Jia-Yang Wang1, Ya-Qi Song1, Jing Peng1, Hong-Lei Luo1. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, The Affiliated Huaian No. 1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No. 25 South Beijing Road, Huai'an, Jiangsu 223300, China.
Abstract
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a significant role in weakening the effect of cancer immunotherapy, which calls for the remodeling of TME. Herein, we fabricated a nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) to codeliver doxorubicin (Dox) and sorafenib (Sfn) as a drug delivery system (NLC/D-S). The Sfn was expected to regulate the TME of esophagus cancer. As a result, the immune response induced by Dox-related immunogenicity cell death could be fully realized. Our results demonstrated that Sfn was able to remodel the TME through downregulation of regulatory T cells (Treg), activation of effector T cells, and relieving of PD-1 expression, which achieved synergistic effect on the inhibition of primary tumor but also subsequent strong immune response on the regeneration of distant tumor.
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a significant role in weakening the effect of cancer immunotherapy, which calls for the remodeling of TME. Herein, we fabricated a nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) to codeliver doxorubicin (Dox) and sorafenib (Sfn) as a drug delivery system (NLC/D-S). The Sfn was expected to regulate the TME of esophagus cancer. As a result, the immune response induced by Dox-related immunogenicity cell death could be fully realized. Our results demonstrated that Sfn was able to remodel the TME through downregulation of regulatory T cells (Treg), activation of effector T cells, and relieving of PD-1 expression, which achieved synergistic effect on the inhibition of primary tumor but also subsequent strong immune response on the regeneration of distant tumor.
Cancer immunotherapy
is a novel promising approach for cancer therapy,
which is getting more and more attention in recent years.[1,2] Different from conventional chemotherapy or radiotherapy, which
employed additional drugs or assistance to kill cancer cells, immunotherapy
is designed to utilize the endogenous human immune system to combat
cancer.[3] With the advances of cancer therapy,
recent studies have found several drawbacks in single cancer immunotherapy.
In particular, the tumor microenvironment (TME) is demonstrated to
significantly downregulate the activation of immune response in tumor
tissue, which finally resulted in impaired cancer immunotherapy.[4] For example, TME can reduce the infiltration
of dendritic cell (DC) and suppress the activation of effector T cells
to finally silence the immune system to current therapies. As a result,
it was generally recognized that the remodeling of TME using other
approaches, such as chemotherapy, in combination with immunotherapy
might be a promising approach for effective cancer therapy. However,
the delivering of proper drugs using the suitable drug delivery system
(DDS) to satisfy both TME regulation and cancer immunotherapy is challenging.[5,6]Recently, the phenomenon that some chemotherapeutics, such
as anthracyclines
and oxaliplatin, induce immunogenicity cell death (ICD) along with
apoptosis of cancer cells is getting more and more attention.[7,8] It was reported that the ICD is capable of effectively presenting
the cancer-specific antigen to the surface of the cells with the following
activation of related immune cells, such as CD4 and regulatory T cells
(Treg). As a result, the chemotherapy-induced ICD has been employed
by previous studies to stimulate the immune response, which showed
promising benefits in cancer therapy.[9,10]Sorafenib
(Sfn) is a widely applied small molecule of multikinase
inhibitor, which is adopted in various cancer treatments through cell
cytotoxicity.[11] Surprisingly, recent discoveries
also revealed its regulation potential on TME by inhibiting the immuno-suppressive
Treg cells[8] and enhancing the function
of effector T cells.[12] As a result, we
suggested that the combination of Sfn with anthracyclines, such as
doxorubicin (Dox), might be a suitable choice for cancer therapy.
It was suggested that Dox can induce strong ICD for immune response
while the negative effects of TME can be neutralized by Sfn.[13] However, the codelivery of both drugs in one
DDS, which integrates decent drug-loading capacity and promising tumor
targetability, is a critical issue that requires careful selection
of suitable carrier.[14,15]In recent years, nanoparticle-derived
DDSs have shown many advantages,
including enhanced drug bioavailability, increased tumor-homing, and
reduced cytotoxicity.[16−18] The DDSs adopted in cancer therapy were widely studied
by previous reports with promising outcomes.[19−21] In particular,
nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC) is a widely adopted organic platform
for drug delivery,[22] which composed of
biocompatible lipids at solid or liquid state and was suitable for
the delivery of hydrophobic drugs.[22,23] As a result,
the application of NLC for the safe and effective delivery of drugs
for cancer therapy has been successfully developed by many previous
researchers.[24,25]Herein, we employed the
mice drug-resistant esophagus carcinoma
cells (AKR/Dox) as the model cell line. Moreover, NLC was selected
as the carrier for the loading of Sfn and Dox (NLC/D-S) and was surface
modified with folic acid (FA) as the targeting moiety to increase
the tumor-homing of the DDS. It was suggested that the NLC/D-S with
nanoscale size can specifically homing to tumor tissue via enhanced
penetration and retention effect and deliver both drugs to target
cells. Upon drug release in cells, the Dox induced ICD to express
the cancer-specific antigen while Sfn regulated the TME. Both effects
were believed to facilitate the immune response of the subject for
effective treatment of AKR/Doxcancer.
