Literature DB >> 32956749

Rhodanine derivative LJ001 inhibits TGEV and PDCoV replication in vitro.

Yunfei Zhang1, Lu Xia1, Yixin Yuan2, Qianqian Li2, Li Han1, Guoyu Yang3, Hui Hu4.   

Abstract

Transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) and porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) are members of the family coronaviridae and mainly cause acute diarrhea/vomiting, dehydration and mortality in piglets, which lead to huge economic losses to the swine industry. Rhodanine derivative LJ001 has been verified to be effective against some enveloped virus infections in vitro. In this study, we evaluated the antiviral activity of LJ001 towards TGEV and PDCoV replication on swine testicular(ST) cells. Our results showed the 50 % cellular cytotoxicity (CC50) value of LJ001 was 146.4 μM on ST cell. The virus titers of TGEV and PDCoV were obviously decreased in the presence of LJ001 with the concentrations of 3.125 and 12.5 μM, and LJ001 potently inhibited TGEV and PDCoV infection at the replication stages of viral life cycle. Further study indicated that LJ001 inhibited TGEV and PDCoV replication by inhibition of viral RNA and protein synthesis, and reducing virus yields at 12 and 24 h post-inoculation. These data indicated that LJ001 had antiviral activities on TGEV and PDCoV replications in vitro, which may serve as a new candidate for treatment of coronaviruses infections.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antiviral activities; Porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV); Rhodanine derivative LJ001; Transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32956749      PMCID: PMC7501054          DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2020.198167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Virus Res        ISSN: 0168-1702            Impact factor:   3.303


Introduction

Coronaviruses are enveloped, single-stranded and positive-sense RNA viruses that can infect and cause diseases in avian and mammal species (Xu et al., 2018). According to the genome and antigenicity features, coronaviridae is divided into four genera: Alphacoronavirus (α-CoV), Betacoronavirus (β-CoV), Gammacoronavirus (γ-CoV) and Deltacoronavirus (δ-CoV) (King et al., 2012; Lu et al., 2015). To date, there are five diff ;erent species of CoV that cause diseases in pigs (Wang et al., 2019): α-CoV, including porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV), transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV), swine enteric alphacoronavirus (SeACoV) and porcine respiratory coronarivurs (PRCV); β-CoV, including porcine hemagglutinating encephalomyelitis virus (PHEV); and δ-CoV, including porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV). TGEV, PEDV, PDCoV and SeACoV can cause swine enteric coronavirus disease and lead to significant economic losses for the pork industry (Jung et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2010; Huang et al., 2013). TGEV, a member of the genus Alphacoronavirus in the family coronaviridae, was first identified as an etiological agent of transmissible gastroenteritis in swine in 1946 in the United States, and since then, it has become one of the most common viral causes of diarrhea in pig herds (Niederwerder and Hesse, 2018). TGEV causes severe watery diarrhea, vomiting, and dehydration in suckling piglets less than 2 weeks old, resulting in a high rate of mortality (up to 100 %) (Niederwerder and Hesse, 2018). Inactivated and live-attenuated vaccines against TGEV have been proven effective in preventing TGEV infections in some extent, however, protection of TGEV infections is not complete in clinic (Jin et al., 2018). To solve this problem, enhancing the immune effects of TGEV vaccines and development of new effective antiviral agents are the effective ways. PDCoV, belonging to the Deltacoronavirus genus of the Coronaviridae family, is a novel swine enteropathogenic coronavirus with worldwide distribution (Hu et al., 2016). PDCoV was first identified in pigs in Hong Kong in 2012 (Woo et al., 2012), then the detection of PDCoV in swine herds were reported in the US, Canada, China, South Korea, and Thailand (Wang et al., 2014b; Ma et al., 2015; Janetanakit et al., 2016; Lee et al., 2016). Similar to TGEV, PDCoV causes severe diarrhea, vomiting, and dehydration in piglets (Jung et al., 2016). There are currently no approved treatments or vaccines available for PDCoV. Therefore, screening drugs that are effectively against PDCoV infections are needed. LJ001, a novel small-molecule rhodanine derivative, has been shown to have broad-spectrum antiviral activities in vitro (Balmer et al., 2017). LJ001 can inhibit the entry and spread of some enveloped viruses, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), influenza, Ebola, arenaviruses and poxvi ruses (Balmer et al., 2017). LJ001 could inhibit enveloped virus infection at the stage of virus entry, for it mainly acts on viruses, and not the cell(Wolf et al., 2010). Further research showed the antiviral activity of LJ001 was light-dependent, and required the presence of molecular oxygen. The exact mechanism was that the LJ001-generated singlet oxygen (1O2) mediated lipid oxidation, which then negatively affects on the biophysical properties of viral membranes (membrane curvature and fluidity), and then result in the virus-cell membrane fusion (Vigant et al., 2013). The virion structures and the viral envelope functions remain intact during LJ001 treatment, so the virions treated with LJ001 are able to bind to their receptors (Wolf et al., 2010). Previous research confirms that even though LJ001 was lipophilic, it still could bind to both viral and cellular membranes, and inhibit virus-cell but not cell-cell fusion (Balmer et al., 2017; Wolf et al., 2010). Although LJ001 has shown the antiviral activities on many viruses, the effects of LJ001 on coronaviruses replication have yet to be demonstrated. So in current study we conducted experiments about LJ001 antiviral activity on TGEV and PDCoV replication on swine testicular (ST) cells. The following report described the LJ001 antiviral activities on TGEV and PDCoV replication.

