Wei Zhang1, Paula Oulego2, Sandeep K Sharma3, Xiu-Lin Yang4, Lain-Jong Li4, Gadi Rothenberg1, N Raveendran Shiju1. 1. Van 't Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Oviedo, C/ Julián Clavería, s/n., E-33071 Oviedo, Spain. 3. Radiochemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, 400 085 Mumbai, India. 4. Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, 23955-6900 Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Abstract
Two-dimensional (2D) transition metal nanosheets are promising catalysts because of the enhanced exposure of the active species compared to their 3D counterparts. Here, we report a simple, scalable, and reproducible strategy to prepare 2D phosphate nanosheets by forming a layered structure in situ from phytic acid (PTA) and transition metal precursors. Controlled combustion of the organic groups of PTA results in interlayer carbon, which keeps the layers apart during the formation of phosphate, and the removal of this carbon results in ultrathin nanosheets with controllable layers. Applying this concept to vanadyl phosphate synthesis, we show that the method yields 2D ultrathin nanosheets of the orthorhombic β-form, exposing abundant V4+/V5+ redox sites and oxygen vacancies. We demonstrate the high catalytic activity of this material in the vapor-phase aerobic oxidation of ethyl lactate to ethyl pyruvate. Importantly, these β-VOPO4 compounds do not get hydrated, thereby reducing the competing hydrolysis reaction by water byproducts. The result has superior selectivity to ethyl pyruvate compared to analogous vanadyl phosphates. The catalysts are highly stable, maintaining a steady-state conversion of ∼90% (with >80% selectivity) for at least 80 h on stream. This "self-exfoliated" synthesis protocol opens opportunities for preparing structurally diverse metal phosphates for catalysis and other applications.
Two-dimensional (2D) transition metal nanosheets are promising catalysts because of the enhanced exposure of the active species compared to their 3D counterparts. Here, we report a simple, scalable, and reproducible strategy to prepare 2D phosphate nanosheets by forming a layered structure in situ from phytic acid (PTA) and transition metal precursors. Controlled combustion of the organic groups of PTA results in interlayer carbon, which keeps the layers apart during the formation of phosphate, and the removal of this carbon results in ultrathin nanosheets with controllable layers. Applying this concept to vanadyl phosphate synthesis, we show that the method yields 2D ultrathin nanosheets of the orthorhombic β-form, exposing abundant V4+/V5+ redox sites and oxygen vacancies. We demonstrate the high catalytic activity of this material in the vapor-phase aerobic oxidation of ethyl lactate to ethyl pyruvate. Importantly, these β-VOPO4compounds do not get hydrated, thereby reducing the competing hydrolysis reaction by water byproducts. The result has superior selectivity to ethyl pyruvatecompared to analogous vanadyl phosphates. The catalysts are highly stable, maintaining a steady-state conversion of ∼90% (with >80% selectivity) for at least 80 h on stream. This "self-exfoliated" synthesis protocol opens opportunities for preparing structurally diverse metal phosphates for catalysis and other applications.
Ultrathin two-dimensional
(2D) materials are attracting increased
attention for several applications, thanks to their distinctive electronic,
optical, semipan class="Chemical">conducting, and catalytic properties.[1,2] Single-
or pan class="Chemical">few-layer 2D sheets expose more interior atoms than their bulk
counterparts, with abundant surface-active sites and vacancy defects.[3,4] The 2D confinement effect also can shorten mass and heat diffusion
pathways.[5] This makes them promising candidates
for designing efficient heterogeneous catalysts.[6]
The main state-of-the-art methods for preparing few-layer
nanosheets
are gas/liquid exfoliation, ion intercalation, or mechanical cleavage.[7] These top-down approaches are suitable for stacked
materials with interplanar van der Waals interactions, such as graphene,
boron nitride, and carbon nitride.[8] Synthesizing
2D nanosheets from nonlayered materials is much more difficult.[9] It requires harsh conditions and gives varied
thicknesses and low yields.[10] Alternatively,
2D nonlayered nanosheets can be produced through template-assisted
synthesis,[11,12] surfactant self-assembly,[13,14] oriented attachment growth,[15] and inorganic–organic
lamellar hybrid intermediates.[16] Still,
making high-quality ultrathin nanosheets of nonlayered inorganic materials
remains a challenge.[17,18]For example, vanadium phosphates
(VPOs) are composed of alternating
vanadium octahedra (VO6) and phosphate tetrahedra (PO4).[19] Several crystal structures
in different oxidation states are known, such as V5+ vanadylphosphate (i.e., αI-, αII-, β-,
ω-, δ-, ε-, and γ-VVOPO4) and V4+ vanadyl pyrophosphate [(VIVO)2P2O7].[20−24] The β-phase is thermodynamically the most stable.[25] However, because this compact structure has
fewer accessible active sites, its catalytic activity is low.[26] We hypothesized that this problem could be avoided
by structuring β-VOPO4 as thin nanosheets, thus exposing
more surface V4+/V5+ redox couples.[27] VOPO4 nanosheets are currently prepared
by intercalation–exfoliation of bulk α-VOPO4·2H2O, exploiting the weak hydrogen bonds between
layers.[28] However, unlike layered α-VOPO4, the 3D network of the nonlayered β-phase is unsuitable
for this method, giving no control over the number of layers.Here, we report a new template-free and scalable method for preparing
2D β-VOPO4 ultrathin nanosheets with controlled layers.
