Literature DB >> 32951079

Screening for domestic violence during pregnancy follow-up: evaluation of an intervention in an antenatal service.

Sophie Duchesne1, Anne-Claire Donnadieu2, Patrick Chariot3, Christine Louis-Sylvestre2.   

Abstract

To assess the impact of a brief training for obstetricians and midwives about screening for domestic violence during pregnancy follow-up and to identify barriers to a routine enquiry. A monocentric quasi-experimental study was performed in an obstetrics department in Paris, France. We asked patients during their pregnancy follow-up to complete a survey describing their demographic characteristics. They were also asked if a health professional had screened them for domestic violence during the current pregnancy. Exclusion criteria were refusal and inability to complete the survey alone. Health professionals attended a brief training about domestic violence. The intervention provided general information about domestic violence to alert health professionals (prevalence, risk factors, consequences on women's health, pregnancy, and children) and guidelines on screening and how to deal with women disclosing domestic violence. They also had to complete a survey about their knowledge and practice concerning domestic violence. Two months later, patients consulting for their pregnancy follow-up completed the same survey. Health professionals were not aware of the study's aim throughout its course. The primary outcome was the rate of patients screened for domestic violence during pregnancy follow-up. The secondary outcome was the identification of barriers to a routine enquiry. Four hundred ninety-five patients completed the first survey (control group): 21 patients (4.8%) had been screened for domestic violence. Twenty-one health professionals attended the intervention. Eight (38.1%) stated that they never screened for domestic violence, and 3 (14.3%) stated that they always did. Three hundred ninety-five patients completed the second survey (experimental group): 17 patients (4.3% vs 4.8%, p = 0.53) stated that they had been screened for domestic violence. The main barriers to screening mentioned by health professionals were the presence of the partner, the lack of awareness of the need to screen, uncomfortable feelings, and the difficulty to identify victims. There was no increased screening for domestic violence during pregnancy follow-up after a brief training of obstetricians and midwives. An early training during medical studies or more extensive training for professionals could be more efficient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Domestic violence; Intervention; Pregnancy; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32951079     DOI: 10.1007/s00737-020-01058-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Womens Ment Health        ISSN: 1434-1816            Impact factor:   3.633


  20 in total

1.  Antenatal detection of domestic violence.

Authors:  R Foy; F Nelson; G Penney; G McIlwaine
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-05-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Intimate partner violence screening and intervention: data from eleven Pennsylvania and California community hospital emergency departments.

Authors:  N Glass; S Dearwater; J Campbell
Journal:  J Emerg Nurs       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Pregnancy and intimate partner violence: risk factors, severity, and health effects.

Authors:  Douglas A Brownridge; Tamara L Taillieu; Kimberly A Tyler; Agnes Tiwari; Susy C Santos
Journal:  Violence Against Women       Date:  2011-07

4.  [Domestic violence: what are the difficulties for practitioners? Analysis of interviews among 19 practitioners within a town-hospital care network aimed at a global approach of patients].

Authors:  Irène François; Grégoire Moutel; Isabelle Plu; Isabelle Fauriel; Christian Hervé
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 1.228

5.  Women's opinions about domestic violence screening and mandatory reporting.

Authors:  A C Gielen; P J O'Campo; J C Campbell; J Schollenberger; A B Woods; A S Jones; J A Dienemann; J Kub; E C Wynne
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  A five year follow-up study of the Bristol pregnancy domestic violence programme to promote routine enquiry.

Authors:  Kathleen Baird; Debra Salmon; Paul White
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.372

7.  Prenatal predictors of intimate partner abuse.

Authors:  Linda L Dunn; Kathryn S Oths
Journal:  J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb

8.  Violence during pregnancy and substance use.

Authors:  H Amaro; L E Fried; H Cabral; B Zuckerman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Effectiveness of training to promote routine enquiry for domestic violence by midwives and nurses: A pre-post evaluation study.

Authors:  Kathleen M Baird; Amornrat S Saito; Jennifer Eustace; Debra K Creedy
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Intimate partner violence and immigration laws in Canada: how far have we come?

Authors:  Ramona Alaggia; Cheryl Regehr; Giselle Rishchynski
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  2009-10-04
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Integrative review of the literature on screening for gender-based violence during pregnancy: Barriers, facilitators, and tools.

Authors:  Laura Andreu-Pejó; Ma Jesús Valero-Chillerón; Víctor Manuel González-Chordá; Desirée Mena Tudela; Agueda Cervera Gasch
Journal:  Nurs Health Sci       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 2.214

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.