Literature DB >> 32958622

Comment on Flory et al. Reports of Lactic Acidosis Attributed to Metformin, 2015-2018. Diabetes Care 2020;43:244-246.

Kerstin Brand1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32958622      PMCID: PMC7510018          DOI: 10.2337/dc20-0993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


× No keyword cloud information.
Flory et al. (1) analyzed cases of lactic acidosis (LA) reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for 2015–2018 to evaluate whether changes to the U.S. metformin label in 2016 altered the reporting rate of LA. LA is rare, and large electronic databases are useful in studying its incidence. The Originator Pharmacovigilance (PV) Database (Merck KGaA) includes all individual case study reports on all metformin tablets manufactured by Merck, from patients, health care practitioners, health authorities, and the literature. The EudraVigilance Data Analysis System (EVDAS) and FAERS collect cases from marketing authorization holders, health authorities, and the literature in the European Union and U.S., respectively. A new EVDAS system requirement (November 2017) requires manufacturers to pull all LA cases in their countries of marketing authorization from the system into their respective company PV database. This increased the number of reports from, for example, France in the Merck PV database, as few identify the manufacturer of the product in EVDAS. The new requirement subsequently created a spillover to FAERS for all companies with marketing authorizations and respective case reporting obligation in the European Union and U.S. The reporting rates for metformin-associated LA (MALA) have fluctuated quite significantly between 2015 and 2019 (Table 1). Cases from the literature are prone to duplication and latency; e.g., 28 cases in a publication in 2018 (2) resulted in 54 cases in EVDAS in 2018, causing a spike in reporting (Table 1). Reporting rates are more stable if literature-derived cases are excluded (Table 1).
Table 1

Number of LA case reports with metformin as suspect or concomitant drug (MALA) in several PV databases by year of entry

DatabaseCase origin20152016201720182019
A. FAERSAll MALA cases5217178921,939
U.S.111171189243
Italy5999245553
France339165344
B. EVDASAll MALA cases5261,069767902911
 % all metformin cases20.029.617.018.116.3
U.S.3012810911689
 % all metformin cases4.614.910.113.113.4
Italy6850170208120
 % all metformin cases20.128.428.936.720.8
France182295168144300
 % all metformin cases52.362.242.628.040.0
C. Merck PVAll MALA cases276315275573481
 % all metformin cases6.15.65.38.75.8
U.S.1220212527
 % all metformin cases2.64.46.48.87.9
Italy62636610425
 % all metformin cases18.129.624.530.412.3
France375632134209
 % all metformin cases24.332.918.330.740.6
D. EVDAS, literature cases excludedAll MALA cases359543442506620
 % all metformin cases13.615.09.810.111.1
U.S.1724493514
 % all metformin cases2.62.84.54.02.1
Italy473370113111
 % all metformin cases13.918.811.919.919.2
France136198141139295
 % all metformin cases39.141.835.827.039.4

Data are numbers of cases unless otherwise indicated.

Number of LA case reports with metformin as suspect or concomitant drug (MALA) in several PV databases by year of entry Data are numbers of cases unless otherwise indicated. In the U.S., the percentage of all reported cases is low, but it is much higher in Italy and, especially, France, where MALA is a topic of health authority interest and where physicians are encouraged to report cases. Other biases are also at play. For example, an ongoing PhD thesis in northern France increased reporting of MALA in 2018–2019, again causing a reporting spike for that period (Table 1). Social media is used increasingly by health care practitioners and patients to identify adverse events (AE) (3), with further potential for bias and nocebo effects. For example, a high frequency of reports of muscle AE with statins in observational data, news media, and social media has not been substantiated in randomized controlled trials (4,5). Thus, reporting of AE to PV databases is subject to multiple sources of distortion and bias, and caution is needed when using these reports to interpret changes in AE incidence. We recommend that two or more PV databases should be used in such studies.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Use of data mining at the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  Hesha J Duggirala; Joseph M Tonning; Ella Smith; Roselie A Bright; John D Baker; Robert Ball; Carlos Bell; Susan J Bright-Ponte; Taxiarchis Botsis; Khaled Bouri; Marc Boyer; Keith Burkhart; G Steven Condrey; James J Chen; Stuart Chirtel; Ross W Filice; Henry Francis; Hongying Jiang; Jonathan Levine; David Martin; Taiye Oladipo; Rene O'Neill; Lee Anne M Palmer; Antonio Paredes; George Rochester; Deborah Sholtes; Ana Szarfman; Hui-Lee Wong; Zhiheng Xu; Taha Kass-Hout
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  The nocebo effect in the context of statin intolerance.

Authors:  Jonathan A Tobert; Connie B Newman
Journal:  J Clin Lipidol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 4.766

3.  Offline: Lessons from the controversy over statins.

Authors:  Richard Horton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Reports of Lactic Acidosis Attributed to Metformin, 2015-2018.

Authors:  James H Flory; Sean Hennessy; Clifford J Bailey; Silvio E Inzucchi
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Metformin associated lactic acidosis: a case series of 28 patients treated with sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Andrea Angioi; Gianfranca Cabiddu; Maura Conti; Gianfranco Pili; Alice Atzeni; Valeria Matta; Riccardo Cao; Matteo Floris; Marco Songini; Maria Franca Mulas; Mitchell Rosner; Antonello Pani
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.388

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.