These sheets are made by self-assembly of vanadyl sulfate (VOSO4) and phytic acid (PTA) precursors, which are abundant and
inexpensive; vanadyl sulfate is a byproduct of crude oil refining,
and PTA is a renewable plant-based acid. The PTA molecules are the
key to this synthesis: (i) they react with VOSO4 as strong
chelating agents, suppressing the agglomeration of vanadium species,
and (ii) they form carbon layers between the vanadium–phosphatecomplexes from the cyclohexane rings during the hydrothermal process.
Subsequent pyrolysis removes the PTA, creating more accessible surface
and increasing the number of V4+/V5+ redox sites
and oxygen vacancies. This self-exfoliating concept is also general,
giving access to various thin transition metal phosphate sheets. We
used this method to make active and selective catalysts from inactive
forms of phosphates by structuring them as thin nanosheets, thereby
exposing more surface active species. The resulting 2D β-VOPO4 ultrathin sheets are excellent catalysts for the vapor-phase
air oxidation of ethyl lactate to ethyl pyruvate (Figure S1, see the Supporting Information for full experimental
details).
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and Characterization of β-VOPO4 Nanosheets
Figure a illustrates
the synthesis strategy for 2D β-VOPO4 ultrathin sheets.
In the first step of this simple two-step process, PTA and VOSO4 are dissolved in aqueous solutions, separately. After mixing
the two solutions, the vanadium–PTAcoordination precursors
are formed by the self-assembly of vanadyl ions and PTA. Subsequently,
ammonia was added to the mixture, adjusting the pH to ∼6. Adding
ammonia accelerates the complexation and helps to form cross-linked
networks by surrounding the vanadium–PTA micelles. The amorphous
mixture is then subjected to a hydrothermal treatment (Figure S2). Then, the cyclohexane part of PTA
is carbonized, forming VOP@C hybrids. Note that the growth of carbon
was restricted between the interlayers of VOP–PTA hybrids,
forming extended 2D carbon layers. In the second step, the in situ-formed
carbon templates were removed by heat treatment at 550 °C, yielding
2D β-VOPO4 nanosheets.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic summary
of the synthesis procedure for 2D β-VOPO4 nanosheets.
(b) X-ray diffraction pattern of 2D β-VOPO4 nanosheets
(the inset shows the model of layered β-VOPO4); (c,d)
SEM images of β-VOPO4 flakes stacked
by the layered structure; (e) AFM image of few-layer β-VOPO4 nanosheets (inset: the corresponding 3D demonstration); (f)
thickness of nanosheets derived from AFM measurement; (g) representative
TEM images of β-VOPO4 nanosheets; and (h–j)
magnified HRTEM images of β-VOPO4 nanosheets taken
along [101], [102], and [110] directions.
(a) Schematic summary
of the synthesis procedure for 2D β-VOPO4 nanosheets.
