Literature DB >> 32949381

When should a rare inherited connective tissue disorder be suspected in bicuspid aortic valve by primary-care internists and cardiologists? Proposal of a score.

Guglielmina Pepe1,2,3, Betti Giusti4,5,6, Stefania Colonna7, Maria Pia Fugazzaro8, Elena Sticchi4,5,6, Rosina De Cario4,5,6, Ada Kura4,5,6, Elisa Pratelli9, Daniela Melchiorre10, Stefano Nistri8.   

Abstract

Size threshold for aortic surgery in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is debated. Connective tissue disorders (CTDs) are claimed as a clinical turning point, suggesting early surgery in BAV patients with CTD. Thus, we aimed at developing a score to detect high risk of carrying CTDs in consecutive BAVs from primary care. Ninety-eight BAVs without ectopia lentis or personal/family history of aortic dissection were studied at the Marfan syndrome Tuscany Referral Center. Findings were compared with those detected in 84 Marfan patients matched for sex and age. We selected traits with high statistical difference between MFS and BAV easily obtainable by cardiologists and primary-care internists: mitral valve prolapse, myopia ≥ 3DO, pectus carenatum, pes planus, wrist and thumb signs, and difference between aortic size at root and ascending aorta ≥ 4 mm. Clustering of ≥ 3 of these manifestations were more frequent in Marfan patients than in BAVs (71.4% vs 6.1%, p < 0.0001) resulting into an Odds Ratio to be affected by MFS of 38.3 (95% confidence intervals 14.8-99.3, p < 0.0001). We propose a score assembling simple clinical and echocardiographic variables resulting in an appropriate referral pattern of BAVs from a primary-care setting to a tertiary center to evaluate the presence of a potential, major CTD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortopathy; Bicuspid aortic valve; Congenital heart disease; Connective tissue disorders; Marfan syndrome; Primary care

Year:  2020        PMID: 32949381     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-020-02458-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  5 in total

Review 1.  Risk Stratification in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy: Emerging Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Alessandro Della Corte; Hector I Michelena; Angelo Citarella; Emiliano Votta; Filippo Piatti; Federica Lo Presti; Rasul Ashurov; Marilena Cipollaro; Amalia Forte
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.200

2.  Evaluation of collateral network near-infrared spectroscopy during and after segmental artery occlusion in a chronic large animal model.

Authors:  Konstantin von Aspern; Josephina Haunschild; Martin Ziemann; Martin Misfeld; Friedrich W Mohr; Michael A Borger; Christian D Etz
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  Pathogenic Mechanisms of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Aortopathy.

Authors:  Noor M Yassine; Jasmine T Shahram; Simon C Body
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 4.  Genetic Bases of Bicuspid Aortic Valve: The Contribution of Traditional and High-Throughput Sequencing Approaches on Research and Diagnosis.

Authors:  Betti Giusti; Elena Sticchi; Rosina De Cario; Alberto Magi; Stefano Nistri; Guglielmina Pepe
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  United States State-Level Variation in the Use of Neuraxial Analgesia During Labor for Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Alexander J Butwick; Jason Bentley; Cynthia A Wong; Jonathan M Snowden; Eric Sun; Nan Guo
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2018-12-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.