired us to investigate whether these B7 family of ligands/receptors could also be employed as potential therapeutic targets in the treatment of CPs.Currently, there are very few studies on the expression and function of B7 family ligands/receptors in CPs. Previous research on ACP (n=23) and PCP (n=18) resections have illustrated that PD-L1 is highly expressed by all tumor cells with a subtype-specific spatial distribution.14 This work supports that CPs might be vulnerable to PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade. Coincidentally, we have found that another B7 family member B7-H3 is also highly expressed in a small cohort of ACP (n=30) and PCP (n=14) cases.15 However, the expression of other B7 family members in CPs remains unknown and the clinical significance of their expressions in CP has not been studied using a large cohort.Therefore, in this study, we examined the expression of PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA proteins in a large CPs cohort using tissue microarray (TMA). In addition, we have correlated the expression of these molecules with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in this cohort to elucidate the potential association between B7 family of ligands/receptors expression and patients’ survival.
Materials and methods
Patients and TMA
The samples were collected from the Department of Neurosurgery of West China Hospital between January 2011 and September 2019, which had adequate tumor samples for TMAs. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before enrolment. The clinical follow-up was continuously performed until the death of patients. Hospital records and pathology reports of all patients were retrieved and reviewed. Brain tissues were collected from traumatic brain injurypatients who underwent injured brain resection. The TMAs were prepared by Shanghai Outdo Biotech (Shanghai, China).
Immunohistochemistry, digital pathology and scoring system
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed on TMAs using the following primary antibodies: PD-L1 (1:200, 4.37 µg/mL, 13684, Cell Signaling Technology), B7-H3 (1:400, 1.49 µg/mL, 14 058S, Cell Signaling Technology), B7-H4 (1:400, 0.66 µg/mL, 14572, Cell Signaling Technology) and VISTA (1:200, 0.05 µg/mL, 54979, Cell Signaling Technology).15–18 TMA slides were stained using standard immunohistochemistry techniques as previously described.15 The IHC staining was scanned using Pannoramic MIDI (3D HISTECH). The histoscore of the membrane and nuclear staining quantification was assessed according to the formula (3+ per cent cells)×3+(2+per cent cells)×2+(1+per cent cells)×1, and the formula total intensity/total cell number was used to assess the histoscore of pixel quantification. In this case, the normalized score is between 0 and 300. This method has previously been described.19
Fluorescent immunohistochemistry
Immunofluorescence staining (IF) staining was performed on TMAs using the following primary and secondary antibodies: VISTA (the same as IHC) and CD3 (1:400, 1.63 µg/mL, ab699, Abcam), Ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1 (IBA-1, 1:100, 25 µg/mL, ab15690, Abcam), PD-L1 (1: 200, 2.5 µg/mL, ab210931, Abcam), goat anti-rabbit Alexa-594 antibody (1:500, 4 µg/mL, ab150088, Abcam), goat anti-mouse (Alexa Fluor 488, 1:500, 4 µg/mL, ab150117, Abcam). Sections were then cover slipped using hard-set mounting media containing DAPI (ab104139, Abcam).The fluorescent IHC staining was scanned using Pannoramic MIDI (3D HISTECH). Quantitative measurement of the fluorescence signal was performed using the AQUA method of quantitative IF (QIF) as previously reported.20 Briefly, The QIF score of VISTA and PD-L1 signal for each antibody in the tumor were calculated by dividing the target VISTA and PD-L1 pixel intensities in the area of the tumor by the DAPI positivity. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) were defined as cells that have CD3 and IBA-1 stain positivity, respectively. Scores were normalized to the exposure time and bit depth at which the images were captured, allowing scores collected at different exposure times to be comparable. Cases were considered as target expressers when the QIF score was above the signal detection threshold determined using the negative control preparation and visual inspection.
