Literature DB >> 32953507

18F-RGD PET/CT imaging reveals characteristics of angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer.

Li Li1,2,3, Wei Zhao2, Xiaorong Sun4, Ning Liu2, Yue Zhou5, Xiaohui Luan6, Song Gao7, Shuqiang Zhao4, Jinming Yu2,3,8, Shuanghu Yuan2,3,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to explore the benefit of 18F-AlF-NOTA-PRGD2 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (denoted as 18F-RGD PET/CT) imaging for determining the clinical pathologic features of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: Seventy-two patients with NSCLC (37 cases of adenocarcinoma and 35 cases of squamous carcinoma) were enrolled to receive 18F-RGD PET/CT scanning pretreatment. The peak standard uptake value (SUVpeak), mean standard uptake value (SUVmean), angiogenic tumor volume (ATV) and total lesion angiogenesis (TLA) of tumors were determined using an automated contouring program. Cases were classified according to the tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) stage.
RESULTS: Significant differences in ATV and TLA were observed among T1, T2, T3 and T4 cases (ATV, P=0.000; TLA, P=0.000). ATV and TLA also differed significantly among cases of clinical stage I, II, III and IV (ATV, P=0.002; TLA, P=0.011). However, no significant differences in any values were observed between stage III and IV NSCLC cases (SUVpeak, P=0.675; SUVmean, P=0.668; ATV, P=0.52; TLA, P=0.634). All assessed values were higher in squamous cell carcinoma cases than in adenocarcinoma cases (SUVpeak, P=0.045; SUVmean, P=0.014; ATV, P=0.003; TLA, P=0.001). For clinical stage III and IV cases specifically, SUVpeak, SUVmean, and TLA were higher for squamous cell carcinoma than for adenocarcinoma (SUVpeak, P=0.015; SUVmean, P=0.009; TLA, P=0.036).Conclusions: 18F-RGD PET/CT imaging revealed the presence of increased angiogenesis in the tumor microenvironment of NSCLC, especially squamous cell carcinoma, and thus may be valuable in planning therapeutic regimens for individual patients. 2020 Translational Lung Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  18F-RGD PET/CT; angiogenesis; characteristics; non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Year:  2020        PMID: 32953507      PMCID: PMC7481644          DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-6751


Introduction

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide, with a 5-year survival rate from diagnosis of only approximately 18% (1). Generally, accurate pathological diagnosis and the tumor, lymph node, metastasis (TNM) stage are particularly important for the development of individualized treatment strategies. Concurrent chemotherapy/radiotherapy (CCRT) is recommended as the first-line treatment for patients with inoperable stage II (node positive) and stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (2). With the continued development of novel agents targeting specific mutations or pathways associated with angiogenic mechanisms, promising clinical benefits are driving the acceptance of these therapies as first-line choices rather than third-line in cancer treatment (2). However, the curative effects of CCRT, targeted therapy, and antiangiogenic therapy vary even among the NSCLC cases of the same TNM stage (3-5). Therefore, new parameters representing the clinical features of NSCLC are needed in order to identify populations that will be responsive to specific treatments. Neovascularization, one important component of the tumor microenvironment (TME), is often highly abnormal and heterogeneous within tumors. It is the basis of tumor proliferation, invasion, recurrence and metastasis (6). The process of angiogenesis is a pathological situation in which new capillaries sprout from existing vessels primarily composed of endothelial cells (7,8). Functional and structural angiogenic abnormalities can lead to impaired tissue perfusion, directly resulting in a hypoxic TME and fueling tumor progression and treatment resistance (9-11). From this perspective, angiogenesis-based in vivo imaging could be a valuable clinical tool for noninvasive evaluation of the TME. High expression of integrin avβ3 in activated endothelial cells make this protein a potential surrogate parameter for angiogenesis in tumors (12,13). As the tripeptide moiety of arginine-glycine-aspartate (RGD) interacts specifically with integrin αVβ3 and exhibits a significant positive correlation with αVβ3 expression, RGD-based molecular imaging intuitively represents a potentially feasible imaging approach for assessing angiogenesis with the TME (14-16). Our previous study demonstrated that 18F-ALF-NOTA-PRGD2 can be used to characterize tumor angiogenesis clearly (17). However, that study only analysed the correlation between RGD uptake values and the antiangiogenic effect in 28 pan-cancer patients, including only 9 lung cancer patients. To better demonstrate the biological characteristics of NSCLC, the present study was carried out to explore the correlation between the angiogenic status and clinical pathologic features of NSCLC using 18F-ALF-NOTA-PRGD2 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (denoted as 18F-RGD PET/CT) imaging. We present the following article in accordance with the STROBE reporting checklist (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-20-187).