Results and Discussion
The NLC is prepared by a solvent diffusion method in a one-pot
route. The drugs can be encapsulated within the hydrophobic region
of the NLC to afford decent drug loading and safe delivery. Here,
in our study, under the given condition, using dynamic light scattering,
it was shown that the size of the acquired NLC/D-S was around 100
nm (Figure A) with
well dispersion, suggesting the successful preparation of uniform
nanosized NLC using this method. By adjusting the charge ratio, the
drug loading of NLC/D-S was 5.96% for Dox and 6.11% for Sfn, which
nearly 1:1 in weight ratio.
Figure 1
The size and stability of NLC/D-S. (A) The size
distribution of
NLC/D-S. (B) Colloidal stability of NLC/D-S in PBS (pH 7.4) and mouse
plasma at 37 °C for up to 48 h. Data were expressed as mean standard
deviation with three parallel experiments.
The size and stability of NLC/D-S. (A) The size
distribution of
NLC/D-S. (B) Colloidal stability of NLC/D-S in PBS (pH 7.4) and mouse
plasma at 37 °C for up to 48 h. Data were expressed as mean standard
deviation with three parallel experiments.Previous studies have shown that colloidal stability plays a significant
role in the in vivo fate of DDS, therefore, the colloidal
stability of NLC/D-S was evaluated using two physiological media (PBS
7.4 and mouse plasma). Because the distribution of DDS to the target
side is a time-dependent process, the DDS should maintain stability
long enough without leakage for tumor targeting.[26] Therefore, the changes in particle size of NLC/D-S were
monitored for 48 h. As displayed in Figure B, NLC/D-S showed almost no changes in size
in both media, which suggested that NLC/D-S might be able to maintain
stability upon in vivo applications, which was a
primary requirement for drug delivery in cancer therapy.[19,27]Then, the biocompatibility of the DDS as another important
parameter
was also studied. The hemolysis of NLC/D-S was studied using 2% red
blood cell (RBC) from New Zealand rabbit. It was suggested that hemolysis
suggested the irritation of DDS on RBC, which was critical for safe
drug delivery upon in vivo applications.[28] As shown in Figure A, NLC/D-S showed almost no hemolysis on
RBC (1.21% h at the concentration of 1 mg/mL) under all given condition,
which might be even lower because of the blood dilution upon in vivo applications. Therefore, the NLC/D-S was suggested
to be a highly biocompatible DDS without hemolysis upon in
vivo applications.[29]
Figure 2
The biocompatibility
of NLC/D-S. (A) Hemolysis of NLC/D-S on 2%
RBC under different concentrations at 37 °C for 1 h. (B) Cytotoxicity
of various concentrations of NLC after 48 h of incubation with AKR/Dox
cells. Data were expressed as mean standard deviation with three parallel
experiments.