Polymerase chain reaction and mutation analysis
Before total DNA from fresh tumor tissue was extracted, the content of the tumor cells was confirmed by instantaneous sections. DNA was extracted by using Animal Genomic DNA Quick Extraction Kit (D0065 M, Beyotime, China). Primer pairs were used for gene amplification of CTNNB1 exon 3 (Primer sequence Forward: 5’-TCACTGAGCTAACCCTGGCT-3’, Reverse: 5’- GCATTCTGACTTTCAGTAAGGCAAT-3’) and BRAF V600E (Primer sequence Forward: 5’-AGGAAAGCATCTCACCTCATCCT-3’, Reverse: 5’-AGGAAAGCATCTCACCTCATCCT-3’). PCR was performed by applying the default conditions: 5 min 95℃ for initial denaturation, which was followed by 30 cycles of amplification that consist of denaturation at 95℃ for 60 s, annealing at 60℃ for 45 s, and extension at 72℃ for 90 s with final extension 72℃ for 12 min. PCR products were sent to TsingKe for sequencing analysis.
Statistical analysis
All values are expressed as means±SEM. Statistical data analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism V.5.03 (GraphPad Software La Jolla, California, USA) statistical package and R language (V.3.6.1). Interdependence between staining and clinical data was calculated using the X2 displayed by cross-tables. Student’s t-test was used for two-group analysis. The Cox proportional hazards regression model and Kaplan-Meier plots were generated by the survival package, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival curves between high and low expression groups. The cut-off points were determined by the survivalROC package. Statistical significance was defined as a p<0.05.
Results
Patient clinicopathological characteristics and outcome
A total of 132 patients were enrolled, including 86 males and 46 females (male/female ratio 1.86:1, table 1, online supplemental table 1). Patients’ ages had a bimodal distribution and ranged from 2 to 75 years with the median age of 40. We chose the lowest point (35 years) between the two peaks to stratify age. Pathologically, there were 89 ACPs and 43 PCPs. Within this cohort, 117 patients had primary tumors and 15 patients had recurrent tumors. The clinical presentations of patients in the study included the following: vision loss, headache, fatigue, drowsiness and unconsciousness. The average tumor diameter in this cohort was 3.6 cm (ranges from 1.2 to 9.2 cm). GTR and subtotal resection (STR) were achieved in 104 (78.8%) and 28 (21.2%) cases, respectively.
Table 1
Comparison of baseline clinicopathological characteristics based on PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA expression in CP patients
Comparison of baseline clinicopathological characteristics based on PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA expression in CPpatients* P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001; **** P<0.0001ACP, adamantinomatous-type craniopharyngioma; GTR, gross-total resection; PCP, papillary-type craniopharyngioma; STR, subtotal resection.A total of 110 out of 132 patients (83.3%) were followed up for an average of 18.2 months, which ranges from 0.2 to 84 months (online supplemental table 1). Within the perioperative period, 26 deaths have occurred. For the 87 GTR patients being followed up, 6 (6.9%) had shown tumor recurrence within an average of 30 months, which ranges from 2 to 82 months. Among the 28 STR patients being followed up, 10 (35.7%) had experienced tumor recurrence within an average of 16.2months, which ranges from 6 to 53 months.In this cohort, the cut-off values of PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and PD-L1 expressions were determined by survivalROC package, which was 70, 182, 0 and 20, respectively. Elevated expressions of PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA were significantly associated with some clinicopathological characteristics (table 1). For example, PD-L1 expression was associated with age, histopathological, tumor morphology and hydrocephalus, whereas VISTA expression was connected with age, histopathological and hydrocephalus.
Expression of B7 family proteins in CP tumor cells
Using IHC, we explored the expression characteristics of PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA in CP. Consistent with the previous study,12 the patterns of PD-L1 staining were predominantly membranous, and 101 (76.5%) positive cases were detected in this set of data. In ACP, PD-L1 expression was present in the regions of well-keratinized squamous tumor epithelium (figure 1A). Notably, we also found strong staining around the cholesterol crystals, which was not seen in previous reports (figure 1A). Compared with ACP, PCP had a much higher expression of PD-L1 (figure 1B), which was observed in multiple layers of tumor cells with the strongest expression surrounding the fibrovascular stroma and decreased with increasing distance from the stroma (figure 1A).