(b) X-ray diffraction pattern of 2D β-VOPO4 nanosheets
(the inset shows the model of layered β-VOPO4); (c,d)
SEM images of β-VOPO4 flakes stacked
by the layered structure; (e) AFM image of few-layer β-VOPO4 nanosheets (inset: the corresponding 3D demonstration); (f)
thickness of nanosheets derived from AFM measurement; (g) representative
TEM images of β-VOPO4 nanosheets; and (h–j)
magnified HRTEM images of β-VOPO4 nanosheets taken
along [101], [102], and [110] directions.Powder X-ray diffraction analysis confirmed the formation of the
pure orthorhombic β-VOPO4 phase (Figure b, cf. PDF#71-0859). Scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) images show the stacked 2D plates with a
smooth surface, shaped edges and corners, indicating a typical lamellar
layered morphology (Figure c,d). Analysis of the sample by atomic force microscopy (AFM)
(Figures e and S3) and the corresponding AFM height profile
(Figure f) indicate
that the VOPO4 samples comprise three stacks (see the inset
in Figure e), each
with the same average thickness of ∼6 nm. This confirms that
we successfully synthesized the β-VOPO4 nanosheets
with a controlled thickness of about 7–8 atomic monolayers.
The ultrathin and nearly transparent features of VOPO4 nanosheets
are also shown by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Figure g), upholding the
AFM results. Moreover, the high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images show
the clear lattice fringes with interplanar distances of 0.53, 0.32,
and 0.40 nm (Figure h–j), which can be assigned to the (101), (102), and (110)
planes of the β-VOPO4 structure, respectively.We hypothesized that PTA plays a key role in the formation of 2D
β-VOPO4 nanosheets. To test this, we ran a control
experiment, where instead of PTA, we used phosphoric acid (H3PO4) as the P precursor (all other conditions were identical).
The resulting VOPO4 material is denoted as PA–VOPO4. As shown in Figure a, the XRD pattern of PA–VOPO4 is almost
identical to that of the PTA-derived VOPO4 nanosheets (denoted
as PTA–VOPO4), yielding a typical β structure.
Unlike layered α-VOPO4 with 2D anisotropic growth
(the adjacent layers are connected with weak van der Waals force),[28] diffraction peaks do not shift in the β-phase.[29] However, the ratios of both (011)/(101) and
(002)/(201) planes in PTA–VOPO4 are higher than
those of PA–VOPO4 (Figures a and S4), probably
because of the lamellar layered structure of PTA–VOPO4.
Figure 2
(a)
Comparison of the X-ray diffraction patterns of two β-VOPO4 catalysts: phytic acid-derived VOPO4 nanosheets
(PTA–VOPO4) and the corresponding phosphoric acid-derived
VOPO4 (PA–VOPO4); (b) magnified HRTEM
images of PA–VOPO4, and the inset shows the V2O5 nanoparticles with the (200) lattice space.
(c) Schematic of the self-assembly process of VOSO4 and
P precursors: PTA and phosphoric acid (PA).
(a)
Comparison of the X-ray diffraction patterns of two β-VOPO4 catalysts: phytic acid-derived VOPO4 nanosheets
(PTA–VOPO4) and the corresponding phosphoric acid-derived
VOPO4 (PA–VOPO4); (b) magnified HRTEM
images of PA–VOPO4, and the inset shows the V2O5 nanoparticles with the (200) lattice space.
(c) Schematic of the self-assembly process of VOSO4 and
P precursors: PTA and phosphoric acid (PA).However, an additional peak appeared at 20.3° in PA–pan class="Chemical">VOPO4, which belongs to crystalline V2O5.
This indicates that some of the vanadyl species are aggregated into
V2O5. Indeed, a representative HRTEM image of
PA–VOPO4 (Figure b) confirmed that the V2O5 nanocrystallites
are dispersed on the VOPO4 matrix. The inset clearly shows
lattice fringes of 0.218 nm, corresponding to the (200) lattice space
of crystalline V2O5. The chemical mapping by
energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy showed that the mean atomic
V/P ratio of surface PTA–VOPO4 is 0.9 (Table S1), much lower than that of PA–VOPO4 (1.41, see Table S2), indicating
the aggregation of vanadia species on the surface of PA–VOPO4.