The biocompatibility
of NLC/D-S. (A) Hemolysis of NLC/D-S on 2%
RBC under different concentrations at 37 °C for 1 h. (B) Cytotoxicity
of various concentrations of NLC after 48 h of incubation with AKR/Dox
cells. Data were expressed as mean standard deviation with three parallel
experiments.The biocompatibility of the DDS
was further investigated by investigating
the cytotoxicity of drug-free carrier on AKR/Dox cells. The cell viability
of AKR/Dox cells recorded after cells was exposed to various concentrations
of NLC for 48 h. As depicted in Figure B, the viability of AKR/Dox cells at the end of the
test remained over 90% at the concentration of 200 μg/mL, which
further suggested the high biocompatibility of NLC.[30]Afterward, the cellular uptake of Dox in AKR/Dox
cells was investigated
to understand the role of FA modification in the cellular uptake of
the DDS. With the aim to find the true result of NLC-mediated drug
uptake in comparison to free drug, the NLC/Dox was employed instead
of NLC/D-S. As illustrated in Figure A, in line with previous reports, the strong drug-resistance
nature of AKR/Dox cells resulted in weak cellular accumulation of
free Dox while this phenomenon significantly overcame by introduction
of NLC/Dox. It was reported that DDS can facilitate drug retention
in cells through endocytosis, especially receptor-mediated pathways
to partially reverse drug resistance of cancer cells.[3,31] In order to identify this merit, the AKR/Dox cells were pretreated
with excess free FA to further study the drug accumulation changes
between free Dox and NLC/Dox. As expected, the cellular uptake of
free Dox was not affected by FA, suggesting that the accumulation
of free Dox was not related to FA. However, compare with the untreated
group, FA pretreatment resulted in significant drop in intracellular
accumulation of Dox, and this phenomenon was observed in all tested
time intervals, which showed a half drop (53.6%) of drug accumulation
at 6 h postincubation. These observation was in line with previous
reports that FA modified in the NLC mediated the cellular uptake of
the DDS through the corresponding receptor, which was beneficial for
cancer therapy.[32,33]
Figure 3
The tumor targetability of NLC/D-S. (A)
Quantitative analysis of
intracellular time-dependent uptake of NLC/Dox in AKR/Dox cells in
comparison with free Dox and pretreated with/without FA. (B) Total
fluorescence intensity of dissected tumors and major organs of mice
treated with NLC/D-S at 4 and 8 h post-injection. Data were expressed
as mean standard deviation with three parallel experiments.
The tumor targetability of NLC/D-S. (A)
Quantitative analysis of
intracellular time-dependent uptake of NLC/Dox in AKR/Dox cells in
comparison with free Dox and pretreated with/without FA. (B) Total
fluorescence intensity of dissected tumors and major organs of mice
treated with NLC/D-S at 4 and 8 h post-injection. Data were expressed
as mean standard deviation with three parallel experiments.Next, the in vivo targetability
of NLC was further
explored. The indocyanine green as a probe was loaded into NLC to
indicate the location of DDS. At predetermined time interval (4 and
8 h), the mice were sacrificed, and the tumor and major organs were
harvested to study the distribution of DDS. As displayed in Figure B, NLC/D-S showed
preferable accumulation in tumor at 4 h and further time extension
resulted in more elevated DDS accumulation. In addition, it was noted
that the distribution of NLC/D-S in major organs, especially the liver
and spleen, was less than that in the tumor, which further suggested
the promising tumor targetability of this DDS.The in
vitro anticancer ability of this DDS was
evaluated using MTT assay. As demonstrated in Figure A, the strong drug resistance of AKR/Dox
cells resulted in impaired cytotoxicity of Dox with cell viability
over 63.6% at the Dox dosage of 50 μM in the NLC/Dox group.
Because of cytotoxicity of Sfn, the NLC/Sfn also exerted moderate
cytotoxicity on AKR/Dox cells. Most importantly, the combination of
Dox and Sfn demonstrated significant drop in cell viability, which
reached 32.7% at the same Dox concentration of 50 μM as compared
to NLC/Dox. The combination index of the drugs was 0.47, which indicated
the strong synergistic suppression effect on AKR/Dox cells.[5]
Figure 4
The in vitro anticancer assay of NLC/D-S.
(A)
Cell viability of AKR/Dox cells treated with different formulations
at different Dox concentrations for 48 h. (B) Western blot assays
of the expression of caspase-3, cytochrome C and
Bcl-2 proteins after different treatments (Dox concentration: 20 μM).
Data were expressed as mean standard deviation with three parallel
experiments.
The in vitro anticancer assay of NLC/D-S.
(A)
Cell viability of AKR/Dox cells treated with different formulations
at different Dox concentrations for 48 h. (B) Western blot assays
of the expression of caspase-3, cytochrome C and
Bcl-2 proteins after different treatments (Dox concentration: 20 μM).
Data were expressed as mean standard deviation with three parallel
experiments.The western blot assay was conducted
to assess the apoptosis level
of cells after different treatments and as another proof to reveal
the in vitro anticancer effects of NLC/D-S. As shown
in Figure B, the bcl-2
level in NLC/D-S-treated cells was the lowest among all groups while
the caspase-3 and cytochrome-3 levels were higher than other groups.
