Literature DB >> 32957416

Adverse reactions of vancomycin in humans: A protocol for meta-analysis.

Yang Peng1, Chen-Yang Li2, Zhi-Ling Yang1, Wei Shi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin is effective against Gram-positive bacteria and considered as a last resort in the case of ineffective use of other antigens. While due to the occurrence of adverse reactions, the application of vancomycin is strictly limited. We will conduct a meta-analysis to summarize adverse reactions of vancomycin in humans.
METHODS: To collect comprehensive randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the following electronic databases will be searched: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database. The range of publication time will be from the inception of the database to August 2020 without language limitation. Two reviewers will independently conduct selection of studies, data extraction and management, and assessment of risk of bias. Any disagreement will be resolved by discussion with the third reviewer. Review Manager 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration) will be used for meta-analysis. The Cochrane risk of bias tool will be used to assess the risk of bias.
RESULTS: This study will synthesize the data from the present eligible high quality RCTs to explore the incidence of adverse reactions such as hypersensitivity reactions, nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, phlebitis, and agranulocytosis.
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis will provide systematic evidence for adverse reactions of vancomycin in humans. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202080094.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32957416      PMCID: PMC7505358          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


Introduction

Vancomycin is a glycopeptide antibiotic isolated from the fermentation broth of Streptomyces orientalis.[ It is effective against Gram-positive bacteria by disrupting cell wall synthesis and has been approved for clinical use for more than 60 years.[ It is commonly used for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), ampicillin-resistant enterococci and Gram-positive organisms in patients allergic to penicillin.[ Vancomycin is usually given by intravenous drip. In the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease, vancomycin is taken orally.[ Because of the strong bactericidal effect, Vancomycin is often considered as a last resort in the case of ineffective use of other antigens.[ While due to the occurrence of adverse reactions, the application of vancomycin is strictly limited.[ The main adverse reactions of vancomycin include hypersensitivity reactions, nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and so on. The most common manifestations of hypersensitivity reaction are hypersensitivity macular cutaneous rashes and anaphylaxis.[ The major effects of vancomycin-induced hypersensitivity reactions are vasodilatation, bronchoconstriction, capillary permeability increase, autonomic nervous system activation, and mucosal hypersecretion.[ One study showed that after vancomycin intravenously, 7%–17% of patients infected with MRSA presented nephrotoxicity.[ The dose, duration, and plasma concentration of vancomycin are all closely related to the incidence of nephrotoxicity.[ Cases of hearing loss may be related to vancomycin because the drug damages auditory branch of the eighth cranial nerve directly.[ Furthermore, some minor adverse reactions such as reversible neutropenia, reversible agranulocytosis, gastrointestinal symptoms, and pseudomembranous colitis should not be ignored.[ Up to now, no meta-analysis has been performed on the adverse reactions of vancomycin. In view of this, we have an opportunity to evaluate adverse reactions of vancomycin in humans comprehensively. Therefore, we will conduct a meta-analysis to summarize adverse reactions of vancomycin in humans.

Methods

Study registration

This study has been registered on INPLASY (INPLASY202080094). This meta-analysis will be performed according the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement checklist.[

Eligibility criteria for study selection

Types of studies

Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on clinical application of vancomycin will be considered without language limitation. Case reports, reviews, non-RCTs, and animal experiments will be excluded.

Types of participants

Participants who received vancomycin therapy will be included without restrictions of age, gender, and race.

Types of interventions

In the experimental group, patients were given vancomycin with no limitations of administration routes, frequency, and treatment period. In the control group, no limitations were applied to the control treatments. However, studies used the combination of vancomycin and other treatments will not be included.

Types of outcomes

The incidence of adverse reactions (such as hypersensitivity reactions, nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, phlebitis, and agranulocytosis) will be designated as the outcomes.

Search strategy

The following electronic databases will be searched: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database. The range of publication time will be from the inception of the database to August 2020 without language limitation. The detailed search strategy of PubMed is shown in Table 1. The similar search strategies will be used for other electronic databases.
Table 1

Search strategy of PubMed.

Search strategy of PubMed.

Selection of studies

EndNote 7.0 (Thomson Reuters) will be used to manage all retrieved citations. After removing duplicates, 2 reviewers will independently scan titles and abstracts to eliminate all irrelevant records. Then, the remaining records will be read by full texts in further assessing the inclusion of the study. Any confusion over inclusion criteria will be resolved by discussion with the third reviewer. A PRISMA flow diagram will be designed to illustrate the details of study selection.

Data extraction and management

After selection, 2 reviewers will independently conduct data extraction. Any confusion will be resolved by discussion with the third reviewer. If some important information is missing, we will contact original authors by email to request detailed information about the research. The general information will be extracted, including first author's name, country of publication, year of publication, title of journal, study design, patient information, experimental, and control intervention (drug names, administration routes, dose, frequency, and treatment period), and specific details about adverse events (symptoms and number of persons experiencing an adverse reaction).

