| Literature DB >> 32957581 |
Hyejoon Park1, Keeyoon Noh1, Jihyun Jane Min2, Christopher Rupar2.
Abstract
Although extensive research exists on toxic environments in the Tri-State Mining District (TSMD), there has been a lack of research on how harmful effects in TSMD could affect residents living in those areas. However, quite recently, such research regarding relationships between the health conditions of residents and toxic elements in the TSMD began to grow. The increase of empirical studies means greater complexity of the findings that require a more intricate understanding. To meet the goals of this study, an extensive, systematic review of the literature using PRISMA was conducted. This method resulted in 19 articles that define the harmful effects of the TSMD on the ecology and the physical health of residents. This research found that toxic metals not only negatively impact natural processes in the TSMD environments (fish species reduction, kidney and liver problems, and toxic diet) but also continuously affect the health of residents (high blood Pb and mortality).This study makes a vital contribution building upon the existing outcomes of the correlations between toxic elements in the TSMD areas and the health of residents. Furthermore, conclusions of this study provide updated information to policymakers and health-related professionals by providing adequate and innovative remediations and health-related services in the TSMD.Entities:
Keywords: PRISMA; TSMD; arsenic; cadmium; community; ecology; health conditions; lead; zinc
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32957581 PMCID: PMC7559543 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Locations of the Tri-State Mining District (TSMD) in the Unites States. Note: The TSMD is located in the Tri-State area (southeast Kansas, southwest Missouri, and northeast Oklahoma). Blue indicates mine-related sites including mines, mineral deposits, and mineral regions in the TSMD. The geospatial database was obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (Date taken: 29 July 2020). The USGS data are publicly available from https://www.usgs.gov/.
Figure 2Locations of TSMD Superfund Sites. Note: Blue indicates the mine-related sites in the TSMD. There were 1017 sites in Jasper County, Missouri, 249 sites in Ottawa County, Oklahoma, 165 sites in Newton County, Missouri, and 156 sites in Cherokee County, Kansas. The geospatial database was obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (Date taken: 29 July 2020). The USGS data are publicly available from https://www.usgs.gov/.
Figure 3Oronogo-Duenweg Mining Belt Site. Note: The Oronogo-Duenweg Mining Belt Site was one of the major mine waste areas near Joplin, Missouri. The satellite imagery, obtained from Google, shows that the site has left marks (the reddish brown areas) since it was inactive in the 1970s (Date taken: 1 August 2020). The image in the Figure 3 is eligible for the Fair Use of a copyrighted work from Google Map [19].
Figure 4Mining Sites near Treece and Picher. Note: The satellite imagery shows areas with mining sites (the white areas in the picture) clustering near Treece and Picher, Oklahoma, in the Tar Creek Superfund Site (Date taken: 1 August 2020). The image in the Figure 4 is eligible for the Fair Use of a copyrighted work from Google Map [19].
Figure 5Impacts of Toxic Metals on the Ecosystem. Note: The graphical abstract above shows the impacts of toxic metals on the ecosystem. The toxic metals, such as lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), cadmium (Cd), and arsenic (As), in the wastes from the mining sites and companies in the Tri-State Mining District (TSMD) contaminate the entire ecology from the nature environment to human life; the images in the Figure are eligible for the Fair Use of a copyrighted work [19].
Figure 6PRISMA Flowchart of Study Selection Process.
Characteristics of the Studies on the Effects of Toxic Contaminations in the TSMD on the Ecological Communities and Human Health.