Both PTA and phosphoric acid are strong chelating
agents and coordinate
to VOSO4. As shown in Figure c, PTAcomprises six phosphoric acids attached
to a cyclohexane ring. Unlike plain phosphoric acid, the steric hindrance
of PTA prevents aggregation during the co-assembly process. Moreover,
during the hydrothermal treatment, the cyclohexane segments of PTAs
are carbonized into a carbon framework, suppressing the agglomeration
of vanadium species to V2O5. Indeed, after the
hydrothermal treatment, the nitrogen sorption isotherm of PTA-derived
VOP (PTA–VOPHT) showed increased N2 uptake
in the low relative pressure (P/P0 < 0.1) and a hysteresis loop in the region of P/P0 > 0.4, suggesting the
formation
of a carbon rich in micropores and mesopores (Figure S5a). In contrast, the PA–VOPHT gave
negligible N2 adsorption. Subsequent calcination removes
the carbon, giving PTA–VOPO4, showing a steep rise
in the range of P/P0 >
0.9 (Figure S5b), which can be assigned
to the interlayer voids. We also prepared PA–VOPO4 samples with different VOSO4/PA molar ratios (0.5 and
0.8) under otherwise identical conditions, trying to avoid the formation
of crystalline V2O5. As is evident from the
XRD patterns in Figure S6 in the Supporting Information, crystalline V2O5 was present in these samples,
further verifying the vital role of the PTA precursor. We conclude
that owing to the confined carbonization of PTA, the formed carbon
acts as an in situ template, giving the desired few-layer nanosheets.
Control experiments wherein the vanadium–PTAcomplex was directly
calcined without any hydrothermal treatment led to the formation of
amorphous VPO (Figure S7), upholding our
conclusion.We then studied the catalytic performance of these
β-VOPO4 materials in the vapor-phase oxidative dehydrogenation
of
ethyl lactate with air to give ethyl pyruvate in a fixed-bed reactor
(eq ). Lactates are
biomass-derived “platform molecules,”[30] and direct aerobic oxidation of lactate is a sustainable
route to biobased pyruvate, an important intermediate in the food,
cosmetics, pharmaceutical, and agrochemical sectors.[31,32] Previously, we showed that aerobic oxidation of ethyl lactate requires
relatively high temperatures. However, the pyruvate is easily overoxidized
on the catalyst surface at such high temperatures, lowering the product
selectivity.[33] A series of control experiments
confirmed that the reaction is in the kinetic regime, with no mass-transfer
limitations. Then, we measured the selectivity to ethyl pyruvate against
ethyl lactateconversion over phytic acid-derived VOPO4 nanosheets (PTA–VOPO4) and phosphoric acid-derived
3D VOPO4 nanoparticles (PA–VOPO4) (Figure a). PTA–VOPO4 outperformed PA–VOPO4 under identical reaction
conditions. At the same conversion of ethyl lactate, PTA–VOPO4 is more selective for ethyl pyruvate than PA–VOPO4. The ethyl pyruvate yield at different reaction temperatures
was much higher over PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets (Figure b), confirming the
enhanced catalytic activity. Previously, we demonstrated that this
reaction is kinetically favored in the presence of isolated amorphous
vanadium oxide sites, while crystalline V2O5 can catalyze this reaction but not selective.[34,35] PA–VOPO4features well-dispersed V2O5 nanocrystals on the surface, yet its catalytic activity
and selectively are lower compared to that of PTA–VOPO4. This is probably because the surface V4+/V5+ active sites and oxygen vacancies of PA–VOPO4 are less accessible than those in PTA–VOPO4. We then reasoned that the reactivity enhancement on PTA–VOPO4 is due to the exposed V4+/V5+ redox
sites and oxygen vacancies.
Figure 3
Vapor-phase oxidative dehydrogenation of ethyl
lactate with air
to give ethyl pyruvate over various β-VOPO4 catalysts:
(a) Selectivity to ethyl pyruvate plotted against conversion over
PTA–VOPO4 and PA–VOPO4. Reaction conditions: ethyl lactate WHSV = 6.25 h–1, air
carrier flow rate = 2.25 L/h; (b) corresponding temperature-resolved
yield profile of ethyl pyruvate. All data were taken after 2 h on
stream.
Vapor-phase oxidative dehydrogenation of ethyl
pan class="Chemical">lactate with air
to give ethyl pyruvate over various β-VOPO4 catalysts:
(a) Selectivity to ethyl pyruvate plotted against conversion over
PTA–VOPO4 and PA–VOPO4. Reaction conditions: ethyl lactate WHSV = 6.25 h–1, air
carrier flow rate = 2.25 L/h; (b) corresponding temperature-resolved
yield profile of ethyl pyruvate. All data were taken after 2 h on
stream.
