Literature DB >> 32951059

Results following prolonged recovery show satisfactory functional and patient-reported outcome after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture: a prospective 5-year follow-up cohort study.

Peter Larsen1,2, Christian Berre Eriksen3, Rasmus Stokholm3, Rasmus Elsoe3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although a large number of previous studies have investigated the outcome in patients following tibial shaft fractures, the literature provides limited information on prospectively reported patients with mid- to long-term follow-up. The present study aimed to investigate prospectively the 5-year development in patient-reported quality of life after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The design was a prospective, 5-year follow-up cohort study. Quality of life (QOL) was measured with the questionnaire Eq5d-5L and compared to the 1-year outcome reported by the same patients. Secondary outcome measurements were the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), recordings of pain, gait and muscle strength.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were eligible for participation. Mean patient age at the time of the 5-year follow-up was 46.3 years. The 5-year postoperative mean Eq5d-5L index was 0.864 (95% CI 0.809-0.918). The mean Eq5d-5L VAS was 88.4 (95% CI 83.4-93.5). Compared with the same patients' Eq5d-5L index scores at the 1-year follow-up (0.784), a significant increase was observed (P = 0.014). A comparison to the Danish Eq.5D reference population showed no statistically significant difference.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported quality of life among patients treated with intramedullary nailing following a tibial shaft fracture increased significantly between the 1-year and 5-year follow-up. In contrast to the 1-year patient-reported quality of life, results are comparable to those of a reference population at the 5-year follow-up. In a clinical setting, these results highlight that patients may expect a prolonged period to recover. However, of most importance is that patients can expect a satisfactory outcome years after fracture and treatment.
© 2020. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-Year follow-up; Intramedullary nailing; Muscle strength; QOL; Tibia shaft fracture

Year:  2020        PMID: 32951059     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03608-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  24 in total

1.  Knee pain correlates with union after tibial nailing.

Authors:  Scott P Ryan; Paul Tornetta; Cassandra Dielwart; Elizabeth Kaye-Krall
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.512

2.  Incidence and epidemiology of tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  Peter Larsen; Rasmus Elsoe; Sandra Hope Hansen; Thomas Graven-Nielsen; Uffe Laessoe; Sten Rasmussen
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.586

3.  Decreased QOL and muscle strength are persistent 1 year after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture: a prospective 1-year follow-up cohort study.

Authors:  Peter Larsen; Rasmus Elsoe; Uffe Laessoe; Thomas Graven-Nielsen; Christian Berre Eriksen; Sten Rasmussen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  Eight years' clinical experience with the Orthofix tibial nailing system in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  George C Babis; Ioannis S Benetos; Theofilos Karachalios; Panayotis N Soucacos
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.586

5.  Asymmetry in gait pattern following tibial shaft fractures - a prospective one-year follow-up study of 49 patients.

Authors:  Peter Larsen; Uffe Laessoe; Sten Rasmussen; Thomas Graven-Nielsen; Christian Berre Eriksen; Rasmus Elsoe
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Outcome at 12 to 22 years of 1502 tibial shaft fractures.

Authors:  C L Connelly; V Bucknall; P J Jenkins; C M Court-Brown; M M McQueen; L C Biant
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Knee pain after tibial nailing: the role of nail prominence.

Authors:  Timothy Bhattacharyya; Khemarin Seng; Nader A Nassif; Ilan Freedman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft: an eight-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized study comparing two different nail-insertion techniques.

Authors:  Olli Väistö; Jarmo Toivanen; Pekka Kannus; Markku Järvinen
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-06

9.  Restrictions in quality of life after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fracture: a retrospective follow-up study of 223 cases.

Authors:  Peter Larsen; Hans Lund; Uffe Laessoe; Thomas Graven-Nielsen; Sten Rasmussen
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.512

10.  Long-term follow-up of tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing.

Authors:  Kelly A Lefaivre; Pierre Guy; Holman Chan; Piotr A Blachut
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.512

View more
  2 in total

1.  Incidence and risk factors of preoperative deep venous thrombosis in closed tibial shaft fracture: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jiangtao Ma; Jin Qin; Meishuang Shang; Yali Zhou; Yingze Zhang; Yanbin Zhu
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 2.  Outcomes and complications following flexible intramedullary nailing for the treatment of tibial fractures in children: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli; Gerardo Perrotta; Fabio Stocco; Joshua Agilinko; Davide Castioni; Michele Mercurio; Giorgio Gasparini; Simon Barker
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.067

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.