Figure 1
Expression of the B7 family ligands/receptors on CPs. (A) PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA expression on the brain, ACP and PCP. (B) Comparison of biomarker expression status in different tumor subtypes. All data displays mean±SEM. Red bar: 0.5 mm, black bar: 50 µm. ****P<0.0001. ACP, adamantinomatous-type craniopharyngioma; ns: no significant; PCP, papillary-type CP.
Expression of the B7 family ligands/receptors on CPs. (A) PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA expression on the brain, ACP and PCP. (B) Comparison of biomarker expression status in different tumor subtypes. All data displays mean±SEM. Red bar: 0.5 mm, black bar: 50 µm. ****P<0.0001. ACP, adamantinomatous-type craniopharyngioma; ns: no significant; PCP, papillary-type CP.B7-H3 was detectable to varying degrees in all samples (100%). It was mainly expressed on the cell membrane of tumor cells and was also observed in vascular endothelial cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells in the two subtypes of CPs (figure 1A). The average expression scores of B7–H3 in both ACP and PCP were higher than in normal brain tissues, but no significant difference was detected between ACP and PCP (figure 1B). Intriguingly, we also found that less than one half of CP tissues (53/132, 40.2%) have weak to moderate expression of B7–H4 (figure 1A), which is currently reported to be expressed only in a few type of tumor cells.21 B7–H4 mainly expressed on the surface of CP cell membrane far from the basal cells. There was no difference in expression level between the two subtypes of CPs (figure 1B).IHC staining demonstrated that 106 (80.3%) CP specimens, including 67 ACPs (histoscore range from 10 to 90) and 39 PCPs (histoscore range from 10 to 230), were positive for VISTA staining. The expression of VISTA was detected both on the cell membrane and in the cytoplasm (figure 1A). It was predominantly presented in the regions of epithelial whorls in ACP and on multiple layers of tumor cells which are far from the basal cell in PCP (figure 1A). The VISTA histoscore was significantly higher in PCPs than in brain tissues and ACPs. However, we found no statistical significance between normal brain tissues and ACPs (figure 1B).We further compared the expression of PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA in primary tumors versus recurrent tumors as well as between preoperative radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups. The results suggested that there was no significant difference between the groups (online supplemental figure 1).
Expression of B7 family proteins in tumor-associated immune cells
All CP cases contain numerous immune cells in the stroma and epithelium. Among these cases, we also found that tumor-associated immune cells expressed B7 family ligands/receptors, of which VISTA expression was the highest (figure 2A). To explore the possible role of VISTA in the immune microenvironment of CPs, we measured its level in CD3+ tumor-infiltrating T cells and IBA-1+ TAMs by colocalization IF staining. As shown in figure 2B–D, VISTA was detected in all immune cell subsets but was significantly higher in IBA-1+ TAMs than in CD3 positive lymphocyte in both ACP (figure 2C) and PCP (figure 2D). Additionally, we found that there was a negative association between CD3 and VISTA, and a positive association between VISTA and IBA-1 (figure 2E–F).
Figure 2
Expression of the B7 family ligands/receptors on immune cells of CPs. (A) PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA expression on immune cells in ACP and PCP. The red arrow refers to the immune cells with positive VISTA. (B) Representative images of VISTA, CD3 and IBA-1 codetection are shown. (C, D) QIF scores show IBA-1+ tumor-associated macrophage expressed more VISTA than CD3+ T lymphocytes in both ACP and PCP. VISTA expression is negatively correlated with the number of CD3+ cells (E) in the tumor and positively correlated with the number of IBA-1+ cells (F). Red bar: 0.5 mm, black bar: 50 µm, white bar: 50 µm. ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. ACP, adamantinomatous-type craniopharyngioma; PCP, papillary-type CP; QIF, quantitative immunofluorescence.
