Literature DB >> 32958261

Management of ER positive metastatic breast cancer.

Nicholas P McAndrew1, Richard S Finn2.   

Abstract

There are over 2 million cases a year of breast cancer, leading to over 600,000 deaths globally [1]. Despite these large numbers, increasingly more women are being cured with early stage disease and women with advanced disease are living longer [2]. The appreciation for molecular subtypes of the disease has led to significant therapeutic advances and estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer represents the largest of these subgroups. An appreciation for the importance of estrogen signaling in ER+ dates back to 1896 when Dr. George Thomas Beatson observed impressive disease responses after performing bilateral oophorectomy in 3 women at Glasgow Cancer Hospital [3]. The evolution of treatment for advanced disease from progestins, to the selective estrogen receptor modulator tamoxifen, and subsequently the aromatase inhibitors and the selective estrogen receptor degrader fulvestrant, has been accompanied by improved efficacy and decreased side effects. While the use of these drugs has changed the natural history of both early and advanced disease, it has been long recognized that many patients will develop resistance to this approach. After many years of trying to improve on single-agent endocrine treatment, since 2012 there has been an explosion of new drugs that have shown improved efficacy in combination with endocrine approaches. The first of these to receive FDA approval was the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (2012) [4], followed by the approval of 3 cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors [palbociclib (2015) [5], ribociclib (2018) [6], and abemaciclib (2018) [7]], and more recently the PI3-kinase inhibitor alpelisib (2019) [8]. In addition, chemotherapy is still used frequently when endocrine manipulations have been exhausted. Like other incurable malignancies, the goal in advanced ER+ breast cancer is to prolong survival and maintain quality of life. Currently, we have more tools available to achieve this than ever before and we will review the efficacy and side effect data with these agents that are driving physician choices for individual patients.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; CDK 4/6; ER positive; Endocrine treatment; Hormone positive; PI3-kinase; mTOR

Year:  2020        PMID: 32958261     DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Oncol        ISSN: 0093-7754            Impact factor:   4.929


  9 in total

1.  Nogo-B receptor increases glycolysis and the paclitaxel resistance of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer via the HIF-1α-dependent pathway.

Authors:  Qing Robert Miao; Ying Jin; Zhimin Fan; Chang Liu; Sijie Li; Xiaoxiao Zhang; Chunxiang Jin; Baofeng Zhao; Liying Li
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 5.854

2.  Redefining breast cancer subtypes to guide treatment prioritization and maximize response: Predictive biomarkers across 10 cancer therapies.

Authors:  Denise M Wolf; Christina Yau; Julia Wulfkuhle; Lamorna Brown-Swigart; Rosa I Gallagher; Pei Rong Evelyn Lee; Zelos Zhu; Mark J Magbanua; Rosalyn Sayaman; Nicholas O'Grady; Amrita Basu; Amy Delson; Jean Philippe Coppé; Ruixiao Lu; Jerome Braun; Smita M Asare; Laura Sit; Jeffrey B Matthews; Jane Perlmutter; Nola Hylton; Minetta C Liu; Paula Pohlmann; W Fraser Symmans; Hope S Rugo; Claudine Isaacs; Angela M DeMichele; Douglas Yee; Donald A Berry; Lajos Pusztai; Emanuel F Petricoin; Gillian L Hirst; Laura J Esserman; Laura J van 't Veer
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 38.585

3.  High nerve density in breast cancer is associated with poor patient outcome.

Authors:  Dong Li; Li Na Hu; Si Min Zheng; Ting La; Li Yuan Wei; Xiao Jun Zhang; Zhen Hua Zhang; Jun Xing; Li Wang; Ruo Qi Li; Qin Zhu; Rick F Thorne; Yu Chen Feng; Hubert Hondermarck; Xu Dong Zhang; Li Li; Jin Nan Gao
Journal:  FASEB Bioadv       Date:  2022-03-03

4.  ENDORSE: a prognostic model for endocrine therapy in estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancers.

Authors:  Aritro Nath; Adam L Cohen; Andrea H Bild
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 13.068

5.  Defining Clinical Utility of Germline Indicators of Toxicity Risk: A Perspective.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; Lisa M McShane; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 50.717

Review 6.  Cancer Stem Cells-Key Players in Tumor Relapse.

Authors:  Monica Marzagalli; Fabrizio Fontana; Michela Raimondi; Patrizia Limonta
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  CD45RO-CD8+ T cell-derived exosomes restrict estrogen-driven endometrial cancer development via the ERβ/miR-765/PLP2/Notch axis.

Authors:  Wen-Jie Zhou; Jie Zhang; Feng Xie; Jiang-Nan Wu; Jiang-Feng Ye; Jian Wang; Ke Wu; Ming-Qing Li
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 11.556

8.  GZ17-6.02 and palbociclib interact to kill ER+ breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Laurence Booth; Cameron West; Robert P Moore; Daniel Von Hoff; Paul Dent
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 9.  The clinical advances of proteolysis targeting chimeras in oncology.

Authors:  Hao Xie; Junjia Liu; Diego M Alem Glison; Jason B Fleming
Journal:  Explor Target Antitumor Ther       Date:  2021-12-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.