Ruchika Gutt1, Sheetal Malhotra1, Drew Moghanaki1, Alice V Cheuk1, Lori Hoffman-Hogg1, Maria Kelly1, Helen Fosmire1, George Dawson1. 1. is a Radiation Oncologist at the Washington DC VA Medical Center (VAMC). is an Endocrinologist at The Southeast Permanente Medical Group in Jonesboro, Georgia. is a Radiation Oncologist at the Atlanta VAMC in Georgia. is a Radiation Oncologist at the James J. Peters VAMC in the Bronx, New York, and an Assistant Professor at Mount Sinai School of Medicine. is National Program Manager for Prevention Policy at Veterans Health Administration National Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Durham, North Carolina. and are Radiation Oncologists at the New Jersey VA Health Care System in East Orange. is Deputy Chief of Staff at the Richard L. Roudebush VAMC in Indianapolis, Indiana.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy plays an important role in the palliation of lung cancer, which is the second most common cancer diagnosed in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) developed evidenced-based treatment guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic lung cancer. METHODS: In May 2016, an electronic survey of 88 VHA radiation oncologists (ROs) was conducted to assess metastatic lung cancer management. Demographic information was obtained and 2 clinical scenarios were presented to glean opinions on dose/fractionation schemes preferred, preferences for/against concurrent chemotherapy, and use of endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) and/or yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser technology. Survey results were assessed for concordance with published ASTRO guidelines. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 61%, with 93% of the 40 VHA radiation departments represented. Among respondents, 96% were board certified, and 90% held academic appointments. 88% were familiar with ASTRO guidelines. Preferred fractionation schemes were 20 Gy in 5 fractions (69%) and 30 Gy in 10 fractions (22%). The vast majority (98%) did not recommend concurrent chemotherapy for palliation. In the setting of bronchial obstruction with lung collapse, about half (49%) recommended EBB or YAG lung reexpansion before external beam radiotherapy. A minority of respondents use stereotactic body radiotherapy or EBB for palliation. CONCLUSION: Most respondents demonstrated up-to-date knowledge of current evidence-based treatment guidelines. We found no distinction in clinical decisions based on demographic profiles.
BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy plays an important role in the palliation of lung cancer, which is the second most common cancer diagnosed in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) developed evidenced-based treatment guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic lung cancer. METHODS: In May 2016, an electronic survey of 88 VHA radiation oncologists (ROs) was conducted to assess metastatic lung cancer management. Demographic information was obtained and 2 clinical scenarios were presented to glean opinions on dose/fractionation schemes preferred, preferences for/against concurrent chemotherapy, and use of endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) and/or yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG) laser technology. Survey results were assessed for concordance with published ASTRO guidelines. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 61%, with 93% of the 40 VHA radiation departments represented. Among respondents, 96% were board certified, and 90% held academic appointments. 88% were familiar with ASTRO guidelines. Preferred fractionation schemes were 20 Gy in 5 fractions (69%) and 30 Gy in 10 fractions (22%). The vast majority (98%) did not recommend concurrent chemotherapy for palliation. In the setting of bronchial obstruction with lung collapse, about half (49%) recommended EBB or YAG lung reexpansion before external beam radiotherapy. A minority of respondents use stereotactic body radiotherapy or EBB for palliation. CONCLUSION: Most respondents demonstrated up-to-date knowledge of current evidence-based treatment guidelines. We found no distinction in clinical decisions based on demographic profiles.
Authors: Leah L Zullig; George L Jackson; Raye Anne Dorn; Dawn T Provenzale; Rebecca McNeil; Catherine M Thomas; Michael J Kelley Journal: Mil Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Florian Kocher; Wolfgang Hilbe; Andreas Seeber; Andreas Pircher; Thomas Schmid; Richard Greil; Jutta Auberger; Meinhard Nevinny-Stickel; William Sterlacci; Alexandar Tzankov; Herbert Jamnig; Karin Kohler; August Zabernigg; Josef Frötscher; Wilhelm Oberaigner; Michael Fiegl Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: H Langendijk; J de Jong; M Tjwa; M Muller; G ten Velde; N Aaronson; R Lamers; B Slotman; M Wouters Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.280