Materials and methods

Cell line, viruses and drug

ST cells were purchased from the Institute of China Veterinary Medicine Inspection. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco) containing 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco). TGEV strain HN-2012 and PDCoV strain CH-01 were isolated and identified by our laboratory. TGEV were propagated in ST cell with maintenance medium (DMEM supplemented with 1% antibiotic-antimycotic) (Jin et al., 2018). PDCoV were propagated in ST cell with maintenance medium (DMEM supplemented with 1% antibiotic-antimycotic and 1% pancreatin). (Zhang et al., 2019). LJ001, kindly provided by Professor Guoyu Yang of Henan Agricultural University, was dissolved in DMEM containing 0.1 % (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO, Solarbio), and stored at 4 °C and protected from light.

Cell viability assay (cytotoxicity)

Cell viability assay was performed with ST cells in 96-well plates. Briefly, cells were seeded into 96-well plates and grown to 100 % confluence after 24 h. Eight wells containing a monolayer of cells were added with the different concentrations of LJ001 (0.782, 1.563, 3.125, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100 and 200 μM), and the cells that treated with DMEM containing 0.1 % DMSO were served as mock controls. After 24 h, cells were washed twice with D-Hanks, and then incubated with 100 μl of 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (5 mg/mL) (Solarbio) for 4 h. The reaction was stopped by adding 150 μl of DMSO, and the absorbance was measured at 570 nm. The CC50 was calculated using GraphPad Prism software.

Assays the antiviral activity of LJ001

To investigate the inhibitory effect of LJ001 on TGEV or PDCoV infection, ST cells were incubated with different concentrations of LJ001 (0.782, 3.125 and 12.5 μM) at various stages of viral infection (MOI = 0.01) (Fig. 2A). Briefly, ST cells were seeded into 24-well plate, and were subjected to the following three experiments: (1) for pre-treatment groups, cells were incubated with LJ001 (0.782, 3.125 and 12.5 μM) for 1 h prior to viral inoculation. After that, cells were washed with D-Hanks and infected with virus at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 1 h. The maintenance medium (DMEM without FBS) was added to the plates and incubated for 24 h. (2) For co-treatment groups, cells were infected with virus in the presence of different concentration of LJ001 (0.782, 3.125 and 12.5 μM) for 1 h. After washed, maintenance medium for supplemented with the corresponding concentrations of LJ001 (0.782, 3.125 and 12.5 μM) were added and cell were incubated for 24 h. (3) For post-treatment groups, cells were firstly infected with virus for 1 h at 37 °C. Cells were washed with D-Hanks, maintenance medium supplemented with different concentration of LJ001 (0.782, 3.125 and 12.5 μM) was added and incubated for 24 h. The cell culture supernatants were collected at 24 h post-inoculation (hpi). For all the experiments, ST cells incubated with 0.1 % DMSO or virus only were used as controls. All groups were performed in three independent experiments. Virus titer was determined by TCID50 assay as previously described (Hu et al., 2015).
Fig. 2

Antiviral effect of LJ001 against TGEV infection. (A) Schematics of LJ001 addition experiments. ST cells were incubated with virus (MOI = 0.05) for 1 h. Different concentrations of LJ001 were added at prior to infection (-1 h) as well as at 0 h or 1 h post-infection. All experiments were performed 24 h after infection. (B) pre-treatment group, LJ001 was used for pretreatment of ST cells at 37 °C for 1 h. (C) co-treatment group, cells were infected with virus in the presence of different concentration of LJ001 for 1 h, (D) post-treatment group, cells were firstly infected with virus for 1 h at 37 °C, after washed, different concentration of LJ001 was added and incubated for 24 h. All experiments were performed 24 h after infection, and the TGEV viral titers in the culture supernatant were measured by TCID50 assay. The experiment was performed three times independently. Differences were considered significant at (*) 0.01 < p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01.