| Study | Purpose | Research Design/Sampling Method | Key Predictor Variable (IV), Measurement | Key Outcome Variables (DV), Measurement | Sample | Statistical Methods | Findings | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Allert et al. (2012) | Characterize physical habitat and water quality; evaluate the potential effects of metals in crayfish and carnivorous wildlife. | Quantitative; comparisons in different sites (reference, mining, downstream). | Pb, Zn, and Cd in surface water, sediment, detritus, and crayfish. | The concentration of Pb, Zn, and Cd. | Nested analysis of variance (ANOVA) for finding group differences of areas with site considered a fixed effect; Linear regression using PROC REG was used for crayfish densities. | 1. Mean densities of crayfish at mining sites were lower than reference sites. | |
| 2 | Beattie et al. (2018) | Understand changes in microbial community structures due to regional metals contamination (Pb, Zn, Cd, AI, and Mg). | Quantitative; | Soil pH, moisture, and heavy-metal concentrations of Topsoil samples. | 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences and quantitative PCR calculations of Bacteria and Archaea. | Topsoil samples ( | Analyzing concentrations of 20 metals with EPA method using an Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES). | 1. Bacteria were negatively and significantly correlated with Pb, Cd, Zn, and Mg. |
| 3 | Besser et al. (2015) | Examine chronic effects of sediment toxicity on freshwater mussels’ survival, growth, and biomass (also known as, amphipod toxicity test). | Longitudinal and quantitative; in 2006, sediment was collected using a Petit Birge-Ekman grab sampler. 2 precleaned 20-L polyethylene sample buckets were filled one third with site water, and a benthos wash bucket with stainless steel screen bottom was placed inside a sample bucket; | Toxic materials in sediments. | Survival, growth (mean weight), biomass (total weight per replicate) for each species. | Tri-State ( | Toxicity test using ANOVA, EC 10 (for metal mixture), and principal components analysis to evaluate relationships among metal concentrations, sediment characteristics, and responses in toxicity tests. | 1. The frequency of highly toxic responses in Tri-State sediments was greater for amphipod survival (25% of samples), midge biomass (20%), and mussel survival (14%). |
| 4 | Beyer et al. (2005) | Determine if the habitat of the TSMD has been contaminated by the espousal of toxic concentrations of metals. | Quantitative; wild birds were selected in chat piles. | Toxic materials in tissues and blood of sample birds. | Biological functions and external signs of poisoning. | An experimental group (13 species) were collected from the TSMD area from December 2000 and August 2001, and a reference group (the same species) was collected from uncontaminated sites (Neosho Wildlife Area, St. Paul, KS, and cliffs in Chestertown, Maryland (MD). | Toxic materials from samples of tissues were quantified by ICPMS/ICP-ES; blood samples were analyzed for ALAD activity. | 1. American robins, northern cardinals, and waterfowl had higher Pb tissue concentrations ( |
| 5 | Beyer et al. (2013) | Estimate the potential exposure of songbirds to Pb in southeastern MO. | Quantitative; earthworms, soil, 34 adult, and juvenile songbirds collected from southeastern MO were collected, reference songbirds remote from Pb mining; one composite sample of eight soil cores was collected at each site. | Earthworms associated with Pb concentrations of soil. | Mean tissue Pb concentrations in songbirds. | All songbirds (reference = 39, mining site = 34). Birds were captured at least 4 weeks after spring migration. | Blood (1% of body weight) of birds was taken with a mic needle. Red-blood cell ALAD activity was measured. The soil samples from the sites were quantified for detecting toxic materials; | 1. Mean tissue Pb concentrations in songbirds from the contaminated areas were greater ( |
| 6 | Brumbaugh et al. (2005) | Assess the surface-and groundwater contamination in the Spring River Neosho River (SR-NR) system of northeastern OK. | Quantitative: 74 fish from 6 locations in the SR–NR system were collected (e.g., catfish, bass, and white crappie). | Pb, Cd, and Zn in tissues, blood, and liver of sample fish. | High levels of toxic contaminations in fish. | Sample size is 74. Sample fish were collected from TSMD-affected portions of the SR and NR in northeastern OK; 4 specimens of each of three primary species were targeted at each OK site (i.e., common carp, largemouth bass, and channel catfish). | The ICP-MS was programmed to determine Zn, Cd, and Pb; for each variable, species-station arithmetic means and standard errors were computed; ANOVA was conducted for each variable; a one-way ANOVA was considered for testing for differences among collection sites; Fisher’s protected LSD was used for differences among individual sites. | 1. Cd and Pb in carp and catfish from OK and Pb in carp and catfish from MO were elevated. |
| 7 | Coolon et al. (2010) | Examine the effect of residual contamination on rodent and the microbial communities at remediated sites in the TSMD. | Quantitative; using 25 trap stations per site, trapped a representation of the small mammal community; tapped 10 | Heavy metal exposure. | Bacterial community diversity (soil bacteria). | 10 rodents’ pair (2 species) from the TSMD and non-TSMD. | Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) technologies to sequence bacterial 16S DNA amplified from the soil and mouse intestines. | 1. Rodents on the remediated site had reduced body mass, smaller body size and lower body fat than animals on reference sites. |