Expression of the B7 family ligands/receptors on immune cells of CPs. (A) PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA expression on immune cells in ACP and PCP. The red arrow refers to the immune cells with positive VISTA. (B) Representative images of VISTA, CD3 and IBA-1 codetection are shown. (C, D) QIF scores show IBA-1+ tumor-associated macrophage expressed more VISTA than CD3+ T lymphocytes in both ACP and PCP. VISTA expression is negatively correlated with the number of CD3+ cells (E) in the tumor and positively correlated with the number of IBA-1+ cells (F). Red bar: 0.5 mm, black bar: 50 µm, white bar: 50 µm. ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001. ACP, adamantinomatous-type craniopharyngioma; PCP, papillary-type CP; QIF, quantitative immunofluorescence.
B7 family proteins expression and CTNNB1 and BRAF mutation status
We further analyzed CTNNB1 and BRAF mutation status in CPs by PCR. 60% (21 out of 35) cases exhibited activating mutations within exon 3 of the β-catenin gene CTNNB1 in ACPs (figure 3A) and 56% (14 out of 25) cases exhibited BRAF V600E mutation in PCPs (figure 3B). In ACPs, CTNNB1 mutation could be linked to the high expression of PD-L1, B7-H3 and VISTA. Moreover, there was a significant difference (p=0.0363) in B7-H3 expression between the two subtypes of CP (figure 3A). Notably, in PCPs, BRAF V600E mutation group showed a significantly higher VISTA expression comparing to the wild type group (p=0.0117) (figure 3B).
Figure 3
Gene mutation and its relationship with B7 family ligands/receptors expression. CTNNB1 mutation was detected in 21 out of 35 ACPs (A). The expression of B7-H3 in the mutation group was significantly higher than in the wild type group, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups. BRAF mutation was detected in 14 out of 25 PCPs (B). The expression of VISTA was higher in the mutation group than in the wild type group, and this result is statistically significant. *P<0.05. ACP, adamantinomatous-type craniopharyngioma; ns, no significant; PCPs, papillary-type CP.
Gene mutation and its relationship with B7 family ligands/receptors expression. CTNNB1 mutation was detected in 21 out of 35 ACPs (A). The expression of B7-H3 in the mutation group was significantly higher than in the wild type group, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups. BRAF mutation was detected in 14 out of 25 PCPs (B). The expression of VISTA was higher in the mutation group than in the wild type group, and this result is statistically significant. *P<0.05. ACP, adamantinomatous-type craniopharyngioma; ns, no significant; PCPs, papillary-type CP.
Clinical significance of B7 family proteins expression in CPs
We further analyzed the relationship between CP tumor size and B7 family ligands/receptors expression. We found that VISTA expression and tumor size had an inverse association (R2=0.04871, p=0.0110); but the expression of the other three molecules had no association with tumor size (figure 4A). Kaplan-Meier survival curves by B7 family ligands/receptors expression levels are shown in figure 4B. Interestingly, strong VISTA expression was correlated with favorable outcomes in CPs. Calculated median OS in CPpatients with high VISTA expression was 7 years compared with a median OS of 2.25 years in VISTA negative or low patients (p=0.0027). However, elevated expression of PD-L1, B7-H3 or B7-H4 was not associated with OS nor PFS in this cohort.
Figure 4
Prognostic value of the B7 family ligands/receptors in CPs. Analysis of the relationship between the expression of B7 family ligands/receptors and tumor volume (A). Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival (B) and progression-free survival (C) based on B7 family ligands/receptors expression. CPs, craniopharyngioma; OS, overall survival; PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; PFS, progression-free survival.