Methods

Our investigation of 72 patients was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013) and approved by the Ethical Committee of Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute (No. SDTHEC20130326). All patients provided written consent for participation in this study.

Patients

Patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed NSCLC were prospectively enrolled and underwent 18F-RGD PET/CT scanning at baseline at the Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute.

18F-RGD PET/CT scanning

A lyophilized kit for labeling the PRGD2 peptide (Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine) was used according to the previously published protocol (18). No fasting or specific CT contrast agents were needed. PET scans were performed 60 min after intravenous injection of 18F-RGD at approximately 1.89±0.37 MBq/kg. The PET scans were acquired on a combined PET/CT scanner (GEMINI TF Big Bore; Philips Healthcare) for 5 min per field of view. A low-dose CT scan for attenuation-correction and localization purposes was also acquired. The patients were advised to remain motionless and to breathe shallowly during the examination.

Imaging data processing

All the PET and CT imaging data were transferred into MIM software (MIM, 6.1.0, Cleveland, OH, USA). The radiotracer concentration in the regions of interest (ROIs) was normalized to the injected dose per kilogram of the patients’ body weight to derive the standardized uptake values (SUVs). ROIs were drawn on transverse slices of the PET scanning images with reference to the CT slices by experienced nuclear medicine physicians, and the MIM software would directly delineate the target tumor with a drawing threshold of 40% (maximum SUV) SUVmax. The peak SUV (SUVpeak), mean SUV (SUVmean), angiogenic tumor volume (ATV) and total lesion angiogenesis (TLA) were also calculated automatically. The TLA represented the product of SUVmean and ATV.

Measurement of tumor size

The greatest dimension of the primary tumor was obtained on CT images by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. The greatest dimension was classified as T1 (dimension ≤3 cm), T2 (3 cm < dimension ≤5 cm), T3 (5 cm < dimension ≤7 cm) or T4 (dimension >7 cm), referring to the definitions for T, N, and M in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines (2).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Imaging parameters were compared between cases according to clinical TNM stages and pathologic types using independent-samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and associations between imaging parameters and clinical TNM stage and pathologic type were determined by Spearman or Pearson correlation analysis. Probability values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

From July 2013 to March 2019, 72 patients diagnosed with NSCLC based on cytology or histological examinations at Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute were enrolled in the study. The patients’ characteristics are presented in .
Table 1

Characteristics of included patients

CharacteristicsOutcome
Age (years), median (range)60 (44–85)
Gender, n
   Female20
   Male52
Smoking, n
   Yes46
   No26
KPS, median (range)85 (70–100)
Pathological subtype, n
   Adenocarcinoma37
   Squamous carcinoma35
Clinical stage, n
   I7
   II7
   III45
   IV13
Greatest dimension, n
   ≤3 cm28
   3–5 cm26
   5–7 cm13
   >7 cm5

Relationships between 18F-RGD PET/CT imaging parameters and greatest tumor dimension

The SUVpeak, SUVmean, ATV and TLA were positively correlated with greatest tumor dimension (SUVpeak, r=0.234, P=0.048; SUVmean, r=0.241, P=0.042; ATV, r=0.595, P=0.000; TLA, r=0.584, P=0.000). ATV and TLA were found to differ significantly among tumors of the T1, T2, T3 and T4 size categories (ATV, 17.45±17.71, 37.67±24.27, 69.37±53.14 and 107.62±50.57, respectively, P=0.000; TLA, 38.10±30.52, 109.85±75.81, 240.95±225.01 and 430.31±334.26, respectively, P=0.000), whereas no significant differences in SUVpeak and SUVmean were found among the T1, T2, T3 and T4 categories (SUVpeak, 3.69±1.83, 4.63±1.90, 4.99±2.66 and 5.54±2.45, respectively, P=0.215; SUVmean, 2.54±1.23, 3.06±1.37, 3.27±1.76 and 3.60±1.65, respectively, P=0.315) (). Overall, the ATV and TLA values increased significantly with increasing tumor diameter.
Figure 1

18F-RGD PET/CT imaging parameters according to different categories of greatest tumor dimension.