RNA extraction and quantitative real-time reverse-transcription PCR (RT-qPCR)

RNA was extracted from ST cells using TRIzol reagent (TaKaRa, China) and cDNA was synthesized by using SuperQuick RT MasterMix (TaKaRa, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR was performed using SYBR Green PCR Master (TaKaRa, China) and the specific primers are shown in Table 1 . Data were normalized against β-actin expression and are expressed as fold differences between control and treated cells using the 2−ΔΔCT method.
Table 1

Primers used for RT-qPCR in current study.

GenesSequences (5′–3′)Size (bp)
β-actinF: GCGGCATCCACGAAACTAC137
R: GATCTCCTTCTGCATCCTGTC
TGEV MF: ATGGTAGAACTGGTGTTGGTATT120
R: CACATGGCGTTACAGAGTAGAT
PDCoV MF: GACCACATGGCTCCAATTCT99
R: TGGCGGATTTCTGACTGATATG
Primers used for RT-qPCR in current study.

Western blot analysis

To determine whether LJ001 could influence the viral proteins synthesis, the expression levels of viral N proteins of TGEV and PDCoV were tested by western blot at 12 and 24 hour post-infection (hpi). Protein lysates were obtained from ST cells using ice-cold lysis RIPA buffer containing 10 Mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). Total protein concentration was determined by BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime, China). Equal amounts of protein were subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore, USA). Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk for 3 h at room temperature, and then incubated with primary antibody at 4°C overnight. The following primary antibodies were used: β-actin (Abcam, USA), TGEV N and PDCoV N polyclonal antibody (prepared in our laboratory using standard methods). After incubated with the primary antibody, HRP-conjugated secondary antibody were added and incubated for 2 h. Protein bands were detected by enhanced chemioluminescence reagents (Thermo, USA), and analyzed by ImageJ software.

Statistical analyses

Results were expressed as the means ± standard deviation (SD) from three independent experiments. Statistical analyses were performed using Student’s t-test. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. Statistical significance is indicated in figures as follows: * 0.01 < p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Results

Minimal cytotoxicity of LJ001

The chemical structure of LJ001 is (5Z)-3-Allyl-5-[(5-phényl-2-furyl) méthylène]-2-thioxo-1, 3-thiazolidin-4-one (Fig.1 A). LJ001 cytotoxicity in the range of 0.782−200 μM was evaluated in three independent experiments by MTT assay. The results showed that LJ001 exhibited no significant cytotoxicity at the concentrations from 0.782 to 25 μM (Fig. 1B). It showed slight cytotoxicity on ST cells at the concentration of 25 μM but without statistical significance (p > 0.05). The CC50 value of LJ001 on ST cells was about 146.4 μM (Fig. 1C).
Fig. 1

Evaluation the cytotoxicity of LJ001. (A) Schematic diagram of the chemical structure of LJ001. (B) The cytotoxicity of LJ001 on ST cells. Cell viability was assayed at 24 h post-treatment by measuring MTT. OD readings of duplicate samples were plotted and used to extrapolate CC50 values using GraphPad Prism. (C) Determination the CC50 of LJ001. ST cells were seeded in 96 well plates, and treated with LJ001 at different concentrations. The experiment was performed three times independently. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of eight duplicate samples. Differences were considered significant at (*) 0.01 < p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01.

Evaluation the cytotoxicity of LJ001. (A) Schematic diagram of the chemical structure of LJ001. (B) The cytotoxicity of LJ001 on ST cells. Cell viability was assayed at 24 h post-treatment by measuring MTT. OD readings of duplicate samples were plotted and used to extrapolate CC50 values using GraphPad Prism. (C) Determination the CC50 of LJ001. ST cells were seeded in 96 well plates, and treated with LJ001 at different concentrations. The experiment was performed three times independently. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of eight duplicate samples. Differences were considered significant at (*) 0.01 < p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01.