Prognostic value of the B7 family ligands/receptors in CPs. Analysis of the relationship between the expression of B7 family ligands/receptors and tumor volume (A). Kaplan-Meier curve for overall survival (B) and progression-free survival (C) based on B7 family ligands/receptors expression. CPs, craniopharyngioma; OS, overall survival; PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1; PFS, progression-free survival.The univariate Cox regression model revealed that histopathological, tumor location, the extent of resection and VISTA expression were all correlated with PFS (p<0.05), whereas tumor location, hydrocephalus and VISTA expression were associated with OS (table 2). We selected the characteristics with p<0.1 in univariate for multivariate analysis. After adjustment, we found that only VISTA was an independent prognostic factor for OS (p=0.018), while only the extent of resection was an independent prognostic factor for PFS of CPpatients (p=0.025).
Table 2
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis of PFS and OS for patients with CP
Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis of PFS and OS for patients with CP* P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001ACP, adamantinomatous-type craniopharyngioma; CI, confidence interval; GTR, gross-total resection; HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival; PCP, papillary-type craniopharyngioma; PFS, progression free survival; STR, subtotal resection.
Increased expression of VISTA correlated with PD‐L1
Recently, some reports showed that VISTA overexpression is correlated with other B7 family ligands/receptors, such as PD-L1, PD-1 and CTLA-4. When investigating the molecules potentially associated with VISTA in the tumor microenvironment, we observed that VISTA expression was associated with PD-L1 in CPs. However, there was no significant association between the expression of VISTA and the expression of B7-H3 and B7-H4 (figure 5A). Furthermore, we explored the spatial distribution relationship between the expression of PD-L1 and VISTA in tumor tissues by colocalization IF staining. We found that PD-L1 and VISTA colocalized with each other only in immune cells within the tumor stroma but not in tumor cells (figure 5B, C).
Figure 5
VISTA is positively correlated with PD-L1 in CPs. Analysis of the correlation between the expression of VISTA and the expression of PD-L1, B7-H3 and B7-H4 in CPs (A). Immunofluorescence colocalization revealed the difference that expressions of PD-L1 and VISTA were different in tumor cells (B), but the two molecules were colocalized in tumor associated immune cells (C). Red bar: 0.5 mm, white bar: 50 µm. CPs, craniopharyngioma; PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1.
VISTA is positively correlated with PD-L1 in CPs. Analysis of the correlation between the expression of VISTA and the expression of PD-L1, B7-H3 and B7-H4 in CPs (A). Immunofluorescence colocalization revealed the difference that expressions of PD-L1 and VISTA were different in tumor cells (B), but the two molecules were colocalized in tumor associated immune cells (C). Red bar: 0.5 mm, white bar: 50 µm. CPs, craniopharyngioma; PD-L1, programmed cell death ligand 1.
Discussion
Immunotherapy holds great promise for eradicating cancer and has achieved long term benefits as well as improved clinical outcomes in treating various types of advanced malignancies, such as late-stage metastatic melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer.22 Immune checkpoint receptors through binding to their ligands can deliver coinhibitory signals to negatively regulate T cell responses, which will facilitate tumor escape from immune surveillance. Thus, many immune checkpoint receptors have been identified as potential cancer therapeutic targets, and among them, B7 family ligands/receptors have received increasing attention.23 The expanding list of B7 family members includes CTLA-4 (ligands B7.1 and B7.2), PD-1 (ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2), TIM3 (ligands CEACAM-1, HMGB1 and galectin-9), TIGIT (ligands CD155 and CD112), BTLA (ligand HVEM), B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA.24 25 In this study, we investigated the expression level of B7 family ligands/receptors in CPs. More importantly, we have discovered some associations between B7 family ligands/receptors expression and clinical features of CPs.Using IHC, we have shown that PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA are differentially expressed both in ACPs and PCPs. These B7 family ligands/receptors are preferentially located on the membrane of tumor cells. Previously, some researches demonstrated that radiation could upregulate B7 family ligands/receptors expression.26 27 However, we found that there was no significant difference in the expression of PD-L1, B7-H3, B7-H4 and VISTA between preoperative radiotherapy and non-radiotherapy groups. A few factors may contribute to the different results that we obtained. First, we had a relatively small sample size, and only five relapsed patients and one primary patient received radiotherapy before surgery. Among them, 3 patients received general radiotherapy, and the rest received gamma knife therapy. Second, there was a long duration between patients who received radiotherapy and underwent reoperation. The effects