Literature DB >> 32951099

Serum CGRP, VIP, and PACAP usefulness in migraine: a case-control study in chronic migraine patients in real clinical practice.

Sara Pérez-Pereda1, María Toriello-Suárez1, Gonzalo Ocejo-Vinyals2, Sandra Guiral-Foz2, Jesús Castillo-Obeso3, Silvia Montes-Gómez3, Rosa M Martínez-Nieto3, Fernando Iglesias4, Vicente González-Quintanilla1, Agustin Oterino5.   

Abstract

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypetide-38 (PACAP-38) have relevant roles in migraine pathophysiology. Their serum levels have been proposed as biomarkers for migraine. Our aim was to assess their diagnostic value in real clinical practice in a cohort of chronic migraine (CM), episodic migraine (EM) and healthy controls (HC). We recruited subjects with CM, EM and HC at two medical centers. Blood samples were drawn under fasting conditions in the interictal period, immediately centrifuged and stored at - 80 ºC. Serum levels were determined by ELISA. Neuropeptide levels, the effect of preventatives, correlations with clinical and demographic variables, and their diagnostic value were studied among clinical categories. 296 age- and sex-matched subjects (101 CM, 98 EM and 97 HC) were included. All three neuropeptide serum levels were higher in CM [median and IQ for CGRP = 18.023 pg/ml (14.4-24.7); VIP = 121.732 pg/ml (48.72-186.72) and PACAP = 204.931 pg/ml (101.08-597.64)] vs EM [CGRP = 14.659 pg/ml (10.29-17.45); VIP = 75.603 pg/ml (28.722-107.10); and PACAP = 94.992 pg/ml (65.77-128.48)] and vs HC [CGRP = 13.988 pg/ml (10.095-17.87); VIP = 84.685 pg/ml (35.32-99.79), and PACAP = 103.142 pg/ml (59.42-123.97)]. Using multinomial modeling, only VIP (OR 1.011, 95% CI  1.003-1.018, p = 0.005) and PACAP (OR 1.003, 95% CI 1.001-1.005, p = 0.002) increased the risk for CM, but not for EM. CGRP did not predict CM or EM. This model could correctly classify only 62/101 (61.38%) of CM, 75/98 (76.53%) of EM, and 5/97 (4.12%) of HC [globally 147/296 (49.8%)]. Individually, PACAP performed the best for classifying clinical categories [global accuracy 150/296 (50.67%)]. In CM, neuropeptide levels were higher in those OnaBT-treated than in no-treated patients. Although interictal serum CGRP and VIP were higher in CM than both EM or HC, their utility to discriminate migraine categories was low. Contrary to other studies, PACAP serum levels were also higher in CM than in EM or HC and had more discriminative capability to distinguish CM from EM and HC. Further investigation is needed for determination technique standardization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CGRP; Migraine; Neuropeptides; PACAP; VIP

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32951099     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-020-05781-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  6 in total

Review 1.  Neurobiology of migraine progression.

Authors:  Wanakorn Rattanawong; Alan Rapoport; Anan Srikiatkhachorn
Journal:  Neurobiol Pain       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  Evaluation of Serum Levels of Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channel Subfamily V Member 1, Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide, and Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase-Activating Polypeptide in Chronic and Episodic Migraine: The Possible Role in Migraine Transformation.

Authors:  Mansoureh Togha; Zeinab Ghorbani; Samira Ramazi; Fahime Zavvari; Fariba Karimzadeh
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Neuropeptide changes in an improved migraine model with repeat stimulations.

Authors:  Yichen Guo; Yawen Cheng; Jiaqi An; Yi Qi; Guogang Luo
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 1.757

Review 4.  Chronic Migraine Pathophysiology and Treatment: A Review of Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Tiffani J Mungoven; Luke A Henderson; Noemi Meylakh
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-25

5.  Plasma Levels of CGRP During a 2-h Infusion of VIP in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Migraine: An Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Lanfranco Pellesi; Mohammad Al-Mahdi Al-Karagholi; Roberto De Icco; Basit Ali Chaudhry; Cristina Lopez Lopez; Josefin Snellman; Jens Hannibal; Faisal Mohammad Amin; Messoud Ashina
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.086

Review 6.  CGRP and Migraine: What Have We Learned From Measuring CGRP in Migraine Patients So Far?

Authors:  Katharina Kamm
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 4.086

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.