Factors Governing Activity
and Selectivity
We further
characterized the β-VOPO4 sheets to understand this
enhanced activity. The full X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS)
survey spectra showed V, P, and O in all samples (Figure S8), in accordance with elemental mapping from high-angle
annular dark-field scanning TEM (HAADF–STEM) analysis (Figures a and S9). As shown in Figure b, the spectra of V 2p can be deconvoluted
into two peaks centered at 517.2 and 518.0 eV, which are associated
with V4+ and V5+ species, respectively. The
PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets gave a much higher V4+/(V4+ + V5+) ratio of 40%, in comparison to
30% in the bulk PA–VOPO4 material. Thus, ultrathin
nanosheets expose more accessible surface sites, thereby increasing
the number of surface V4+ species. The enhanced catalytic
activity can be assigned to the increased V4+/V5+ redox active sites of β-VOPO4 nanosheets.[36] From redox perspectives, introducing V4+ into β-VOPO4 nanosheets increases the number of
defects and oxygen vacancies. Elsewhere, we have reported that the
oxidation of ethyl lactate follows a Mars–van Krevelen mechanism:
ethyl lactate adsorbed on the catalytic surface is oxidized by the
lattice oxygen, and then, the resultant oxygen vacancies are replenished
by gas-phase oxygen during the oxidation reaction.[33] Thus, both surface lattice oxygens and oxygen vacancies
play key roles in aerobic oxidation of ethyl lactate to ethyl pyruvate.
These two species can be roughly estimated from the O 1s XPS spectrum
(Figure c): the peak
at ∼532.5 eV can be attributed to the lattice oxygen (OI) and the peak at ∼531.0 eV can be attributed to the
adsorbed oxygen species at the vacancy sites (OII).[4] The OI peak has a larger area for
the PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets than PA–VOPO4, indicating that the former exposes more lattice oxygen atoms.
Additionally, OII oxygens can enhance the mobility of oxygen
species; they are more easily reduced and favorable for the oxidation
reaction. PTA–VOPO4 has a higher OII/(OI + OII) ratio, indicating abundant structural defects
and oxygen vacancies. Moreover, as the structural defects and oxygen
vacancies decrease the electron charge density around phosphorus of
PTA–VOPO4, the P 2p1/2 and P 2p3/2 peaks shift slightly toward a higher binding energy in comparison
with PA–VOPO4 (Figure d).[37]
Figure 4
(a) STEM image
and corresponding elemental mappings of V, P, and
O of PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets. XPS studies showing high-resolution
V 2p spectra (b), high-resolution O 1s spectra (c), and high-resolution
P 2p spectra (d) of PA–VOPO4 and PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets. (e) PALS spectra of PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets (the inset shows the positron annihilation lifetimes
and the corresponding intensities in PA–VOPO4 and
PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets, respectively). (f) Schematic
diagram of defects and vacancies, originating from the removal of
carbon layers, in PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets.
(a) STEM image
and corresponding elemental mappings of V, P, and
O of PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets. XPS studies showing high-resolution
V 2p spectra (b), high-resolution O 1s spectra (c), and high-resolution
P 2p spectra (d) of PA–VOPO4 and PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets. (e) PALS spectra of PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets (the inset shows the positron annihilation lifetimes
and the corresponding intensities in PA–VOPO4 and
PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets, respectively). (f) Schematic
diagram of defects and vacancies, originating from the removal of
carbon layers, in PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets.Further information on the structural defects was obtained
from
positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS). Figure e shows a typical PALS spectrum
of PTA–VOPO4. All the PALS spectra could be fitted
to two positron lifetime components with a reasonable variance of
fit (1.0–1.1). The first positron lifetime (τ1) in the range of ∼208–240 ps is attributed to positron
annihilation in the bulk of the materials (see the inset in Figure e). The longer lifetime
(τ2) in the range of ∼422–478 ps indicates
the presence of larger-size defects, that is, vacancy clusters present
either in the bulk or at the grain boundaries of the samples. The
τ1 values of PTA–VOPO4 and PA–VOPO4 are nearly the same, showing the identical lattice structure.