of radiation on the tumor might be weakened.Interestingly, we also observed that VISTA is highly expressed on tumor-associated immune cells. Moreover, by IF colocalization staining, we found that VISTA has a higher expression on macrophages than T lymphocytes. Former studies have revealed the high expression of VISTA in hematopoietic cells, lung and small intestine in mice.28 Additionally, VISTA has also been reported to be mainly expressed in hematopoietic cells, especially in myeloid cells in human.20 29 30 However, only a few articles reported that VISTA is expressed on tumor cells.20 31 32 To our knowledge, we are the first group to demonstrate that VISTA has a high expression on tumor cells in a large human CPs cohort.It has been reported that the expression of B7 family ligands/receptors regulators in various tumors is associated with different prognoses. For example, a recent study revealed that the OS and disease-free survival outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma negatively correlate with the expression level of PD-L2 on tumor membranes and PD-L1 in the immune stroma. Besides, Altan et al33 have described that the high B7-H3 protein level (top 10 percentile) was associated with poor OS in NSCLC. Loeser et al34 have also found that esophageal adenocarcinomapatients with VISTA expression have demonstrated an improved median OS compared with the patients without VISTA expression (202.2 months vs 21.6 months; p<0.0001). In our study, we identified that patients with high expression of VISTA had longer OS and FPS, while the expression of PD-L1, B7-H3 and B7-H4 was not related to prognosis in CPs. Thus, VISTA may serve as an important prognostic marker for CPs. However, other validation cohorts need to be used to demonstrate the consistency of the findings and validity of the marker cut-off values in future research.In this work, we also analyzed the relationship between the expression of B7 family ligands/receptors and clinical significance. VISTA expression was statistically correlated with patient age (p=0.0004), tumor histopathological subtypes (p<0.0001) and hydrocephalus (p=0.0053). CPs are the most common pediatric intracranial tumors of nonglial origin.1 2 These tumors can present at any age, there is a bimodal age distribution, with peak incidence rates in children aged 5–15 years and in adults aged 40–70 years. Among them, the PCP subtype is mainly found in adults but very rare in children. In our study, we found that PCP has higher VISTA expression than ACP (figure 1 and table 1). This may explain why the high expression of VISTA is mainly distributed in adults.Most PCPpatients carry recurrent activating mutations in BRAF V600E.35 36 This mutation causes constitutive activation of the BRAF kinase and subsequent oncogenic activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway through phosphorylating MEK and ERK.37 Therefore, we hypothesized that PCPs with BRAF V600E mutation has higher VISTA expression. By comparing the expression of VISTA between the mutant group and the wild type group, we found that the BRAF mutant group indeed had a higher expression of VISTA. We suspect that the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK signaling pathway may play an important role in regulating VISTA expression in PCPs.Currently, little is known about the association between VISTA and other B7 family members. In our work, we observed that VISTA was positively correlated with PD-L1. Moreover, we found that the expression and distribution of VISTA and PD-L1 on the surface of tumor cells were significantly different. PD-L1 was highly expressed in the basaloid, while the high expression of VISTA was seen far away from the basaloid (figure 5B). This finding suggests that VISTA and PD-L1 are regulated by different mechanisms in tumor cells. It is possible that the tumor cells far away from the basaloid are also far away from the tumor blood vessels, thus, the tumor microenvironment is relatively anoxic. Therefore, we speculate that hypoxia may regulate the expression of VISTA in CP cells. A study using a CT26colon cancer model showed that compared with less hypoxic tumor regions or draining lymph nodes, regions of profound hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment were associated with increased VISTA expression on tumor-infiltrating myeloid-derived suppressor cells.38 Using chromatin immunoprecipitation and genetic silencing, this study showed that hypoxia-inducible factor−1α binds to a conserved hypoxia response element in the VISTA promoter region and upregulates VISTA on myeloid cells.38Notably, our study also has several limitations. First, we included retrospectively collected samples from cases with variable follow-ups as well as different treatments, and the selection bias cannot be excluded. Second, the use of TMAs to examine a relatively small tissue area could over-represent or under-represent the markers in the cases. Third, in this study, patients who died in the short term after operation were not excluded. The deaths in this scenario are mainly due to serious surgical complications caused by surgical resection of CP. The inclusion of these cases may interfere with the evaluation of prognosis. Finally, further experiments are needed to verify the role of B7 family ligands/receptors in the development of CP.
