Literature DB >> 32953825

Using the Ilizarov technique to treat limb shortening after replantation of a severed lower limb: a case report.

Qing Jiang1, Kai Huang2, Yiyang Liu2, Genying Chi2.   

Abstract

The Ilizarov technique for limb lengthening can solve the problem of shortening deformity due to limb replantation after high-energy injury. However, the specific time-points and speed of limb lengthening and the treatment of complications have been thorny issues. In the present case, a 26-year-old male who presented with 12-cm left limb shortening caused by the replantation of the left severed leg, and then treated with the Ilizarov technique to lengthen it simultaneously on the ends of osteotomy and replanted bone. After the limb length restored to normality, tibia bone transport was performed. Considering the unsatisfactory mineralization of the lengthened segment, the external ring fixator was replaced with a splint for temporary fixation, which accompanied with an angular deformity of the lengthened segment. And then a locking plate plus autologous ilium graft was performed to improve the stability and mineralization of the lengthened bone segment. Finally, left lower limb returned to equal length with right one while standing, and the left ankle joint remained in the functional position. In conclusion, this case showed satisfactory follow-up results in terms of limb function and X-ray images. Our study demonstrated that the Ilizarov technique is an effective treatment for shortening deformity after limb replantation. 2020 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ilizarov; Limb lengthening; case report

Year:  2020        PMID: 32953825      PMCID: PMC7475505          DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-5316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


Introduction

The severing of a lower limb due to high-energy injury is often accompanied by bone and soft-tissue defects (1,2). Managements of severing of lower limbs mainly includes replantation and amputation, which are depended on specific indications and contraindications (3). Although the success rate of limb replantation is high, postoperative limb shortening often occurs to varying degrees (4). Recent studies revealed that the Ilizarov technique could overcome this issue (5,6). The Ilizarov apparatus is an external fixation used to lengthen or reshape limb bones with complex and/or open bone fractures and in cases of infected non-unions. We here used the law of tension-stress advocated by Ilizarov to stretch bone and extend soft tissue simultaneously, and eventually restore a 12-cm lower limb shortening after replantation. Considering the healing process of soft tissues (7,8), limb lengthening, here, was different from pure bone transport. Liu et al. shared some cases by using Ilizarov technique to treat limb shortening after replantation. But complications of limb pain and delayed union were observed during the lengthening process in this case. These were resolved by effective countermeasures, eventually achieving satisfactory results in this patient. We presented the following case in accordance with the CARE reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-5316).

Case presentation

A 26-year-old male patient had his left leg wholly severed at mid-calf in a traffic accident (). He was admitted to our hospital 5 h later for emergency shortening replantation, wherein the limb was shortened by 12 cm and replanted with full viability. Nineteen weeks later, a U-shaped ring was placed on the patient’s foot to prevent foot sagging, and osteotomy was performed at the proximal end of the left tibia ().
Figure 1

Preoperative image of the severed left leg.

Figure 2

Anteroposterior and lateral X-ray images of the severed left leg.

Figure 3

19 weeks after emergency shortening replantation. (A) The left replanted limb survived with good condition of peripheral circulation of left lower extremity. (B) The right tibia was 357 mm in length. (C) The left replanted limb length was 237 mm in length.

Figure 4

Nineteen weeks after performing the shortening replantation. (A,B) A U-shaped ring was placed on the left foot, and (C) osteotomy was performed at the proximal end of the left tibia.

Preoperative image of the severed left leg. Anteroposterior and lateral X-ray images of the severed left leg. 19 weeks after emergency shortening replantation. (A) The left replanted limb survived with good condition of peripheral circulation of left lower extremity. (B) The right tibia was 357 mm in length. (C) The left replanted limb length was 237 mm in length. Nineteen weeks after performing the shortening replantation. (A,B) A U-shaped ring was placed on the left foot, and (C) osteotomy was performed at the proximal end of the left tibia. One week after surgery, bone lengthening at the rate of 1 mm/d was performed simultaneously on the osteotomy end and the replanted bone end. Subsequently, due to local pain, the lengthening rate was decreased to the range of 0.25 to 0.5 mm/d. Four months later, because the left limb had been restored to normal length, limb lengthening strategy was replaced by tibia bone transport (). However, mineralization of the lengthened segment was found to be unsatisfactory during a follow-up. After 10 months, the external ring fixator was replaced with a splint for temporary fixation. Unfortunately, due to the loosening of the splint, an angular deformity of the lengthened segment occurred 3 days later (). After 12 days, an internal fixation by locking plate plus autologous ilium graft was performed to improve the mineralization of the lengthened bone segment. At 10 weeks postoperatively, both lower limbs showed equal length while standing, and the left ankle joint remained in the functional position. The left knee joint mobility was 0–110° (). An X-ray revealed ideal bone healing (), and the sensation was partially recovered in the left plantar.
Figure 5