The intensity corresponding to larger components (I2) is higher (40%) for nanosheets compared to that of
bulk PA–VOPO4 (36%), suggesting more vacancy defects
for PTA–VOPO4 nanosheets. Positrons trapped at the
defect sites predominantly annihilate with the surrounding elements
and hence provide information about the chemical surrounding. They
are efficiently trapped either at negatively charged or neutral open
volume defects such as vacancy clusters. According to the crystal
structure of the samples, cation vacancy defects (e.g., V or P based
vacancy defects) are surrounded by oxygen atoms. Figure S10 shows the ratio curves of these samples with respect
to a reference Si, in which the peak at PL ≈ 10 × 10–3mc indicates the annihilation
with the surrounding oxygen atoms at the defect sites. The corresponding
peak intensity of PTA–VOPO4 is higher than that
of PA–VOPO4, indicating that the defects present
in the nanosheets have more O atoms in the surrounding lattice sites.
Thus, our ultrathin VOPO4 nanosheets expose more lattice
oxygen and oxygen vacancies (Figure f), which can explain their high catalytic activity.
Self-Exfoliated Synthesis of Other Transition Metal Phosphate
Nanolayers for Catalytic Aerobic Oxidation of Ethyl Lactate to Ethyl
Pyruvate
Based on this “self-exfoliated” synthesis
protocol, we successfully made V-, Ni-, Co-, and Fe-based phosphates
(see the experimental section in the Supporting Information for details). These desired few-layer nanosheets
with thicknesses of 2–6 nm were confirmed by HRTEM and AFM
analyses (Figures a–c and S11). The combination of
XRD, SEM, and EDX analyses showed that these phosphates have lamellar
layered morphologies with high crystallinity, purity, and uniformity
(Figures S12 and S13 and Tables S3–S5, in the Supporting Information). Thus, our synthesis method is general,
facile, and scalable via a two-step process (hydrothermal and calcination
treatment).
Figure 5
Morphological and microstructural characterization of various PTA-derived
metal-phosphate nanosheets (a–c); NiPO4 nanosheets:
(a1–a3) TEM images and (a4) AFM image; CoPO4 nanosheets:
(b1–b3) TEM images and (b4) AFM image; FePO4 nanosheets:
(c1–c3) TEM images and (c4) AFM image. Note: the corresponding
height profiles of phosphate nanosheets are shown in Figure S11, which were derived from AFM measurement.
Morphological and microstructural characterization of various PTA-derived
metal-phosphate nanosheets (a–c); NiPO4 nanosheets:
(a1–a3) TEM images and (a4) AFM image; CoPO4 nanosheets:
(b1–b3) TEM images and (b4) AFM image; FePO4 nanosheets:
(c1–c3) TEM images and (c4) AFM image. Note: the corresponding
height profiles of phosphate nanosheets are shown in Figure S11, which were derived from AFM measurement.All the PTA-derived phosphate nanosheets were then
tested in the
vapor-phase aerobic oxidation of ethyl lactate with air at different
reaction temperatures (300, 325, and 350 °C). As shown in Figure a, control experiments
confirmed that Ni and Co showed some conversion but selectivity to
ethyl pyruvate was low, owing to the hydrolysis of ethyl pyruvate
on Co- and Ni-based phosphate.[36] Intriguingly,
VOPO4 nanosheets exhibited the best catalytic performance
among all the phosphate catalysts tested in this study, giving a remarkably
high activity and selectivity. To better understand this, the apparent
activation energies (Ea) were calculated
based on Arrhenius plots (Figure b), from the data collected below 15% ethyl lactateconversion. The corresponding Ea value
for VOPO4 (35 kJ/mol) is much smaller than that for other
phosphates: FePO4 (83 kJ/mol), CoPO4 (102 kJ/mol),
and NiPO4 (114 kJ/mol). This result confirmed that VOPO4 is intrinsically more active for ethyl lactate oxidation.
Figure 6
(a) Comparisons
of ethyl lactate conversion and ethyl pyruvate
selectivity over various PTA-derived metal phosphate nanosheets: VOPO4, FePO4, CoPO4, and NiPO4. Reaction conditions: ethyl lactate WHSV = 8 h–1, air flow rate = 2.25 L/h, and reaction temperature: 300, 325, and
350 °C. (b) Arrhenius plots for steady-state ethyl lactate consumption
rate over various phosphate catalysts, and the apparent activation
energy (Ea) was measured at a series of
temperatures below 15% ethyl lactate conversion.