Conclusion
We performed a comprehensive evaluation of B7 family molecules in CPs and found heterogeneous expression of PD-L1 in CPs. B7-H3, and VISTA proteins were highly expressed in CPs, while B7-H4 was expressed at a lower level. Our study also revealed that the expression level of VISTA may be utilized as an important indicator to predict the OS and PFS of CPs. The wide expression of PD-L1, B7-H3 and VISTA in human CPs, together with their immunomodulatory capacity, all suggests that these B7 family ligands/receptors may serve as both prognostic markers and attractive novel targets for immunotherapy against CPs.
Authors: Benjamin T Himes; Michael W Ruff; Jaimie J Van Gompel; Sean S Park; Evanthia Galanis; Timothy J Kaufmann; Joon H Uhm Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Scott J Rodig; Daniel Gusenleitner; Donald G Jackson; Evisa Gjini; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Chelsea Jin; Han Chang; Scott B Lovitch; Christine Horak; Jeffrey S Weber; Jason L Weirather; Jedd D Wolchok; Michael A Postow; Anna C Pavlick; Jason Chesney; F Stephen Hodi Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2018-07-18 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Shannon Coy; Rumana Rashid; Jia-Ren Lin; Ziming Du; Andrew M Donson; Todd C Hankinson; Nicholas K Foreman; Peter E Manley; Mark W Kieran; David A Reardon; Peter K Sorger; Sandro Santagata Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-07-05 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Li Wang; Rotem Rubinstein; Janet L Lines; Anna Wasiuk; Cory Ahonen; Yanxia Guo; Li-Fan Lu; David Gondek; Yan Wang; Roy A Fava; Andras Fiser; Steve Almo; Randolph J Noelle Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Jie Deng; Jiannan Li; Aurelien Sarde; J Louise Lines; Yu-Chi Lee; David C Qian; Dov A Pechenick; Richard Manivanh; Isabelle Le Mercier; Christopher H Lowrey; Frederick S Varn; Chao Cheng; David A Leib; Randolph J Noelle; Rodwell Mabaera Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 12.020
Authors: Hermann L Müller; Thomas E Merchant; Stephanie Puget; Juan-Pedro Martinez-Barbera Journal: Nat Rev Endocrinol Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 43.330
Authors: Lucas A Horn; Jeffrey Riskin; Heidi A Hempel; Kristen Fousek; Hanne Lind; Duane H Hamilton; Kristen K McCampbell; Dean Y Maeda; John A Zebala; Zhen Su; Jeffrey Schlom; Claudia Palena Journal: J Immunother Cancer Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 13.751
Authors: Jiannong Li; Inna Smalley; Zhihua Chen; Jheng-Yu Wu; Manali S Phadke; Jamie K Teer; Thanh Nguyen; Florian A Karreth; John M Koomen; Amod A Sarnaik; Jonathan S Zager; Nikhil I Khushalani; Ahmad A Tarhini; Vernon K Sondak; Paulo C Rodriguez; Jane L Messina; Y Ann Chen; Keiran S M Smalley Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-05-13 Impact factor: 13.801
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5