Assessment of risk of bias

Risk of bias of the selected studies will be assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. This tool covers 7 aspects: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other bias. A bias value of “high”, “unclear”, or “low” was given for each item. These 7 items were assessed independently by 2 reviews. Any divergences will be resolved by discussion with the third reviewer.

Data synthesis and analysis

Data synthesis

Review Manager 5.3 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration) will be used for data synthesis. Odds ratio will be used for dichotomous outcomes with 95% confidence interval. Heterogeneity will be examined using the I2 test. The I2 value > 50% means significant heterogeneity, and the random effects model will be used. Otherwise, the I2 value ≤ 50% means minor heterogeneity, and the fixed effects model will be utilized. If significant heterogeneity still exists after subgroup analysis, meta-analysis will not be pooled, and descriptive summary will be reported.

Subgroup analysis

Subgroup analysis will be performed to check the potential heterogeneity and inconsistency based on the different participant characteristics, administration routes, and dose of vancomycin, control methods, and outcome measurements.

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to check the robustness and reliability of pooled outcome results by excluding low-quality studies and small studies.

Reporting bias

Publication bias will be assessed with funnel plot and Egger regression test if sufficient trials (≥10 trials) are included.[

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to conduct a comprehensive literature search and provide a systematic synthesis of current published data to summarize adverse reactions of vancomycin in humans. We will search 7 electronic literature databases to avoid missing any potential eligible studies, and apply rigorous methodology to examine studies reporting the adverse reaction outcomes of vancomycin for patients. The results of this study will provide helpful evidence for clinical practice and patients, future research, as well health related policy makers.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Yang Peng, Chen-yang Li, Zhi-ling Yang. Data curation: Yang Peng, Zhi-ling Yang. Formal analysis: Yang Peng, Chen-yang Li, Zhi-ling Yang, Wei Shi. Funding acquisition: Chen-yang Li. Investigation: Chen-yang Li, Wei Shi. Methodology: Yang Peng, Chen-yang Li. Project administration: Zhi-ling Yang. Resources: Yang Peng, Chen-yang Li, Zhi-ling Yang. Software: Zhi-ling Yang, Wei Shi. Supervision: Yang Peng, Zhi-ling Yang. Validation: Chen-yang Li. Visualization: Zhi-ling Yang, Wei Shi. Writing – original draft: Yang Peng, Chen-yang Li. Writing – review & editing: Zhi-ling Yang, Wei Shi.
  21 in total

1.  Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses.

Authors:  A J Sutton; S J Duval; R L Tweedie; K R Abrams; D R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-10

Review 2.  Vancomycin-associated drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome.

Authors:  Lauren M Madigan; Lindy P Fox
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Increased vancomycin production by overexpression of MbtH-like protein in Amycolatopsis orientalis KFCC10990P.

Authors:  K S Lee; B M Lee; J H Ryu; D H Kim; Y H Kim; S-K Lim
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.858

Review 4.  The use of vancomycin with its therapeutic and adverse effects: a review.

Authors:  F R Bruniera; F M Ferreira; L R M Saviolli; M R Bacci; D Feder; M da Luz Gonçalves Pedreira; M A Sorgini Peterlini; L A Azzalis; V B Campos Junqueira; F L A Fonseca
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.507

5.  A Vancomycin Derivative with a Pyrophosphate-Binding Group: A Strategy to Combat Vancomycin-Resistant Bacteria.

Authors:  Venkateswarlu Yarlagadda; Paramita Sarkar; Sandip Samaddar; Jayanta Haldar
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Oral Vancomycin Followed by Fecal Transplantation Versus Tapering Oral Vancomycin Treatment for Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Susy S Hota; Valerie Sales; George Tomlinson; Mary Jane Salpeter; Allison McGeer; Bryan Coburn; David S Guttman; Donald E Low; Susan M Poutanen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Vancomycin Reduces Cell Wall Stiffness and Slows Swim Speed of the Lyme Disease Bacterium.

Authors:  Michael W Harman; Alex E Hamby; Ross Boltyanskiy; Alexia A Belperron; Linda K Bockenstedt; Holger Kress; Eric R Dufresne; Charles W Wolgemuth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Evaluation of vancomycin MIC creep in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Diaz; V Afreixo; E Ramalheira; C Rodrigues; B Gago
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 8.067

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Device-Associated Meningitis by Linezolid-Resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus in a Vancomycin- Hypersensitive Patient.

Authors:  Priya Vijayan; Dwarakanath Srinivas; Nagarathna Siddaiah; Veena Kumari Haradara Bahubali
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2019-12-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Acute liver failure with thrombotic microangiopathy due to sodium valproate toxicity: A case report.

Authors:  Xuan Mei; Hai-Cong Wu; Mei Ruan; Li-Rong Cai
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Disturbance of Vancomycin Infusion Flow during Multidrug Infusion: Influence on Endothelial Cell Toxicity.

Authors:  Maryline Drouet; Elodie Cuvelier; Feng Chai; Stéphanie Genay; Pascal Odou; Bertrand Décaudin
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.