These results provided decisive evidence to show that severe apoptosis
was occurred upon NLC/D-S treatment, which explained the best cell
inhibition effect of NLC/D-S.[34]The
multicellular tumor spheroid (MCTS), which simulates the in
vivo solid tumor, was further employed to assess the in vivo anticancer effects of different treatments. As shown
in Figure A,B, the
growth of MCTS in the free Dox group was uncontrollable, which was
almost 3-fold of original volume, suggesting the neutralization profile
of AKR/Dox on the cytotoxicity effect of Dox. Moreover, the inhibition
effect of single delivery systems (NLC/Dox and NLC/Sfn) is only moderate
without reversing the growth of MCTS. In contrast, NLC/D-S significantly
reversed MCTS growth, which was merely 0.72-fold of the original volume
at day 5, which suggested the promising synergetic effects of both
drugs on the inhibition of drug resistance cells.[35]
Figure 5
The inhibition effect on MCTS. (A) The volume changes of MCTS after
different treatments (Dox concentration: 20 μM) for 5 days.
(B) The representative optical image of MCTS at day 0 (left) and day
5 (right) after different treatments. Scale bar: 200 μm. Data
were expressed as mean standard deviation with three parallel experiments.
The inhibition effect on MCTS. (A) The volume changes of MCTS after
different treatments (Dox concentration: 20 μM) for 5 days.
(B) The representative optical image of MCTS at day 0 (left) and day
5 (right) after different treatments. Scale bar: 200 μm. Data
were expressed as mean standard deviation with three parallel experiments.Afterward, the core design of our study, verifying
the role of
NLC/D-S in activating immune responses, was evaluated in vivo using the AKR/Doxtumor-bearing model. Mice were randomly divided
and treated with different formulations in parallel. The tumor volume
of the subjects was recorded before every administration. After 15
days of treatment, the mice were challenged with tumor cells on the
other side of the primary tumor, and the growth in distant tumor was
monitored for another 15 days without any treatment to assess the
immune responses upon different treatments. As displayed in Figure A, the growth of
primary tumors was significantly suppressed in NLC/D-S group (286
mm3) as compared with other groups. In contrast, the NLC/Dox
and NLC/Sfn groups showed faster tumor growth during the whole period
(final tumor volume of 416 and 553 mm3, respectively).
In particular, the further tumor challenging using the same tumor
cells also revealed the promising effects of NLC/D-S. As displayed
in Figure B, the distant
tumor in the control group persistently increases to the inferior
acquired immunity. In contrast, both NLC/Dox and NLC/Sfn treatments
triggered elevated immune response as the tumorigenicity of AKR/Dox
cells was suppressed to some extent. It was noted that the performance
of NLC/Dox was better than the NLC/Sfn group, suggesting the critical
role of ICD in the immune response. In particular, the NLC/D-S group
showed the lowest tumorigenicity of cancer cells with a final distant
tumor volume of 101 mm3, which was in line with results,
as obtained in Figure A, and our suggestions.
Figure 6
In vivo antitumor efficacy
of different formulations
for AKR/Dox tumor-bearing Balb/c mice. Tumor volume changes of primary
(A) and distant tumors (B) after different treatments as a function
of time were recorded. Data were expressed as mean standard deviation
with six parallel experiments.
In vivo antitumor efficacy
of different formulations
for AKR/Doxtumor-bearing Balb/c mice. Tumor volume changes of primary
(A) and distant tumors (B) after different treatments as a function
of time were recorded. Data were expressed as mean standard deviation
with six parallel experiments.In order to further confirm this conclusion and understand the
underlying mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon, the cytokine
(IL-6) was selected as a signal for DC maturation, and its plasma
concentration after different treatments was measured by the ELISA
kit. As demonstrated in Figure A, the plasma levels of IL-6 increased upon the administration
of different treatments, which further increased as a function of
time. These results suggested the DC maturation as a result of immunotherapy.
As expected, the NLC/D-S group showed higher elevation on IL-6 levels
than other groups, which further confirmed the preferable activation
effect of NLC/D-S on the immune system.[36] In order to understand the role of ICD in DC activation, the ICD
in tumor tissues was further assessed. In line with results, as obtained
in Figure A, compared
to the inferior ICD level in Sfn and control groups, Dox could induce
strong ICD while the aid of Sfn in the NLC/D-S group further enhanced
the ICD level.
Figure 7
The (A) cytokine IL-6 level in peripheral blood serum
(indicating in vivo DC stimulation) after different
time intervals of
treatment. Data were expressed as mean standard deviation with three
parallel experiments. (B) The ICD of tumor tissues at the end of the
test after different treatments. Scale bar: 100 μm.