LJ001 possesses antiviral activity against TGEV and PDCoV infection

To determine whether LJ001 has the negative effect on the production of TGEV and PDCoV, ST cells were treated with various concentrations of LJ001 (ranging from 0.782 μM to 12.5 μM) before (pre-treatment), during (co-treatment), and after (post-treatment) the virus inoculation (Fig. 2A), all experiments were performed 24 h after infection. In the pre-treatment group,LJ001 had only marginal effect on TGEV infection with slight reduction of viral titers (Fig. 2B). In the co-treatment and post-treatment groups, no obvious antiviral effects were observed on the TGEV replication when 0.782 μM of LJ001 was added. While LJ001 at the concentrations of 3.125 and 12.5 μM obviously suppressed TGEV replication, and the virus titers (TCID50) decreased approximately by 1.35–2.0 log10 respectively (Fig. 2C and D). Antiviral effect of LJ001 against TGEV infection. (A) Schematics of LJ001 addition experiments. ST cells were incubated with virus (MOI = 0.05) for 1 h. Different concentrations of LJ001 were added at prior to infection (-1 h) as well as at 0 h or 1 h post-infection. All experiments were performed 24 h after infection. (B) pre-treatment group, LJ001 was used for pretreatment of ST cells at 37 °C for 1 h. (C) co-treatment group, cells were infected with virus in the presence of different concentration of LJ001 for 1 h, (D) post-treatment group, cells were firstly infected with virus for 1 h at 37 °C, after washed, different concentration of LJ001 was added and incubated for 24 h. All experiments were performed 24 h after infection, and the TGEV viral titers in the culture supernatant were measured by TCID50 assay. The experiment was performed three times independently. Differences were considered significant at (*) 0.01 < p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01. The effect of LJ001 on PDCoV infection was also evaluated, the result showed only the 12.5 μM of LJ001 pre-treatment group induced a slight decrease in the PDCoV virus titer (Fig. 3 A). In the co-treatment group, exceeding 24 % and 36 % of decrease of the viral titers were observed in the 3.125 and 12.5 μM of LJ001 treated-groups as compared to the virus only group, respectively (Fig. 3B). The similar phenomena were also observed in the case of LJ001 post-treated groups (Fig. 3C), which resulted in 1.3 and 2.1-log10 decrease of PDCoV viral titers in the 3.125 and 12.5 μM of LJ001-treated groups, respectively.
Fig. 3

Antiviral effect of LJ001 against PDCoV (MOI = 0.5) infection. ST cells were treated with LJ001 and PDCoV as described above. (A) pre-treatment group, LJ001 was used for pretreatment of ST cells at 37 °C for 1 h. (B) co-treatment group, cells were infected with virus in the presence of different concentration of LJ001 for 1 h, (C) post-treatment group, cells were firstly infected with virus for 1 h at 37 °C, after washed, different concentration of LJ001 was added and incubated for 24 h. All experiments were performed 24 h after infection, and the PDCoV viral titers in the culture supernatant were measured by TCID50 assay. The experiment was performed three times independently. Differences were considered significant at (*) 0.01 < p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01.

Antiviral effect of LJ001 against PDCoV (MOI = 0.5) infection. ST cells were treated with LJ001 and PDCoV as described above. (A) pre-treatment group, LJ001 was used for pretreatment of ST cells at 37 °C for 1 h. (B) co-treatment group, cells were infected with virus in the presence of different concentration of LJ001 for 1 h, (C) post-treatment group, cells were firstly infected with virus for 1 h at 37 °C, after washed, different concentration of LJ001 was added and incubated for 24 h. All experiments were performed 24 h after infection, and the PDCoV viral titers in the culture supernatant were measured by TCID50 assay. The experiment was performed three times independently. Differences were considered significant at (*) 0.01 < p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01.

