| Literature DB >> 32954290 |
Harpreet Hyare1, Enrico De Vita2, Marie-Claire Porter1, Ivor Simpson3, Gerard Ridgway3, Jessica Lowe1, Andrew Thompson1, Chris Carswell1, Sebastien Ourselin2, Marc Modat2, Liane Dos Santos Canas4, Diana Caine1, Zoe Fox5,6, Peter Rudge1, John Collinge1, Simon Mead1, John S Thornton3.
Abstract
Therapeutic trials of disease-modifying agents in neurodegenerative disease typically require several hundred participants and long durations for clinical endpoints. Trials of this size are not feasible for prion diseases, rare dementia disorders associated with misfolding of prion protein. In this situation, biomarkers are particularly helpful. On diagnostic imaging, prion diseases demonstrate characteristic brain signal abnormalities on diffusion-weighted MRI. The aim of this study was to determine whether cerebral water diffusivity could be a quantitative imaging biomarker of disease severity. We hypothesized that the basal ganglia were most likely to demonstrate functionally relevant changes in diffusivity. Seventy-one subjects (37 patients and 34 controls) of whom 47 underwent serial scanning (23 patients and 24 controls) were recruited as part of the UK National Prion Monitoring Cohort. All patients underwent neurological assessment with the Medical Research Council Scale, a functionally orientated measure of prion disease severity, and diffusion tensor imaging. Voxel-based morphometry, voxel-based analysis of diffusion tensor imaging and regions of interest analyses were performed. A significant voxel-wise correlation of decreased Medical Research Council Scale score and decreased mean, radial and axial diffusivities in the putamen bilaterally was observed (P < 0.01). Significant decrease in putamen mean, radial and axial diffusivities over time was observed for patients compared with controls (P = 0.01), and there was a significant correlation between monthly decrease in putamen mean, radial and axial diffusivities and monthly decrease in Medical Research Council Scale (P < 0.001). Step-wise linear regression analysis, with dependent variable decline in Medical Research Council Scale, and covariates age and disease duration, showed the rate of decrease in putamen radial diffusivity to be the strongest predictor of rate of decrease in Medical Research Council Scale (P < 0.001). Sample size calculations estimated that, for an intervention study, 83 randomized patients would be required to provide 80% power to detect a 75% amelioration of decline in putamen radial diffusivity. Putamen radial diffusivity has potential as a secondary outcome measure biomarker in future therapeutic trials in human prion diseases.Entities:
Keywords: CJD; MRI; prion
Year: 2020 PMID: 32954290 PMCID: PMC7425333 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Commun ISSN: 2632-1297
Figure 1Flow chart describing the recruitment of individuals into the study. Ninety-five participants attended for MRI scanning: 37 patients and 34 controls. Twenty-three patients and 24 controls underwent serial scanning. hGH = human growth hormone; vCJD = variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease.
Cross-sectional group data including DTI measure region of interest values
| A: controls ( | B: patients ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 48.7 (13.0) | 50.7 (10.4) | 0.29 |
| MRC Scale | 20 (0) | 15.7 (4.1) | <0.001 |
| Male gender | 15 | 20 | 0.44 |
| TIV (ml) | 1.58 (0.17) | 1.59 (0.18) | 0.73 |
| MD (×10−6 mm2 s−1) | |||
| Caudate | 952.7 (100.1) | 953.0 (229.7) | 0.45 |
| Putamen | 713.9 (44.1) | 666.4 (135.8) | 0.03 |
| Thalamus | 856.6 (53.5) | 930.2 (164.7) | 0.01 |
| FA | |||
| Caudate | 0.22 (0.04) | 0.19 (0.03) | <0.01 |
| Putamen | 0.25 (0.04) | 0.24 (0.04) | NS |
| Thalamus | 0.29 (0.03) | 0.26 (0.04) | <0.01 |
| RD (×10−6 mm2 s−1) | |||
| Caudate | 980.7 (161.2) | 997.6 (297.0) | 0.21 |
| Putamen | 842.7 (38.2) | 775.9 (140.8) | <0.01 |
| Thalamus | 983.5 (86.6) | 1032.4 (165.2) | 0.68 |
| AD (×10−6 mm2 s−1) | |||
| Caudate | 1148.6 (161.01) | 1147.6 (296.2) | 0.29 |
| Putamen | 945.1 (42.8) | 875.3 (165.6) | 0.01 |
| Thalamus | 1114.0 (92.0) | 1158.2 (201.1) | 0.38 |
Values for continuous measures are mean (standard deviation).