| 8 | Ettinger et al. (2009) | The association between the level of arsenic and impaired glucose tolerance. | Correlational and quantitative; screening pregnant women during prenatal visits at the hospital in Ottawa county. | Toxic elements in blood and hair. | Blood glucose. | 532 pregnant women/The Tar Creek Superfund Site. | Univariate, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses. | 1. The concentration of arsenic was found between 0.2 and 24.1 ug/L (ppb) and 1.1 to 724.4 ng/g (ppb) in blood and hair, respectively. |
| 9 | Garvin et al. (2018) | Determine metal concentrations in consumed plant species in the TSMD. | Quantitative; collect 36 species of edible plants and soil from floodplain areas, plants from reference sites. | Cd, Pb, and Zn in plants. | Cd, Pb, and Zn in soil. | The sample size is 210; 36 species edible plants from various floodplain areas for tribal communities in the TSMD soil samples. | ICP-MS; Spearman rank correlation. | 1. A significantly positive correlation between metal concentrations in plant tissues and soil. |
| 10 | Hays & McBee (2010) | Investigate the effect of Pb and Zn on the ecology of Red-Eared Slider Turtles. | Quantitative; out of 327 turtles, 293 individuals were used to determine sex ratios, SDI, and average sizes. | Toxic elements in the TSMD. | Body size, sex ratios, sexual dimorphism indices, and recapture and survival rates. | 293 | Chi-square test, goodness-of-fit tests in RELEASE, saturated global model, adjusted Akaike’s Information Criterion. | 1. Sex ratios were female-biased at TCSFS and Lake Carl Blackwell and male-biased at Sequoyah National Wildlife Refuge. |
| 11 | Lynch et al. (2000) | Examine the independent contributions of various lead sources to elevate blood lead levels in area children. | Quantitative; (a representative random sample of Native American and white households residing within the study area). | Level of lead in sources (from the soil, dust, and paint). The paint was measured using protocols of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. | Elevated blood lead level measured by micrograms per deciliter (10 μg/dL). | Logistic regression using SAS and EpiInfo to estimate associations between environmental exposures and elevated blood lead levels. | 1. Floor dust, yard soil, interior paints, and location of residence were independently associated with elevated blood lead levels. | |
| 12 | Malcoe et al. (2002) | Examine the effects of lead sources on blood lead concentrations (BPbs) in rural children. | Quantitative; (a population-based, representative sample of Native American and white children in the study area). | Paint indices measured as Index Value = ( | Blood lead concentrations measured by micrograms per deciliter (10 μg/dL). | Non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test and multiple linear regression using SAS for BPb variability. | 1. Soil and dust lead derived largely from mining waste pose a health hazard to Native American and white children, and that | |
| 13 | Neuberger et al. (2009) | Examine the potential impact of exposure to heavy metals and health problems. | Quantitative; (secondary data obtained from the Oklahoma State Department of Health). | Geographic comparisons (exposed areas of Ottawa County vs. unexposed areas). | Mortality outcomes (lung cancer, Tuberculosis, Bronchitis, emphysema, asthma, kidney disease, hypertension, stroke, and heart disease), health outcomes in the first year of life (low birth weight, infant mortality, and infant mortality excluding infectious diseases). | Standardized Mortality Ratio (SMR) (observed versus expected mortality calculation by ratio) and a Poisson model. | 1. Excess mortality was found for stroke and heart disease when comparing the exposed County to the state but not when comparing the exposed cities to the nonexposed rest of the County. | |
| 14 | Phelps & McBee (2009) | Determine ecological characteristics of small mammal communities inhabiting a heavy metal contaminated site, Tar Creek Superfund Site, compared to reference sites located in | Quantitative; (small mammal communities were sampled at two locations within Tar Creek Superfund Site (TCSFS) and two uncontaminated reference sites). | Geographic comparisons (two locations within TCSFS vs. two uncontaminated sites). | Species diversity measured using Simpson’s diversity index, rank abundance analysis measured using Southwood and Henderson (2000)’s method, and differences in community composition among sites evaluated using detrended correspondence analysis (Ter Braak and Smilauer, 2002). | Simpson’s diversity index, rank abundance analysis, and detrended correspondence analysis with GANOCO. | 1. Tar Creek Superfund. | |
| 15 | Schmitt et al. (2005) | Examine biochemical effects of lead, zinc, and cadmium from mining on fish in the TSMD. | Quantitative; (fish representing six species were collected from six sites on the Spring and Neosho Rivers, and additional samples from the Big River). | Concentrations of Zn, Cd, Pb, and iron in the blood of six species of fish. | d-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase (ALAD) activity, and Hb-adjusted ALAD activity (ALAD/Hb) in the blood of fishes. | One-way ANOVA using the site as a fixed effect and stepwise multiple linear regression using SAS. | 1. ALAD activity was inhibited by more than 50% in catfish from several TSMD sites, which is evidence that Pb is both bioavailable, and active biochemically. | |
