Literature DB >> 32958425

Perineal reconstruction following abdominoperineal resection: Comprehensive review of the literature.

Libby R Copeland-Halperin1, Talia Stewart2, Youdinghuan Chen3, Christopher D Funderburk4, Gary L Freed5.   

Abstract

Abdominoperineal resection (APR) in patients with anorectal carcinomas may involve flap-based perineal reconstruction techniques, such as rectus abdominis, myocutaneous, gracilis, and gluteal flaps. There is no consensus on the optimal approach. We evaluated the outcomes of perineal reconstruction following APR in the literature and identified a predominance of abdominal-based approaches, though overall outcomes were similar compared with thigh or perineal-based options. Statistical power to detect small differences in outcomes is limited, however, due to the retrospective design, relatively short-term follow-up, and potential selection bias based on morbidities associated with reconstructive techniques. Lacking randomized studies to define optimum approaches to perineal reconstruction, clinicians should individualize surgical strategy.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominoperineal resection; Anus neoplasms/surgery; Colorectal neoplasms; Perineum; Reconstructive surgical procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32958425     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  1 in total

1.  A National Survey on Perineal Reconstruction Following Standard and Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Current Practices and Trends in the UK.

Authors:  Rushabh Shah; Rituja Kamble; Mohammed Herieka; Milind Dalal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-08-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.