18F-RGD PET/CT imaging parameters according to different categories of greatest tumor dimension.

Relationships between 18F-RGD PET/CT imaging parameters and clinical stage

Significant increases in ATV and TLA were seen with advancing clinical stage from I to IV (ATV, r=0.378, P=0.001; TLA, r=0.313, P=0.008). Moreover, the ATV and TLA values differed significantly among clinical stage I+II, stage III and stage IV (ATV, P=0.002; TLA, P=0.011) (, ). However, no significant differences in any of the imaging parameters (SUVpeak, SUVmean, ATV and TLA) were found between clinical stage III and IV (SUVpeak, P=0.675; SUVmean, P=0.668; ATV, P=0.52; TLA, P=0.634).
Table 2

Relationships between 18F-RGD PET/CT imaging parameters and clinical staging

ParametersTNM stageP
I+IIIIIIV
SUVpeak4.37±1.994.52±2.294.11±1.660.882
SUVmean2.97±1.323.01±1.562.69±1.060.881
ATV13.10±8.6445.90±43.4450.03±39.500.002
TLA38.91±30.85153.98±197.38133.38±133.050.011

ATV, angiogenic tumor volume; TLA, total lesion angiogenesis.

Figure 2

18F-RGD PET/CT imaging parameters according to different clinical stages of NSCLC.

ATV, angiogenic tumor volume; TLA, total lesion angiogenesis. 18F-RGD PET/CT imaging parameters according to different clinical stages of NSCLC.

Relationships between 18F-RGD PET/CT imaging parameters and pathological subtype

Significantly higher SUVpeak, SUVmean, ATV and TLA values on 18F-RGD PET/CT imaging were seen for squamous carcinoma as compared to adenocarcinoma (P=0.045, P=0.014, P=0.003 and P=0.001, respectively) (, ). For clinical stage III and IV NSCLC specifically, all imaging parameters were higher in squamous carcinoma cases than in adenocarcinoma cases (SUVpeak, 4.98±2.44 vs. 3.69±1.46, P=0.015; SUVmean, 3.34±1.66 vs. 2.41±0.93, P=0.009; 50.36±40.50 vs. 42.15±44.94, P=0.111; TLA, 186.90±212.40 vs. 99.81±125.73, P=0.036; ).
Table 3

Relationships between 18F-RGD PET/CT imaging parameters and pathological subtype of NSCLC

ParametersPathological subtypeP
Squamous carcinomaAdenocarcinoma
SUVpeak5.05±2.403.96±2.100.045
SUVmean3.37±1.632.53±1.140.014
ATV48.99±39.7733.09±40.530.003
TLA181.77±207.1979.10±110.950.001

NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; ATV, angiogenic tumor volume; TLA, total lesion angiogenesis.

Figure 3

18F-RGD PET/CT imaging parameters according to different pathological subtype of NSCLC. SC, squamous carcinoma; AD, adenocarcinoma.

Figure 4

Representative 18F-RGD PET/CT scans of adenocarcinoma with low RGD uptake values (A, SUVpeak =1.68, SUVmean =1.13, ATV =77.92, TLA =87.71) and squamous carcinoma with high RGD uptake values (B, SUVpeak =8.58, SUVmean =5.80, ATV =163.42, TLA =947.72).

NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; ATV, angiogenic tumor volume; TLA, total lesion angiogenesis. 18F-RGD PET/CT imaging parameters according to different pathological subtype of NSCLC. SC, squamous carcinoma; AD, adenocarcinoma. Representative 18F-RGD PET/CT scans of adenocarcinoma with low RGD uptake values (A, SUVpeak =1.68, SUVmean =1.13, ATV =77.92, TLA =87.71) and squamous carcinoma with high RGD uptake values (B, SUVpeak =8.58, SUVmean =5.80, ATV =163.42, TLA =947.72).