| 16 | Struckhoff et al. (2013) | Examine the effects of mining-associated lead and zinc soil contamination on native floristic quality. | Quantitative; (plant communities were sampled in three strata. | Soil concentrations of lead and zinc measured as mg/kg. | Mean C and Floristic Quality Index (FQI) measured using Floristic Quality Assessment methods (Swink and Wilhelm, 1994). | Least-square regression trees to identify variables that best explain variation in Mean C and FQI and univariate regression. | 1. Significant negative relationships between both Mean C and FQI. | |
| 17 | Merwe et al. (2011) | Assess the presence of preclinical | Quantitative; (birds were collected by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service personnel). | Geographic locations (four mine waste-exposed sites vs. a reference site). | Lead and zinc concentrations in bird tissues. | One-way ANOVA for data with normality and Kruskal–Wallis One-way ANOVA for data with failed normality using SigmaPlot. | 1. Elevated tissue lead concentrations and inhibited blood | |
| 18 | Yoo & Janz (2003) | Determine HSP70 protein | Quantitative; (two fish species were collected in pre-spawning period and recrudescence period). | Season (spring and winter) and site (Tar Creek and Lytle Creek) | The 70-kDa stress protein family (HSP70) level. | Two-way ANOVA and student t-tests to detect differences between reference and metal-exposed fish. | 1. HSP70 | |
| 19 | Schmitt et al. (2006) | Evaluate potential human and ecological risks associated with metals in fish and crayfish from mining in the TSMD. | Quantitative; (fish of six frequently consumed species collected from the Oklahoma waters of the Spring River and Neosho River). | Metals contaminations in aquatic organisms in Spring River vs. Neosho River. | Diets of Native Americans and wildlife, potential hazards of Pb, Zn, and Cd in these organisms to fish, wildfire, and humans. | Separate one-way ANOVA. | 1. Metals concentration were typically higher in samples from sites most heavily affected by mining and lowest in reference samples. Within the TSMD, most metals concentration were higher at sites on |
Manuscripts Quality Assessment.
| Studies | Objective | Design | Method | Subjects | Random | Blinding Investigations | Blinding Subjects | Measures Outcomes | Sample Size | Analytic Methods | Variance | Controlled for Confounding | Results | Conclusions | Quality Score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 90.9 |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 95.4 |
| 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 95.4 |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 95.4 |
| 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 90.9 |
| 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | N/A | N/A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 87.5 |
| 9 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 90.9 |
| 10 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 95.4 |
| 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | N/A | N/A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 95.8 |
| 12 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | N/A | N/A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 95.8 |
| 13 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | N/A | N/A | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 83.3 |
| 14 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100 |
| 15 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 95.4 |
| 16 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 95.4 |
| 17 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 86.3 |
| 18 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 95.4 |
| 19 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100 |
1. Question: Questions or objective sufficiently described? 2. Design: Design evident and appropriate to answer the study question? 3. Method: Method of subject selection (and comparison group selection, if applicable) or source of information/input variables is described and appropriate? 4. Subjects: Subjects (and comparison group, if applicable) characteristics or input variables/information sufficiently described? 5. Random: If the random allocation to treatment group was possible, is it described? 6. Blinding Investigation: If interventional and blinding of investigators to the intervention was possible, is it reported? 7. Blinding Subjects: If interventional and blinding of subjects to the intervention was possible, is it reported? 8. Measure Outcome: Outcome and (if applicable) exposure measure(s) well defined and robust to measure/ misclassification bias? Means of assessment reported? 9. Sample Size: Sample size appropriate? 10. Analytic Methods: Analysis described and appropriate? 11. Variance: Some estimate of variance (e.g., confidence intervals, standard errors) is reported for the main results/outcomes? 12. Controlled for Confounding: Randomized study, with a comparability of baseline characteristics, reported. Or appropriate control at the design or analysis stage. 13. Results: Results reported in sufficient detail? 14. Conclusions: Do the results support the conclusion?