| Literature DB >> 32958334 |
Yuyun Ika Christina1, Meyla Restia Diana1, Eka Noviya Fuzianingsih1, Faradisa Noviani Ridwan1, Muhaimin Rifa'i1, Muhammad Sasmito Djati2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elephantopus scaber (ES) and Sauropus androgynous (SA) have been frequently reported to possess antibacterial activity through in vitro, but in vivo studies about the protective effect of combined ES and SA have acquired less attention.Entities:
Keywords: E. coli; Elephantopus scaber; Hormonal; Pregnant; Sauropus androgynous
Year: 2020 PMID: 32958334 PMCID: PMC8185979 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2020.09.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ayurveda Integr Med ISSN: 0975-9476
Effect of combined E. scaber (ES) and S. androgynus (SA) extract on prolactin levels of infected pregnant mice.
| Group | Prolactin levels (ng/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Day-8 | Day-12 | Day-16 | |
| N | 15.21 ± 0.47b | 12.76 ± 0.20b | 38.95 ± 0.82d |
| C+ | 11.62 ± 0.51a | 16.74 ± 1.56c | 14.00 ± 0.60a |
| C1 | 19.01 ± 0.85c | 6.66 ± 1.37a | 20.97 ± 1.01b |
| C2 | 20.34 ± 1.53c | 13.67 ± 1.43b | 9.93 ± 0.76a |
| C3 | 28.45 ± 0.48d | 9.82 ± 2.01a | 28.05 ± 1.30c |
| C4 | 23.47 ± 0.56c | 14.99 ± 1.60c | 31.00 ± 1.11c |
| C5 | 13.32 ± 1.13b | 35.44 ± 0.24d | 24.83 ± 0.45c |
Values were expressed as mean ± SD, n = 4. Healthy pregnant mice were not subjected to E. coli infection (N), pregnant mice infected with E. coli (C+), pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 200 mg/kg of ES (C1), pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with combined 150 mg/kg ES and 37.5 mg/kg SA (75% ES: 25% SA), 100 mg/kg ES and 75 mg/kg SA (50% ES: 50% SA), 50 mg/kg ES and 112.5 mg/kg SA (25% ES: 75% SA) (C2, C3, C4, respectively), pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 150 mg/kg SA (C5). Different superscript letters indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Effect of combined E. scaber (ES) and S. androgynus (SA) extract on estradiol levels of infected pregnant mice.
| Group | Estradiol levels (pg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Day-8 | Day-12 | Day-16 | |
| N | 3.29 ± 0.008a | 3.42 ± 0.008a | 3.30 ± 0.014a |
| C+ | 3.28 ± 0.010a | 3.26 ± 0.004a | 3.26 ± 0.005a |
| C1 | 3.30 ± 0.025a | 3.33 ± 0.052a | 3.27 ± 0.010a |
| C2 | 3.30 ± 0.020a | 3.30 ± 0.034a | 3.28 ± 0.018a |
| C3 | 3.29 ± 0.047a | 3.37 ± 0.030a | 3.20 ± 0.009a |
| C4 | 3.40 ± 0.116a | 3.33 ± 0.054a | 3.30 ± 0.012a |
| C5 | 3.30 ± 0.018a | 3.42 ± 0.031a | 3.18 ± 0.008a |
Values were expressed as mean ± SD, n = 4. Healthy pregnant mice were not subjected to E. coli infection (N), pregnant mice infected with E. coli (C+), pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 200 mg/kg of ES (C1), pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with combined 150 mg/kg ES and 37.5 mg/kg SA (75% ES: 25% SA), 100 mg/kg ES and 75 mg/kg SA (50% ES: 50% SA), 50 mg/kg ES and 112.5 mg/kg SA (25% ES: 75% SA) (C2, C3, C4, respectively), pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 150 mg/kg SA (C5). Different superscript letters indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Effect of combined E. scaber (ES) and S. androgynus (SA) extract on progesterone levels of infected pregnant mice.