LJ001 inhibits the life cycle of viral replication

To further investigate which steps of the viral life cycle were affected by LJ001, LJ001 were added to ST cells during virus infection. According to the cytotoxicity test and antiviral activity, 12.5 μM of LJ001 was selected to the following experiments. Briefly, ST cells were co-incubated with virus (TGEV or PDCoV, MOI = 0.01) and LJ001 (12.5 μM) for 1 h. After washing, maintenance medium supplemented with 12.5 μM of LJ001 was added to the cells. The intracellular viral RNA levels, extracellular viral titers, and expression levels of viral N protein were examined at 1 (the time point for virus entry), 6, 12 (the time point for virus replication) and 24 hpi (the time point for virus release) after virus infection. The RT-qPCR results showed the intracellular TGEV RNA titer in the LJ001-treated groups was similar to that in the virus only group at 1 hpi (p > 0.05), while the inhibitory effects were prominent at 6, 12 and 24 hpi when compared to the virus only groups (Fig. 4 A). The TCID50 titers of TGEV in the cultural supernatants in the LJ001 treated group were markedly reduced at 12 and 24 hpi when compared with the virus only group, there was over 2 log10 viral-titer decrease in the LJ001-treated groups at 24 hpi (Fig. 4B). Western blot analysis showed that about 50 % of TGEV N protein expression was reduced at 24 hpi in the infected cells with 12.5 μM of LJ001 treatment, comparing to the TGEV-infected cells (Fig. 4C).
Fig. 4

Effect of LJ001 on the virus replication. ST cells were incubated with TGEV or PDCoV for 1 h, and maintenance medium supplemented with 12.5 μM of LJ001 was added. Viral replication was estimated by RT-qPCR (A and D), TCID50 assay (B and E), and western blot (C and E) at 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after virus infection. Experiments were performed at least three times. Differences were considered significant at (*) 0.01 < p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01.

Effect of LJ001 on the virus replication. ST cells were incubated with TGEV or PDCoV for 1 h, and maintenance medium supplemented with 12.5 μM of LJ001 was added. Viral replication was estimated by RT-qPCR (A and D), TCID50 assay (B and E), and western blot (C and E) at 6 h, 12 h and 24 h after virus infection. Experiments were performed at least three times. Differences were considered significant at (*) 0.01 < p < 0.05, (**) p < 0.01. Similar results were found in the PDCoV groups, with the evident decrease of intracellular viral RNA titers at 12 and 24 hpi (p < 0.01) (Fig. 4D), the obvious reduction of extracellular viral titers at 6, 12 and 24 hpi (Fig. 4E), and significant suppression of the expression of PDCoV N-protein at 24 hpi (Fig. 4F). These results indicated that LJ001 inhibited TGEV and PDCoV infection at the replication stage of the virus life cycle.