(a) Comparisons
of ethyl lactateconversion and ethyl pyruvate
selectivity over various PTA-derived metal phosphate nanosheets: VOPO4, FePO4, CoPO4, and NiPO4. Reaction conditions: ethyl lactate WHSV = 8 h–1, air flow rate = 2.25 L/h, and reaction temperature: 300, 325, and
350 °C. (b) Arrhenius plots for steady-state ethyl lactateconsumption
rate over various phosphate catalysts, and the apparent activation
energy (Ea) was measured at a series of
temperatures below 15% ethyl lactateconversion.
Comparisons of Catalytic Efficiency of Various Vanadium Phosphorus
Oxides for Aerobic Oxidation to Ethyl Lactate
Olier et al.
reported that all vanadium phosphorus oxides (VPO) can be hydrated
except for β-VOPO4, owing to its highly stable structure.[38] This is consistent with our XPS measurements
(Figure c), where
no surface-chemisorbed water was detected (∼533 eV). As a result,
the competing hydrolysis is suppressed, which may explain why the
β-VOPO4 nanosheets gave such high selectivity to
pyruvatecompared with other metal phosphate catalysts.To test
this, we prepared a series of bulk VPO catalysts for comparison with
our nanosheets: vanadyl pyrophosphate [(VO)2P2O7], vanadyl phosphate dihydrate (VOPO4·2H2O), and vanadyl hydrogen phosphate hemihydrate (VOHPO4·0.5H2O, see the Supporting Information for full experimental details). Their crystalline
structures were confirmed by XRD and Raman spectroscopy (Figures S14 and S15).[39,40]Figure a shows the
selectivity–conversion plots. All the VPO catalysts were active
in lactate-to-pyruvate reaction. Interestingly, β-VOPO4 nanosheets showed the highest ethyl pyruvate selectivity, reaching
over 90% at an ethyl lactateconversion of ∼25%. Even at a
high ethyl lactateconversion of ∼80%, the selectivity is as
high as 80% compared with ∼60% for (VO)2P2O7. Control experiments were performed at a steady-state
conversion of ∼6% for all the tested catalysts (the carbon
balances were >98%) to better differentiate the influence of the
VPO
phases on product selectivity. As shown in Figure b, β-VOPO4 nanosheets gave
over 99% selectivity to ethyl pyruvate, while a series of byproducts
were detected on other three VPO catalysts, such as acetaldehyde,
ethanol, acetic acid, ethyl acetate, and CO. This indicates that except for the β-phase, the VPO
catalysts undergo the competing overoxidation, hydrolysis, decarbonylation,
and decarboxylation (see Figure c). The byproduct distribution is different among different
catalysts. VOHPO4·0.5H2O and VOPO4·2H2O gave higher selectivity to ethanol than (VO)2P2O7, owing to the hydrolysis of ester
on their hydrated surfaces.
Figure 7
(a) Selectivity to ethyl pyruvate plotted against
conversion for
different VPO catalysts: 2D β-VOPO4 nanosheets, (VO)2P2O7, VOHPO4·0.5 H2O, and VOPO4·2H2O. (b) Comparison
of the selectivity of various products at an ethyl lactate conversion
of ∼6% (β-VOPO4 nanosheets: 6.0%, (VO)2P2O7: 6.2%, VOHPO4·0.5
H2O: 5.7%, and VOPO4·2H2O: 6.4%).
The carbon balances were >98%. (c) Reaction pathway for the aerobic
oxidation of ethyl lactate on the VPO catalysts. (d) Mass-specific
activity for pyruvate formation over VPO catalysts in the temperature
range 250–325 °C. (e) Comparisons of the area-specific
production rate of pyruvate over 2D β-VOPO4 nanosheets
and (VO)2P2O7. (f) Stability test
of the 2D β-VOPO4 nanosheets under optimized conditions
(WHSV = 3 h–1 and T = 300 °C).
(a) Selectivity to ethyl pyruvate plotted against
conversion for
different VPO catalysts: 2D β-VOPO4 nanosheets, (VO)2P2O7, VOHPO4·0.5 H2O, and VOPO4·2H2O. (b) Comparison
of the selectivity of various products at an ethyl lactateconversion
of ∼6% (β-VOPO4 nanosheets: 6.0%, (VO)2P2O7: 6.2%, VOHPO4·0.5
H2O: 5.7%, and VOPO4·2H2O: 6.4%).