Discussion

In support of the development of personalized precision medicine, it is very important to characterize the clinical pathological heterogeneity of lung cancer among patients. The results of our current study provide clinical evidence that 18F-RGD PET/CT imaging parameters correlate significantly with the greatest tumor dimension, clinical stage and pathological subtype of NSCLC, with higher SUVs correlating with later stage squamous carcinoma and larger tumor diameter. Several studies have demonstrated advantages of RGD-based imaging over fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-based imaging. Wei et al. conducted micro-PET imaging in Lewis lung carcinoma-bearing C57BL/6 mice using both imaging modalities, and the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 18F-RGD PET/CT for identifying necrotic tumor area and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were higher than those of 18F-FDG PET/CT (19). Additional clinical studies also reported advantages of RGD-based imaging over FDG-based PET/CT, showing that 18F-RGD PET/CT is more sensitive and applicable for evaluating the heterogeneity of the TME, especially as associated with integrin αVβ3 expression or angiogenesis (20,21). Previous studies primarily focused on evaluating the heterogeneity between NSCLC and SCLC using RGD PET/CT imaging (20,21). Kang et al. showed that NSCLC had higher (68)Ga-RGD uptake values than SCLC and was unlikely to benefit from anti-angiogenic therapy (22). However, until now, no clinical studies have explored the heterogeneity of angiogenic status in NSCLC. The present study mainly focused on intra-tumor TME heterogeneity in patients with NSCLC on the basis of recognized clinical staging. It is well known that additional neovascularization is needed for adequate nutrient transfer as the tumor diameter increases, especially beyond a volume of 2 mm3 (23). Our results revealed a significant positive correlation between the greatest tumor dimension and RGD uptake values. This trend demonstrated that our imaging parameters are reflective of the true dimension of the tumor, and thus, RGD PET/CT could be valuable tool for assessing the TME. The ATV and TLA values were higher for stage III or IV NSCLC cases than for stage I and II cases, and this result was similar with findings in glioma, in which RGD uptake values also showed positive correlation with World Health Organization (WHO) grading (21,24). However, we found no statistically significant differences in RGD uptake parameters between stage III and IV cases. Notably, the RGD uptake parameters SUVpeak, SUVmean and TLA were all significantly higher for squamous cell carcinoma than for adenocarcinoma, even among stage III and IV NSCLC cases. Based on these data, we propose that the parameters obtained by 18F-RGD PET can reflect the TME heterogeneity effectively and, as such, may offer a certain comparative advantage over traditional TNM staging. In our study, the ATV and TLA values were significantly greater in cases of squamous cell carcinoma, implying that neovascularization in squamous carcinoma may be more abundant than that in adenocarcinoma. Our original study revealed the phenomenon that higher RGD uptake values are associated with better responses to antiangiogenic therapy in preclinical and clinical studies (17,25), suggesting that squamous carcinoma may have a better therapeutic effect in antiangiogenic therapy. Certainly, researchers should not only focus on the treatment efficacy, but also pay attention to the safety management in clinical applications. It is still an essential step to assess the risk of bleeding during clinical decision-making for individual patients. Additionally, the higher RGD uptake values could predict the poor efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC, which may result from the hypoxic TME and treatment resistance caused by nonfunctional tumor neovascularization (9-11,26). In general, 18F-RGD PET/CT molecular imaging related to αVβ3 expression provides a tool for assessing tumor heterogeneity and thus offers predictive value for personalized tumor therapy. Further studies with larger cohorts of NSCLC patients and related subgroup analyses are warranted to investigate this possibility.

Conclusions

The TME of NSCLC with a large dimension and advanced clinical stage, especially squamous cell carcinoma, is more likely to present extensive angiogenesis, and related parameters on 18F-RGD PET/CT imaging can be applied in the planning of appropriate therapeutic regimens. The article’s supplementary files as
  24 in total

1.  Positron emission tomography using [18F]Galacto-RGD identifies the level of integrin alpha(v)beta3 expression in man.