Discussion

The threat of emerging and re-emerging coronaviruses highlights the need to develop broad-spectrum antivirals. Rhodamine derivative LJ001 has previously reported to inhibit the entry of numerous lipid-enveloped viruses at non-cytotoxic concentrations. LJ001 exerts antiviral activities by binding to both viral and cellular membranes and inhibits virus–cell fusion (Wolf et al., 2010). In this study, LJ001 was shown to have antiviral activities against two swine enteropapthogenic coronaviruses (TGEV and PDCoV) infection in vitro. which can serve as a new candidate for treatment of swine enteric coronaviruses infections. Moreover, there is an urgent need for targeted and effective COVID-19 treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic, we deduced the SARS-CoV-2 also needs to be tested under similar in vitro conditions with or without LJ001 treatment, especially in comparison to those positive control groups treated with known antivirals, such as remdesivir. Our cellular toxicity assays revealed that the cytotoxicity of LJ001 to ST cells was as high as 146.4 μM, and the LJ001 of 12.5 μm has no obvious influence on ST cell viability and morphology (Fig. 1). Wolf et al. also demonstrated there was no effect on active cell metabolismin on LJ001-treated Vero cells (Wolf et al., 2010). In the pre-treatment group (Figs. 2B and 3 A), different concentration of LJ001 (12.5, 3.125 and 0.782 μM) was added to ST cells and incubated for 1 h, then cells were infected with TGEV or PDCoV, the miscible liquids were detected at 24 hpi. The results showed that LJ001 had no obvious effect on cells. Wolf et al. also demonstrated that LJ001 does not act on virus infection, there is no obvious inhibitory effects for VSV infection after the cell pretreated with LJ001(Wolf et al., 2010). Present research demonstrated that LJ001 could inhibit the infection for Influenza A, HIV, Rift Valley Fever Virus (RVFV) and HCV (Wolf et al., 2010; Vigant et al., 2013). In our study, the cells were infected with virus in the presence of different concentration of LJ001 (0.782, 3.125 and 12.5 μM) for 1 h, then the presence of different concentration of LJ001 (0.782, 3.125 and 12.5 μM) were added, the miscible liquids were detected at 24 hpi in the co-treatment group. The results showed that the LJ001 have obvious inhibitory effect for TGEV and PDCoV infection (Figs. 2C and 3 B). Furthermore, the cells infected with TGEV or PDCoV for 1 h, 12.5 μM of LJ001 were added to ST cells, the miscible liquids were detected after infected for 1, 6, 12 and 24 hpi. The results showed that LJ001 had no obvious effect at the early stages of TGEV and PDCoV replication, while its inhibitory effect was apparent at the viral replication cycle (Fig. 4). Previous research showed that LJ001 acts on VSV during the viral-entry stage, further studies indicated LJ001 targeted the virus-cell fusion binding to lipid membranes of VSV in an irreversible manner (Wolf et al., 2010; Vigant et al., 2013). These previous results differ with our observations of the LJ001 effects on the viral replication stage, which may be because of the difference of the lipid membrane of TGEV and PDCoV with other enveloped viruses in biophysical and physiological properties. However, the specific mechanism needs further investigation. Future experiments will determine if LJ001 can be used not only as a treatment but also for preventing TGEV and PDCoV infection. TGEV and PDCoV belong to different genera of coronavirus, encoding distinct nucleotide sequence and amino acid sequence (Zhu et al., 2018). The clinical symptoms of PDCoV are similar to that of TGEV. Histologic lesions are observed in all sections of small intestine, while the pathogenesis mechanism behind TGEV and PDCoV infections remain largely unknown (Koonpaew et al., 2019). No treatments or vaccines are available for PDCoV currently. In this study, LJ001 was described to have the antiviral activity against TGEV or PDCoV at a micromolar range. Recent years, the emerging and re-emerging coronaviruses cause severe threat to global public health, and new drugs were constantly discovered to anti-coronaviruses. Prior research showed saracatinib can inhibit middle east respiratory syndrome-coronavirus (MERS-CoV) at the early stages of the viral life cycle by suppressing the Src-family of tyrosine kinases (SFK) signaling pathways (Shin et al., 2018). Agostini’ reports showed that antiviral remdesivir (GS-5734) could inhibit several coronaviruses replication, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV), murine hepatitis virus (MHV) and MERS-CoV. They further demonstrated that this antivial activity was mediated by the viral polymerase and the proofreading exoribonuclease (Agostini et al., 2018). However, the exact mechanism of the antiviral activity of LJ001 on TGEV or PDCoV replication need further study. In summary, this study suggested that LJ001 showed antiviral activity at the replication stage of TGEV and PDCoV. LJ001 has the potential to serve as a new therapeutic agent for coronaviruses infections. Further study is still needed to understand the underlying antiviral mechanism of LJ001 on PDCoV and TGEV infection.

Author Statement

Hui Hu and Guoyu Yang designed and funded the study; Yunfei Zhang performed the experiments; Yunfei Zhang and Lu Xia analyzed the results and drafted the manuscript; Yixin Yuan, Qianqian Li and Li Han participated in correcting the manuscript. All the authors have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve it for publication. No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part.

Funding

This work was supported by funds from the (2016YFD0500102), the (31972678 and 31772773), Scientific and Technological Innovation Talents in Colleges and universities of Henan Province (20HASTIT040).

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.
  22 in total

1.  A broad-spectrum antiviral targeting entry of enveloped viruses.

Authors:  Mike C Wolf; Alexander N Freiberg; Tinghu Zhang; Zeynep Akyol-Ataman; Andrew Grock; Patrick W Hong; Jianrong Li; Natalya F Watson; Angela Q Fang; Hector C Aguilar; Matteo Porotto; Anna N Honko; Robert Damoiseaux; John P Miller; Sara E Woodson; Steven Chantasirivisal; Vanessa Fontanes; Oscar A Negrete; Paul Krogstad; Asim Dasgupta; Anne Moscona; Lisa E Hensley; Sean P Whelan; Kym F Faull; Michael R Holbrook; Michael E Jung; Benhur Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Inhibition of an Aquatic Rhabdovirus Demonstrates Promise of a Broad-Spectrum Antiviral for Use in Aquaculture.