| Group | Progesterone levels (pg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Day-8 | Day-12 | Day-16 | |
| N | 2.93 ± 0.008a | 3.22 ± 0.008a | 2.92 ± 0.014a |
| C+ | 2.92 ± 0.010a | 3.09 ± 0.004b | 2.93 ± 0.005a |
| C1 | 2.93 ± 0.025a | 3.09 ± 0.052b | 2.94 ± 0.010a |
| C2 | 2.92 ± 0.020a | 3.22 ± 0.034a | 2.91 ± 0.018a |
| C3 | 2.93 ± 0.047a | 3.14 ± 0.030b | 2.92 ± 0.009a |
| C4 | 2.93 ± 0.116a | 3.19 ± 0.054b | 2.92 ± 0.012a |
| C5 | 2.93 ± 0.018a | 3.12 ± 0.031b | 2.90 ± 0.008a |
Values were expressed as mean ± SD, n = 4. Healthy pregnant mice were not subjected to E. coli infection (N), pregnant mice infected with E. coli (C+), pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 200 mg/kg of ES (C1), pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with combined 150 mg/kg ES and 37.5 mg/kg SA (75% ES: 25% SA), 100 mg/kg ES and 75 mg/kg SA (50% ES: 50% SA), 50 mg/kg ES and 112.5 mg/kg SA (25% ES: 75% SA) (C2, C3, C4, respectively), pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 150 mg/kg SA (C5). Different superscript letters indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Fig. 1The relative number of Gr1+ cells after combined ethanolic extract of E. scaber (ES) and S. androgynus (SA) administration in pregnant mice with E. coli infection. Flow cytometry analysis of Gr1+ cells in infected pregnant mice at (A). Day-8, and (B). Day- 16 of pregnancy period of mice. Note: N: healthy pregnant mice; C+: pregnant mice infected with E. coli; C1: pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 200 mg/kg of ES; C2–C4: pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with combined 150 mg/kg ES and 37.5 mg/kg SA (75:25); 100 mg/kg ES and 75 mg/kg SA (50:50); 50 mg/kg ES and 112.5 mg/kg SA (25:75); and C5: pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 150 mg/kg SA.
Effect of combined E. scaber (ES) and S. androgynus (SA) extract on the relative number of Gr1+ cell of infected pregnant mice.
| Group | Gr1+ cell (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Day-8 | Day-16 | |
| N | 30.7 ± 0.008a | 31.6 ± 0.014a |
| C+ | 40.1 ± 0.010b | 41.2 ± 0.005b |
| C1 | 34.4 ± 0.025a | 29.9 ± 0.010a |
| C2 | 34.5 ± 0.020a | 33.1 ± 0.018a |
| C3 | 39.2 ± 0.047b | 31.4 ± 0.009a |
| C4 | 42.4 ± 0.116b | 38.3 ± 0.012b |
| C5 | 39.6 ± 0.018b | 44.0 ± 0.008b |
Values were expressed as mean ± SD, n = 4. Healthy pregnant mice were not subjected to E. coli infection (N), pregnant mice infected with E. coli (C+), pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 200 mg/kg of ES (C1), pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with combined 150 mg/kg ES and 37.5 mg/kg SA (75% ES: 25% SA), 100 mg/kg ES and 75 mg/kg SA (50% ES: 50% SA), 50 mg/kg ES and 112.5 mg/kg SA (25% ES: 75% SA) (C2, C3, C4, respectively), pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 150 mg/kg SA (C5). Different superscript letters indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05).
Fig. 2(A) Photomicrograph of liver section stained with H&E (400× magnification). H (hepatocytes), S (sinusoids), CV (central vein), HS (hydropic swelling) and N (necrosis cell); (B) The level of hepatocytes necrosis after combined ethanol extract of E. scaber (ES) and S. androgynus (SA) administration in pregnant mice with E. coli infection. The error bar indicated the standard error of the means. ∗p < 0.05 versus control group, #p < 0.05 versus infected pregnant mice, ##p < 0.05 versus C1–C5. Note: N: healthy pregnant mice; C+: pregnant mice infected with E. coli; C1: pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 200 mg/kg of ES; (C2, C3, C4) pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with combined 150 mg/kg ES and 37.5 mg/kg SA (75:25), 100 mg/kg ES and 75 mg/kg SA (50:50), 50 mg/kg ES and 112.5 mg/kg SA (25:75); C5: pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 150 mg/kg SA; and C6: pregnant mice treated with 100 mg/kg ES and 75 mg/kg SA (50:50).
Fig. 3(A) Light micrograph of the kidney section from different treatment groups. G (glomerulus), P (proximal tubule), D (distal tubule), and N (necrosis cell). Original magnification ×400. (B) The level of hepatocytes necrosis. The error bar indicated the standard error of the means. ∗p < 0.05 versus control group, #p < 0.05 versus infected pregnant mice, ##p < 0.05 versus C1–C4 and C6. Note: N: healthy pregnant mice; C+: pregnant mice infected with E. coli; C1: pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 200 mg/kg of ES; (C2, C3, C4) pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with combined 150 mg/kg ES and 37.5 mg/kg SA (75:25), 100 mg/kg ES and 75 mg/kg SA (50:50), 50 mg/kg ES and 112.5 mg/kg SA (25:75); C5: pregnant mice infected with E. coli and treated with 150 mg/kg SA; and C6: pregnant mice treated with 100 mg/kg ES and 75 mg/kg SA (50:50).