Literature DB >> 32955823

FLT3 inhibitors in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: current status and future perspectives.

Adrián Mosquera Orgueira1,2,3, Laura Bao Pérez4,5, Alicia Mosquera Torre4,5, Andrés Peleteiro Raíndo4,5,6, Miguel Cid López4,5,6, José Á Díaz Arias4,5, Roi Ferreiro Ferro4, Beatriz Antelo Rodríguez4,5,6, Marta S González Pérez4,5, Manuel Albors Ferreiro4,5, Natalia Alonso Vence4,5, Manuel M Pérez Encinas4,5,6, José L Bello López4,5,6, Giovanni Martinelli7, Claudio Cerchione7.   

Abstract

Mutations in the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) gene arise in 25-30% of all acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. These mutations lead to constitutive activation of the protein product and are divided in two broad types: internal tandem duplication (ITD) of the juxtamembrane domain (25% of cases) and point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD). Patients with FLT3 ITD mutations have a high relapse risk and inferior cure rates, whereas the role of FLT3 TKD mutations still remains to be clarified. Additionally, growing research indicates that FLT3 status evolves through a disease continuum (clonal evolution), where AML cases can acquire FLT3 mutations at relapse - not present in the moment of diagnosis. Several FLT3 inhibitors have been tested in patients with FLT3-mutated AML. These drugs exhibit different kinase inhibitory profiles, pharmacokinetics and adverse events. First-generation multi-kinase inhibitors (sorafenib, midostaurin, lestaurtinib) are characterized by a broad-spectrum of drug targets, whereas second-generation inhibitors (quizartinib, crenolanib, gilteritinib) show more potent and specific FLT3 inhibition, and are thereby accompanied by less toxic effects. Notwithstanding, all FLT3 inhibitors face primary and acquired mechanisms of resistance, and therefore the combinations with other drugs (standard chemotherapy, hypomethylating agents, checkpoint inhibitors) and its application in different clinical settings (upfront therapy, maintenance, relapsed or refractory disease) are under study in a myriad of clinical trials. This review focuses on the role of FLT3 mutations in AML, pharmacological features of FLT3 inhibitors, known mechanisms of drug resistance and accumulated evidence for the use of FLT3 inhibitors in different clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32955823     DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4806.20.06989-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Med        ISSN: 0026-4806            Impact factor:   4.806


  4 in total

Review 1.  Lower RNA expression of ALDH1A1 distinguishes the favorable risk group in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Garrett M Dancik; Ioannis F Voutsas; Spiros Vlahopoulos
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Interim results from a postmarketing surveillance study of patients with FLT3-mutated relapsed/refractory AML treated with the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib in Japan.

Authors:  Haruko Sugamori; Takumi Lee; Takeshi Mitomi; Chika Yamagishi
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.925

3.  Clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia treated with gilteritinib who received prior midostaurin or sorafenib.

Authors:  Alexander E Perl; Naoko Hosono; Pau Montesinos; Nikolai Podoltsev; Giovanni Martinelli; Nicki Panoskaltsis; Christian Recher; Catherine C Smith; Mark J Levis; Stephen Strickland; Christoph Röllig; Marco Groß-Langenhoff; Wen-Chien Chou; Je-Hwan Lee; Hisayuki Yokoyama; Nahla Hasabou; Qiaoyang Lu; Ramon V Tiu; Jessica K Altman
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 9.812

4.  Molecular Modeling Studies of N-phenylpyrimidine-4-amine Derivatives for Inhibiting FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase-3.

Authors:  Suparna Ghosh; Seketoulie Keretsu; Seung Joo Cho
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 5.923

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.