Treated-process of tibia bone transportation. (A) Four months after bone lengthening, tibia bone transport was performed. (B,C) Ten months after bone transport, the external ring fixator was replaced with a splint fixation.

Figure 6

10 weeks after surgery of internal fixation by locking plate plus autologous ilium graft. (A) The left lower limb recovered satisfactorily concerning limb length, left ankle joint position, and left knee joint mobility. (B) X-ray image of the left tibia at the anteroposterior position. (C) X-ray image of the left tibia at the lateral position.

Treated-process of tibia bone transportation. (A) Four months after bone lengthening, tibia bone transport was performed. (B,C) Ten months after bone transport, the external ring fixator was replaced with a splint fixation. 10 weeks after surgery of internal fixation by locking plate plus autologous ilium graft. (A) The left lower limb recovered satisfactorily concerning limb length, left ankle joint position, and left knee joint mobility. (B) X-ray image of the left tibia at the anteroposterior position. (C) X-ray image of the left tibia at the lateral position. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee(s) and with the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Discussion

Regarding the choice of lengthening time, the limb lengthening method used for this patient differed from that used in traditional bone transport and the treatment of congenital malformations. Self-repairing and lengthening of skin and soft tissues (nerves, blood vessels, etc.) after anastomosis should be taken into account when lengthening the bone (9,10). The anastomosis of blood vessels, nerves, and tendons take 4 to 8 weeks to heal (11,12). Therefore, limb lengthening should be timed for at least 8 weeks after the successful replantation of the severed limb. In this case report, we initiated a limb lengthening 19 weeks after successful replantation, with consideration of the above factors. Lengthening speed is one of the critical factors associated with the success or failure of treatment (13,14). For this patient, we initially adopted the routine protocol for lengthening at 1 mm/d, which we completed over four sessions. Later, due to limb pain, we gradually slowed down the lengthening rate to a minimum value of 0.25 mm/d. Relevant research has shown that when lengthening speed >2 mm/d, the patient sustains vascular and nerve damage and bone nonunion, whereas when it is <0.25 mm/d, the replanted bone will heal in advance, causing bone lengthening to fail (15). In this study, our patient did not experience complications due to the inappropriate lengthening rate. In particular, his recovery of sensation in the sole of his foot eventually confirmed our choices for lengthening timing and rate had been effective. Poor mineralization in the lengthened segment is a common complication of bone transport (16), and surgical intervention is a treatment measure for this issue. For this patient, we removed the external ring fixator while he was waiting for the operation, and an angular deformity occurred during temporary fixation with the splint. We found that the reduction of angular deformity in the lengthened bone segment was different from that in a fresh fracture. Also, conventional traction and folding reduction were entirely ineffective. Therefore, we recommend that when the lengthened segment does not heal well and requires surgical treatment, surgeons use the more reliable long leg cast for fixation, replacing the external ring fixator before internal fixation. However, the biomechanical mechanism of the ineffectiveness of conventional reduction for the angulated fracture of the extended segment remains unclear. We have three final points to share. First, compared with the pure bone transport technique, the external ring fixator is applied for a longer-duration limb lengthening, and pin track infection is more likely to occur. Our patient experienced such problems and needed more frequent changes in his wound dressings and oral antibiotics to control the infection. Hence, pin track management throughout treatment is essential. Second, the long-term application of a fixator can cause complications in adjacent joints, especially a high incidence of talipes varus. For this reason, we placed a U-shaped ring on the foot of the patient’s affected leg to prevent drop foot deformity. Finally, in this case, we adopted an extensive treatment cycle, which required high patient compliance and close cooperation between doctor and patient. We gave our weekly patient guidance via online video chat. Using the Ilizarov technique can effectively treat limb shortening after replantation of a severed limb and expand the indication range of replantation of severed lower limbs. Although a series of complications occurred in the treatment of this patient, the final follow-up results were satisfactory. The article’s supplementary files as
  16 in total

1.  Distraction lengthening of the thumb following replantation.

Authors:  Nathan E Lesley; Miguel A Pirela-Cruz
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 2.  Efficiency in Digital and Hand Replantation.

