| Literature DB >> 32954480 |
Weifeng Shang1, Yuanyuan Li2, Hua Li1, Wei Li1, Chengxu Li1, Yuan Cai1, Junwu Dong3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This present study aims to investigate the relationship between laboratory parameters on admission and prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in maintenance hemodialysis patients, as well as providing a theoretical basis for clinical evaluation of prognosis and corresponding intervention measures.Entities:
Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019; Hemodialysis; Laboratory parameters; Novel coronavirus pneumonia
Year: 2020 PMID: 32954480 PMCID: PMC7502275 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02646-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Urol Nephrol ISSN: 0301-1623 Impact factor: 2.370
Comparison of demographic data and laboratory parameters of survival and fatality groups
| Variables | Total ( | Survival group ( | Fatality group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male) | 30 (63.8%) | 23 (60.5%) | 7 (77.8%) | 0.560* |
| Age (years) | 59.7 ± 15.3 | 57.2 ± 15.0 | 70.6 ± 11.8 | 0.016 |
| Hospital length of stay (days) | 18.9 ± 9.8 | 19.5 ± 9.3 | 16.4 ± 12.0 | 0.401 |
| White blood cell count (109/L) | 5.49 ± 2.04 | 5.09 ± 1.76 | 7.17 ± 2.37 | 0.005 |
| Neutrophil count (109/L) | 4.02 ± 1.80 | 3.60 ± 1.47 | 5.80 ± 2.03 | 0.001 |
| Lymphocyte count (109/L) | 0.77 (0.62–1.01) | 0.82 (1.10–0.63) | 0.77 (1.22–0.44) | 0.756 |
| Platelet count (109/L) | 194 ± 83 | 197 ± 84 | 181 ± 80 | 0.593 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 33.7 ± 4.6 | 34.6 ± 3.9 | 29.9 ± 5.7 | 0.005 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 43.6 (12.3–139.2) | 23.0 (5.9–49.9) | 98.7 (68.1–161.6) | 0.001 |
| Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | 1.10 (0.48–2.49) | 0.58 (0.32–1.57) | 2.15 (0.99–5.73) | 0.035 |
| LDH (U/L)# | 274 (185–331) | 249 (183–305) | 322 (293–460) | 0.030 |
| D-dimer (mg/L)# | 1.83 (1.03–3.26) | 1.42 (0.80–3.49) | 2.15 (1.76–3.04) | 0.212 |
*One cell had expectation values between 1 and 5, thus Chi-square test for continuity correction was used
#LDH was absent in 14 patients (13 in the survival group and one in the fatality group). D-dimer was absent in five patients (four in the survival group and one in the fatality group)
The AUC and optimal threshold of each related variable
| Variables | AUC | 95% CI | Optimal threshold* | Sensitivity | Specificity | Youden index | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White blood cell count (109/L) | 0.757 | 0.600–0.914 | 0.017 | ≥ 5.395 | 0.889 | 0.632 | 0.520 |
| Neutrophil count (109/L) | 0.813 | 0.658–0.968 | 0.004 | ≥ 4.355 | 0.889 | 0.763 | 0.652 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 0.743 | 0.532–0.954 | 0.025 | ≤ 31.1 | 0.667 | 0.842 | 0.509 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 0.895 | 0.793–0.997 | < 0.001 | ≥ 45.2 | 0.889 | 0.684 | 0.573 |
| Procalcitonin (ng/mL) | 0.728 | 0.512–0.944 | 0.035 | ≥ 0.925 | 0.889 | 0.579 | 0.468 |
| LDH (U/L)# | 0.758 | 0.544–0.971 | 0.031 | ≥ 281 | 0.8750 | 0.640 | 0.515 |
#LDH was absent in 14 patients (13 in the survival group and one in the fatality group), and the ROC curve was used to analyze the data of 33 patients; *The Youden index was calculated based on the sensitivity and specificity of the ROC curve, and the cut-off point with higher sensitivity was selected as the optimal threshold among several points with relatively large Youden index