Authors:  Bethany F Balmer; Rachel L Powers; Ting-Hu Zhang; Jihye Lee; Frederic Vigant; Benhur Lee; Michael E Jung; Maureen K Purcell; Kevin Snekvik; Hector C Aguilar
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Origin, evolution, and virulence of porcine deltacoronaviruses in the United States.

Authors:  Yuanmei Ma; Yu Zhang; Xueya Liang; Fangfei Lou; Michael Oglesbee; Steven Krakowka; Jianrong Li
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 7.867

4.  Origin, evolution, and genotyping of emergent porcine epidemic diarrhea virus strains in the United States.

Authors:  Yao-Wei Huang; Allan W Dickerman; Pablo Piñeyro; Long Li; Li Fang; Ross Kiehne; Tanja Opriessnig; Xiang-Jin Meng
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 7.867

5.  Saracatinib Inhibits Middle East Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus Replication In Vitro.

Authors:  Jin Soo Shin; Eunhye Jung; Meehyein Kim; Ralph S Baric; Yun Young Go
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 5.048

Review 6.  PEDV and PDCoV Pathogenesis: The Interplay Between Host Innate Immune Responses and Porcine Enteric Coronaviruses.

Authors:  Surapong Koonpaew; Samaporn Teeravechyan; Phanramphoei Namprachan Frantz; Thanathom Chailangkarn; Anan Jongkaewwattana
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2019-02-22

Review 7.  Porcine deltacoronavirus infection: Etiology, cell culture for virus isolation and propagation, molecular epidemiology and pathogenesis.

Authors:  Kwonil Jung; Hui Hu; Linda J Saif
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.303

8.  A mechanistic paradigm for broad-spectrum antivirals that target virus-cell fusion.

Authors:  Frederic Vigant; Jihye Lee; Axel Hollmann; Lukas B Tanner; Zeynep Akyol Ataman; Tatyana Yun; Guanghou Shui; Hector C Aguilar; Dong Zhang; David Meriwether; Gleyder Roman-Sosa; Lindsey R Robinson; Terry L Juelich; Hubert Buczkowski; Sunwen Chou; Miguel A R B Castanho; Mike C Wolf; Jennifer K Smith; Ashley Banyard; Margaret Kielian; Srinivasa Reddy; Markus R Wenk; Matthias Selke; Nuno C Santos; Alexander N Freiberg; Michael E Jung; Benhur Lee
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 6.823

9.  Swine enteric coronavirus disease: A review of 4 years with porcine epidemic diarrhoea virus and porcine deltacoronavirus in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  M C Niederwerder; R A Hesse
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 5.005

10.  Experimental infection of gnotobiotic pigs with the cell-culture-adapted porcine deltacoronavirus strain OH-FD22.

Authors:  Hui Hu; Kwonil Jung; Anastasia N Vlasova; Linda J Saif
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 2.574

View more
  6 in total

1.  Broad-spectrum Respiratory Virus Entry Inhibitors.

Authors:  Hanjun Zhao; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 2.  Comparison of Cell Fusions Induced by Influenza Virus and SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Chuyuan Zhang; Xinjie Meng; Hanjun Zhao
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  An Updated Review of Porcine Deltacoronavirus in Terms of Prevalence, Pathogenicity, Pathogenesis and Antiviral Strategy.

Authors:  Cong Duan
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-13

4.  Antiviral Effect of Selenomethionine on Porcine Deltacoronavirus in Pig Kidney Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Zhihua Ren; Guilin Jia; Hongyi He; Ting Ding; Yueru Yu; ZhiCai Zuo; Yanchun Hu; Zhijun Zhong; Shumin Yu; Huidan Deng; Liuhong Shen; Suizhong Cao; Guangneng Peng; Ya Wang; Dongjie Cai; Liping Gou; Xiaoping Ma; Haifeng Liu; Ziyao Zhou; Youtian Deng; Dingyong Yang; Junliang Deng
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Preparation of a Single-Chain Antibody against Nucleocapsid Protein of Porcine Deltacoronavirus by Phage Display Technology.

Authors:  Yixuan Zhang; Yue Song; Haojie Ren; Quan Zeng; Yixin Yuan; Lu Xia; Zhanyong Wei
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 5.818

6.  Antiviral effects of ergosterol peroxide in a pig model of porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV) infection involves modulation of apoptosis and tight junction in the small intestine.

Authors:  Cong Duan; Junchi Wang; Yi Liu; Jialu Zhang; Jianyong Si; Zhihui Hao; Jiufeng Wang
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.683

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.