Zihan Jin1, Gaojun Cai2, Ping Zhang1, Xiaohong Li3, Shuang Yao4, Lin Zhuang5, Min Ren6, Qiang Wang5, Xiaolong Yu7,8. 1. Clinical Lab, Changzhou Second People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou City, China. 2. Department of Cardiology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou City, China. 3. Clinical Lab, Changzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Changzhou City, China. 4. Clinical Lab, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou City, China. 5. Department of Surgery, The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou City, China. 6. Department of Rheumatology, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou City, China. 7. Science and Education Section, Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University, Changzhou City, China. 8. Department of Ultrasonics, The Wujin Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University, Changzhou City, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have drawn attention in recent years as novel non-specific inflammatory markers; however, only a few studies have been conducted to investigate their value in RA. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as complementary diagnostic tools in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHOD: This study included 1009 patients with RA, 170 patients with other rheumatic diseases, and 245 healthy individuals from four medical centers. The patients' general data, including complete blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and rheumatoid factor (RF), were retrospectively analyzed, and the NLR and PLR were calculated. Potential effective indicators were screened by logistic regression analysis, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate their diagnostic value for RA. RESULTS: (a) The NLR and PLR were significantly higher in the RA group than in the non-RA group and the control group (P < .05). (b) Spearman's Rho showed that the NLR was positively correlated with the PLR (r = .584, P < .05), RF (r = .167, P < .01), and CRP (r = .280, P < .01) but was not significantly correlated with ESR (r = .100, P > .05). The PLR was positively correlated with RF (r = .139, P < .01), CRP (r = .297, P < .01), and ESR (r = .262, P < .05). (c) Logistic analysis showed that RF, CRP, ESR, and the NLR had diagnostic value for RA. (d) For the NLR, the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve was 0.831; at the cutoff value of 2.13, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Youden index were 76.7%, 75.9%, 76.4%, and 0.5424, respectively. CONCLUSION: The NLR was less effective than CRP and RF but was superior to ESR in the diagnosis of RA. The NLR can thus be used as a complementary diagnostic indicator in the diagnosis of RA.
BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have drawn attention in recent years as novel non-specific inflammatory markers; however, only a few studies have been conducted to investigate their value in RA. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as complementary diagnostic tools in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHOD: This study included 1009 patients with RA, 170 patients with other rheumatic diseases, and 245 healthy individuals from four medical centers. The patients' general data, including complete blood count, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and rheumatoid factor (RF), were retrospectively analyzed, and the NLR and PLR were calculated. Potential effective indicators were screened by logistic regression analysis, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate their diagnostic value for RA. RESULTS: (a) The NLR and PLR were significantly higher in the RA group than in the non-RA group and the control group (P < .05). (b) Spearman's Rho showed that the NLR was positively correlated with the PLR (r = .584, P < .05), RF (r = .167, P < .01), and CRP (r = .280, P < .01) but was not significantly correlated with ESR (r = .100, P > .05). The PLR was positively correlated with RF (r = .139, P < .01), CRP (r = .297, P < .01), and ESR (r = .262, P < .05). (c) Logistic analysis showed that RF, CRP, ESR, and the NLR had diagnostic value for RA. (d) For the NLR, the area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC curve was 0.831; at the cutoff value of 2.13, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Youden index were 76.7%, 75.9%, 76.4%, and 0.5424, respectively. CONCLUSION: The NLR was less effective than CRP and RF but was superior to ESR in the diagnosis of RA. The NLR can thus be used as a complementary diagnostic indicator in the diagnosis of RA.
Authors: Michal Mleko; Kazimierz Pitynski; Elzbieta Pluta; Aleksandra Czerw; Katarzyna Sygit; Beata Karakiewicz; Tomasz Banas Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 3.989