Literature DB >> 32949328

Ocular siderosis: a misdiagnosed cause of visual loss due to ferrous intraocular foreign bodies-epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical signs, imaging and available treatment options.

Giamberto Casini1, Francesco Sartini1, Pasquale Loiudice1, Gabriella Benini2, Martina Menchini3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to provide a meaningful literature review about the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical signs, imaging and treatment of ocular siderosis (OS).
METHODS: A computerized search from inception up to March 2020 of the online electronic database PubMed was performed using the following search strings: "ocular siderosis" and "siderosis bulbi". The reference list in each article was analysed for additional relevant publications.
RESULTS: OS is an uncommon cause of visual loss due to a retained ferrous intraocular foreign body (IOFB). It may develop from 18 days to years after a penetrating trauma that usually occurs during hammering. On average, patients are 22-25 years old, and the vast majority are male. The most common cause of OS development is delayed presentation by the patient or missed diagnosis of IOFB after trauma. The pathophysiology is not fully understood; nevertheless, iron deposition causes hydroxyl radical formation, which damages photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium. Moreover, iron damages retinal vessels with consequent inner retinal layers degeneration. The most frequent signs are iris heterochromia, pupillary mydriasis, cataract development and retinal arteriolar narrowing with pigmentary retinal degeneration. Electroretinogram signs, in particular, b-wave amplitude reduction, arise earlier than clinical signs. Orbital CT scans and ultrasonography play an essential role in detecting IOFBs. Treatment depends on the IOFB location and OS development. However, it is crucial to remove the IOFB after OS development because visual acuity and clinical signs may improve. Anterior segment IOFBs can be dislodged using an intraocular magnet (IOM) or forceps through limbal paracentesis. In contrast, posterior segment IOFBs require a pars plana vitrectomy and IOM or forceps to be removed through an enlarged sclerotomy or the limbus.
CONCLUSION: Recommending the usage of protective glasses and spreading knowledge about OS may further benefit patient care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electroretinogram; Intraocular foreign body; Ocular siderosis; Penetrating ocular trauma

Year:  2020        PMID: 32949328      PMCID: PMC7943509          DOI: 10.1007/s10633-020-09792-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  107 in total

1.  Experimental aspects of ocular siderosis and hemosiderosis.

Authors:  P A CIBIS; T YAMASHITA
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1959-11       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Acute retinal toxicity caused by the bimetallic electrochemical action of a galvanized steel intraocular foreign body.

Authors:  D H Steel; D R Rosseinsky; C R James
Journal:  Retina       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.256

3.  Reversal of siderosis.

Authors:  A Pollack; M Oliver
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1998-05

4.  The varied presentations of siderosis from retained intraocular foreign body.

Authors:  Mohammad S Dowlut; David S Curragh; Maria Napier; Brian Herron; Gawn McIlwaine; Richard Best; Wing Chan
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 5.  Posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies.

Authors:  S C Khani; S Mukai
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol Clin       Date:  1995

6.  Intraocular foreign bodies: management, prognostic factors, and visual outcomes.

Authors:  C M Greven; N E Engelbrecht; M M Slusher; S S Nagy
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Lens siderosis resulting from a tiny missed intralenticular foreign body.

Authors:  Tsung-Tien Wu; Ya-Hsin Kung; Shwu-Jiuan Sheu; Cheng-An Yang
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.743

8.  Management of Ocular Siderosis: Visual Outcome and Electroretinographic Changes.

Authors:  Naresh B Kannan; Olukorede O Adenuga; Renu P Rajan; Kim Ramasamy
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Ocular Trauma Score in Siderosis Bulbi With Retained Intraocular Foreign Body.

Authors:  Lili Zhu; Pingyu Shen; Hong Lu; Chixin Du; Jianqin Shen; Yangshun Gu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 10.  Potential Treatment of Retinal Diseases with Iron Chelators.

Authors:  Wanting Shu; Joshua L Dunaief
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-22
View more
  6 in total

1.  Conditional knockout of hephaestin in the neural retina disrupts retinal iron homeostasis.

Authors:  Kevin R Zhang; Bailey Baumann; Ying Song; Jacob Sterling; Elizabeth A Erler; Samyuktha Guttha; Zbynek Kozmik; Joshua L Dunaief
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.770

2.  Value of Ocular Endoscopy in Extraction of Intraocular Foreign Bodies of Cilia in Patients with Open Ocular Trauma.

Authors:  Youyou Zha; Shu Du; Shaoli Wang; Hui Ren; Jie Yu; Xun Yang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2021-12-29

3.  Retinal evaluation by fundus angiography before and after vitrectomy and foreign body removal in a patient with ocular siderosis: a case report.

Authors:  Qi Cai; Yan Zhu; Junnan Li; Junjie Li; Panpan Li; Yu Song
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-03

4.  Correlation Between Electroretinogram and Visual Prognosis in Metallic Intraocular Foreign Body Injury.

Authors:  Xiaoting Mai; Fangyi Ling; Yuting Gong; Jialin Chen; Hongjie Lin; Haoyu Chen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-24

5.  A rare asymptomatic metallic intraocular foreign body retained in the anterior chamber for 15 years: A case report.

Authors:  Na He; Zhigang Lv
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Clinical Characteristics and Visual Outcomes in Patients with Intralenticular Foreign Bodies with Self-Sealing Corneal Penetrating Wounds.

Authors:  Zhitao Su; Yuanqi Wang; Quanyong Yi; Lin Lin; Kairan Lai; Panpan Ye; Yao Wang; Xiaoyun Fang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 1.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.