Authors:  Shimpei Ono; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 2.017

3.  [Primary shortening--secondary lengthening. A new treatment concept for reconstruction of extensive soft tissue and bone injuries after 3rd degree open fracture and amputation of the lower leg].

Authors:  A M Betz; R Hierner; R Baumgart; W Stock; E Sebisch; M Kettler; L Schweiberer
Journal:  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.018

4.  The Combined Use of a Neurocutaneous Flap and the Ilizarov Technique for Reconstruction of Large Soft Tissue Defects and Bone Loss in the Tibia.

Authors:  Jia Xu; Wan-Run Zhong; Liang Cheng; Chun-Yang Wang; Gen Wen; Pei Han; Yi-Min Chai
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 5.  Pediatric Replantation and Revascularization.

Authors:  Amir H Taghinia
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 1.907

6.  Characterization of a composite injury model of severe lower limb bone and nerve trauma.

Authors:  Brent A Uhrig; Isaac P Clements; Joel D Boerckel; Nathaniel Huebsch; Ravi V Bellamkonda; Robert E Guldberg
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.963

7.  The effectiveness of distraction lengthening in traumatic hand amputation with Ilizarov mini fixator.

Authors:  Thepparat Kanchanathepsak; Hiroyuki Gotani; Yoshitaka Hamada; Yoshitaka Tanaka; Kosuke Sasaki; Hirohisa Yagi; Yutaka Kubota; Tulyapruek Tawonsawatruk
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Cross limb vessel transfer for salvage of the extremity with irreparable artery injury.

Authors:  Jiantao Yang; Canbin Zheng; Honggang Wang; Jacques Henri Hacquebord; Bengang Qin; Xiang Zhou; Bo He; Dong Wang; Ping Li; Xiaolin Liu; Liqiang Gu; Jian Qi; Qingtang Zhu
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.586

9.  Replantation of avulsively amputated thumb: a report of 15 cases.

Authors:  G L Cheng; D D Pan; Z Y Qu; B Lin; Z X Yang
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Nerve wrap after end-to-end and tension-free neurorrhaphy attenuates neuropathic pain: A prospective study based on cohorts of digit replantation.

Authors:  Xiaozhong Zhu; Haifeng Wei; Hongyi Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  5 in total

1.  Positive psychological suggestions improve the self-efficacy, social functioning and mood of patients undergoing replantation.

Authors:  Qiaoli Mo; Risheng Qiu; Songhe Cheng; Xiaomin Chen; Aiping Peng
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  Treatment of diaphyseal forearm defects caused by infection using Ilizarov segmental bone transport technique.

Authors:  Yanshi Liu; Maimaiaili Yushan; Zhenhui Liu; Jialin Liu; Chuang Ma; Aihemaitijiang Yusufu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.362

3.  Bone Bricks: The Effect of Architecture and Material Composition on the Mechanical and Biological Performance of Bone Scaffolds.

Authors:  Evangelos Daskalakis; Boyang Huang; Cian Vyas; Anil A Acar; Fengyuan Liu; Ali Fallah; Glen Cooper; Andrew Weightman; Gordon Blunn; Bahattin Koç; Paulo Bartolo
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-02-22

4.  Bone Defects in Tibia Managed by the Bifocal vs. Trifocal Bone Transport Technique: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Authors:  Alimujiang Abulaiti; Yanshi Liu; Feiyu Cai; Kai Liu; Abulaiti Abula; Xiayimaierdan Maimaiti; Peng Ren; Aihemaitijiang Yusufu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-19

5.  3D printing of conch-like scaffolds for guiding cell migration and directional bone growth.

Authors:  Boshi Feng; Meng Zhang; Chen Qin; Dong Zhai; Yufeng Wang; Yanling Zhou; Jiang Chang; Yufang Zhu; Chengtie Wu
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2022-09-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.