Benjamin Pardue1, Austin Thomas1, Jake Buckley2, William J Suggs3,4. 1. Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine - Auburn Campus, 910 South Donahue Drive, Auburn, AL, 36832, USA. 2. Crestwood Medical Center, One Hospital Drive, Huntsville, AL, 35801, USA. 3. Crestwood Medical Center, One Hospital Drive, Huntsville, AL, 35801, USA. jsuggs@alabariatrics.com. 4. Alabama Bariatrics, 705 Bank Street, Decatur, AL, 35601, USA. jsuggs@alabariatrics.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The current literature is sparse on post discharge pain management for bariatric surgical patients. This study aimed to determine if an opioid-sparing protocol could decrease opioid use during the postoperative period (hospital to home). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we implemented an opioid-sparing protocol in January 2018, for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at our institution. We compared recovery time, pain scores (in hospital and at home), and perioperative opioid use between the historic control group (February 2017 to December 2017) and the opioid-sparing group (January 2018 to December 2018). A p value of < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study included 400 patients (200 in each group), and 165 participated in the phone survey. Baseline characteristics were similar, except the control group had a higher body mass index and body weight. The average recovery time was significantly shorter in the opioid-sparing group (18.9 versus 35.3 days, P = .043). There was no significant difference in mean postoperative pain scores in the hospital or at home. The opioid-sparing group required significantly fewer opioids postoperatively (10.4 versus 16.1 morphine milligram equivalents, P < .001). Only 1 out of the 200 patients in the opioid-sparing arm requested an opioid prescription after discharge. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an opioid-sparing protocol improved recovery time and reduced postoperative opioid use in the hospital and after discharge without changing perceived pain in patients undergoing LSG.
PURPOSE: The current literature is sparse on post discharge pain management for bariatric surgical patients. This study aimed to determine if an opioid-sparing protocol could decrease opioid use during the postoperative period (hospital to home). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we implemented an opioid-sparing protocol in January 2018, for patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) at our institution. We compared recovery time, pain scores (in hospital and at home), and perioperative opioid use between the historic control group (February 2017 to December 2017) and the opioid-sparing group (January 2018 to December 2018). A p value of < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The study included 400 patients (200 in each group), and 165 participated in the phone survey. Baseline characteristics were similar, except the control group had a higher body mass index and body weight. The average recovery time was significantly shorter in the opioid-sparing group (18.9 versus 35.3 days, P = .043). There was no significant difference in mean postoperative pain scores in the hospital or at home. The opioid-sparing group required significantly fewer opioids postoperatively (10.4 versus 16.1 morphine milligram equivalents, P < .001). Only 1 out of the 200 patients in the opioid-sparing arm requested an opioid prescription after discharge. CONCLUSION: Implementation of an opioid-sparing protocol improved recovery time and reduced postoperative opioid use in the hospital and after discharge without changing perceived pain in patients undergoing LSG.
Authors: A Thorell; A D MacCormick; S Awad; N Reynolds; D Roulin; N Demartines; M Vignaud; A Alvarez; P M Singh; D N Lobo Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Ola S Ahmed; Ailín C Rogers; Jarlath C Bolger; Achille Mastrosimone; William B Robb Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-02-27 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Ryan D Horsley; Ellen D Vogels; Daaron A P McField; David M Parker; Charles Medico; James Dove; Marcus Fluck; Jon D Gabrielsen; Michael R Gionfriddo; Anthony T Petrick Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Stacy A Brethauer; Arielle Grieco; Teresa Fraker; Kimberly Evans-Labok; April Smith; Matthew D McEvoy; Alan A Saber; John M Morton; Anthony Petrick Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Wendy C King; Jia-Yuh Chen; Steven H Belle; Anita P Courcoulas; Gregory F Dakin; David R Flum; Marcelo W Hinojosa; Melissa A Kalarchian; James E Mitchell; Walter J Pories; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski; Scott G Engel; Kristine J Steffen Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2017-04-07 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Margaret E Smith; Jay S Lee; Aaron Bonham; Oliver A Varban; Jonathan F Finks; Arthur M Carlin; Amir A Ghaferi Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jun Jie Ng; Wei Qi Leong; Chuen Seng Tan; Keah How Poon; Davide Lomanto; Jimmy B Y So; Asim Shabbir Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.129