| Literature DB >> 32953963 |
Shoji Maenohara1, Takahiro Fujimoto2, Masao Okadome1, Kenzo Sonoda1, Kenichi Taguchi2, Toshiaki Saito1.
Abstract
Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LG-ESS) is a rare uterine tumor that sometimes recurs and advances. Hormonal treatment, especially high-dose progestins and aromatase inhibitors (AIs), has demonstrated efficacy against these tumors. Because the standard treatment period is uncertain and hormonal treatment is effective, hormonal agents are likely to be used long-term, especially when a residual tumor is present. However, the long-term use of high-dose progestins and AIs may cause thromboembolism, as well as musculoskeletal stiffness and pain. Dienogest, a relatively new progestin, has demonstrated safety after long-term administration; it also appears to have a more favorable long-term safety profile compared with other progestins and AIs. We encountered a young patient with recurrent LG-ESS that metastasized to the liver and exhibited resistance to high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). The patient was successfully treated with dienogest monotherapy. This is the first report describing the efficacy of dienogest against recurrent and metastatic LG-ESS that is resistant to MPA and other agents.Entities:
Keywords: Dienogest; Endometrial stromal sarcoma; Hormonal therapy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32953963 PMCID: PMC7486439 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2020.100634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gynecol Oncol Rep ISSN: 2352-5789
Fig. 1(A) Axial magnetic resonance images before the first operation. The tumor invaded the left side of the uterine myometrium. (B) Specimen excised during the first operation. The yellow arrow denotes the tumor. (C) Hematoxylin and eosin-stained section at lower magnification. The tumor infiltrated the myometrium in an irregular pattern. (D) At higher magnification, oval-to-short spindle cells with mild nuclear atypia and mitotic figures were noted in 5 of 10 high-power fields. (E) Negative immunohistochemical staining for (E) estrogen receptor. (F) Positive immunohistochemical staining for (F) progesterone receptor. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2(A) Computed tomography of the pelvis confirmed a para-rectal tumor (yellow arrow). (B) Specimen excised during the second operation. The yellow arrow denotes a metastatic tumor that was identical to the previously resected uterine tumor on histology and immunostaining. (C) Amplification of the JAZF1/SUZ12 fusion transcript in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens. RT-PCR was performed, and the fusion transcript was not detected in either sample. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3Hepatic nodules were detected on computed tomography (A and B). The nodules disappeared after 3 months of dienogest treatment (C and D).