Authors:  Ambros J Beer; Roland Haubner; Mario Sarbia; Michael Goebel; Stephan Luderschmidt; Anca Ligia Grosu; Oliver Schnell; Markus Niemeyer; Horst Kessler; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Wolfgang A Weber; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Integrin alpha(v)beta(3)-Targeted Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Zhaofei Liu; Fan Wang; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Drug Dev Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.360

Review 3.  Second-line therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: the DELTA between different genotypes widens.

Authors:  Alona Zer; Natasha B Leighl
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Anne Aupérin; Cecile Le Péchoux; Estelle Rolland; Walter J Curran; Kiyoyuki Furuse; Pierre Fournel; Jose Belderbos; Gerald Clamon; Hakki Cuneyt Ulutin; Rebecca Paulus; Takeharu Yamanaka; Marie-Cecile Bozonnat; Apollonia Uitterhoeve; Xiaofei Wang; Lesley Stewart; Rodrigo Arriagada; Sarah Burdett; Jean-Pierre Pignon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Differentiation of endothelium.

Authors:  W Risau
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Antiangiogenesis strategies revisited: from starving tumors to alleviating hypoxia.

Authors:  Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 7.  Angiogenesis: an update and potential drug approaches (review).

Authors:  Maen Abdelrahim; Santhi Konduri; Riyaz Basha; Philip A Philip; Cheryl H Baker
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 8.  Normalizing tumor microenvironment to treat cancer: bench to bedside to biomarkers.

Authors:  Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Pretreatment PET/CT imaging of angiogenesis based on 18F-RGD tracer uptake may predict antiangiogenic response.

Authors:  Li Li; Li Ma; Dongping Shang; Zhiguo Liu; Qingxi Yu; Suzhen Wang; Xuepeng Teng; Qiang Zhang; Xudong Hu; Wei Zhao; Wenhong Hou; Jianyue Jin; Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Jinming Yu; Shuanghu Yuan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  18F-alfatide PET/CT may predict short-term outcome of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Xiaohui Luan; Yong Huang; Song Gao; Xiaorong Sun; Suzhen Wang; Li Ma; Xuepeng Teng; Hong Lu; Jinming Yu; Shuanghu Yuan
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  7 in total

1.  Negative Correlation Between 18F-RGD Uptake via PET and Tumoral PD-L1 Expression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Leilei Wu; Jingru Liu; Shasha Wang; Menglin Bai; Min Wu; Zhenhua Gao; Jianing Li; Jinming Yu; Jie Liu; Xue Meng
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 2.  Translating Molecules into Imaging-The Development of New PET Tracers for Patients with Melanoma.

Authors:  Laetitia Vercellino; Dorine de Jong; Laurent Dercle; Benoit Hosten; Brian Braumuller; Jeeban Paul Das; Aileen Deng; Antoine Moya-Plana; Camry A'Keen; Randy Yeh; Pascal Merlet; Barouyr Baroudjian; Mary M Salvatore; Kathleen M Capaccione
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29

Review 3.  Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Wentao Tian; Chenghui Cao; Long Shu; Fang Wu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Preliminary Clinical Application of RGD-Containing Peptides as PET Radiotracers for Imaging Tumors.

Authors:  Li Li; Xiaoyuan Chen; Jinming Yu; Shuanghu Yuan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  A Pilot Study of Radiomics Models Combining Multi-Probe and Multi-Modality Images of 68Ga-NOTA-PRGD2 and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Pulmonary Space-Occupying Lesions.

Authors:  Fei Xie; Kun Zheng; Linwen Liu; Xiaona Jin; Lilan Fu; Zhaohui Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 6.  The current status and future prospects for molecular imaging-guided precision surgery.

Authors:  Imke Boekestijn; Matthias N van Oosterom; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Floris H P van Velden; Martin Pool; Tobias Maurer; Daphne D D Rietbergen; Tessa Buckle; Fijs W B van Leeuwen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.605

Review 7.  Molecular Imaging of Angiogenesis in Oncology: Current Preclinical and Clinical Status.

Authors:  Alexandru Florea; Felix M Mottaghy; Matthias Bauwens
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.