The carbon balances were >98%. (c) Reaction pathway for the aerobic
oxidation of ethyl lactate on the VPO catalysts. (d) Mass-specific
activity for pyruvate formation over VPO catalysts in the temperature
range 250–325 °C. (e) Comparisons of the area-specific
production rate of pyruvate over 2D β-VOPO4 nanosheets
and (VO)2P2O7. (f) Stability test
of the 2D β-VOPO4 nanosheets under optimized conditions
(WHSV = 3 h–1 and T = 300 °C).We also compared the mass-specific activity (calculated
as grams
of pyruvate produced per gram of the catalyst per hour) over VPO catalysts
at different temperatures (Figure d). Our β-VOPO4 catalyst outperformed
the classical phosphates, especially at high reaction temperatures
over 300 °C. Moreover, layered β-VOPO4 and (VO)2P2O7 gave similar specific Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
areas of 33 and 25 m2/g, respectively, much higher than
VOHPO4·0.5H2O (16 m2/g), VOPO4·2H2O (9 m2/g). We then plotted
the area-specific catalytic rates for pyruvate production over β-VOPO4 and (VO)2P2O7 catalysts.
As shown in Figure e, the area-specific activity for β-VOPO4 nanosheets
is almost twice higher than that for (VO)2P2O7 at 300 °C. The stability and regenerability are
key factors for a heterogenous catalyst in its practical application.
We tested the stability of our β-VOPO4 nanosheets
under optimized conditions (WHSV = 3 h–1, T = 300 °C, see Table S6). As shown in Figure f, this catalyst is highly stable, with a steady-state conversion
of ∼90% (over 80% selectivity) for at least 80 h without significant
loss of activity. We also used the same catalyst bed for a series
of testing studies, and for this, the catalyst was cleaned and regenerated
by simply passing air at 500 °C for 2 h and switching off the
ethyl lactatefeed. The XRD, TEM, and XPS analyses further confirmed
that the structure was well preserved after multiple regenerations
(Figures S16–S18 in the Supporting Information). Most of the 2D nanosheets are still far from commercialization
because their cost is a problem to scale-up. Our 2D β-VOPO4 nanosheets are promising in this regard because they can
be readily achieved from inexpensive starting materials such as VOSO4 and PTA. VOSO4 is a byproduct of crude oil refining
(ca. 2000–5000 $/ton), and PTA is a renewable inexpensive plant-based
acid (ca. 6500 $/ton).[41] The metal salts
are also cheap; therefore, these nanosheets are industrially viable
catalysts cost-wise as well.
Conclusions
We
report the synthesis of 2D ultrathin phosphate nanosheets by
a new template-free “self-exfoliated” strategy using
renewable PTA. PTA acts as a strong chelating agent, but can also
be carbonized in situ into carbon templates, which are responsible
for the precisely controlled few-layer nanosheets. Application of
this method to VPO produces β-VOPO4 ultrathin nanosheets,
which expose abundant V4+/V5+ redox sites and
oxygen vacancies. Importantly, β-VOPO4 does not get
hydrated, thereby reducing the competing hydrolysis by water byproducts.
These features result in a superior catalytic activity and selectivity
in the aerobic oxidation of ethyl lactate to ethyl pyruvatecompared
to the classical VPO. The inexpensive β-VOPO4 nanosheets
show good long-term stability and facile recovery. These nanosheets
are not only among the best heterogeneous catalysts for the vapor-phase
oxidation of lactate to pyruvate, they also show for the first time
that the “inert” β-VOPO4 phase can
be an efficient oxidation catalyst under the right conditions. Note
that this is a general synthesis method, giving access to various
metal phosphate nanosheets, such as Ni, Co, and Fe. Therefore, this
work opens a new avenue for the synthesis of new transition metalphosphate nanosheets for catalysis and other applications.
Authors: Constanze Schliehe; Beatriz H Juarez; Marie Pelletier; Sebastian Jander; Denis Greshnykh; Mona Nagel; Andreas Meyer; Stephan Foerster; Andreas Kornowski; Christian Klinke; Horst Weller Journal: Science Date: 2010-07-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Maik Eichelbaum; Michael Hävecker; Christian Heine; Andrey Karpov; Cornelia-Katharina Dobner; Frank Rosowski; Annette Trunschke; Robert Schlögl Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Ying Zhang; Xiaolong Zhang; Yunzhi Ling; Fengwang Li; Alan M Bond; Jie Zhang Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-09-03 Impact factor: 15.336