Literature DB >> 3295148

Initiation of warfarin therapy: comparison of physician dosing with computer-assisted dosing.

R H White, R Hong, A P Venook, M M Daschbach, W Murray, D R Mungall, R W Coleman.   

Abstract

In a prospective, randomized study at two university hospitals, the authors examined how effectively housestaff physicians (n = 36) managed the initiation of warfarin therapy compared with a computer-assisted dosing regimen (n = 39) using the software program Warfcalc, which was managed by one of the authors. Target prothrombin time ratios were selected by the physicians. Study endpoints included: the time to reach a therapeutic prothrombin ratio, the time to reach a stable therapeutic dose, the number of patients transiently overanticoagulated, the number of bleeding complications, and the accuracy of the predicted maintenance dose, which was assessed at steady-state 10-14 days later. Computer-assisted dosing consistently out-performed the physicians: a stable therapeutic dose was achieved 3.7 days earlier (p = 0.002), fewer patients were overanticoagulated (10% versus 41%), and the predicted maintenance dose was in the therapeutic range in 85% of the computer-dosed patients versus 42% of the physician group (p less than 0.002). For physicians who did not routinely manage warfarin therapy, computer-assisted dosing improved the accuracy of dosing and shortened the time required to achieve a stable therapeutic dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3295148     DOI: 10.1007/BF02596140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  27 in total

1.  Estimation of population characteristics of pharmacokinetic parameters from routine clinical data.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; B Rosenberg; V V Marathe
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1977-10

2.  Forecasting individual pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; S Beal; B Rosenberg; V V Marathe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 3.  Bleeding associated with antithrombotic therapy.

Authors:  J G Kelton; J Hirsh
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 3.851

4.  Computer assisted management of warfarin treatment.

Authors:  R Wilson; A H James
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-08-18

5.  Bayesian pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic forecasting of prothrombin response to warfarin therapy: preliminary evaluation.

Authors:  J M Svec; R W Coleman; D R Mungall; T M Ludden
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.681

6.  Flexible induction dose regimen for warfarin and prediction of maintenance dose.

Authors:  A Fennerty; J Dolben; P Thomas; G Backhouse; D P Bentley; I A Campbell; P A Routledge
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-04-28

7.  Predicting individual phenytoin dosage.

Authors:  S Vozeh; K T Muir; L B Sheiner; F Follath
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1981-04

8.  Multicenter evaluation of six methods for predicting warfarin maintenance-dose requirements from initial response.

Authors:  W T Sawyer; T E Poe; B R Canaday; J S Weiner; D M Williams; C E Webb; M J Ellison
Journal:  Clin Pharm       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug

9.  Different intensities of oral anticoagulant therapy in the treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  R Hull; J Hirsh; R Jay; C Carter; C England; M Gent; A G Turpie; D McLoughlin; P Dodd; M Thomas; G Raskob; P Ockelford
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Predicting warfarin maintenance dosage based on initial response.

Authors:  D R Miller; M A Brown
Journal:  Am J Hosp Pharm       Date:  1979-10
View more
  21 in total

1.  Prediction of the international normalized ratio and maintenance dose during the initiation of warfarin therapy.

Authors:  B Vadher; D L Patterson; M Leaning
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Changing doctor prescribing behaviour.

Authors:  P S Gill; M Mäkelä; K M Vermeulen; N Freemantle; G Ryan; C Bond; T Thorsen; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-08

3.  Computer support for determining drug dose: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Walton; S Dovey; E Harvey; N Freemantle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-04-10

4.  Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit?

Authors:  R Kaushal; D W Bates
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-09

5.  A conceptual framework for evaluating outpatient electronic prescribing systems based on their functional capabilities.

Authors:  Douglas S Bell; Shan Cretin; Richard S Marken; Adam B Landman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-10-05       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  A critical appraisal of the literature on the effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on clinician performance and patient outcomes.

Authors:  K B Langton; M E Johnston; R B Haynes; A Mathieu
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1992

Review 7.  Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Anne Holbrook; Sam Schulman; Daniel M Witt; Per Olav Vandvik; Jason Fish; Michael J Kovacs; Peter J Svensson; David L Veenstra; Mark Crowther; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Organizing and accessing the literature.

Authors:  R B Haynes
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug

9.  A Bayesian dose-individualization method for warfarin.

Authors:  Daniel F B Wright; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 10.  Warfarin therapy: in need of improvement after all these years.

Authors:  Stephen E Kimmel
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.