The (A) cytokine IL-6 level in peripheral blood serum
(indicating in vivo DC stimulation) after different
time intervals of
treatment. Data were expressed as mean standard deviation with three
parallel experiments. (B) The ICD of tumor tissues at the end of the
test after different treatments. Scale bar: 100 μm.In order to identify the role of Sfn, the strong immune response
effect of NLC/D-S, the Treg, and effector T cell regulation effects
after Sfn treatment were explored. As displayed in Figure A, the percentage and number
of CD4+CD25+ Treg in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
were significantly dropped after Sfn treatment in a concentration-dependent
manner. Moreover, as confirmed in Figure B, the proliferation of Treg was also negatively
regulated by Sfn in a concentration-dependent manner. As CD4+CD25+ Treg was responsible for the immune suppression
of TME, the negative regulation effect of Sfn on these cells was supposed
to exert beneficial effects on the restoration of the function of
effector T cells and DC cells to fully induce immune response.[37]
Figure 8
(A) Number of CD4+CD25+ Tregs cells
among
the CD4+ T cell population in the tumors tissue after different
dosage treatment of Sfn. (B) Effect of different concentrations of
Sfn on Treg proliferation in vitro. Data were expressed
as mean standard deviation with three parallel experiments.
(A) Number of CD4+CD25+ Tregs cells
among
the CD4+ T cell population in the tumors tissue after different
dosage treatment of Sfn. (B) Effect of different concentrations of
Sfn on Treg proliferation in vitro. Data were expressed
as mean standard deviation with three parallel experiments.Cytotoxic (CD8+) T lymphocytes (CTLs)
are important
cells in cancer killing through the release of effector molecules
and/or effector cytokines. Its activation was critical to the final
performance of immunotherapy. As a result, the inhibition or regulation
effect of Sfn on CTLs is also our concern. As demonstrated in Figure A, the cell number
of CTL among CD8+ cells was increased by Sfn treatment
and was positively related to drug concentration, which suggested
the beneficial effect of Sfn on CTL activation. Considering that PD-1
signaling of cancer cells can mediate potential immune escape, we
next aim to explore if Sfn could further facilitate the recognition
of CTL on cancer cells. As a result, the PD-1-positive CD8+ T cells in TME were also examined before and after Sfn treatments.
As depicted in Figure B, the percentage of PD-1+ CD8+ T cells in
the TME decreased drastically with the increase of Sfn dosing, suggesting
that Sfn can regulate the PD-1 expression in the effector T cells
to block the PD-1/PD-L1 pathways in the major cases of tumor immune
escape. In all, we concluded that Sfn was able to remodel TME on the
AKR/Doxtumors through elevation of CTL percentage and decrease of
proportion/proliferation of PD-1+ CD8+ effector
T cells and Treg cells, which finally sensitized the subject to ICD-induced
immune responses with promising inhibition on tumors.[38]
Figure 9
Sfn treatment augmented effector function of tumor-specific T cells
and downregulated the PD-1 expression of CD8+ T cells in
TME. (A) The mean percentage of CD25 (activation marker) expressing
cells among tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and (B) corresponding
flow cytometry graphs. (C) Percentage of PD-1-expressing CD81 T cells
in tumor draining lymph nodes of tumor bearing mice. Data were expressed
as mean standard deviation with three parallel experiments.
Sfn treatment augmented effector function of tumor-specific T cells
and downregulated the PD-1 expression of CD8+ T cells in
TME. (A) The mean percentage of CD25 (activation marker) expressing
cells among tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and (B) corresponding
flow cytometry graphs. (C) Percentage of PD-1-expressing CD81 T cells
in tumor draining lymph nodes of tumor bearing mice. Data were expressed
as mean standard deviation with three parallel experiments.
Conclusions
In summary, we successfully
fabricated dual drug-loaded NLC as
an effective DDS for TME remodeling and ICD-based cancer immunotherapy
(NLC/D-S). Our results demonstrated that nanosized NLC/D-S was highly
stable and biocompatible with promising tumor targetability. The synergistic
effect of Dox and Sfn on NLC/D-S showed the best in vitro and in vivo anticancer benefits as compared to
single delivery systems (NLC/Dox and NLC/Sfn). Most importantly, the
NLC/D-S with the combination of Dox-induced ICD and Sfn-mediated TME
remodeling showed strong immune response after treatment. Our results
further revealed that the TME remodeling effect of Sfn was through
the combination of Treg inhibition/effector T cell activation/PD-1
relieving. In all, the NLC/D-S might be promising DDSs for effective
cancer immunotherapy.
Experimental Section
Detailed information
about Materials and Method can be found in
the Supporting Information.