| Literature DB >> 32949474 |
Sándor Beniczky1,2, Harald Aurlien3, Silvana Franceschetti4, Antonio Martins da Silva5, Francesca Bisulli6,7, Carla Bentes8,9, Laura Canafoglia4, Lorenzo Ferri6,7, David Krýsl10,11, Ana Rita Peralta8,9, Attila Rácz12, J Helen Cross13, Alexis Arzimanoglou14,15.
Abstract
Our goal was to assess the interrater agreement (IRA) of photoparoxysmal response (PPR) using the classification proposed by a task force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE), and a simplified classification system proposed by our group. In addition, we evaluated IRA of epileptiform discharges (EDs) and the diagnostic significance of the electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities. We used EEG recordings from the European Reference Network (EpiCARE) and Standardized Computer-based Organized Reporting of EEG (SCORE). Six raters independently scored EEG recordings from 30 patients. We calculated the agreement coefficient (AC) for each feature. IRA of PPR using the classification proposed by the ILAE task force was only fair (AC = 0.38). This improved to a moderate agreement by using the simplified classification (AC = 0.56; P = .004). IRA of EDs was almost perfect (AC = 0.98), and IRA of scoring the diagnostic significance was moderate (AC = 0.51). Our results suggest that the simplified classification of the PPR is suitable for implementation in clinical practice.Entities:
Keywords: IRA; SCORE; electroencephalography; epilepsy; epileptiform discharges; intermittent photic stimulation
Year: 2020 PMID: 32949474 DOI: 10.1111/epi.16655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Epilepsia ISSN: 0013-9580 Impact factor: 5.864