+ = Kruskal–Wallis test.
NS = not significant; TIV = total intracranial volume.
Longitudinal analysis: group-wise rates-of-change in MRC Scale score and ROI DTI measures
| A: controls ( | B: patients ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at entry (years), mean (SD) | 48.9 (12.1) | 49.0 (8.8) | 0.22 |
| Time between symptom onset and first MRI (months), mean (SD) | 2.9 (1.2) | ||
| Time between first and last MRI (months), mean (SD) | 16.2 (6.7) | 14.2 (10.5) | 0.26 |
| Male gender | 12 | 13 | 0.73 |
| Neurological outcomes | |||
| MRC Scale score change-per-month, median (IQR, interquartile range) | 0.0 (0.0–0.0) | −0.26 (−0.60 to −0.10) | <0.0001 |
| DTI metrics | |||
| MD rate of change (×10−6 mm2 s−1 month−1) mean (95% CI) | |||
| Caudate ROI | 0.31 (−0.72 to 1.34) | 0.63 (−6.61 to 7.87) | 0.86 |
| Putamen ROI | −0.87 (−1.74 to 0.01) | −6.82 (−12.06 to −1.58) | 0.01 |
| Thalamus ROI | −0.81 (−1.85 to 0.24) | −0.77 (−9.08 to 7.54) | 0.99 |
| FA rate of change (×103 month−1) mean (95% CI) | |||
| Caudate ROI | 0.16 (−0.33 to 0.64) | 0.68 (−0.42 to 1.78) | 0.60 |
| Putamen ROI | 0.34 (−0.17 to 0.84) | 2.53 (0.16 to 4.89) | 0.06 |
| Thalamus ROI | 0.47 (−0.11 to 1.05) | 0.07 (−3.76 to 3.90) | 0.97 |
| RD rate of change (×10−6 mm2 s−1 month−1) mean (95% CI) | |||
| Caudate ROI | 0.21 (−0.85 to 1.26) | 0.48 (−6.31 to 7.27) | 0.86 |
| Putamen ROI | −0.88 (−1.76 to 0.00) | −7.04 (−12.07 to −2.00) | 0.008 |
| Thalamus ROI | −0.89 (−1.93 to 0.16) | −0.51 (−8.92 to 7.89) | 0.99 |
| AD rate of change (×10−6 mm2 s−1 month−1) mean (95% CI) | |||
| Caudate | 0.51 (−0.53 to 1.55) | 0.94 (−7.29 to 9.18) | 0.86 |
| Putamen ROI | −0.85 (−1.79 to 0.08) | −6.38 (−12.30 to −0.47) | 0.05 |
| Thalamus ROI | −0.65 (−1.70 to 0.41) | −1.28 (−9.47 to 6.91) | 0.96 |
ANOVA. + = Kruskal-Wallis test.
CI = confidence intervals; SD = standard deviation.
Figure 2Cross-sectional VBA correlation of DTI measures with MRC Scale in ‘patients’. SPM-t maps showing significant positive correlation between MRC Scale and DTI metrics in the putamen bilaterally in ‘patients’ (n = 37) for FDR P < 0.05: (A) MD, t ≥ 2.823, r = 0.57; (B) RD, t ≥ 3.61, r = 0.46 and (C) AD, t ≥ 3.321, r = 0.54. Colour scale t = 2.8–5.0. FDR = false discovery rate.
Figure 3Cross-sectional correlation of DTI metrics with MRC Scale in the putamen. Graphs show scatterplots of DTI metrics versus MRC Scale with line of best fit and 95% confidence intervals. (A) MD, r = 0.57, P < 0.01, (B) FA r = 0.29, P = 0.4, (C) RD, r = 0.46, P < 0.01 and (D) AD, r = 0.54, P < 0.01. hGH = human growth hormone; vCJD = variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease.